Wednesday 18 August 2021

Rain Falls on Probation Parade

It doesn't look like HMI Justin Russell got the HMPPS memo about this being a celebratory week for probation:- 

Probation services – ‘disappointing’ work with drug users ‘lacks focus and funding’

Probation services are responding poorly to drugs misuse and addiction cases, according to inspectors.

Probation services across England and Wales supervise nearly 156,000 people in the community. HM Inspectorate of Probation estimates that almost 75,000 of these individuals have a drugs problem, yet fewer than 3,000 people were referred by probation services to specialist drug misuse treatment in 2019/2020.

HM Inspectorate of Probation partnered with the Care Quality Commission to examine how probation services supervise this cohort.

Inspectors found:
  • too few people on probation receive help to tackle drugs misuse – and when referrals are made, the quality of services is often not good enough
  • funding for treatment has reduced and criminal justice programmes to identify and refer people for treatment have “withered on the vine”
  • very few drug users on probation are being tested for drug use – just one in six of the inspected sample of known users
  • key information is missing, not captured properly or used to commission services. Probation services were unable to tell inspectors how many Class A drug users were on their caseload or how many were in treatment
  • six out of 10 magistrates that the Inspectorate surveyed said they were not confident probation was delivering the necessary treatment.
Chief Inspector of Probation Justin Russell said: 

“Drug-related crime causes widespread misery and costs the public purse more than £9bn a year. Yet there is a lack of focus and funding across the whole criminal justice system to tackle drug use and supply. The current system is not working well and the findings of this inspection were very disappointing.”

In the inspected areas, two-thirds of prison leavers received treatment for drugs misuse while in custody but did not continue to receive help on release. Inspectors were concerned to see poor follow-up arrangements in the community, with the situation considerably worse in England and better in Wales.

For several years, HM Inspectorate of Probation has reported on heavy workloads in parts of the probation service. Some probation officers managed upwards of 70 cases, which affected the overall quality of their work.

The findings in this inspection were consistent with the overall picture, with probation services often overstretched. Practitioners did not always have the time to examine individuals’ back stories and identify factors that could help support them into recovery, stay safe and move away from drug-related offending. Probation court teams made too few recommendations for treatment.

Two-thirds of the practitioners interviewed during this inspection felt they needed more training on the impact of drugs and how to support individuals with trauma and recovery. At the time of the inspection, probation services were delivered by the National Probation Service and privately-owned Community Rehabilitation Companies. Major reforms took place at the end of June and probation services are now unified into one public-sector service.

The Inspectorate has made 14 recommendations in its report to improve the quality of supervision including more drug rehabilitation court orders, greater use of testing, and increased funding for treatment.

Mr Russell said: 

“Probation services have an important role to play in supporting positive change for individuals caught up in drugs and their supply. The new Probation Service must strengthen every aspect of its work with drug users. It needs to build a comprehensive picture of this crime-generating cohort and commission the right services to reduce their drug use. Justice and health organisations must work more closely together, for example to ensure continuity of support for prison leavers.”

Mr Russell added: 

“Earlier this year, the government provided additional funding to improve drugs treatment. While the announcement was welcome, the money is for just one year – we need sustained commitment to fund drug treatment and recovery for people on probation. I welcome Dame Carol Black’s recent call for additional ring-fenced government funding for substance misuse treatment. People on probation should be an urgent priority for any future increase in investment, which would cut crime, save lives and more than pay for itself in the long run.”

Dr Rosie Benneyworth from the Care Quality Commission said: 

“Where services were available and people could access them, we found dedicated health workers providing good quality care for people in need of substance misuse services. However, the vital holistic support provided around this can vary greatly and be a barrier to keeping people engaged and on their recovery journey. Concerns around the availability of these services, along with concerns around continuing engagement with people as they move from one part of the system to another, means that as it stands the right care is not reaching everybody that it should.”

Oliver Standing, Director of Collective Voice, said: 

“Effective drug treatment and recovery has real transformational power – reducing mental and physical health harms, supporting people into super-charged citizenship, healing families and creating savings for the public purse. And crucially it has a strong, proven link to reducing crime – keeping vulnerable people out of the criminal justice and leading to fewer victims of crime in the future.

“The findings of the report are stark. It is estimated almost half of those supervised in the community by the probation service have a drug problem. The fact that only slightly more than two per cent were referred into specialist support in 2019/20 surely represents a systems failure. Although community services have experienced a decade of profound disinvestment, Dame Carol Black’s recent review has set out a compelling vision of a refreshed and renewed system and made the case for major investment. This important thematic review will help to shape that brighter future.”

6 comments:

  1. Oh, is there a parade? Too busy to notice, slogging away in the face of staff shortages, staff sickness, and working with a client a nearly a year into a drugs treatment order, for whom the expected court reviews would in her case have been a crucial element of the treatment, but these have been cancelled for the duration "due to Covid"... he gets little from me, given he is not high risk, just desperate, in awful health and precarious housing. He has quickly worked out that there is little actual help or enforcement here, which is an absolute tragedy given motivation at the start.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The ultimate problem with drug problems is Government policy and its failure to own the problem.
    The problem with drugs and addiction for the probation service is the desistance model its adopted, which will always gravitate to comply or face sanction, very little carrot and lots of stick.
    Carol Black's recent report provided the Government with an opportunity to take control of the problem, but they choose to continue with the same old policies that continually fails and has no real impact.
    Sanction or punishment for addiction doesn't solve anything, infact it only pushes the problem further underground.
    The Government must realise this, and that makes their current policy approach even more bizarre.

    Snippet from the Times...

    Matt Dathan

    Friday August 06 2021, 12.01am, The Times

    Criminals who offend to fund their drug addiction could be forced to wear monitors as a way of making them stop.

    Ministers are exploring technology that would enable a device to sense when an illegal substance has been taken, sources have told The Times.

    They would be similar to ankle tags that track offenders, or a medical patch, and would be an attempt to slash reoffending for drug-related crime and tackle soaring drug use in prisons.

    The “drug tags” would apply to criminals released from prison on probation or those serving community sentences who have been convicted of drug- related offences or who have committed a crime to fund their addiction.

    If police or probation officers detect they have taken drugs while wearing the...

    'Getafix


    ReplyDelete
  3. https://www-birminghammail-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/war-drugs-ending-narcotics-quietly-21245262.amp?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16292723575249&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.birminghammail.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fmidlands-news%2Fwar-drugs-ending-narcotics-quietly-21245262

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Government isn't shouting about it but drugs are quietly being decriminalised

      Home Secretary Priti Patel is never going to stand up in the House of Commons and proclaim that the Government has decriminalised drugs.

      But it’s happening. There’s a growing acceptance on the part of government that treating drug users as criminals hasn’t worked. Instead of locking addicts up, Ministers want to provide them with medical treatment.


      More people are dying from drug use than ever before. This past week, new figures were published showing the number of drug deaths in the West Midlands county had reached its highest level since records began (in 1993), with 219 deaths related to drug poisoning in 2020.

      Some campaigners have called for the “decriminalisation” of drugs. The idea is that drug users would generally be treated as people with medical conditions in need of treatment, rather than criminals who can be dealt with by fines and jail. That even goes for users guilty of crimes such as theft.

      This generous approach would not be extended to the people selling drugs. The trade in the UK is controlled by criminal gangs, who commit acts of horrific violence to secure their markets and remove competitors. We see the effects of this on the streets of Birmingham.

      However, it’s thought that the key to eliminating the gangs in the long term is help their customers kick the habit. Some police forces have already begun to take this approach, working with bodies such as the probation service and the NHS.

      They include West Midlands Police, which in October 2020 launched a scheme called DIVERT. It meant caught by the police for "possession of a controlled substance" (as opposed to "possession with intent to supply") were put into a programme "to divert them away from the criminal justice system". In other words, they weren't taken to court.

      Explaining how the scheme works, West Midlands Police said that people who appear in court charged with low level drug offences are regularly fined or receive a short prison sentence. As part of the new scheme, police officers could arrange for offenders who meet the criteria to attend a drug outreach/education course rather than being formally put through the criminal justice system, the force said.

      However, there's a limit to how far this approach can go without explicit backing from the Home Office.

      Delete
  4. The evidence emerged as Carina Heckroodt, head of the London Extremism Gangs and Organised Crime Unit at the Probation Service, denied it was a “missed opportunity” not to recall Amman to prison on January 31 after he was spotted buying items later used to fashion a fake suicide belt.

    Ms Heckroodt also said Amman was considered at that meeting to be “high threat” and it was “suspected he would use a knife to carry out an attack”.

    She said she subsequently learned Amman bought some bottles of Irn Bru soft drink, a roll of tape and some kitchen foil from Poundland prompting her to call the Probation Service’s national security lead to discuss whether Amman could have breached the terms of his release from prison.

    However, it was not felt Amman’s actions were sufficient enough to recall him to prison. He struck two days later.

    Giving evidence, Ms Heckroodt said she was “satisfied” there was nothing about the purchases that suggested he had breached any licence conditions.

    Rajiv Menon, representing Amman’s family, said: “Your failure to recall him was a most serious missed opportunity in this case.”

    Ms Heckroodt replied: “I disagree, it was not a missed opportunity.”

    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/police-poundland-metropolitan-police-london-streatham-high-road-b949359.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. A jury has been asked whether the probation service "missed an opportunity" which may have prevented the attack and the subsequent death of Sudesh Amman, in not deciding to recall him to prison after he bought items that might be used to create a fake suicide belt.

    https://news.sky.com/story/streatham-terror-attack-inquest-jury-asked-if-death-of-attacker-sudesh-amman-could-have-been-prevented-12384558

    ReplyDelete