Wednesday, 14 June 2017

Advice From an Insider

I notice that advice is already coming in for the new Justice Secretary. Here's part of a fascinating Spectator article written by the former speech writer to both Michael Gove and Liz Truss. It's worth reading in full.  

Butter up the judges, release some prisoners: how David Lidington can survive as Justice Secretary

After getting to know the judges, the next problem David Lidington will encounter is the utterly chaotic prisons system, where Truss had identified what was wrong and was beginning to attempt serious reform, largely along the lines set out by Michael Gove before her. In this area, I would argue, her all-guns-blazing style was better suited.


There’s a Ministry of Justice playbook that’s probably being followed at the moment. You take the new Justice Secretary to the high security Belmarsh prison, have them photographed with the Prison Governor during a whistle-stop visit, introduce them to some staff, and publish the picture on the MoJ website. Certainly you don’t want it to emerge that a Justice Secretary has never set foot inside a prison.

But if Lidington really wants to get an idea of the state of the prison system, the ‘Category A’ high security estate is not the best place to start: it’s pretty well resourced – because the inmates are very dangerous – and well run. Instead he should visit a prison that has received a terrible inspection report. Like, for instance, Wormwood Scrubs, which was said to be ‘infested with rats and overcrowded’ last year. Or Wandsworth prison, one of the largest in Europe, where in 2016 BBC cameras filmed inmates openly smoking cannabis.

It’s this part of the prison system that will take up most of the Justice Secretary’s time.

Politically, it’s worth noting that Cabinet ministers at the moment are virtually unsackable. ‘Hang ’em and flog ’em’ commentators in the right-wing press will stay on side because the one thing they fear most is Jeremy Corbyn as prime minister. So Lidington should use this freedom to speak frankly about the prisons crisis.


First, he should admit that the prison population has grown too large. There are around 85,000 inmates now (about double the 1990 population – see graph above), who spend most of their days not being rehabilitated or educated – but locked inside their cells, often taking drugs such as spice and ‘black mamba’. As the chief prisons inspector put it in 2015: ‘It is hard to imagine anything less likely to rehabilitate prisoners than days spent mostly lying on their bunks in squalid cells watching daytime TV.’

Yes, prisons exists to keep the public safe, and part of their purpose is to punish crime. But what is the point of regimes like the above, where 59% of those who receive prison sentences of less than 12 months go out and reoffend again? It would help if the staff-to-prisoner ratio was improved for a start, so that prisoners can be taught basic skills like how to read, write and add up. One question: why are there still so many prisoners held indefinitely under ‘Indeterminate Sentences of Imprisonment for Public Protection’, even though some, according to the Parole Board Chairman, present a very low level of risk to the public? Given that the cost of keeping someone locked up is more than the fees at Eton – and there remain serious cash pressures at the Ministry of Justice – these inmates might be a good place to start.

A source flags up a more urgent problem coming down the tracks – a smoking ban that has to be implemented in all long-term and high security prisons by the end of August. ‘You couldn’t have come up with a more stupid date,’ I’m told. Officials are always wary of riots in the hot summer, when prison officer numbers are depleted due to holidays, yet somehow this is the date that has been agreed. Is Lidington going to go ahead with it? Is the timing clever?

He will have plenty of other red lights flashing on the department’s warning systems. Murders, suicides and assaults – both prison-on-prisoner and prisoner-on-staff – remain off the scale. Two people who know the system well have separately mentioned the words ‘corporate manslaughter’ to me, which illustrates the depth of the problem facing the government. The fact that so many older, more experienced prison staff are leaving, outstripping the rate of recruitment, also urgently needs addressing. Can Lidington persuade recently departed staff with experience to return? And if the Prison Officers’ Association are still up in arms about assaults on staff, understandably, why not introduce a new offence that immediately increases time in custody for attacks on prison officers? This would serve as a deterrent for attacks like ‘potting’, which, in the words of Urban dictionary, involves ‘dumping a steaming bucket of urine and excrement over the head of a much-loved prison service employee’.

Another question that needs asking: if NOMS (the National Offender Management Service) was such a disaster that it had to be closed down and rebranded, why is Michael Spurr, its former head, in charge of the shiny new HMPPS (Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service)? A review of the capability of the top team, I’m told by someone with experience of them, is overdue.

Perhaps the top priority, however, should be rehabilitation. It badly needs improvement, given the appallingly high level of reoffending among offenders mentioned above. Lidington should review which reforms in this area are working and which are not. Has Chris Grayling’s ‘Transforming Rehabilitation’ white paper had the desired effects, four years on? Worryingly, I’m told of a ‘collapse in morale and effectiveness in probation, particularly in the Community Rehabilitation Companies’ that were set up during his time in the department. If these aren’t working, then rehabilitation will be non-existent.

Judging by recent atrocities, yet another challenge that David Lidington will face is the treatment of Islamist extremists in custody. Some, as I pointed in my article for this week’s Spectator, are considered so dangerous that they are locked up alongside the most dangerous murderers in Britain today. But unlike the killers, some are on course to be released. Anjem Choudary, for instance, was only locked up for five and a half years last year. Why not longer? And how much will be done not just to safeguard the public from the most subversive Islamist proselytisers, but to persuade them that they are wrong? Separation units for extremists, introduced by Liz Truss, are a very sensible measure; but they must actively reduce risk, not just isolate it.

It’s a strange thing, given its size and its importance in keeping the public safe, that the Ministry of Justice doesn’t have a particularly high status in Whitehall. The Home Office, and certainly the Foreign Office, are considered more prestigious to work for. But, as Justice Secretary and Lord Chancellor, David Lidington is about to discover what sort of hospital pass he has just caught. He is said to be brilliant by those who know him: I just hope he’s given longer in the job than his predecessors.

Will Heaven was speechwriter to Michael Gove and Liz Truss at the ministry of justice

--oo00oo--

Footnote:- not being the slightest bit knowledgeable about football, I had to resort to wikipedia for the following:-
"David Lidington is about to discover what sort of hospital pass he has just caught."
"Hospital pass" is a term originally used in football codes to describe a pass that subjects the recipient to heavy contact, usually unavoidable, from an opposing player — the expression implying that the recipient of the pass could end up in hospital.

8 comments:

  1. It would seem that the incredible London tower block fire will have a number of serious consequences, not least politically:- https://grenfellactiongroup.wordpress.com/2016/11/20/kctmo-playing-with-fire/

    ReplyDelete
  2. My God,was this social housing? May not seem related to probation but this is all about cutting costs and making more profit, lack of accountability, private profit over public safety. Truly shocking and just mind blowing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Without apportioning blame, but noting the comments and anger expressed by residents of the tower block, a huge enquiry is enevitable.
    It's worth noting however, that most if not all social housing has now been outsourced and in the hands of management companies. Profit again the main priority.
    But government policy can't be ignored either. George Osborne as Chancellor gave all social tenants a 1% discount in rent. I'm not sure of the reasoning for this. But a tenant who's rent is £500 a month gains a fiver a month, or £1.25 a week better off. The outsourced management company who may manage 2000 properties loses £10,000 a month. That's a lot of corners to cut to recoup that for shareholders.
    This is a huge tragedy, and it should force the government to have to re-examine it's policy of outsourcing social problems.
    It's a horrendous catastrophe.

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
  4. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/pentonville-prison-inmates-totally-unacceptable-delays-mental-health-provision-report-inspectorate-a7788561.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. "One question: why are there still so many prisoners held indefinitely under ‘Indeterminate Sentences of Imprisonment for Public Protection’, even though some, according to the Parole Board Chairman, present a very low level of risk to the public?" Presumably they stay inside because, despite them presenting a very low level of risk etc, the Parole Board declines to recommend release. Pourquoi?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Parceque they are risk averse and at the same time incapable of making a sound judgment

      Delete
  6. Zero leadership in missing links South West! We have been left running around like a bunch of headless chickens! I hope the previous managers are reading this blog because everything you worked for has basically been shat on
    The remaining staff in South West are being shat on from a great height just because some arsehole at the home office has a massive ego. We can't go on much longer. Everyone knows it isn't working but no one has the guts to admit it apart from maingrade po/ pso's. WHAT will it actually take for the bastards at MOJ to wake up and getvtheir fat, self rightous arses out of their ivory tower and make a fucking decision for a change instead of the usual crappy excuses..change this target or that target. Fucking wankers need to pull their fingers out of their arses and sort out this crap. Shameful bunch of tossers who don't deserve the shit off my shoe. Public protection has gone out the window and all you are bothered about is your targets and bonuses. I'm out of it now so you can shovel your own shit.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The author of this article hopes the new minister will be given longer in the post than his predecessors. I don't. I hope he will be given less time and that a labour minister will be appointed in his place. It is true that Michael Spur should go.

    ReplyDelete