It's been awhile since we've covered union news, but here we have the latest Napo mailout:-
Dear Xxxxxxxx
Your pay and the cost of living
On a day that sees our members across Probation, Cafcass and Probation Northern Ireland face massive increases in utilities and council tax together with a hike in national insurance, we understand the anger of members about inadequate pay. We will be doing all that we can in the pay negotiations with your respective employers to try and achieve significant improvements, but members should know that we have many challenges ahead of us. Napo through the TUC, will also be playing its part in the ‘Cost of Living’ campaign and a range of activities are being planned over the Spring building up to the National Demonstration in London on Saturday 18th June. More details of how you can get involved in our pay campaigning will follow over the coming weeks
Changes to Access to Work affecting Civil Servants.
Access to Work (ATW) is a government scheme which supports disabled people in work. It was set up to provide employees with practical support with their work via a grant that can help pay for things like: BSL interpreters; specialist equipment; adaptations to your vehicle so you can get to work; or pay for taxi fares; and, provide a support worker to help you in the workplace.
However, from today if you are a civil servant you cannot apply or renew your grant from the 1st April 2022. If you already have grant in place, please do not worry, this will continue as normal until the grant is due for renewal. Provision is in place so that each individual department will take over responsibility for providing the service previously provided via Access to Work.
This is a significant change and will create a level of anxiety and uncertainty for disabled members. We have been re-assured by the Probation Service that the necessary mechanisms are in place to cover any individual whose funding comes to an end on the 31st March or if a disabled member of staff needs to make any new application from today onwards. This process will be dealt with by the MoJ Workplace Adjustment Service.
If you have any concerns or questions about what support you need as a disabled member of staff, and have any concerns about the changes to ATW please contact Napo’s lead for Equalities Ranjit Singh at rsingh@napo.org.uk
Open online recruitment meeting – Thursday 7 April 12.30-13.30pm
We are holding an ONLINE RECRUITMENT MEETING ON THURSDAY 7TH APRIL 12.30PM-13.30PM with General Secretary, Ian Lawrence, to give an update on matters concerning Probation and the Family Courts and why join Napo. This event is a meeting open to all members AND non-members also so please circulate widely and talk to colleagues about this if they are not yet in a union.
Recruit a Friend Scheme
If you were not aware of this yet, we are running a current ‘Recruit a Friend Scheme’ till the end of April whereby any member who recruits a new member, means that both of you will get a £25 online LovetoShop voucher. So please talk to your colleagues and if they are not yet in a union, encourage them to join Napo or come along to the online seminar on 7th April to find out more. Due to this year’s budget, it is capped at one voucher only for your first new recruit, of course all new recruits will still get the voucher, but don’t let that stop you from recruiting please, as our top recruiters will also be entered into a draw to get an extra prize/voucher. We will be running several of these schemes frequently throughout the year. Do always check out the Napo website where you can download leaflets and handy tips for recruiting and organising.
Activ8rs
In Napo we have accredited reps that will help members in individual and collective representations as well as having accredited Health & Safety reps. We would like to increase our accredited reps across the union and you can sign up for courses at the TUC here https://www.tuc.org.uk/TUCcourses
Make sure you get in touch with your branch if you want to sign up for any of these courses or contact Annoesjka Valent at avalent@napo.org.uk
This could be daunting if you do not know what is involved, but your branch will be happy to talk you through the task and perhaps arrange for you to sit in on some cases / meetings that are happening, so that you get a better understanding of what it all entails. As an accredited Napo rep or when undergoing training, you are entitled to time-off and workload relief/ The branch or Napo HQ Official will assist you with this if you should encounter any problems with your line management.
However, if you feel you cannot take on a role like this, there is always ‘something union’ you can do! You could be a Napo ‘Activ8r’ – be a signpost in your office, maintain the union notice board and just put your name up for people to approach you. You don’t have to have any answers, just listen and tell people you’re going to pass their query/issue onto a rep to get back to them.
Contact Annoesjka Valent at avalent@napo.org.uk if you want to be added to the Activ8r list.
Napo AGM – Thursday 13 to Saturday 15 October in Eastbourne
A mail-out was sent to branches this week about this year’s hybrid AGM. We hope you are looking forward to getting together again, it sure was great to meet up in Newcastle last year. Obviously this is for members feeling comfortable in doing so and able to attend, but we hope you look forward to returning to a seaside venue!
Following on from last year’s post-AGM Survey, we of course will be continuing with a hybrid format for all the main conference sessions the way it was run last year in Newcastle but we will be returning to in-person fringe meetings at the actual conference rather than hold online fringes in the run up to AGM. There may be possibility for one or two fringe meetings to be held hybrid in the main hall but we need to confirm that with the venue and information will be sent to branches following a next site visit. But meanwhile please put this date in your diary now!
Pay updates
Members will be aware that the annual pay progression and pay award is due today. As usual it will not be paid on time because HMPPS cannot make any payments relating to progression or the pay award until the totality of the pay award is settled, and the negotiations on the pay award cannot begin formally until the Civil Service pay remit is issued and permission is given. We have yet to begin formal negotiations on the Probation pay award for 2022/23 and will be issuing the Joint Trade Union pay claim shortly. We will of course share the pay claim once it has been submitted.
We are now at the end of the trial year for the Competency Based Framework for pay progression (CBF). The CBF was part of the 2018 pay deal that members voted on with a commitment for the Trade Unions to work with HMPPS to develop the details of the scheme. We have retained automatic contractual pay progression for all the years while the framework was developed and we secured a genuine trial year during which pay progression would remain automatic. This means that everyone who is eligible for pay progression will become entitled to progression today (even though it won’t be paid until the pay award is concluded). The progression will of course be back dated to today
The CBF is the mechanism that replaces automatic pay progression and enables staff to move more quickly up the pay scales. It would not have been possible to move from the former 23 year pay scales without some mechanism. The CBF was designed to enable staff to progress through the pay scale, not to hold them back. The intention is that no more staff will be held back from progression than with the previous mechanisms (because there was always the potential to hold someone back from progression as a specific outcome of a disciplinary or poor performance process). We know that some staff are struggling to believe that there is no catch, but the truth is that the only catch with CBF is the natural inclination of people working in Probation to seek to prove themselves. The CBF is genuinely a simple process, with very little bureaucracy attached, which only requires staff to evidence maintenance of competence during the year. The threshold for holding someone back from pay progression is necessarily high, as there is a pay implication that could result in justified complaints against decision makers if this was to be withheld.
We encourage members to share any and all feedback about their experience of the trial year of CBF, and to share any concerns about suggestions that the CBF is linked to performance measures in any way.
Contacts – Ian Lawrence and Katie Lomas
Health and Safety
Version 15 of the Safer Working Practice has now replaced V14. You will notice that a lot of the mandated protections have been removed and replaced with words such as "encouraged" or "choose". This is because the government has now handed back the duty of care to the employer.
What this means for us is that the covid risk assessments are even more important to ensure the safety of colleagues and people on probation, especially as the rates are rising as fast as they are doing. Can all health and safety reps ensure they take part in revising existing risk assessments, including those for programme delivery etc. We are not in "business as usual" but "living with covid" and that is about ensuring safety. Good ventilation is key, and staff should still not be using rooms where there is no or inadequate ventilation. Keeping a safe distance and/or wearing face coverings are also important to maintain.
If you are, or suspect a person on probation is, vulnerable please ensure you ask for an individual covid risk assessment (soon to be known as a personal management plan), even if you feel you don't need any reasonable adjustments (and this includes our pregnant members of staff). We are aware that very few people were recorded nationally as being in this group so it is extremely possible there was under reporting of it. Completing this document ensures that the employer is aware of who is more vulnerable to ensure all safety adjustments are put in place.
We have asked for further clarity in relation to this morning's advice that if you think you are experiencing symptoms of covid you should isolate for 5 days, or if it will be more cost effective for the employer to continue to provide testing kits.
Our weekly Winter Recovery meetings with the employer are continuing for the time being, so please do get in touch with any comments or concerns.
Contacts – Carole Doherty and Ian Lawrence
Best Wishes
Napo HQ
“ pay award is due today. As usual it will not be paid on time”
ReplyDeleteIs that the best this shitty union can do ??
And what’s Crapo Napo doing about getting rid of vetting and all the other add ons not in our contracts ???
What an excellent start to 22/23 - on top of covid running rife while all checks/balances or protective measures are scrapped, the fuel crisis & cost of living increases you have to cope with:
ReplyDelete- access to work grants being suspended
- no pay increase for the foreseeable future - again
- Version 15 of the Safer Working Practice has now replaced V14, handing responsibility to your employer. That's comforting, then. The 'employer' is this feckless govt.
- but you can pocket a £25 shopping voucher if you lure someone you know into joining Crappo (but will it pay the leccy bill?)
Sudenly I feel so much better.
Activ8ors what is this exactly recruitment to an irrelevant activity in a place where representatives have no role. Napo are seeking new members from where? Most staff want to leave. Napo are just out of any real work here in Nps. Telling us to accept a pay awards scheme based in trying to prove myself get lost my qualifications do that and the burden of overwork. Do you want me to ask for more sir. Napo are thick.
ReplyDeleteAnyone seen the staff members of the year award? Not one London candidate is London that bad or is this a sad reflection of management in London?
ReplyDeleteEver had the thought that someone somewhere other than London might just be quite good at their job?
DeleteIt's probably that staff were so busy recording data they had no time to make any nominiations, or writing case records in the tiniest screen there could ever possibly be in Delius using the ridiculous crissa system, updating OASYS after OASYS to exacting standard, doing police checks and social services checks on people who don't need them or have recently had them, updating risk registers, HETE data, personal circumstances and equality monitoring boxes, filling out NSi's and trying to figure out what they hell they are, filling out "EPF 2" system, filling out "refer and monitor" system, trying to work out which of the 5000 delius drop downs we need to use, filling out RSR, OGRS, SARA.
DeleteAnd yet, after all this data entry what does our RPD think the priority for London is right now as per her recent all staff message #?? "that we need to get better at recording what we do".
I've had it.
here's something that's not like probation service procedures:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.yellowad.co.uk/police-sergeant-abused-female-colleagues/
Here's that same story, but from another newspaper:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10687871/amp/Gaslighting-Met-Police-sergeant-raped-two-women-finally-barred.html
Im unable to copy even a snippet to post,but there appears to be a very interesting article in todays Times (Wednesday)that claims that the number of murders being committed by released prisoners is soaring at the same time as growing numbers of probation officers are leaving the service. The little I've been able to read does suggest there's link.
ReplyDeleteMaybe someone can access the whole article?
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/murders-by-former-prisoners-rising-vz7wr868s
'Getafix
Murders by former prisoners have soared over the last three years at the same time as the number of probation officers quitting has been rising, according to official figures.
ReplyDeleteOver the last decade, 685 ex-offenders have been convicted for subsequent murders, an analysis of Ministry of Justice figures by the Labour party has found.
Here's a bit more
ReplyDeleteMurders by former prisoners have soared over the last three years at the same time as the number of probation officers quitting has been rising, according to official figures.
Over the last decade, 685 ex-offenders have been convicted for subsequent murders, an analysis of Ministry of Justice figures by the Labour party has found.
More than a third of those — 251 — were committed between 2018 and 2020, according to the latest data available, which is the highest for a three year period since the government started collecting the data in 2003.
Eleanor Reeves, the shadow prisons minister, said that public was paying the cost of the government’s attempt to privatise the probation service
The data refers to former offenders who commit a serious further offence, which covers violent or sexual offences committed by individuals who are the subject of probation supervision. Data released in response...
Ellie Reves' comment led me to this written question before the recent Easter break:
ReplyDeleteWritten Question
Offender Assessment System
Monday 4th April 2022
Asked by: Ellie Reeves (Labour - Lewisham West and Penge)
Question to the Ministry of Justice:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment his Department has made of the effectiveness of the Offender Assessment System (OASys) in probation.
Answered by Kit Malthouse - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) (jointly with Home Office)
OASys is the core risk assessment tool for HMPPS and was built on the existing evidence base in the literature and piloted prior to its implementation in 2001. The intention was that, as the evidence base developed, the System would be improved over time. A continuing research programme has assisted in the development of OASys following implementation, helping to ensure that it remains a valid and reliable tool for assessing offenders’ risk.
The first OASys research compendium (Debdin, 2009) presented the findings from research and analysis completed between 2006 and 2009. This contributed to some important revisions to OASys: A compendium of research and analysis on the Offender Assessment System (OASys) 2006-2009 (cep-probation.org).
A second research compendium (Moore, 2015) presents the OASys studies completed between 2009 and 2013, including a systematic review of the underlying evidence base, a survey of assessors’ views and experiences, and analyses of various aspects of reliability and validity: A compendium of research and analysis on the Offender Assessment System (OASys), 2009–2013 (publishing.service.gov.uk).
The OASys Sexual reoffending Predictor was introduced after the compendium was written, and the evaluation of that tool is also available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/955345/comparing-2-predictors-sexual-recidivism.pdf.
And this written question from th3e same day:
ReplyDeleteWritten Question
Probation: Health Services
Monday 4th April 2022
Asked by: Ellie Reeves (Labour - Lewisham West and Penge)
Question to the Ministry of Justice:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what plans his Department has for the provision of clinical supervision to probation officers.
Answered by Kit Malthouse - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) (jointly with Home Office)
Rather than offer structured supervision provision for probation staff, we deliver one-to-one ‘Reflective Sessions’. Reflective Sessions, formerly called Structured Professional Support, have been in place for probation staff since 2018. The sessions are delivered by qualified professionals from the incumbent Employee Assistance Programme (EAP) provider, provides a safe space to discuss the impact of difficult cases, challenging casework and other impactful aspects of their role.
The sessions are not counselling but a preventative measure that focuses on the impact of work on one’s professional life, assisting to further develop coping strategies for managing stress and mitigating the professional impact of working with offenders. Furthermore, Reflective Sessions assists in considering aspects of probation work that may trigger challenging emotional responses and explore additional strategies for managing these. Furthermore, Reflective Sessions explores and considers the qualities and strengths the employee brings to work, the specific stressors of their work and what strategies are most beneficial to support them.
We have expanded the service to account for the increased staff count following unification of probation and simplified the booking process to make these sessions more easily accessible to all staff.
Interestingly, in my view at least, the answer bears no relation to the question as it doesn't seek to clarify or define what the questioner meant by 'clinical supervision'.
The answer provides the usual cover-all-&-that'll-do bollocks without offering any understanding of what the question was about.
Professional development & reflexive practice are in another part of the universe from the provision of therapeutic interventions. But clearly EAP are Masters of The Universe - presumably another world-beating load of old bullshit from this pack of lying, law-breaking charlatans?
Brilliant thanks I was taken right in until you brought me back to sense.
Delete"Follow the money"
DeletePrivate equity firm LDC has completed a minority investment in preventative healthcare specialist PAM, who are the "incumbent EAP provider"... The transaction will see Andy Parker, formerly the CEO of Capita, join PAM.
PAM Group, one of the largest occupational health, EAP and wellbeing providers in the UK with 650 staff, offers a range of integrated programmes to public and private sector clients, supporting more than 600,000 employees at over 1,000 businesses and organisations. The group is looking to double turnover to £80m over the next three years through continued organic growth and acquisitions.
PAM’s services include absence management, health surveillance, employee assistance programmes, corporate health assessments...
Under leadership of founder and CEO James Murphy, PAM has delivered significant growth since it was founded in 2004, recording turnover of £29m in 2020.
https://napomagazine.org.uk/napo-renews-calls-for-public-inquiry-following-bbc-documentary/
ReplyDeletehttps://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m001687x
Released On: 12 Apr 2022
Available for over a year
On October 14, 2016, Michael Hoolickin was murdered by a man he had never met. His killer, Tim Deakin had 55 previous offences. His last crime was to bite a man's ear off in a pub fight.
Deakin was a high risk and prolific offender who had been freed early - "on Probation Service Licence" - to serve what was left of his sentence in the community. Deakin was later jailed for 27 years.
At Michael's Inquest, the family discovered Deakin had been stopped following a car chase just a few days earlier, with no insurance and carrying drugs.
The Coroner outlined serious failures by the people who were supposed to be monitoring Deakin that meant he stayed out of prison and remained free - on license - to kill, and she made recommendations for change.
Radio 4 discover the true extent of crimes, many of them violent committed by people who have been released on license, including those where the advice was they were still a danger to the public
At the heart of this is Garry and Leslie and the torment over their sons death and how that's drives them to uncover the reasons his murderer wasn't in prison on that night. We follow them as they meet another Mother and Father still missing their son after his life was taken in the same circumstances
Napo has renewed its calls for a public inquiry into the probation service following a documentary aired on BBC Radio 4 last night.
DeleteLicense to Kill? explored the impact of Transforming Rehabilitation, claiming over 500 serious further offences had been committed since 2014.
The programme featured two separate families whose loved ones had been murdered by people who were under probation supervision at the time. Sharing their anguish, they also spoke passionately about their respective campaigns for answers and accountability.
In the wake of the documentary, Napo GS Ian Lawrence said: “Napo welcomes this expose of the earlier disastrous political decision by the former Secretary of State for Justice which has cost the taxpayer unknown millions and has directly led to an underfunded and overworked Probation service which currently simply does not have the capacity to guarantee the required levels of public protection that our communities deserve. The thoughts of our members go out to the families of the two victims featured in the BBC programme and to all those families who have lost their loved ones as well as the victims of other serious further offences.”
Despite the service being reunified, Napo knows the problems are far from over. Ongoing staffing and workloads crisis continue to plague the service.
The private sector cut staffing levels to the bone during TR, while poor pay across both sectors has led to poor recruitment and retention rates, low morale and ultimately dangerously high workloads. On average staff are working to 130% of the workload management tool with many nearing 200%.
Ian Lawrence said: “It is simply not sustainable for probation staff to continue in this current crisis with dangerously high workloads without the public being at risk of serious further offending. It is inevitable that under this extreme work pressure, mistakes will be made and the public and our members will be the ones most affected.”
Napo is calling for urgent Ministerial intervention for probation, a detailed plan of how this crisis can be resolved, a full public enquiry into how the probation service has been allowed to fall into such disarray and what impact that has had on public safety.
"The private sector cut staffing levels to the bone during TR"
DeleteNow let's be very clear & absolutely accurate here.
The Tory Government AND the private sector bidders, with the tacit approval of the probation unions, ALL agreed to the TR terms & conditions that included swingeing job losses.
That is exactly why the Modernisation Fund (allegedly £80m+, but a total never admitted to) was released to cover the KNOWN costs of job losses under the terms of pre-negotiated Enhanced Voluntary Redundancies.
The TR/CRC contracts had the substantial loss of staff embedded & enshrined within them.
I have always been a strong advocate of unions - and will still be so, where the union acts in the interests of its members, BUT...
... Napo led everyone up a garden path, round the edge of the manicured camomile lawns & into an ambush behind the potting shed.
They were present when the contracts were agreed. They knew there would be job losses. They signed off on the EVR that was rarely honoured for union members (although senior managers seemed to fill their pockets). They signed off on the ridiculous & see-through "no redundancies within seven months" clause.
Deal done 1 Feb. First jobs lost 1 Sept.
Sorry, Mr Lawrence, Napo etc. Your members - and now the general public - are paying the price for you getting into bed with Spurr & co back in 2014, for keeping your lips tightly sealed when members started asking questions, and taking no action when the CRCs stole your members' redundancy money.
Your words are as hollow as those of a well-known Liar-in-Chief & convicted criminal.
And in terms of figures: if we deduct the publicised £16m payout to ex-HQ staff from the as-yet-unconfirmed £80m, the balance will have been £64m... a balance gifted to the CRCs by Andrew Selous & MoJ.
DeleteSodexo represent about 30% of the CRCs & their own scheme, imposed in defiance of the EVR, saw them pocket around 60% of the monies intended for staff:
"Staff [in Sodexo CRCs] have also been warned to expect jobs cuts of more than 30% – at least 700 posts – in the next six to 12 months."
60% of their 'share' of that staff fund equates to approx £12m that never made it into members' pockets.
Maybe it enhanced the bon homie amongst Sodexo senior managers as they celebrated their good fortune?
1604 and 1900 above you are so right and thank you for reminding us of utter dishonesty if Lawrence. He has not the skill or capacity to actually fight the issues properly for members of Napo yet there he is. A chameleon cloaked in whatever direction the wind blow surrounded by incompetent props called the top table. It is time to go surely. The stale old table thumoing rhetoric nonsense from a colluding windbag.tjerenwere no legal challenges by Napo on behalf of the robbed members . We all know why not because you agreed a flawed contract that you had not had checked in law properly so you shafted members instead. It's a disgrace and you went onto many a questionable practice on expenses and suchlike. It's all out there.
DeleteHansard, October 2015... just 1 month after the no-redundancy clause expired. All the evidence was there from the start:
ReplyDelete"We have scrutinised so many Government attempts to transfer the accountability of services from the state to shareholders, followed by cuts.
That is what we are now witnessing across the probation service. With each such change, we see a shift in risk from the Government, so that when things go wrong they may simply point a finger—but they no longer have a responsibility to lift a finger.
The community rehabilitation company that serves my constituency and the whole of Humberside, Lincolnshire and North Yorkshire, Purple Futures, is a combination of Interserve—the main provider, which describes itself as a leading
“multinational support service and construction company”—
and three minor partners, social enterprise and charity P3, Shelter and 3SC, which manages the contract. None of those organisations boasts any expertise in the provision of rehabilitative services for offenders. They have worked together for only a short time and have not built up any evidence to prove that they can transform rehabilitation.
The fracturing of the prison, probation and now rehabilitation services has of course, as with all such arrangements, created serious issues, which also means risk. Predictably, issues of IT, communications—as we have heard—and barriers to information sharing have come to the fore. We have also seen increased bureaucracy. That is why it is so important to be able to scrutinise what is going on, but without access to information and without freedom of information making it freely open to the public, it is hard to scrutinise services and therefore safety.
We have seen the job losses that inevitably follow the privatisation of services. As a result, confidence in the service has fallen, and as we heard from my hon. Friend the Member for Torfaen (Nick Thomas-Symonds), staff morale has plummeted..."
From here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/2010-to-2015-government-policy-reoffending-and-rehabilitation/2010-to-2015-government-policy-reoffending-and-rehabilitation
to here:
https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2017-03-07/debates/EB7A5685-B940-4B4D-ADE8-24F99B917C9B/OralAnswersToQuestions
"Following the transforming rehabilitation reforms, there has been a 57% increase in the number of offenders being recalled as a result of failure to keep in touch during supervision after short sentences."
There are too many tragic stories relating to failures of release, of recall, of murder, of suicide... ALL post-TR
I’d be embarrassed to recruit a friend to Napo.
ReplyDeleteIt’s like asking them to burn £30 every month.
Well put it would be as productive to be a non member as Napo are not genuine. Those went when Judy mcknight took napos integrity with her. The remaining bunch of leaders have no talent.
DeleteI don't think your accurate there and while i think you may believe that when matters of the working links abusive regime were being challenged in the correct forum the idiocy of the general secretary jumped ship. He sat across the table with the joint secretary side. Instead of working with members who presented the case. Naively and probably the most stupid event ever witnessed was the Welsh unison rep suggest the no breach policy was an order.
ReplyDeleteWhen challenged to produce the written he could not. This undone all the major evidence presented by the fantastic work of the only able branch who sorted out working links. That's right the south west. The level of input and constant fighting led Napo to attack to the branch. Publish your information you won't prove the order to no breach policy . I know it was out there but they never wrote it into any document. It was the pathetic managers acos and Wannabees that took the subliminal to practice. They were fervent. Ian Lawrence had no idea how to manage or support activists in any campaign. He just wanted to agree things to destroy any rejection of the disaterous failing links.
Please point out what you mean by Napo. There was a brave and courageous few local Napo activists. These colleagues had a strong team and identity who fought working links to defeat. This credit could not include the efforts of national Napo who sought to collude against us. I am well informed the initial unison position was just as foolish.
ReplyDeleteI've noticed lately in many local newspapers around the country that there's quite a bit of funding being handed out locally to not for profit, charity and CIC organisations. It's all aimed at supporting ex prisoners and those leaving care now they've become young adults.
ReplyDeleteIt appears to me that what is being sought from these organisations are the things I'd (and probably the public too) expect to be within the remit of probation.
I'm left wondering, with so much of what once was seen as probation work being handed over to wherever, is 'probation' still an appropriate term for what the service does?
https://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/20075416.york-labour-councillor-hoping-street-kitchen-help-former-prisoners/
'Getafix
No, current practice not worthy of the term 'probation'.
DeleteTo a familiar tune:
"Its HMPPS, they're HMPPS, we know they are, that's all they are, they're HMPPS."
The word 'probation' within that acronym is simply to tick yet another a box; a bit like tying your enemy's flag to the back of your rocketlauncher, or carving a notch in the stock of your rifle.
Probation is dead.
NB: There are individuals desperately trying to keep small samples of probation DNA alive in the hope they can recreate the noble beast. It is important to keep these locations secret as the HMPPS operatives are determined to exterminate any & all traces.
You have a clear grip of a war theme and you will know we are lost today as a disparate old guard. It has all but gone. The blog makes a clear History of what was and what could,still have been. Very sad
DeleteVery sad indeed. What's more, the servility of the senior civil servants who have enabled the destruction of our public services is of much regret. And we have our most senior minister, the 'prime' minister, leading by example.
ReplyDeleteMost reading this blog are, presumably either probation practitioners or have knowledge/experience of the probation environment. Many will therefore, I assume, be familiar with the wriggly 'werent-me-guv' behavioural traits of 'regular customers', of those who excel in perpetrating domestic abuse, of the sexual offence perpetrators in denial & the run-of-the-mill bullies who have an overblown sense of entitlement.
All of these behaviours have been publicly celebrated as defining our 'prime' minister by government ministers & (with rare exception) the supporting cast of backbench MPs.
It comes as no surprise that the unfashionable values of 'probation' are unwanted, unloved & ridiculed. How can you possibly believe in truth, compassion & integrity if you are cheering on Boris - a vile creature who regards life as a parlour game for posh boys, something to toy with in between enjoying sexual favours, drinking, eating & spending other peoples' money.
It is true. The rules simply do not apply to Boris. He is other-worldly, esoteric, beyond the ken of man. But not in a good way.
Has anyone actually met him? I have. Skin-crawlingly unpleasant. Vain-glorious. Aloof. Shambolic. Rude. No capacity for focus and very easily distracted by a strong drive to acknowledge wide-eyed women. Easy to see how Jennifer Arcuri became a fill-in shag on the sofa while his previous soon-to-be-ex-wife was undergoing cancer treatment. (Arcuri made sure of pocketing a few quid from her experience & doesn't seem to have regrets).
Lies, law-breaking & other socially inappropriate acts of indiscretion are merely inconveniences to this grotesque.
But I think the longer he stays, the better. Uh!?!?
Firstly, the more likely it becomes that he loses his shit in public &/or takes his private quipping & trolling beyond what even the most heinous lickspittles can stomach.
Secondly, the irrepairable damage to the Tories becomes more widespread.
Sadly there are always unintended consequences, but Starmer might have a better long-term plan than we imagine by baiting the buffoon on a regular basis. We saw signs of a snarl today.
Again, practitioners with some time under their belts will have tales of X or Y eventually being unable to hide the reality of their true personality, or the enormity of what they've done.
The demise of probation values has been coterminus with the demise of the moral fabric of the UK, the methods & Modus Operandi very similar. The targetting & bullying of vocal opponents, the failures & the syphoning-off of public monies has been an experience far too familiar for many probation staff.
It is VERY, VERY sad.