Saturday, 17 December 2022

Napo Job Opportunity

Yesterday saw the usual Napo mailout to members and if you were of a cynical view you might be tempted to feel that advertising the post of General Secretary just before Christmas isn't really designed to encourage too many applicants:-

The law requires all union General Secretaries to submit themselves for re-election at least every five years. To comply with this regulation, an election must be held for the position of General Secretary of Napo before 30 June 2023.

In accordance with the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, Napo has appointed Civica Election Services of 33 Clarendon Road, London, N8 0NW as the Independent Scrutineer of the election.

The election process begins on Friday 16th December 2022 with the publication of the advert for the post of Napo General Secretary on the TUC, GFTU and Napo websites.

The election procedure and timetable are available here: Procedure Timetable

The advert containing full details for the post can be found here.

Please note that the incumbent will be standing for re-election.

For further details please contact the Office Operations Manager, Keith Waldron.

--oo00oo--

Regular readers will recall that following some spirited discussion at the Eastbourne AGM, we discussed the intended timetable for the likes of 'hustings' should the union find itself in the position of receiving more than one applicant. If memory serves me correctly, on the last occasion of a contested election the incumbent declined to submit themselves to the process and therefore it could not proceed.    

General Secretary 

Salary: £76,288 to £88,579 pa exclusive of London Allowance (£4,729 pa). Pay award pending. 

The post holder is the senior elected employee of Napo and will need to provide strategic leadership across all of the union’s activities. Their role includes acting as the union’s principle national spokesperson and they are expected to lead on professional issues. In addition they will have responsibility for and where appropriate participate in negotiations relating to members’ salaries and conditions of service. 

The successful candidate will have a demonstrated track record within the trade union movement and it is desirable that they can demonstrate an understanding of the requirements of Napo’s professional status. 

If successful following election, the applicant will be required to take up the post on 1st July 2023 following a suitable handover period. Remote working / Hybrid working. Expectation of travel to some meetings where required. Please note that the incumbent will be standing for re-election. Closing date: 13th January 2023 Interviews: 23rd – 27th January 2023

--oo00oo--

In other news:-

Unions meet with new Probation Minister 

The start of this week saw Napo and our sister trade unions attend an introductory meeting with Damien Hinds MP, the new Minister for Prison, Parole and Probation. As is usual in these engagements time was limited, but we were able to demonstrate just how passionate we are in retaining our profession; and our fundamental concerns about the current direction of the Probation Service's intentions to encapsulate Probation within 'One HMPPS'. We said that this invokes an overwhelming feeling of being subsumed by our important but very different value based Prison Service. The very fact that the 'One HMPPS' is the terminology being used, clearly outlines to those within, that we are not at One, we are different. We will challenge the 'one size fits all approach' which we know will simply not fit, will not recognise the individuals we work with, will not protect the public, and subsequently not reduce the number of victims - which as many of you continue to tell us, is core to the work we do and continue to do, day in and day out.

We heard from the Minister that the employer intends to commence consultation with the Trade Unions in the new year. We will stand firm and tall on behalf of our members, and will continue to implore the employer to recognise that this cost cutting project will result in significant costs to the value of the work you do. We are not resistant to change, we have continually evolved and reformed especially when the profession has felt that it is under attack. Yet, we will oppose the 'tick box culture' we are being expected to conform to.

Another main feature of the meeting was the unions combined resistance to the employers future intentions on Programmes and Interventions and the threat to public safety and the pay of our members if the current thinking evolves into final policy. In next week’s mail out we will provide a comprehensive narrative as to why this second big campaign is so vital to our members future, and our developing efforts with the Labour Party to convince them of the dangers around such a move, if they are successful in the next General Election.

27 comments:

  1. Worst General Secretary ever who turned Napo into a useless union. He fleeced Napo members for £80k a year for the last decade yet will be standing for re-election. He needs to do a Boris and walk away.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I hope we get any applicant a woman should come forward anyone else but this idiot. The incumbent has proven when he first came to Napo a nodding dog could lead. He has a zero success record and has merely sat the game plan dodging real issues to time playing. Long grass can kicking down the road and more usually ignores matters. His appointment proves to us all we need to find new leadership and given this situation they do not need to be what the application form states because we all know the current is not up to the role. So let's just appoint anyone else for napos sake.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am staggered that the present incumbent/incompetent is standing for re-election. Talk about not reading the room.
    He should have been the subject of a vote of no confidence a long time ago.
    Perhaps in his manifesto he can detail what he has achieved over the years, that shouldn’t take long to read.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Part of the problem is the successive Napo chairs keep protecting him. The last joint chairs tried to corruptly push him along because they had not the right level of intelligence to do it properly . Had they have gone a legitimate route it would have been all over for the fool before now.

      Delete
  4. Anyone fancy a job share? Asking for a friend... Half of the salary is still more than mine

    ReplyDelete
  5. It beggars belief that the current GS should even consider standing again. I for one will resign from Napo should that happen. Enough is enough. Napo needs a GS who actually understands probation and can stand up for it against the oncoming storm of One HMPPS and the rest of the bollocks coming from HQ. The current GS is simply not up to this and does not give a damn about probation. Do not reward incompetence and failure!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stop ploughing your hard earned money into napo and start a new union.

      Delete
  6. I’ve a. Idea why don’t we consistently show the employer how dived we are and how we have no collective action and see if we continue to get rubbish pay rises ? Idiots

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So you think they don't know? You think the last decade or so of the GS being in the thrall of noms/hmpps went unnoticed?

      Some will remember the SpittingImage presentation of Steel & Owen: "Steel was caricatured as a naive, childlike little man who was always fooled by Owen's egotistic plans and literally lived in Owen's pocket."

      Sound familiar?

      Delete
    2. To have any impact with any employer we would have to have credible and at the least able GS. You must realise most members who left Napo did so because it has failed to represent them. The current GS is understood to be cooperative with his friendly group in the senior management because they see him as a tamed allie. They do not need to worry about membership divisions or staff unrest as they know Napo under Lawrence is a spent group. He's in the bag so they don't care for us. Pay terms conditions all worsened under lawro. Defenceless against any policy driven change. No able reps no cases taken to protect anyone. No tactics no real support and apathy up.you want to keep the fool by all means but he has destroyed many of us in roles that have lost authority and meaning under his two terms plus.Loser.

      Delete
    3. Who you blaming us . The general secretary is a coward has no skills for the role to lead a professional service yet here we are stuck with a shop display dummy. Course we are divided he's on the management's ear looking for a role in the lord's the fool. Sold us out everything time. The staff transfer agreement ratified po redundancies. You would never see that from Mick lynch a real hero. We have a pretender and we let him back.

      Delete
    4. The Napo GS did that all on his own. Go and ask him how many tribunals for probation staff he support for those impacted by TR and Unification. Then ask him why he was unable to secure a probation pay rise for a whole decade, and didn’t oppose the abysmal probation pay offer that eventually came in 2022.

      Delete
  7. It’s not clear from tHe script, but I think 18:30 is referring to earlier commentators when they state, ‘ why don’t we consistently show the employer hoe divided we are……’
    There are 7 comments showing at this point and 6 are critical in the extreme of the current GS. hardly a house divided.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm genuinely shocked that five years has past by since Mike Rolfe (formally prisons and POA) used this blog to try to garner support for his bid to become GS.
    His interest in, and concerns for the direction of probation appeared to die instantaneously with his failure to achieve his ambition to be elected GS. He then of course decided he wanted to be a Tory councillor instead.
    Would things have been any better for probation and its workforce if he had have managed to get himself elected?
    Personally I doubt it very much.
    I found it very interesting when both NAPO and UNISON appeared to have little or no interest in whether or not it's membership accepted the recent pay deal or not.
    I wonder (without wanting to appear antagonistic), if the union executive has just the same lack of faith in its membership to take action, as its membership appears to have in the executive to ballot for it?

    Five years? Time flies!

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tory councillor, eh? We might have dodged a bullet there, who knows. If he had been a ruthless negotiator with an eye for detail, that might have made up some ground. Im frustrated by the lack of political campaigning, the long term view for the profession and our mission and identity, PI seem to be on that, not sure where Napo is

      Delete
    2. His name is Mike Rolf and may not have been a good alternate leader for napo given a defection to the tories. He had won part of a principled case against the poa his own union which gave him some reputation as a fighter winner. Napo itself lost a certification officer case for breaching its rules having abused a highly skilled representative member and that reflects incredibly badly on the lame competency of Napo leadership. There should have been an investigation as to those issues and aftermath but another Napo cover up. No way should Napo continue with this guy if we are to hope to get anywhere in the future.

      Delete
  9. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prisoners-paid-350-day-dismantle-28759213?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sharebar

    Yet another brilliant tory strategy - get the public to fund £billions of ppe & test kits (bought from tory chums without competition) then, when they are either proven to be useless or politically "not needed", pay prisoners to destroy the evidence!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Napo loves a ringing phrase: 'We will stand firm and tall on behalf of our members.' If that's what they are doing, makes you wonder how to describe the stances of other unions currently taking industrial action. As Orwell noted, 'Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. ”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "firm and tall on behalf of our members" indeed change behalf to the back of and that would be accurate to. You are right to contrast an Orwellian and napos dystopian reality. Those unions who hold out and those members striking is because they have real.leadership. Napo blames the memberships apathy but napos problem is the cowardice of the accidental general secretary pack up and go it is hi time to find a decent leader anew.

      Delete
  11. Have I missed something, what are the plans around Programmes and Interventions? They're not going to hive them off are they?????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. as I understand it, the plan is to dissolve the DSOIU's (DIvisional Sex Offender Interventions Units) to free up the staff therein to Offender Management, with SO programmes going to the generic programmes teams... and then to drop all the programmes and have one generic programme. What could possibly go wrong

      Delete
    2. Why not London lopped off CP no problem the ledger Wilson duo blinkered vision let that ball through. Two years later it was a CRC hat trick.

      Delete
  12. Seen in a roundup of local news pieces from around the uk:

    https://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/23201601.carlisle-nurse-drunken-train-assault-likely-lose-job/

    ReplyDelete
  13. I am, quite simply, far too angry to be allowed near a keyboard & an internet connection without adult supervision. I've just managed to slip away for five mins...

    Teachers, social workers, NHS staff, probation, police prison staff - in fact every profession that adds value to the concept of society & community has been diluted in every possible way by tory policies viz-budgets, quality, staffing, etc.

    12 years of these tory fuckers has reduced the UK govt to a mumbling, slavering collection of celebrity-wannabe zombies who steal candy from the mouths of babes - or anyone - & cheerily put the blame on everyone else.

    Nurses & ambulance staff go on strike - they are branded by this govt: "plotting to cause intentional harm to others"

    No mention of the tens of thousands who died because of the politically expedient indecision of johnson & wankcock in 2020.

    Oh dear, time's up; the adult is back.

    Bye.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes and demonising union action as they need to blame away. That won't include Napo leadership who surrender to Tory value.

      Delete
    2. The only difference is the others will get a decent pay offer and move on with bit of a smile, while probation accepted a miserable 3%.

      Delete
  14. Killamarsh murder - probation staff to be investigated.

    ReplyDelete