Saturday 11 July 2020

What a Lovely Surprise!

This from BBC website on Thursday:-

G4S selected to run Wellingborough 'mega prison'

Private firm G4S has been selected as the preferred bidder to run a new "mega prison", the BBC understands. It is believed the contract to operate the jail in Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, will be for 10 years at a cost of more than £300m.

The company has been told it has been chosen, but the contract has not been ratified and could be challenged. An official announcement on the prison, which will hold 1,600 male inmates, is expected over the next few weeks. A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: "The operator competition has not yet concluded. We will set out confirmed details in due course."

The decision comes as a surprise after G4S was stripped of its contract to run Birmingham Prison following a damning inspection report which said it was in a "state of crisis". The company also gave up running Medway secure training centre in Kent and Brook House immigration removal centre near Gatwick Airport after undercover filming by the BBC's Panorama programme showed inmates and detainees allegedly being mistreated.

However, G4S has been praised for its running of four prisons in England and Wales - Altcourse, Oakwood, Parc and Rye Hill. It is thought three other companies - Sodexo, Serco and MTC Novo - bid to run Wellingborough, which is costing £253m to build and is expected to open next year. A source with knowledge of the process said the G4S bid was not the "cheapest" but was regarded as of "higher quality" than the others.

Frances Crook, chief executive of the Howard League for Penal Reform, said: "It is disappointing that public money is being squandered on expanding the prison estate; extremely disappointing that public money is being poured into the coffers of G4S. At a time when we need to invest in jobs and the nation's health, it is shameful to waste money on the profiteers of punishment."

Shadow justice secretary David Lammy said: "When G4S ran HMP Birmingham there had to be an emergency takeover by the government after reports of drug dealing, violence, squalid conditions and poor leadership. It highlighted many of the problems with privatisation in the justice system. Serious questions must now be asked about why the government plans to hand the company control of the new prison in Wellingborough."

Wellingborough MP Peter Bone said: "My concern would be to make sure that whoever runs it, runs it properly."

--oo00oo--

This from BBC website on Friday:-

G4S fined £44m by Serious Fraud Office over electronic tagging

Security firm G4S has been fined £44m by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) as part of an agreement that will see it avoid prosecution for overcharging the Ministry of Justice for the electronic tagging of offenders, some of whom had died. The SFO said G4S had accepted responsibility for three counts of fraud that were carried out in an effort to “dishonestly mislead” the government, in order to boost its profits.

Former justice minister Chris Grayling asked the SFO to investigate G4S and rival Serco in 2013, after a departmental review found they had overcharged for tracking the movements of people who had moved abroad, returned to prison, or died. G4S agreed to compensate the Ministry of Justice in 2014, reaching a settlement worth £121m. But it remained under investigation by the SFO until Friday, when it announced a deferred prosecution agreement, pending approval by a judge at a hearing scheduled for next Friday.

Under the terms of the agreement, G4S will pay a £38.5m penalty and £5.9m to cover the SFO’s costs. The company was given a 40% discount on its fine after co-operating with the SFO. It has also agreed to enforce new controls, including a programme of “corporate renewal” to prevent a repeat of the scandal, which took place within its G4S Care & Justice division.

“G4S Care & Justice repeatedly lied to the Ministry of Justice, profiting to the tune of millions of pounds and failing to provide the openness, transparency, and overall good corporate citizenship that UK taxpayers expect and deserve from companies entering into government contracts,” SFO director Lisa Osofsky said. “The terms of this deferred prosecution agreement will provide substantial oversight and assurance regarding G4S Care & Justice’s commitment to responsible corporate behaviour.”

G4S chief executive Ashley Almanza said: 

“The behaviour which resulted in the offences committed in 2011 and 2012 is completely counter to the group’s values and standards and is not tolerated within G4S. We have apologised to the UK government and implemented significant changes to people, policies, practices and controls, designed to ensure that our culture is underpinned by high ethical standards and that our business is always conducted in a manner which is consistent with our values. We have made significant progress in embedding these standards throughout the group and we are pleased that this has been acknowledged by the SFO and the UK government.”

The £44.4m in fines and costs takes the total paid out by outsourcing firms involved in the prisoner tagging scandal to more than £250m. Serco reached its own £22.9m agreement with the SFO last year, six years after repaying £68m to the Ministry of Justice. The SFO said its agreement with G4S was made possible by factors including the company’s disclosure of evidence and its “overall – albeit delayed – substantial cooperation” with the investigation.

--oo00oo--

In other dodgy-dealing - some would say corruption - news by HM Government, this from the Guardian:-  

Firm with links to Gove and Cummings given Covid-19 contract without open tender

The Cabinet Office has awarded an £840,000 contract to research public opinion about government policies to a company owned by two long-term associates of Michael Gove and Dominic Cummings, without putting the work out for tender.

Public First, a small policy and research company in London, is run by James Frayne, whose work alongside Cummings – the prime minister’s senior adviser – dates back to a Eurosceptic campaign 20 years ago, and Rachel Wolf, a former adviser to Gove who co-wrote the Conservative party’s 2019 election manifesto.

The government justified the absence of a competitive tendering process, which would have enabled other companies to bid, under emergency regulations that allow services to be urgently commissioned in response to the Covid-19 crisis. However, the Cabinet Office’s public record states that portions of the work, which involved focus group research, related to Brexit rather than Covid-19, a joint investigation by the Guardian and openDemocracy has established.

A Cabinet Office spokesman said this was because of bookkeeping methods, and insisted that, contrary to government records, all the focus group research done by Public First was related to the pandemic. The Cabinet Office, where Gove is the minister responsible, initially commissioned Public First to carry out focus groups from 3 March, although no contract was put in place until 5 June.

Government work is legally required to be put out for competitive tender to ensure the best qualified company is appointed, unless there are exceptional circumstances, such as an unforeseen emergency. When a contract was finally produced on 5 June, it was made retrospective to cover the work done since 3 March. The Cabinet Office paid Public First £253,000 for the two projects listed as being Brexit-related and two more pieces of work done before the contract was put in place.

Public First was required to conduct focus groups “covering the general public and key sub-groups”, according to a Cabinet Office letter. The firm was required to provide the government with “topline reporting” of their findings on the same day, with fuller findings reported the following day. The deal also included “on-site resource to support No 10 communications” in the form of a Public First partner, Gabriel Milland, being seconded to Downing Street until 26 June. Milland was the head of communications at the Department for Education when Gove was the minister and Cummings was his political adviser.

The Cabinet Office said in the letter that it had commissioned the work from Public First for a total of £840,000 without any tender “due to unforeseeable consequences of the current Covid-19 pandemic”. According to further details published by the government under its transparency requirements, Public First was paid £58,000 on 18 March for its first focus group work, classed by the Cabinet Office as being for “Gov Comms EU Exit Prog”, then a further £75,000 on 20 March for work classed as “Insight and Evaluation”.

On 2 April, 10 days into lockdown and with increasing numbers of people dying from Covid-19, the Cabinet Office paid Public First £42,000 for work listed again as “EU Exit Comms”. The first payment for work listed as being coronavirus-related was on 27 May: £78,187.07. A total of £253,187.07 was paid to Public First before the contract was entered into on 5 June.

15 comments:

  1. All this money being poured into punishment! How much would it cost to invest in services which would support potential offenders and prevent crime? Doesn't matter does it. These are the people whose needs are ignored during the virus pandemic. Those in charge don't care.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They have no incentive to 'care'.

      Register of members' interests for the current parliament (2019-2021) gives a flavour of how much they can accrue just by being 'in charge'.

      For example, Clown Prince Bozo's declarations amount to just shy of £1m to date in donations, gifts in kind or secondary income.

      Why should they care? Just because we voted for them...?

      Delete
    2. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmregmem/contents1921.htm

      Delete
  2. Nice. G4S cough up a stake of £44m & against the odds they land a £300m jackpot, subject to verification of course. There'll be at least five other pissed off punters who might cry "foul!" unless they can be placated:

    https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Commons/2019-07-01/271526/

    Buckland in 2019: "On the 5 June 2019 I wrote to the Justice Select Committee to provide an update on the modernisation of the prison estate. In that letter, which I will place a copy of in the House Library, I confirmed the six bidders (G4S Care and Custody Services UK Limited, Interserve Investments Limited, Management and Training Corporation Works Limited, Mitie Care & Custody, Serco Limited, and Sodexo Limited) who had been accepted on to the Prison Operator Services Framework and who are now eligible to bid in future mini-competitions to operate individual prisons. We intend to launch the mini-competition for the first new Resettlement Prison at Wellingborough in July 2019 and anticipate making the award to the successful operator in July 2020."

    While we already know about Cummings' & Gove's use of covid-cloud-cover to dish out contracts, viz NHSX & Faculty etc:

    "Highly controversial contracts which allow ministers and senior health officials to mine confidential data from tens of thousands of COVID-19 hospital patients have been awarded to technology companies without being put out to competitive tender, NHS England has disclosed to Byline Times... Palantir is owned by Peter Thiel, a right-wing billionaire, who has set up ‘HHS Protect Now’ in the US, which – according to Forbes magazine – won a $17 million contract on 10 April from the US Department of Health and Human Services Program Support Center to provide detailed data from a wide range of organisations on the spread of COVID-19. Thiel is publicly backing Trump’s 2020 re-election campaign... Faculty – which had a pre-existing contract with other companies to help build a £250 million artificial intelligence lab for the NHSX subsidiary – took on a leading role in the data response to the pandemic. It is run by Marc Warner, whose brother, Ben, was reported by the Sunday Times to have been recruited to Downing Street by Cummings after running the Conservative Party’s private election model."

    https://bylinetimes.com/2020/04/22/palantir-coronavirus-contract-did-not-go-to-competitive-tender/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Unfortunately it's just a sign of things to come post Brexit. Deregulation and no recourse to the ECHR means the pigs can eat as greedily as they like and stick their fingers up to the rest of us.
    It's prisons today, it will be the NHS tomorrow.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/society/2020/jul/10/boris-johnson-plans-radical-shake-up-of-nhs-in-bid-to-regain-more-direct-control

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Cabinet Office said in the letter that it had commissioned the work from Public First for a total of £840,000 without any tender “due to unforeseeable consequences of the current Covid-19 pandemic”
    _____________________________________________________

    This is the same parliamentary office, i.e. The Cabinet Office, that stumped up £80m from the "Modernisation Fund" to get rid of probation staff as the TR project began.

    Initially it was to pay off probation staff so they could reduce costs for the privatisation but, later, it was simply turned into commitment-free handouts for the greedy CRCs, while hundreds of probation staff got a P45 & a tiny fraction of what was due to them under a national Enhanced Voluntary Redundancy agreement.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jenrick continues to irritate anyone & everyone:

    https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/jenrick-facing-high-court-action-over-handling-of-shoah-memorial-planning-application-1.501477

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/25/the-three-housing-controversies-robert-jenrick-is-facing-down

      "This week it emerged [Jenrick] had enjoyed some good fortune of his own when it came to planning matters, with Conservative councillors in Westminster approving an extension to one of his London homes, even though officials had objected three times.

      The Times found that Jenrick had applied twice under his own name to have an extra room added to the house as part of wider renovations. A further application was made by his wife. Each time officials refused, saying it would damage the character of the building, which is in a conservation area.

      But with the third application, made two months after Jenrick was elected as an MP, a Conservative councillor living in the square intervened to request the application be referred to a planning committee, which approved the plans."

      Delete
  6. Surely we are due another "Great Reform Act"? - It seems to me that Parliament itself is just not fit for purpose.

    The Expenses scandal exposed by the Daily Telegraph is only just over a decade ago - yet we seem in a far worse state than then.

    I have no confidence in the official Opposition Party despite being a Labour Party member - there now needs to be serious consideration of how such reforms can happen that are in the genuine interests of "the many not the few."

    These sort of nonsenses are what happens when the Government can command a large majority in the House of Commons.

    How is it the the G4S Serious Fraud Office investigations could not be resolved in seven years yet 7 months after The Conservatives are back in office with a majority for the first time since when the SFO arose - I think in 2012 - it is all put to rights to such an extent that G4s are awarded contracts again. Serco managed to buy their way out years ago - why did it take longer for G4S?

    Another point - yet again the reports are happening just prior to the summer recess, by Septemeber/October the news will have become familiar - also released at a weekend - this is utterly scandalous.

    It is on a par with the President of the USA releasing his supporters when they have been convicted. There will be a bit of a fuss but then it will all die down - nowadays we expect no better - such despicable behaviour in the name of Her Majesty is becoming common place.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hailshams 'elective dictatorship' perhaps?
      I read the following a couple of days ago Andrew, it's from 2014 but it may interest you.
      They are a disgrace, you're so right.

      https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/elective-dictatorship-democratic-mandate/

      'Getafix

      Delete
    2. Excellent analysis and a taster:-

      Against the background of a general breakdown of public confidence in the political elite, politicians on both left and right have seen themselves not as part of a broader governing elite but as outsiders, empowered by their democratic mandate to shake up government and make it more responsive to the wishes of the people. Nat le Roux argues that taken to its logical extreme, the end point of this doctrine is an impoverished political ecology in which the only actor is an omni-competent centralised executive, constrained only by periodic popular election.

      There is a very widespread view in Britain that our political culture is dysfunctional. According to the survey carried out for the Hansard Society’s 2013 Audit of Political Engagement, two out of three citizens believe that the present system of governing Britain is in need of significant improvement. When asked how this might best be achieved, a large majority of respondents favoured action to increase the transparency of politics and the popular accountability of elected representatives.

      It is easy to see why many people believe that a disjunction between citizens and elected politicians is the primary problem in an increasingly dysfunctional, and disrespected, political system. However this is at best a partial diagnosis. In reality, British politics are considerably more transparent than a generation ago: proceedings in parliament are televised, it is much easier to access many types of government information, and the public and private activities of the political elite are subject to relentless media scrutiny. From the perspective of the ordinary citizen, Westminster culture may appear introverted and opaque, but this is an inadequate explanation for the current malaise felt towards British politics and government.

      Less evident to outsiders, but equally debilitating, is the growing and dangerous imbalance of power between the institutions of the state itself. Lord Hailsham coined the term elective dictatorship in 1976, and it is a more accurate description of the political landscape today than was the case forty years ago. Two developments have taken us further down that road. The first is the increasing unwillingness of the executive to respect the independent authority of the judiciary, the civil service, local government and parliament itself. The second is the willingness of governments, especially after 1997, to introduce fundamental constitutional changes, many of them effectively irreversible. Perversely, it is the over-representation of democratic legitimacy as the dominant contemporary political virtue which arguably bears a large measure of responsibility for our current predicament.

      Delete
  7. Just seen this advertised on indeed !

    Commercial Manager -Probation Services
    FPSG
    -
    Manchester
    Job details
    Salary
    £34,090 - £45,102 a year
    Job type
    Permanent
    Benefits
    Pulled from the full job description
    Salary:
    Full Job Description
    Role: Commercial Manager (Probation Services Team)
    Location: Manchester based
    Salary: £34,090 - £45,102 plus excellent benefits - Please note any new entrants into the civil service will start at the bottom of the advertised banding scale.
    Our retained client The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) are a major government department, at the heart of the Justice system. The department serves the public by upholding the rule of law, and by delivering an efficient, fair, timely and effective justice system. Our vision is to deliver a world-class justice system that works for everyone in society.
    Our 4 strategic priorities to deliver our vision are:
    Prison and probation service that reforms offenders;
    Modern courts and justice system;
    Global Britain that promotes the rule of law;
    Transformed department that is simpler, smarter and more unified.
    MoJ's Commercial and Contract Management Directorate (CCMD) support some of the most innovative commercial work in government. The directorate's work is crucial to the successful delivery of the £1.3bn prison reform and £700m court reform programmes, and spends approximately £3.5bn a year on over 1,000 active contracts. The directorate also provides procurement and contract management activities across a wide range of categories, ensuring value for money agreements are in place for wider MoJ staff to source goods and services from.
    We are seeking a Commercial professional with the right personal qualities - enthusiasm, energy, proactivity, collaborative, prepared to work as part of a team and under their own initiative and to be flexible and adaptable in a demanding environment.
    The Probation Services Commercial team in CCMD's Rehabilitation Services portfolio lead the end-to-end strategy, sourcing and management (including service provider transition and exit management) of the current and future probation services.
    As part of this we are establishing the largest dynamic framework in the public sector a suite of core intervention services.
    Reporting to Senior Commercial Manager
    Managing the transition and exit of suppliers against current contract
    Community Rehabilitation Company (CRC) Supplier management to ensure robust management of commercial delivery against contract (including payment mechanisms and commercial delivery)
    To support the SCM in range of key commercial matters including areas such as Change notices and contractual disputes
    Attend when required / instructed the CRC governance meetings as agreed with SCM
    Ensure that collaborative professional relationship with key colleagues in CMT's for respective CRC's. Provide professional commercial service to all relevant stakeholders, operating at all times as an ambassador within CCMD and the wider commercial profession.
    Comply with all Departmental controls relating to commercial practice and otherwise, including strict adherence to delegated authorities, and ensure that staff do the same.
    Essential
    A proven track record of procuring and/or managing high value, complex and important contracts in a similar complex commercial environment;
    Working with complex contractual, financial and legal constructs;
    Managing supplier and contract performance across multiple, complex contracts;
    Excellent stakeholder and supplier management skills;
    Awareness of public sector procurement legislation;
    Ownership of tasks / projects from initial stages through to completion;
    Demonstrable Experience of Project management; Stakeholder engagement; Presentation and drafting skills;
    Experience of eProcurement portals, Bravo, Oracle systems or similar.
    Desirable

    Application of public sector procurement legislation in a central government setting including a working knowledge of public sector procurement legislation including EU Rules and UK interpretations;


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Love it.

      "Our 4 strategic priorities to deliver our vision are:
      - Prison and probation service that reforms offenders;
      - Modern courts and justice system;
      - Global Britain that promotes the rule of law;
      - Transformed department that is simpler, smarter and more unified."

      Transformed? From excellent to pile of crap. Tick.
      Simpler? Grayling is as simple as they come. Tick.
      Smarter? Suit, shirt & tie, skirts, shiny shoes. Tick.
      Unified? More homogeneous for sure. Tick.

      Delete
    2. This is failure on a grand scale - whatever skills and qualifications these folk will have (sorry I cannot understand precisely what talents there are too employ) there is absolutely no need for them to have experience of practicing front-line probation skills(traditionally a form of what has become known as social work)& engagement with suprvisees, convicts, courts and such-like.

      it makes no sense to me.

      Delete
  8. London markets bounce amid reports of progress for Covid-19 drug

    Workers must get back to offices to help economy recover, says hiring boss

    Jacob Rees-Mogg: No-deal Brexit will boost UK economy by £1.1 trillion over 15 years

    Jacob Rees-Mogg suggests 'the weather' is to blame for UK’s sky-high coronavirus death toll
    ____________________________________

    11 July uk gov data:

    No. cases reported: 820 (+308 on 10 July)
    No. deaths recorded: 148 (+100 on 10 July)

    ReplyDelete