Wednesday, 8 February 2023

Simplistic Words From Labour

Whilst we are beginning to hear more and more regarding the true state of the Probation Service from insiders willing to talk to the media, those of us that thought the Labour Party might bring some fresh thinking to the party are going to be bitterly disappointed by crap such as this from Steve Reed MP:-
"As Shadow Justice Secretary I have a simple mantra: punish, prevent, and protect. Labour will make the criminal justice system work from end-to-end to punish criminals and prevent crime, while protecting victims." 

This is what happens when politicians dream up policy when they clearly don't know much about the subject. I have no idea who is advising them on CJS matters, but they're either not being listened to, or they need changing asap. It's not a very intelligent policy statement but simply designed for consumption by Daily Mail readers. Goodness knows what the Fabians think of it, but I see they've published Steve's simplistic thoughts nevertheless:- 

BACK TO THE FUTURE

It is time to get tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime once more. Steve Reed MP sets out Labour’s approach to justice

A growing number of young people in my constituency are being robbed at knifepoint and forced to hand over their mobile phones. The attacks take place as students travel to or from school, with the robbers taking photographs of their victims and threatening more serious violence if they report the crime.

Parents told me they tracked the stolen phones on location apps until they were switched off, so they knew where they had been taken. The attackers used the stolen phones to order cabs, food and in one case, alarmingly, a 10-inch hunting knife. With police numbers still down after the Conservatives’ cuts, response times were too slow to track the stolen phones and arrest the criminals. Parents’ WhatsApp groups at their children’s schools report multiple similar attacks across the area, but a repeated failure to pursue or prosecute the offenders.

It should come as no surprise, then, that according to the official police inspectorate just 6.6 per cent of robberies and 4 per cent of burglaries ever result in a prosecution.

Earlier this year, the father of a teenage rape victim contacted me for help. His daughter had waited two years for her attacker to be brought to justice, only to be told the trial was postponed for a further nine months just four days before it was due to begin. A delay of nearly three years for a girl who was raped at the age of just 13 is an eternity, and the trauma these delays have caused her is incalculable.

What is shocking is that delays of this length are now the norm not the exception for rape trials. Most rape survivors never see their attacker bought to justice at all since barely one in every 100 reported rapes ever leads to a prosecution.

This is the troubling story of criminal justice under the Conservatives: criminals let off and victims let down.

It is clear that the public feel that crime is out of control under the Conservatives, who have cut 22,000 police, closed courts, reduced the number of judges, and stood by as one in four criminal barristers quit in despair at our crumbling justice system. There is currently a record-breaking backlog of nearly 60,000 criminal court cases, and the Conservatives have lost control of our prisons so completely that a prisoner is more likely to leave jail addicted to drugs than when they went in. The government simply cannot get a grip on unacceptable reoffending rates when these failures are stoking rather than stopping crime.

It will fall to Labour to make our streets safe and secure once again. Victims will be at the heart of our approach. I know how it feels to want offenders brought to justice because I was once robbed in a dark street with a knife pressed against my throat. I wanted my attackers caught and punished. But, like every victim, I would rather not have been attacked at all.

When I was first elected as a council leader in south London, the area was in the grip of an increase in violent youth crime. Three young people were murdered within six months as gangs fought on the streets to control the drug trade. But our newly elected Labour council in Lambeth didn’t stand by.

We worked with the most affected communities and the police to draw up a new strategy that successfully cut violent crime by a third in just 18 months, setting a template that was adopted by many other councils.

We invested in better support for families struggling to prevent their children getting involved in crime; launched a helpline for parents worried that their child was being groomed by a violent gang; involved local voluntary sector and faith groups to channel support to young people who would not engage with the authorities; and set up projects that diverted them away from crime and helped them back into education or employment. This was the first ‘public health’ approach to violent crime in England, but we also got tough on enforcement – supporting the police to arrest and prosecute those whose criminal behaviour was making the law-abiding majority fearful for their safety.

I learned that while beating crime needs communities to come together to fight it, those communities need the police, the courts, and councils on their side – with the whole system focused on the needs of victims.

We know that these local successes can be reproduced at the national level. Nearly 30 years ago, Tony Blair declared that Labour would be tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime. The result? A Labour government that reduced crime by a third. It is time to update that approach for today’s world.

As Shadow Justice Secretary I have a simple mantra: punish, prevent, and protect. Labour will make the criminal justice system work from end-to-end to punish criminals and prevent crime, while protecting victims.

Labour will introduce neighbourhood crime prevention hubs to crack down on crime and anti-social behaviour. This will include 13,000 additional police officers visible on the streets, and places where victims can report crime directly or find support. Labour will also make prison work. Instead of the drug-fuelled colleges of crime they have become under the Tories, Labour will support prison officers to rehabilitate offenders and reduce reoffending as we create the world’s first ‘trauma-informed’ criminal justice system.

There is much we can learn from the developing science around the impact of childhood trauma on criminalisation. In so many cases, from low-level anti-social behaviour to the most serious forms of crime, you can trace an offender’s criminal behaviour back to childhood trauma that damaged their cognitive and emotional development and distorted their sense of right and wrong. Whether it is a child growing up with a drug-addicted parent, or one who witnesses violent abuse in their home, deep-rooted trauma can express itself in damaging criminal behaviour later in life. If we focus our courts and prisons on tackling that, we can break the cycle of crime for good.

Labour will bring in the victims’ law long denied by the Conservatives so that we can put victims at the heart of the criminal justice system. We will set up new victims’ panels that give communities in every neighbourhood a bigger say over how offenders pay back for the harm they have done and to make sure that community sentences handed down by the courts are carried out.

We will crack down on violent sexual assaults by introducing specialist rape courts across the country to tackle the Tory backlog of cases, and we will bring in a national domestic violence register to stop serious convicted abusers seeking out new victims to attack.

The damage the Tories have caused is immense, but they want to go even further by ripping up the fundamental rights and freedoms that protect British people from criminals or failure by the state. Dominic Raab has now spun back through the Tories’ revolving door of chaos to resume his former role as Justice Secretary. He wants to rip up the Human Rights Act that was used by rape survivors to force the police to prosecute the black cab rapist John Worboys, and by grieving relatives to expose the fatal errors that led to so many deaths at Hillsborough football stadium. Labour will oppose any renewed Tory attempt to shred these legal protections that prevent victims’ voices from being silenced.

The Conservatives have broken our criminal justice system and left people feeling unsafe. Labour is led by a former Director of Public Prosecutions who has devoted his life to delivering justice. Under Keir Starmer’s leadership, our party has a plan to take back control of our streets for the law-abiding majority and put victims at the heart of a revitalised criminal justice system. Our old slogan ‘tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime’ is about to meet the future.

19 comments:

  1. What is there to be disappointed in? This is what the Labour right always say and do when they are in power or approaching it. Have we all forgotten the disastrous Blair/Brown years?

    This isn't some Rube Goldberg scheme to lute in Daily Mail readers either. This is what these people genuinely believe.

    ReplyDelete
  2. https://www.bbc.co.uk/otr/intext92-93/Blair4.7.93.html

    Bliar's 1993 interview with Dimbleby

    2012: Swift and Sure Justice - herbert

    2012: Tough but intelligent - cameron

    2016: we need prisons. - cameron

    2021: Beating Crime - johnson

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/will-crime-ever-pay-the-real-cost-of-tough-slogans-bl8lm8fdvk3

    FRANCES GIBB
    Tuesday July 06 2004, 1.00am, The Times

    CRIMINAL justice is one of the key electoral battlegrounds of this Government. “Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime” was a 1997 election slogan. And judged by the Government’s own yardstick of success — the Public Service Agreements — it has met targets to reduce crime and the fear of it.

    But a new analysis of the criminal justice system in England and Wales by A. T. Kearney, a leading management consultant, finds that the battle against crime is one of diminishing returns and the costs increasingly high.



    And this one's for Jim:

    https://ministry-of-justice-acronyms.service.justice.gov.uk/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon 08:00 Bloody hell - acronyms! Must be a special department creating them!

      Delete
    2. Wherever you draw your views it is very common nowadays in London. There other nationals in gangs now settled and they intimidate locals into paying them for fear from reprisal. I know of many localised gang intimidation extortions and people pay in fear as they live in the detritus of the communities which are overrun with lawless thugs. Why because there is no law to protect them anymore. It is these underlying urgencies that are driving such aggressive headlines and really it has to be stopped. The social obsession of greed feeds the momentum and yet the Tories will not invest in community. Sunack cuts budgets to inner cities for the Tory chumocs while the also spend the national debt on a railway to London Birmingham . What's wrong with the old line it's 20 mins slower. Has nothing to do with it. The building contracts all went to Tory business and Tory donors. Grow up Britain.

      Delete
    3. You just know its yet another fucking civil servant parlour game when this is included:

      "TAFKADSD - The Artists Formerly Known as the Digital Services Division - Subsequently known as MOJ Digital Services.Currently known as MOJ Digital."

      Memories of this:

      https://www.politico.eu/article/theresa-may-simples-aide-won-bet-with-pms-simples-comment-seema-kennedy/

      or this:

      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/penny-mordaunt-speech-parliament-bet-b2122671.html

      It is no longer the mother of all parliaments; its the motherlode of contempt; of disrespect for others; its the home of 'otherness', a bubble where those with a pass can comfortably while away their hours in subsidised luxury, pontificating about others' behaviour while being actively blinkered to their own failings.

      Its £65million in basic salaries to 650 fuckwits, plus whatever it costs for the 3,000 or so other employees of the parliamentary estate (£170million), plus the 650 MPs' own staff (probably another £100million), etc etc etc.

      The HoC budget is split into two: Resource & Capital, together giving a total of £750bn. That's WITHOUT MP salaries & expenses claims.

      Delete
    4. Maybe Labour will abolish probation in England and possibly Wales as he does not even mention the service that according to a recent Francis Crook Financial Times article currently supervises about 200,000 people.

      I no longer subscribe to the FT so was surprised to even be able to access it and will not attempt to transcribe it.

      https://www.ft.com/content/0185c7a7-f210-4cfc-bf0a-377a51ef36dd

      Delete
    5. If it doesn’t have an acronym then it doesn’t exist these days.

      Delete
    6. Andrew - Labour WILL abolish probation in England & Wales as it simply finishes off the job they started back in the 90's, & legislated for in the OMAct2007.

      And on this occasion it may actually be the *right* thing to do. It would make space for a truly independent service to blossom - a bit like pruning an apple tree to encourage more vigorous growth & healthier fruit.

      Delete
    7. I tend to agree about a fresh start being needed but notwithstanding my membership f the UK Labour Party, I am not confident a replacement organisation will be better than what we have now.

      Delete
    8. I meant a fresh start for a new probation service; the Labour Party is way beyond redemption or reinvention!

      Delete
  3. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/02/07/probation-officers-optimistic-freed-terrorists-prevent-report/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can't access Telegraph articles?

      https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/feb/07/review-of-uk-prevent-strategy-to-call-for-more-focus-on-islamist-terrorism

      This is a terrifying story whereby Braverman agrees with Shawcross's Prevent report & says that the Prevent programme's expanded focus on right-wing beliefs is misplaced & runs the risk of including well-meaning right wing politicians; whereas more emphasis should be placed on Islamist terrorists.

      "Shawcross, an author and the former chair of the Charity Commission, was seen as a controversial choice to head the report when it was announced four years ago, leading to a boycott of his review by independent groups including Amnesty International."

      About Braverman's position:

      "The new attorney general is a member of a controversial religious sect which continues to venerate its founder despite well-documented claims that he was a serial sexual predator, the Observer can reveal.

      Suella Braverman is a mitra – Sanskrit for “friend” – within the Triratna order, once one of Buddhism’s largest sects in the UK, which has been rocked by claims of sexual misconduct, abuse and inappropriate behaviour.

      The Buddhist Centre website, which promotes the Triratna community, acknowledges: “There has been controversy surrounding the past sexual activity of our founder, Urgyen Sangharakshita, and others”.

      It observes: “Sangharakshita himself later made a statement of apology about his own past, endorsed by the Triratna college of public preceptors.” "

      Braverman doesn't seem to like anyone. In Oct 22 she said:

      “Look at migration in this country — the largest group of people who overstay are Indian migrants” - which caused upset in Modi's Hindu govt.

      More here:

      https://ridingtheelephant.wordpress.com/2022/10/13/bravermans-anti-india-immigrant-pitch-delays-uk-trade-deal/

      Modi's Hindu govt is not a stranger to Islamophobia:

      https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2022/6/10/analysis-islamophobia-is-the-norm-in-modis-india

      Sunak is a proud Hindu & was equally unimpressed with Braverman's comments last October... which begs the question why did he so eagerly re-appoint her to the cabinet?

      The Home Office said: “There were more adopted cases for individuals referred for concerns related to extreme rightwing radicalisation (339; 42%) compared [with] individuals with concerns related to Islamist radicalisation (156; 19%).”

      Delete
    2. Probation officers are too “optimistic” about freed terrorists, putting the public at risk, an official review of the Prevent deradicalisation programme has found.

      William Shawcross, the author of the review, which will be published on Wednesday, is expected to warn that probation officers are putting too much trust in convicted terrorists when they claim they have given up their murderous ideology.

      He will say officials should take a more precautionary approach to their rehabilitation to avoid “optimism bias”, which can have “tragic consequences”.

      Mr Shawcross, a former chairman of the Charity Commission, is expected to cite the Fishmongers Hall attack of 2019, when Usman Khan pulled the wool over the eyes of his probation and police handlers before stabbing two Cambridge graduates to death at a rehabilitation conference he had been allowed to attend.

      It is among recommendations by Mr Shawcross to overhaul the Prevent programme so it returns to its “core mission” of protecting the public rather than treating extremists as victims.

      His report will also say Prevent is “out of kilter” by putting too much focus on Right-wing extremists at the expense of the bigger threat from Islamist terrorism, partly because of a fear of being accused of “being racist, anti-Muslim or culturally-insensitive”.

      Suella Braverman, the Home Secretary, will make a statement to the Commons and is expected to accept all the recommendations, including refocusing Prevent on extremists’ dangerous ideology rather than their mental health.

      Prevent includes a programme known as Desistance and Disengagement, designed to rehabilitate convicted terrorists on release from jail.

      In a draft of his review, Mr Shawcross said the tailored intervention could provide tangible benefits to tackle offending but warned: “I am not satisfied that sufficient precaution is being applied to rehabilitation work. As the murderous Fishmongers Hall attack of 2019 showed, optimism bias can have tragic consequences.

      “Procedures need to be built in that can correct this. It is vital to avoid complacency around the danger that ideologically-driven offenders may continue to pose, and how this can differ from other types of offending. This requires staff to have an understanding of the ideology itself, how it manifests and the risks it can pose.”

      The recommendation was welcomed by Professor Ian Acheson, a senior adviser to the Counter-Extremism Project and a former prisoner governor.

      “It’s the idea that everyone can be redeemed that is infecting the approach, which is always looking for improvement and for reduction of risk,” he said.

      “It means officials are particularly vulnerable to psychologically sophisticated, ideologically-motivated terrorists. The terrorists don’t have to be particularly intelligent, they just have to be cunning and adept at hiding their true motivations.”

      Delete
    3. The review is expected to confirm that taxpayers’ money has been handed to groups promoting Islamist extremism by Prevent, as revealed by The Telegraph in December.

      It is expected to identify groups and individuals funded from the £40 million Prevent budget who are alleged to have supported the Taliban, defended militant Islamist groups banned in the UK and hosted hate preachers.

      The review is expected to say that these “unacceptable” cases undermined Prevent’s ability to “effectively undertake counter-radicalisation” work.

      It is expected to provoke a backlash from Islamic organisations, with one claiming that naming them will amount to a “McCarthyite blacklist” that will damage community relations.

      Zara Mohammed, Secretary General of the Muslim Council of Britain said: “Today, many British Muslims may well feel less protected as they are told that the Government should ignore the evidence and focus less on the threat from extreme right-wingextremism. This is athreat that thrives on Islamophobia, and a threat that has already seen violent attacks on Muslim communities.”

      The Home Office said the review would ensure we “better protect people from being drawn into poisonous and dangerous ideologies”.

      Delete
  4. BBC news today.

    https://www-bbc-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-64344284.amp?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16758664032490&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
  5. Now they've shown they CAN prosecute MPs for dodgy expense claims... let the games begin:


    "A former MP has been found guilty of submitting a series of fraudulent expense claims.

    Jared O’Mara, 41, who represented Sheffield Hallam between 2017 and 2019, was convicted of six charges of fraud at Leeds Crown Court today.

    Co-defendant Gareth Arnold, 30, was found guilty of three counts of fraud.

    The CPS showed the jury evidence that O’Mara invented an autism charity and falsely billed for work said to have been carried out.

    In 2019, the former MP submitted a series of dishonest claims to the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) – the organisation that regulates the staffing and business costs of MPs.

    Four claims, totalling £19,400, came from the fictitious organisation Confident About Autism South Yorkshire."

    https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/ex-mp-convicted-submitting-fraudulent-expense-claims

    ReplyDelete
  6. Good media work is being achieved, not least by Jim & readers of / contributors to this blog:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-64344284

    The majority of the service which tries to prevent criminals reoffending in England and Wales is working at excessive capacity, internal figures seen by the BBC show.

    Some officers in the Probation Service have workloads twice as large as their recommended capacity.

    A whistleblower warned the risks to the public are "significant".

    The government said it would "recruit thousands more staff to keep the public safe".

    The revelations about the extent of the probation crisis come after two damning reports into failures to monitor offenders who went on to commit murders.

    His Majesty's Chief Inspector of Probation, Justin Russell, said the service failed at every stage to assess the risk of killer Damien Bendall, who murdered his partner Terri Harris, her two children and their 11-year-old friend.

    Mr Russell also said it was impossible to be sure the public was safe because of the quality of work in parts of the Probation Service, after Jordan McSweeney murdered law student Zara Aleena nine days after being released from prison.

    The internal figures confirm inspectors' concerns about "unmanageable workloads", Mr Russell said. He added that staff shortages in some parts of the country are "severely" affecting the service's ability to manage offenders, including "those who pose a serious threat to the public".

    Probation officers play a critical role assessing how much risk criminals pose to us, during the sentencing process, during sentences served in the community, and after someone is released from prison.

    Their jobs combine face-to-face meetings with criminals with writing reports and making checks to prevent them descending back into criminality.

    The BBC has seen a snapshot of data from an internal Probation Service workload measurement system which monitors daily case numbers and warns if staff are operating beyond their capacity.

    The numbers were collected this week and assess workload based on a points system which takes into account the complexity of cases.

    In the 12 regions of England and Wales, 10 were operating at over 100% of capacity. Only Wales and the North East Region were just below.

    Seven were "showing red" with average scores of more than 110%.

    Justice Minister Alex Chalk said in 2021 that "anyone over 110% for a period of four consecutive weeks is deemed to have an excessive workload", adding that there were policies to help staff who meet this threshold.

    London is under most pressure at around 127% of its capacity on average, followed by the Yorkshire and Humber and Eastern England regions at 118%.

    Our analysis suggests at the moment the data was collected, more than 400 probation officers were working at 160% of their capacity or more, with some over 200%.

    This includes probation officers still in training, as well as more experienced staff.

    In some cases, staff had individual caseloads of more than 70 people.

    ...

    ReplyDelete
  7. The probation watchdog concluded in 2021 that "in our opinion, it is difficult for even experienced practitioners to deal with 60, 70, 80 or more cases properly".

    The figures do fluctuate, but insiders told the BBC the pressure on the workforce creates an inevitable risk of mistakes.

    Staff said the workload makes it harder to dig deeper into cases and chase up checks with police forces, who often fail to respond.

    "We are supposed to question everything, but people don't because it opens a can of worms," one said.

    Even offenders rated low and medium risk can be people capable of killing themselves and others, probation officers say.

    A string of cases have demonstrated the risks of failing to carry out checks. One murder a week is committed by an offender on probation.

    Nadine Marshall, whose son Conner was murdered by David Braddon while he was on probation for drug offences and assaulting a police officer, said the data shows there are not enough probation workers and the service is "completely inept".

    "Probation officers are being fed to the dogs by the management and structure of the probation system. They are left to carry a heavy load which is unsustainable," she said.

    An internal report on the case, marked "sensitive" but obtained by the BBC, describes a key probation officer involved feeling "overwhelmed" by work and says the "alertness to risk" had suffered.

    Braddon missed a number of meetings with the service and the reasons were not fully investigated, the report found.

    At moments when an offender breaches the terms of their licence or sentencing conditions, the probation service is under pressure to gather evidence to support an offender being sent or returned to prison.

    A whistleblower told the BBC that if this does not happen, "you're just sitting there waiting for another offence to be committed".

    Low level breaches of sentence conditions are supposed to be dealt with within six days.

    But a recent data snapshot for London also shown to the BBC reveals that of more than 860 breaches, 669 had not been resolved within that target time.

    After three months, 198 were still outstanding.

    A whistleblower told the BBC staff were "burnt out" and "working late every night and weekends".

    ...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Another junior probation officer said they had dealt with caseloads "in the high 70s", sometimes seeing up to 12 offenders a day, though recently the demand had reduced. At one point in the pandemic, an offender they were overseeing committed a serious offence.

    Pressure on the probation service grew with changes in the law leading to an increasing number of cases requiring their attention.

    Then in 2013, there was a disastrous reorganisation of the service. It was reversed by 2021, but the probation inspectorate said it played a major part in pushing up workloads.

    Covid made matters worse, with probation officers reduced to going to offenders' doorsteps for face to face meetings.

    By next month 4,000 new probation officers are being recruited, the Ministry of Justice said.

    But front line officers are leaving because of the mental health pressures they face.

    In the year up to September 2022, data reveals that mental health or behavioural issues were the cause of half of all days of staff absence. This figure is rising steadily.

    The Ministry of Justice said "we have taken immediate steps to address the serious issues raised by recent reviews and are investing £155m more every year into probation to improve the supervision of offenders."

    The ministry said the extra spending would "reduce officers' caseloads and recruit thousands more staff to keep the public safe".

    The government is also introducing more rigorous requirements for prisoners to be given parole, and the power for the Justice Secretary Dominic Raab to prevent the most dangerous offenders being released.
    Banner saying 'Get in touch'

    Have you been personally affected by the issues raised in this story? Share your experiences by emailing haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk.

    Please include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a BBC journalist. You can also get in touch in the following ways:

    WhatsApp: +44 7756 165803
    Tweet: @BBC_HaveYourSay
    Upload pictures or video
    Please read our terms & conditions and privacy policy

    ReplyDelete