Here we have the second part of the bumper Napo mailout to members this week:-
It’s difficult to believe that a Secretary of State for Justice could have less of a basic grasp of the criminal justice system than Liz Truss but the current incumbent seems determined to prove us wrong.
The latest proposals in the Victims and Prisoners Bill are the usual offerings of bluster, ignorance, headline-grabbing and distraction from Ministers fresh from a humiliating and entirely foreseeable defeat at the High Court in relation to the so-called Secretary of State’s Single View as regards the parole process.
The Government’s reported commitment that “victims’ voices will be cemented at the heart of the justice system” ring hollow given the Secretary of State and his political party have fought to ensure that statues have greater protection under the criminal justice system than some of the most vulnerable people in our communities. The lengthy list of failures of this Government and its predecessors from 2010 in relation to the victims of crime is the obvious consequence of their assaults on the criminal justice system, be it through the starvation of public services under ‘austerity’ or the repeated – and fascistic – comments by Ministers that question the legitimacy of the Courts and members of the legal profession. While the Secretary of State claims to want “to ensure dangerous offenders face the strictest scrutiny” it remains the case that he and others have presided over the wholesale devastation of large parts of the criminal justice system in their thirteen long years in power.
In relation to the parole process the bill is to include the following measures:-
The evidence, from their botched interference in the parole process last year, suggests the only confused person as regards the ‘release test’ is the Secretary of State for Justice. Unfortunately they’re also the person with the power to inflict further havoc through their ignorance on others in the criminal justice system.
- Enshrining a new release test for the Parole Board into law, leaving no room for confusion over whether public safety should be the only priority when making release decisions
While a more detailed examination of the provisions of the Bill is ongoing it’s apparent that this represents a further attempt by the Secretary of State for Justice to engage in a power grab and undermine a fundamental power of the Parole Board, similar to what we saw by their behaviour last year. Given what we know of their intentions it’s apparent this is a means to increase their own control over a part of the criminal justice system while trying to generate favourable headlines in the right-wing media, especially given the likelihood of a further legal challenge to these provisions through the domestic Courts or the European Court of Human Rights.
- Creating a new tier of the most serious offenders including murderers, rapists and terrorists and giving the Justice Secretary the power to veto the release of those offenders in the interest of public safety. It will also be available in cases where the Parole Board cannot confidently decide the release test has been met.
There is current evidence of the chaos the Secretary of State has created with their political interference in relation to the overcrowding of prisons, contributed to by the refusal of the Secretary of State to accept the vast majority of Parole Board recommendations for progression to ‘open conditions’. If they receive powers to veto release it’s clear, from their past behaviour, that they will use this enthusiastically and in doing so increase the prison population.
With respect to those Police Officers who have a role in managing individuals in the community subject to MAPPA, it’s an ongoing grievous insult to Probation staff to suggest that we do not have the greatest level of expertise, training and experience to “manage serious offenders and the risk they pose”.
- Making it a legal requirement for ex-police officers and detectives to sit on parole panels for these ‘top-tier’ cases. Their first-hand experience of managing serious offenders and the risk they pose will help place an even greater focus on public protection in parole hearings.
Members will be aware from significant media coverage, especially in recent months, of the extent of serious misconduct – including the commission of sexual and physical abuse of vulnerable members of the public – by a minority of Police Officers in England and Wales. The Secretary of State must provide assurances to the public that any ex-Police Officer who is a Parole Board member – including those currently appointed – are subject to the most stringent vetting possible, involving an examination of any prior allegations of such misconduct during their time as a serving Police Officer, to properly assess that they are entirely suitable to fulfil this crucial role.
In the coming weeks and months Napo will work with those in the Justice Unions Parliamentary Group, as well as other campaigning organisations, to inform the Parliamentary debates on this Bill and make clear our opposition to the plans of the Secretary of Justice in this regard. We will keep you updated with this work as it progresses.
I missed this April Fool which someone had craftily snuck into yesterday's blog:
ReplyDelete"If the Civil Service headcount needs to be reduced, then Napo have the perfect solution which is ‘oven ready’. Move the Probation Service out of the Civil Service... Give Probation professionals the freedom to practice, give senior leaders the freedom to truly lead."
It was that last line that gave it away: "give senior leaders the freedom to truly lead."
Brilliant!!
… especially if this is example of how probation senior leaders “lead”. Better they stick to posting pictures of food and golden shovels on social media.
DeleteCommand and Control https://probationmatters.blogspot.com/2022/03/command-and-control.html?m=1
Racism by probation service staff is rife, say inspectors https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/03/16/racism-probation-service-staff-rife-say-inspectors/
Those posting food tweets wtf like anyone is interested in her constantly living her life on twitter. If she was doing some real work than a pretend public affairs portfolio probation might not be in such a mess.
DeleteThe other issue is if you ask anyone to complain they will. I resent the idea there is so many complaints about colleagues especially as all staff don't dare do or say anything to cause offence to any group no matter. I think there is way too much fear of these issues and it's not for sure one sided. Sad to say but it has to be acknowledged.
Put her on £30k a year and give her a caseload of 60 high risk offenders and see how quick those fancy food pictures become a bacon buttie and a pack of crisps. The reason these “senior leaders” can’t lead is because they have no idea what it is like to do probation work in the 2020s, and are just pleasing everyone above them to hang on for dear life for their pensions and MBEs. Now they want to stop us working from home when that is all they ever do and get bonuses for it too.
DeleteYes quite she is well known for needy attention seeking and always dominates in the workplace. That and chain smoking breaks for 70k plus what a waste of money. A caseload of high risk and a real job would drive up their retirement dates that's for certain.
Delete"It’s difficult to believe that a Secretary of State for Justice could have less of a basic grasp of the criminal justice system than Liz Truss but the current incumbent seems determined to prove us wrong."
ReplyDeleteThe real problem is that there is no real separation of power between the legislature and the executive following the combination of the roles of Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor.
How is it possible to oversee the independence of the justice system whilst at the same time pushing through ideological and politically motivated legislation?
It's no accident that since the amalgamation of the two roles we've seen some of the most inept, but also some of the most ideologically driven SoSs for Justice like Grayling, Truss and now Rabb.
The roles of SoS for Justice and Lord Chancellor need to be separate ones, and until they become separate again, the justice system and everyone involved in it will continue to suffer from more Graylings, Truss' and Rabbs and political and ideological opportunism.
'Getafix
Some published stuff I've come across this weekend, starting with another fence-sitting masterclass from Justin, this time for Derby City PDU:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprobation/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/02/An-inspection-of-probation-services-in-Derby-City-PDU-1.pdf
"The overall quality of work delivered by Derby City PDU was rated as ‘Requires improvement’ across four out of our five standards for casework, with assessment rated as ‘Inadequate’... The positive leadership...should lay the foundations for progress to be made before the next inspection."
And just so y'all know what you're supposed to be doing, hmpps have put this out there (presumably its not aimed at the excellent leaders):
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1147562/sentence-management-pf.pdf
"This policy framework provides a comprehensive outline of the expectations of sentence management taking an evidence-informed approach to support practitioners in establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with the person on probation as a key driver to successful completion of their sentence in the community, either during their Licence / Post Sentence Supervision period, or whilst subject to a Community Order (CO) or Suspended Sentence Order (SSO)."
If you are managing someone in custody, look no further:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1143540/Offender_Management_in_Custody__post-release.pdf
"This response is the HMPPS and MoJ response to the HM Inspectorate of Probation thematic inspection on Offender Management in Custody – post-release"
While refugees & others detained by HMGov are likely to be housed in old MoD buildings or on tugboats, convicted prisoners can look forward to their new accommodation:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/first-rapid-deployment-cells-unveiled-to-boost-prison-places
" First Rapid Deployment Cells unveiled to boost prison places - New modern prison cells that can be built and rolled-out at speed in order to boost jail capacity and keep the public safe were unveiled at HMP Norwich yesterday (2 March 2023)... This spring the 1,700-capacity HMP Fosse Way near Leicester will open its doors, and construction has already started on HMP Millsike, the UK’s first all-electric prison in East Yorkshire, which will hold nearly 1,500 prisoners when full."
And just in case you were interested in the outcome of the consultation into further expanding HMP Fosse Way, there's a link to the Blaby District Council website:
"A server problem prevented the webpage from displaying. Try again later to see if the problem has been corrected."
And the March 2023 hmpps workforce stats are published:
"These statistics will be released on 18 May 2023 9:30am"
"HMP Millsike, the UK’s first all-electric prison in East Yorkshire" - that concept aged well. Wonder what the bills will look like?
DeleteHMP Millsike is expected to open in 2025. Work on the site started last November. It is one of a series of new prisons planned or under construction. The new 'smart prison' will be opposite the existing HMP Full Sutton.
Prisons Minister, Damian Hinds, said: “Naming this site puts us one step closer to our new prison playing its vital role in protecting the public and cutting crime. This is a vital advancement towards our goal of creating 20,000 modern, innovative places.”
As an aside,although linking to earlier threads, I am a 20 year qualified PO, black and proud to work my patch in Leeds. Racism, although under the rug, would have been routinely challenged by colleagues of all backgrounds and inevitably this crossed over to many forms of discrimination. I used to be proud to be a probation officer but I see a decline, a worryingly decline! The recent post of a newly qualified PO promoted despite allegations of racism by experienced colleagues in the NE mirrors my own recent experiences and I worry are we being drawn to some of the darker police cultures
ReplyDeleteAlready rife
Delete“newly qualified PO promoted despite allegations of racism”
DeleteHappens all the time mate. Probation has had a problem with racism for decades. Managers particularly.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/801451.stm
Agency emails received today with biggest number of probation jobs I have seen, mainly for POs, Kent and London. It appears some funding has been allocated!
ReplyDeleteRed Snapper?
Delete"We began our journey in 2005 with a mission to provide cost-effective, transparent and innovative recruitment services to the UK Public Safety sector."
The Daily Hate doesn't like them:
"The company that provides civilian investigators for the Iraq Historic Allegations Team (IHAT) has almost trebled its turnover in three years to £20.5million, it has emerged.
Red Snapper Recruitment is paid nearly £5million a year by the Ministry of Defence to provide staff, including ex-police officers, to the inquiry.
The agency is owned by husband and wife Martin and Helen Jerrold, who live in a £2million home in Islington, North London."
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3795764/The-married-couple-paid-5-million-year-build-cases-against-TROOPS.html
The Snappers are also busy trying to snap up old timers:
"PROBATION REJOINER TRAINING COURSE
RSR Justice is a market leading recruitment business dedicated to providing top quality candidates and services to the offender rehabilitation and supervision work sectors.
This is a completely free service aimed at former Probation Officers and Probation Service Officers seeking to return to work in offender management, or simply in need of refreshing their skills.
The training will be delivered over two days, across weekends, over Zoom – virtually and the link will be sent out beforehand. The day will start at 9am until 4pm with breaks in between.
Due to the high volume of applications received, if you do not hear from us within 7 working days, I am afraid your application has been unsuccessful."
It’s not extra funding. More like desperation trying to claw back former POs. These are agency jobs. There’s always lots of agency vacancies.
Delete