David Lidington’s Conservative conference speech, full text
“Yesterday morning, as Lord Chancellor, I joined our country’s senior judges and lawyers in Westminster Abbey to mark the opening of the new legal year. Then we processed together across Parliament Square to Westminster Hall – the heart of our democracy. It was a great occasion, a celebration of the long history and ancient traditions of our legal system. But at heart, what was being honoured was not wigs and robes, nor ritual and protocol, but the living constitutional principles which that ceremony affirmed.
The rule of law and the independence of the judiciary underpin our democracy and lie at the heart of our way of life. They are the very cornerstone of our freedoms. No individual, no organization, no government is above the law. That is why the refusal by the leadership of today’s Labour Party to rule out supporting illegal strikes is a shameful abdication of responsibility from a party seeking to govern.
I believe, this party believes, in the rule of law, and in our system of justice that protects the innocent, punishes the guilty, and gives voice to victims. And after seven years of Conservatives in office, crime is down by a third. More victims of serious crimes – particularly sexual offences – are coming forward, no longer silenced by fear of stigma or mistrust.
Of course there is always more to be done. That’s why, together with Amber Rudd, I am developing a comprehensive strategy to tackle domestic violence and abuse, a pernicious crime that has been in the shadows for too long in our country. I pay tribute to our Prime Minister, Theresa May, who has been unwavering in the fight against injustice throughout her time at the Home Office and in Downing Street.
I also want to thank my outstanding ministerial team – Dominic Raab, Sam Gyimah, Phillip Lee and Richard Keen, our whips Mike Freer and Charlotte Vere and our PPSs Lucy Frazer and Alan Mak. They all work incredibly hard for our party and for our country. They deserve our thanks.
The greatest challenge facing our criminal justice system is in our prisons. The men and women who work in our prisons are the unsung heroes of the criminal justice system. Day in, day out, they accept responsibility for more than 86,000 offenders, to keep them secure and the public safe.
As I’ve visited prisons and listened to officers and governors, I’ve been struck by their professionalism, their dedication and their commitment, not just to keep prisons secure, but to do everything they can to help prisoners make a change in their lives. Too often, this work can be forgotten. It’s unseen behind the high walls of our prisons. But we should all take this opportunity to thank our prison staff for what they do on behalf of us all.
Prison officers face enormous pressure. The levels of violence inside our prisons are too high. So are cases of self-harm and suicide among prisoners. Last year, the Prisons Ombudsman said that the arrival of new synthetic drugs into our prisons was a game-changer. These drugs, smuggled in from the outside, were – he said – increasing violence, debt, poor health, and instability.
Today, more of that drug traffic is being orchestrated by sophisticated criminal networks. Gangs smuggle not only drugs, but mobile phones for their operations. They use drones to drop as much as a kilo of drugs at a time. They stop at nothing, even spraying children’s drawings – sent to inmates – with liquid synthetic drugs to infiltrate our prisons. This is no cottage industry. This is not a matter of opportunism. It is serious organized crime.
I am determined to do more to track and target that crime. So today I can announce the start of additional intelligence-led counter-drone operations, to disrupt drones as they enter prison airspace and trace them back to the criminals involved.
Inside prisons, we’ve already deployed hundreds of sniffer dogs trained to detect drugs, and we’re working with the technology companies to block mobile signals and drones within the prison walls. And today I can announce pilots of a new generation of body scanners to add to our tools in the fight against drug smuggling.
And we have ramped up our efforts to deploy more and better trained staff. Today we have 868 more prison officers on duty than at the start of the year, meaning we are on course to hire two and half thousand extra frontline officers by the end of 2018. And we are keeping them safer too – training staff to use body-worn cameras to deter assaults and capture evidence whenever they occur. We will not let up on action to ensure that our prisons are secure and that prison staff and prisoners are safe.
Here today, in Manchester, we are reminded of the loss and the grief this city suffered when terrorists struck here in May, at the most innocent and vulnerable of us all: children emerging from a concert. As the Prime Minister has said, we cannot and must not pretend that things can continue as they are.
We have stepped up the work within prison to contain dangerous extremists, opening separation units to stop our most toxic prisoners from being able to groom or intimidate others. And we’ve established a counter-intelligence unit to monitor and disrupt the evolving threat of extremism behind bars.
Safety and security are important in their own right, but they’ve got a broader purpose too. The real prize of a calm and ordered prison environment is to make it possible to transform them into places of genuine reform and rehabilitation.
All bar a tiny handful of prisoners will one day be released. And we cannot be satisfied with a situation in which nearly half of prisoners reoffend within a year of release. That failure matters. It matters to us, as Conservatives, because in the end the cost of reoffending is borne by the victims of those crimes.
Let me be clear: those who commit crimes are responsible for their actions. And successful rehabilitation has to start with the prisoner wanting to make it work. There are some who, no matter what support is offered, will show no remorse and no desire to change.
Nothing can excuse crime. But we have to recognise that the problems in our prisons don’t start at the gates. A quarter of prisoners have spent time in care. Many come from homes that were at best chaotic, at worst violent and abusive. And the cycle perpetuates: nearly two thirds of prisoners’ sons go on to commit crime. Most prisoners assessed on arrival have the reading skills of an 11-year-old, and half have no qualifications at all.
When these prisoners return to society I want to see them able to get a job and to keep it. I want them willing and able to take responsibility for themselves and their families, keeping on the straight and narrow rather than falling back into their old ways.
And I want more intensive rehabilitation to take place in the community, particularly to tackle offenders with substance misuse and mental health needs. We also need probation to work better, so we have tough community sentences that command the confidence of the courts and the public.
Now, rehabilitation does not mean that we ignore the need for punishment and deterrence. It means using the time that we have people inside to maximize the chance that they will change their attitudes when they get out, spending as much time as possible in classrooms and workshops, not banged up in cells.
So I am pushing ahead with reform. I am giving prison governors new powers over how their prisons are run. Next year, every governor will be given the power to tailor education and training to the needs of their prisoners. They’ll have more freedom to innovate, but they will also be held to account for the results of their work.
And that goes for us too. Openness and transparency are powerful instruments of change. The reports of prison inspectors shine a spotlight on problems. Where recommendations are made by the Inspectorate, they should be followed up. So I have set up a new taskforce, charged with responding promptly and publicly to inspection reports and following those through with action to put problems right – and if we disagree, providing a clear, public explanation.
We have a particular responsibility towards young prisoners. We cannot sit back and allow them to become the adult offenders of tomorrow. Since we took office in 2010, the number of young people in custody has plummeted – by nearly two-thirds- leaving only the most serious and difficult offenders behind bars. These youngsters also have the most complex needs. Youth custody cannot just be the dumping ground for society’s problems.
So I can today announce a new investment of £64 million to entrench reform of youth custody. We will boost the number of frontline staff in youth offender institutions by 20% – that’s 120 additional recruits, including newly trained specialist youth justice workers, equipped to tackle the needs of young offenders.
The work of overcoming the challenges in our prisons means we are also looking beyond the prison walls for solutions. It includes the work Jeremy Hunt is leading across government on a new strategy for mental health. That will help ensure offenders get the help they need both in prison and after release. It embraces Justine Greening’s drive to promote high-quality apprenticeships and first-class technical and vocational education to give prisoners – old and young – the chance to get steady, quality work after prison.
The private sector has a role to play, too. Redemption Roasters, a new start-up working at Aylesbury Young Offender Institution in my own constituency, is offering the boys there a full-time barista training programme, with a real prospect of employability. They are working with one 22 year-old apprentice, who in his own words has “never had any experience of working legit”. He’s now about to begin his first job at Redemption’s flagship coffee shop in central London. This is what a fresh start looks like.
From Timpsons, to Greggs the bakers, to Halfords, to the construction firm Mitie, employers are appreciating what ex-offenders have to offer: the hard-work and dedication of someone committed to proving they deserve that second chance. We need to take this further. That’s why I am today announcing a new national task force – the New Futures Network – to match offenders with employers and make sure training in prisons mirrors the demands in the local jobs market.
The evidence shows that a former prisoner who has got both the responsibility and opportunity that comes with work is far less likely to reoffend. Getting prisoners into employment works. This work of reform is ambitious and difficult. I’m not going to promise instant solutions. We are dealing with some of the most troubling and troubled people in society. But there are two things which, despite those difficulties, still fill me with hope.
The first is the success stories I’ve heard in our prisons. There’s the officer in Northumberland who runs the recycling yard in his prison, who’s built basic English and Maths skills into the work, and set up links with local businesses to secure jobs for his men when they’ve done their time. One of the prisoners in his team put it this way. He said: “Not only does this give us hope, it also gives us purpose in life”.
Or the prisoner in South Wales who told me how it was the work of staff there to maintain and strengthen contact between prisoners and their families that had finally made him realise how much damage his criminal past and his absence in prison had caused to a partner and children whom he loved, and how he was determined, once released, not to let them down again.
Or the amazing work by charities, from women’s groups to churches to sports clubs to get them to see that there is a better way than going back to a life of crime. I want to see charities and voluntary groups, large and small, play an even stronger role as we move forward with our reforms.
And the second thing that gives me both hope and confidence is what, after more than 40 years of membership, I know about our Party. We say that the Conservative Party is the party of one nation. We are at our best when we speak and act and work on behalf of every part of this country, when we strive to do our best for people from all walks of life, whatever their background, their accent, their beliefs or the colour of their skin.
And just as there can be no no-go areas, no city, no estate, no street that is out-of-bounds for us in our campaigning, so there should be no area of policy, no social challenge that we should fear to address. So let our government and our party work together, with energy, confidence and determination on the great cause of prison and penal reform.
And through our efforts let us pass on to the next generation a country that is more fair, more ready to offer a second chance, and more just than the one that we inherited ourselves.”
David Lidington
I can't see a single reference to probation. Lots about using Prisons and a small acknowledgement to the charities for their work but no reference to Probation.
ReplyDeleteHas David L made any visits to Probation offices yet?
Lidlington cannot be completely stupid, so it seems reasonable to presume that he genuinely believes the majority of folk who consider the utter nonsense he spouted will also believe it.
DeleteOur attempts to alert the media and parliamentarians of the reality of the complexities of the criminal justice system have almost completely failed.
I've absolutely had enough of this pack of lying, cheating, greedy alien shitbags. Sadly it seems that their species are widespread & well-established on Planet Earth.
ReplyDeleteSo I'm going to close my eyes, hold my nose & make a wish that they'll all just fuck off back to Planet Shithead.
All this self-proclaimed 'elite' will ever pass on is their vile attitude towards others and their personal wealth to their own progeny. Yesterday May made some glib comment about 'being in government for the benefit of others' - no doubt she can name every single one of those "others", i.e. her chums who are benefitting from Tory policies. Meanwhile Bozo the Clown dismisses the utter devastation in the Middle East by suggesting that once the dead have been ploughed out of sight there are massive profits to be made by Disneyfying Sert. I feel sick to the soul.
Entirely agree with both comments. They go on a little walkabout and someone wheels out the flagship project or the reformed prisoner. Everyone cheers and pats each other on the back and minister goes back to his ivory tower and asks a civil servant to write his speech. Job done. Meanwhile back on planet earth prisons continue to be breeding grounds for crime, self harm and suicide abd inhuman conditions for most prisoners with gang culture abd drugs rife. Back in probation..yes, we are still here, hanging by a thread..we continue to struggle with the increasing ravages of a selfish and uncaring post privatised system where those at the bottom sink in the mud and those floating at the top spout their lies and shit on anyone beneath them.
Delete'Probation must do better'??!! Does he not get that it's as a result of Grayling's stupid TR that it's in total disarray ! Another clueless SoS for Justice.
ReplyDeleteLidington talks much about what charities and the third sector have to offer. Indeed charities feature far more in his criminal justice search then probation.
ReplyDeleteBut to my mind charities have become just as bad as the private sector. They live in the same pond, they just feed on the bottom.
There's a very revealing article here that demonstrates very clearly (to me anyway) just how unsavoury charities and the third sector have become.
Processes, tick box, payment. It's about nothing else.
https://www.thirdsector.co.uk/david-walker-labours-bonfire-contracting-untold-harm-charities/policy-and-politics/article/1446025
'Getafix
Seems to be a paywall Getafix!
DeleteTo continue reading this article you need to be registered with Third Sector. Registration is free and only takes a minute. Register here or sign in below if you already have an account.
DeleteDavid Walker: Labour's bonfire of contracting could do untold harm to charities
Delete29 September 2017 , Be the First to Comment
Will 'public by default' be read as 'social by default' and included charities and mutuals as well as the public sector, asks our guest columnist
Labour surfaces from its annual conference committed, more or less, to repealing a chunk of the Private Finance Initiative and a thoroughgoing review of outsourcing by councils and other public bodies. That’s bad news for companies, but there’s also a risk that the third sector will get hit by the flak as Team Corbyn opens fire on contracting.
The third sector got scant airtime at the Brighton jamboree, but pledges now being made by Labour on public services carry deep implications for charities and voluntary organisations, especially those that partner with profit-making firms or are themselves contracted by councils and government agencies. At a minimum, Labour is now set to revisit contracts for probation, benefits and work capability assessment in policing and prisons, and to exclude the private sector.
The shadow home secretary, Diane Abbott, lumped together privatisation and outsourcing as responsible for the Grenfell Tower disaster. She presumably meant arm’s-length management organisations. Labour activists would probably also include joint ventures and partnerships and would not necessarily make a fine distinction between arrangements with firms and those with non-profits.
David Walker: Labour's bonfire of contracting could do untold harm to charities
Delete29 September 2017 , Be the First to Comment
Will 'public by default' be read as 'social by default' and included charities and mutuals as well as the public sector, asks our guest columnist
Labour surfaces from its annual conference committed, more or less, to repealing a chunk of the Private Finance Initiative and a thoroughgoing review of outsourcing by councils and other public bodies. That’s bad news for companies, but there’s also a risk that the third sector will get hit by the flak as Team Corbyn opens fire on contracting.
The third sector got scant airtime at the Brighton jamboree, but pledges now being made by Labour on public services carry deep implications for charities and voluntary organisations, especially those that partner with profit-making firms or are themselves contracted by councils and government agencies. At a minimum, Labour is now set to revisit contracts for probation, benefits and work capability assessment in policing and prisons, and to exclude the private sector.
The shadow home secretary, Diane Abbott, lumped together privatisation and outsourcing as responsible for the Grenfell Tower disaster. She presumably meant arm’s-length management organisations. Labour activists would probably also include joint ventures and partnerships and would not necessarily make a fine distinction between arrangements with firms and those with non-profits.
A Corbyn government looks unlikely to breathe life into the social value act. It would rethink commissioning, yes, but not in order to expand it. Dan Corry, chief executive of the think tank NPC, laid into "stupid procurement policies" that shut out charities, but the signs are that a future Labour government is going to prefer, if not insist upon, in-house supply.
DeleteAround the fringes of the conference, you heard support in principle for the third sector: Barbara Young spoke up; Chuka Umunna and other MPs remain supportive; Corbyn will go on being a keen visitor to charity projects. With the prospect of power, Seumas Milne and other key advisers are becoming increasing pragmatic, which could mean they won’t want to offend.
But third sector leaders who might take a lesson from what has been happening to party thinking about local government aren’t alone in seeking answers. Labour made major commitments on public spending and extending public services, yet its councillors left the conference somewhat dazed and confused.
Gwynne talked about a "renaissance" and legislation to give councils greater powers to deliver services (along with fair-wages clauses, which again could have unintended consequences for third-sector contractors). But on the platform and around the fringes of the conference, speakers insisted that councils would have to toe the line: they would be told to do this and required to do that. The next Labour government, on present evidence, is not going to be noticeably "localist". Councillors would deliver what a Corbyn government ordered. Charities, too?
'Getafix.
(can't get it all in one go) sorry
Should be 15:41 (middle section) sorry again, it's hard on a phone.
DeleteOf course, Labour would have to win the next election for any of this to matter, and it has yet to establish a consistent, let alone a commanding lead in the national opinion polls. And as things stand, the next election might not be until 2022. But you don’t have to be a worshipper at the shrine to accept the possibility of a Labour government. And it looks like Labour’s public service policies are now being set without much if any input from the charity sector.
Would the "detailed implementation manuals" that the shadow chancellor John McDonnell is putting together make a fine distinction between good outsourcing (to the third sector) and bad? It’s true that he is looking to the likes of Lord Bob Kerslake for advice. The former head of the civil service is chair of the housing provider Peabody and a vocal advocate of charities. But Labour is likely to commit to "public by default" in procuring services, and who will ensure that is understood as "social by default", to include charities and mutuals as well as the public sector?
Andrew Gwynne, the shadow communities secretary, promised to increase council powers in order to end outsourcing of work that removes public accountability, which could well include contracts let to third-sector organisations. Some councillors might think charities and non-profits also bear some responsibility for, as Gwynne put it, "hollowing out of council capacity". The services that Labour councils could deliver better and more efficiently in-house, as Labour would have it, include social care, child protection and other domains where the third sector has become an important supplier to local authorities.
Not quite sure what planet Lidington is living on. Or possibly what psychoactive substances he has been sniffing but this speech is complete and total fantasy.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/Probation-service-staff-praised-for-good-work-despite-poor-working-conditions-bc90d0ae-16d7-4d9b-9111-86392cbc4ae3-ds
ReplyDeleteApparently the story has been deleted!
DeleteManaged to salvage this snippet before deletion. It implies HMIP have been up in Cumbria:
Delete"13 Sep 2017 - EMPLOYEES tasked with managing criminals in Cumbria have been praised for their good work despite inspectors finding they were hampered by "poor working conditions"."
That Inspection is not reported on HMIP's website as far as I can tell, maybe the newspaper published a report about an Inspection that is currently embargoed.
Deletehttp://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprobation
Geographically relevant. Anyone recognise the multi-disciplinary Court Diversion Teams from the olden days?
DeleteWonder how the 2017 roll-out has gone then? Three guesses...
From Cumbria Disability Forum website, 2014:
"Offenders with learning disabilities are not getting the support they need from police, probation and prosecution services, an inspection has found.
Inspectors for the services, along with the Care Quality Commission, estimate 30% of those going through the criminal justice system have such conditions.
Their report found many police custody sergeants were not trained to spot conditions such as autism.
And most forces did not have access to medical or psychiatric help, they said.
There is no agreed definition across criminal justice and health organisations about what constitutes learning difficulties or disabilities.
Michael Fuller, chief inspector of HM CPS Inspectorate
The inspection of the treatment of offenders with learning disabilities within the criminal justice system was conducted by HM Inspectorate of Probation, HM Inspectorate of Constabulary, HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate and the Care Quality Commission.
The report found that those with learning disabilities were often regarded as a problem to be processed - rather than a person with particular needs.
And it found those offenders were not receiving the support they needed to reduce their risk of harm to others or likelihood of reoffending.
Michael Fuller, chief inspector of HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate, said the inspection "found some excellent examples of professionals going the extra mile to ensure that individual offenders with learning disabilities received the appropriate support they required".
But he added: "Such instances were exceptional and these deficits were mirrored across the criminal justice system. A balance needs to be struck between the support needs of those with learning disabilities and the need to hold them to account, where appropriate, for their offending."
'Effective screening'
The report found that, in two-thirds of the cases inspected, the CPS was not being provided, at key stages, with information about the offender's learning disability.
And it urged the agencies to come up with a common definition of learning disability and to make sure information on individuals was properly passed on.
"If offender engagement is to have any real meaning it has to start with an understanding of the offender's learning ability and style based on an effective screening of all offenders," Mr Fuller said.
"For those with a learning disability this is even more important as failure to identify and address their needs denies them their right to access services both inside and outside the criminal justice system."
Earlier this month, it was announced mental health nurses are to be based in police stations and courts in 10 areas of England as part of a pilot scheme aimed at cutting reoffending.
The nurses' duties will include helping officers to respond to calls and identify those with problems.
The £25m scheme - being trialled in areas including London and Merseyside - could be extended England-wide by 2017."
The public private debate is, to my mind, much less complicated than people are led to believe. In short, the public sector has, during it's most effective periods when it was properly funded, resulted in services delivered by properly qualified staff, properly remunerated, resilient work forces, consistently trained and sensibly funded. The private sector has universally brought fewer staff, poorly paid in insecure posts resulting in poorer services cut to the bone to generate profit. SKYPE interviews? Call centres? An absolute joke. We all have a trusty anecdote to wave around about how bad the trains were in the 1970s or how great an individual private provider is but, in a nutshell, when I was a kid, I used to get on a train in Newport, S. Wales and be in London in 90 minutes. Now it takes 5 hours. A coach from where I live in Suffolk takes SIX HOURS to make a journey I could do in a car in about 80 minutes. My clients tell me that they all bid for ex-council houses on these Gateway websites because they are bigger and better built. The private sector has only one objective and that is to generate profit for it's share holders. End of. The public sector has always served it's clients as well as it's funding allows. The private sector doesn't undercut that by 'innovation', it does so by paying fewer people less. Lower wages generally means poorly trained staff, recruitment and retention problems, ill-equipped services, poorly targeted. Probation? Prisons? The privatae sector has tanked it all. We all knew it before TR and said so but we were ignored, marginalised, abused, lied to and corrupted. Properly funded and properly managed public services are the only way to meet the needs of the majority of people in our communities with anything even vaguely approaching integrity. Everything else is just opportunism, self interest and bullsh*t.
ReplyDeleteHear, hear 16.49. Well said.
DeleteHow about ministers must do better! It makes me sick to the stomach when I continue to hear truly horrific accounts of what is going on in our prisons. Time and time again and seems to just get worse. Prisons have a duty of care but appear unable to do anything to prevent the wave of violence, drug use, suicide and human misery occuring in U.K prisons. I am ashamed to be part of the CJS when I hear such brutal accounts..what is being done and why are these men and women being allowed to suffer like this and no recourse to compensatio? Never in my 20+ year career have I heard such sickening reports coming out of U.K prisons.
ReplyDeleteIn the UK we're subjects not citizens of a Republic. The state therefore has obligations.
DeleteIt should be protecting its subjects from the big corporations, not selling them off to it.
At a court last week, someone appeared by video link. The court file did not explain the listing. The Prosecutor was none the wiser. There was no defence rep. The Defendant gave an eloquent and detailed account of previous hearings and outcome resulting in listed charge being dropped. The system is a chaotic joke. Solicitors waiting for hours for prosecution papers. Probation court staff shipped about to plug ever widening holes. E3? What a joke.
Delete