Monday 17 April 2017

Pick of the Week 24

As we wait and see if the rumours are true regarding the long-awaited Probation Review being kicked into the long grass of Autumn, here are some powerful contributions that particularly caught my eye over the last week or so:-

Morning fellow blogees and what a great weekend to reflect on the failures of the prison and probation 'reforms'. I am sure most of us would agree that 'reform' is just a pseudonym for enormous financial cuts in this time of austerity. There is no actual reform is there..nothing that could be described as an actual improvement to services. Here is a snapshot of 'reform' to the management of offenders in the community over the past 25 years from someone who has recently taken early retirement. 


Remove our professional qualification and take social work out of probation. Let's face it the Certificate of Qualification in Social Work was more representative of our job which incorporates many aspects of social work, working with mental health, drugs and alcohol, domestic violence, child protection...bread and butter of social workers. Concentrating on only criminology or even psychology is missing the major environmental factors that are in need of change. Society v individual as the cause of crime. This government would prefer to blame the individual rather than focus on failings of society.


Creation of PSO's as opposed to fully qualified PO only. Ok I know this is contentious. I actually think there IS a role for PSO's and have worked with many in my time but it is a bit like teaching assistants in schools. Until they are accredited fully and have years of experience behind them they need close supervision and support. They should not be employed and then immediately given large caseload of low to medium risk offenders which is what happens now. It is similar to the news recently with large numbers of classroom assistants left in charge of classes. Gradual erosion of professional standards is not good for anyone. Just because you don't need a professional qualification to be an MP it doesn't mean other professions don't or do. We want to go back to the days of asking the barber to stitch a wound or pull teeth?!


Loss of community reporting offices and day centres. Gone are the days when you knew your local area and everyone operating services there. Some staff were running services voluntarily such as football groups or groups for women on probation. It wasn't cute n cuddly social work, it was a lifeline for some people who have told me years later in the street how much it meant to them! Now service users have to travel miles to get to a central office or 'hub' which seems to be the new fangled word!


Groupwork: groupwork rose to prominence but never replaced one to one work entirely. 2 years ago there were about 8 different groups in my area but post privatisation they have shrunk to about 4 and I am told even lower now as staff running them have left and need to train people up. Doesn't sound like progress to me.


RAR days! Hmmmm..do magistrates really know what a RAR day is I wonder? Surely this is just basic one to one supervision or a group which is what we were doing anyway when we had the time. A trip to the jobcentre? Come on! People would be doing that anyway.. just a renaming if you ask me!


Management. What was wrong with having one SPO managing one office! Worked for me but now TR means running around like a headless chicken supervising staff at 2 or even 3 offices and failing miserably.


Training. If it's free book staff on, if it costs forget it! No more in house training unit. So who is doing the basics such as managing risk, working with sex offenders? Ok, CRC don't work with sex offenders! Except when it is historical! Dodgy that! 


Could go on for ever here! Anyway I'm off to mow the lawn on this sunny day and ponder the meaning of life. Back to work on Monday, early retirement doesn't mean you can't get another job but you can hopefully choose to do something a whole less stressful.

******
"Supervision" rolled far more easily off the tongue in court, rather than "rehabilitation activity requirement", and far more straightforward to explain in terms of the Act and its practical application. I sometimes wonder whether these ridiculous changes are intended to fudge and confuse, all the easier to create an impression of something being done. What is a RAR day? I still don't know. How long does it last? If one is missed, does it require making up? Is there some mystical corner of ND that I've (easily) so far missed that shows how many RAR days have been completed on an ongoing order?

******
What is a RAR day? Same goes for Post Sentence Supervision. Poorly defined concepts, poorly integrated and in consequence practitioners, managers and so called businesses alike confused and uncertain. Justice Committee sensibly asks for clarity on Prison Reform lest it be the dog's breakfast that is TR.

******
RAR days = professionals running around like headless chickens ticking boxes and (forced to make some up if not enough are ticked), delivering meaningless interventions all so that the paymasters can get paid. Maybe this should be put in all PSRs when judges and magistrates ask for explanations as to what we do on RAR days.

******
Just had a bizarre dream series where CRCs had been forced to hand contracts over to Citizens Advice Bureaux, and "community rehabilitation" was being delivered in libraries & train station cafes by freelance "advisors" who were paid in cash after downloading their contact details via a laptop into a CAB mobile server mounted in the boot of a white Volvo V70.

******
The answer, is 'No.' No-one has noticed - including politicians, journos, etc - because no-one really gives a rats arse. Probation-as-was was always under the radar, low key, understated, modest to the point of clinically shy. On a number of occasions this blog has highlighted the path of probation's demise, from 1992 & the CJAct which turned probation into a political plaything, through the cessation of SW training in 1995/6, NOMS in 2003, Trusts in 2007 to the implementation of TR in 2013. NAPO lost its way from 2005 on as NOMS's stranglehold tightened & Trusts were hatched, with Ledger metaphorically & literally fumbling in the dark.

I've been out of the profession for some time now but I had chance to have conversations with some who are either still hanging on or more recently departed, and they have revealed shocking conditions in which people are working - bullying, incompetence, lying, no equipment, no management, no office, dismissals, people frog-marched out of offices... These are all things written about on this blog at various times, but which I've now had first-hand accounts of. It is monstrous how the privateers are behaving towards staff and clients.

One conversation was with an ex-colleague, now a senior manager, who thinks it's all just fine & dandy. They seemed well, positive, content and spoke enthusiastically about their achievements in the CRC......interestingly, and without fail, that same person was named by others as a "major local problem" - variously referred to as a bully, a braggart who refuses to listen, rarely in the office, blames staff for everything, a liar & a fraud.

A gaping chasm has opened up... is that where the simple truth has gone? Everywhere I look these days there are several varieties of truth. Take the US strikes on Syria. 59 tomahawk missiles were fired, but that's the only fact people can agree on. US say 58/59 landed on target. Russia say 23/59. Etc, etc...So Grayling's truth is not my truth - that much I do know!

******
It's clearly time for a blog special on the fiasco/failure/debacle/disaster that is Interserve's Cheshire and Manchester (and Merseyside, let's not pretend that's really separate) CRC - the very embodiment of cynicism with its institutional disdain for the real needs of its client group and a venomous contempt for the professional and personal integrity of what remains of its workforce.

******
Off Piste I know... but you need an update on the lunacy that is Interserve and the now fabled Interchange Model....The CEO, young Mr Edwards and his now infamous blog; his updates have somehow managed to conflate the abject failure of Interserve to manage one of their contracts in their core role as facility management and subsequent loss of revenue with the service credits accrued by MCRC and CMCRC which are currently running in excess of 100 thousand pound sterling. How he manages to compare the failure to clean a toilet to a satisfactory standard with the production of an ISP that has a Risk Management Plan and good sentence plan in the same breath is bewildering at best...

He completely ignores; or if I am being kind; he cannot compute the serious high sickness rates, coupled with PSOs/POs leaving in droves... in tandem with those clueless Directors (ACOs) Interchange Managers (SPOs) who think that by cascading an email untouched or not explained sent from on high with a single note saying "Please action". Knowing the attachment being one of those heavy duty many-paged documents they want you to pick the bones out of and somehow implement... and you know what the coal face does... F9 Delete.... 


If you can't be bothered to even try to explain in plain English what you want then it does not deserve my attention.... Off piste again with that rant but the latest offering from Interserve is that they want the flex teams (Pods, teams, units, in old money) to sort out amongst themselves, without any management oversight, no direction, no leadership, to reallocate case which may show as failing targets or cases that are 'drifting'. They want us to meet as flex team each week without any management involvement .. review their super duper Service Level Spreadsheets which are monitored by the poor old Case Coordinators (Case Admin, again in old money - there is a theme running here) and decide who should complete the ISP which is now too close to ignore as they are failing said target. 

The reason that the target is failing my dear Christopher, is because the ridiculous central focused Professional Service Centres (PSCs) are allocating new case to case managers at the start of their leave. So when they return from leave they ae faced with immediate failures.... Now the PSCs will blame the IMs (SPOs - Do keep up!!) for not completing their staffing spreadsheets which show who is available and who is not... but when the IMs have gone off sick or are trying their collective best to learn how to be facility managers (lets be honest, that is what they have turned into) who is in charge? Are the lunatics now running the asylum?... 

When I sit down and have a good old one to one with little Tommy Aikens during one of our RAR sessions (Reality = A good old supervision session in old money).. We both end up sharing the same comfort blanket to get through our day... Just another day in the life... interRUPT, interFERE, interGALACTICAL, interMITTENT but very little (inter)service..

******
Absolutely spot on - Mr E is far too removed to actually care about staff - on one of his visits to offices where he wanted to be viewed as "a listener/doer/caring" all he kept banging on about was when "everything was working effectively then it would make life easier to be a offender manager" we told him to come back when this was actually happening and that due to the failure of the Interserve model and the stresses associated with it, all staff were dropping like flies or hanging on by our finger nails - I'm sure this was resonated by staff in all offices he visited - the management of Interserve are like the 3 monkey's "hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil" - so much for their motto "every one has a voice" - well as long as you're saying what they want to hear!!

******
I don't know how Chris can carry on being so deceitful, its like he knows the service has failed and can't offer anything to the staff but instead of admitting it he carry's on spouting nonsense. I used to think he was okay when he worked for the trust, but he has turned out to be a right pillock. Both him and his wife are doing very well thank you out of interswereve.

******
If I could afford to leave Interserve's Manchester CRC I'd be gone today. While staff are being run into the ground by unmanageable caseloads and impossible and pointless targets and deadlines the managers - sorry I mean 'executives' and 'directors' and 'Interchange managers' - are busy slapping each other on the back for the 'progress' we're making because they've rendered the already dismal working environment even more unpleasant by shutting most of the offices and making the remaining spaces look and feel like start-up call centres done on the cheap. If there are consultants who advise cut-throat companies on how to make job conditions so miserable that everyone will leave instead of having to be paid redundancy money, they're definitely working for Manchester CRC.

******
I totally agree. I too work within Manchester CRC - I would so love to be able to leave but my finances at present dictate otherwise - Chris Edwards blog this week was of no surprise telling staff that he was impressed by those using Skype in order to cut down on travel expenses (not sure who these people are skyping instead of face to face contact - offenders ?). I've also been waiting (since I read it some time ago) for the "we need to tighten our belts and not do anything to loose Interswerve any more money" - they can't even manage a waste contract adequately. 


He also banged on about groups etc which we all know don't need half as many staff - I'm concerned and have been for some time (especially as Yvonne Thomas told the JSC that they didn't make as many cuts to staffing as they'd anticipated) that they will do so now they need to recoup their losses and nail them out of litigation (due to failed waste contract) - watch this space!! These really are bloody awful times and I totally agree that they want to shaft the experienced more expensive staff to be able to employ more niave inexperienced buggers on Interswerve contracts and T&C's whilst the exec, directors and the likes are of the belief that all in the garden is rosy - full of Interswerves waste Shit!

*****
I too would like to leave but can't afford to, however on some days I feel the salary does not add up to the horror and stress working for interswere. They are despicable. I knew the minute I was shafted to work for them that my career was over and that I no longer could uphold the values dignity and morals to help those that are most marginalised in society.

*****
Yes, it's like there are two Interswerve Manchester CRCs - the special magical Interswerve/Management version where just saying 'inter' five times transforms lives and everything's 'innovative' and 'exciting', and then the real one where the totally demoralised and ever-dwindling staff group are crammed into miserable call centre style offices designed to sap their will to live, while being expected to supervise sixty or seventy cases each with no resources apart from a laptop computer that only works every other day. It's Hellish, and better still it's clearly meant to be hellish so that we'll fuck off and make way for cheaper and more desperate and malleable staff.

*****
I think Interswerve are beating the battle on that front from the comments regularly made about them on this blog, it won be long before the odd few staff that are left will leave, you can only suffer for so long. They'll keep getting paid and our lives will continue to be made miserable. Maybe the only staff left will be managers and they can deliver their own worthless piece of shit that they call the interchange model.

*****
A little off topic but can I just stress again how much we loath and despise our clueless and morally bankrupt parasite paymasters Interserve, and how their bizarre notion that Probation staff would have the slightest interest in celebrating being a part of what they risibly try to term the 'Interserve family' only makes us hate them all the more... The 'Interserve family' might just be the most repugnant notion I've encountered in my working life....

*****
The chief executive of the Interserve owned Cheshire and Greater Manchester CRC today warned staff that Interserve's losses in their waste business mean that we as a CRC will now have to tighten our belts! Better still, in spelling it out he detailed how we are now expected to respond to Interserve's incompetence by...being of sick less!!

*****

And as for their 'Interchange model' - A list of words chosen purely because they start with the same five letters as 'interserve' is not a 'model', even if you have paid off a bunch of mercenary university hacks to pretend it is.

*****
Again back to one of my previous posts, the people that are banging the Interswerve drum are Probation staff (Snr Probation officers etc ) - Chris Edwards and his cronies who are narcissists with fragile egos that believe all their own hype and who's bank balances are so much more important than the people that they trained and used to work closely with! - Interswerve have obviously seen their greed and naivety as I'm sure when the going gets tougher Interswerve will (here's hoping) will kick them to the kerb like they've done with everything and everyone else they've touched.

*****
I too work for interswerve CGM - I agree in the fact that "most" but not all IM's are approachable, however quite a few now have no case manager experience (?) as they've been shafted into the role from being programme managers.


We received an email today highlighting the fact that NPS will no longer be  loosening the shackles" and will be rejecting breaches for whatever reason, probably only known to them - numerous colleagues of mine have already experienced breach rejections/failures due to no fault of their own but reasons that the gatekeeping NPS team decided without liaising with said case manager.


The PSC's regularly get so many things wrong making life very difficult - the majority of staff I speak with feel that their job now entails more administrative duties due to the new model. Case loads are far to high (people have 60 - 100 cases) resulting in most staff being unable to prioritise as everything's a priority - it's a horrible feeling juggling plates like this knowing at some point you're going to drop a few (which could result in an SFO). Staff I know (I've been around quite a long time) experienced ones at that, have dropped like flies due to stress levels of holding so many cases (hearing a name and thinking 'who the hells that?', please tell me they're not on my case load).

*****
Just the word 'Interserve' makes my flesh crawl. 'Purple Futures' was bad enough, but Interserve have now abandoned even any pretence of leading a 'partnership'. They plainly don't give a fuck about Shelter still taking our money and yet barely even bothering even to pretend to provide a meaningful 'Through the Gate' service. No one knows who 3SC are or what the fuck they even claim to do. P3 operate a criteria whereby they only provide support to clients who can demonstrate that they don't need it and otherwise it's just Interserve Interserve Interserve all the way. Better still, despite their transparent efforts to deprofessionalise our service, they seem to have some bizarre notion that we might somehow respect their filthy money-grubbing organisation and in some way be pleased or even proud to be a part of their 'Interserve family'. Their efforts to try and make us believe that they are our 'friend' or that they could give a damn about the people we work with truly make me want to vomit. Do they really not understand that as a workforce we have nothing but contempt for them and for everything they stand for? Fuck Interserve.

*****
Seeing Interswerves "Ingenuity at work" signs on everything makes me feel incensed!! Through the gate staff don't even have access to NDelius so have no bloody idea who they need to contact, hence "we" are told that we have to make contact with TTG staff in whatever prison with ALL our custody cases, which yet again is a massive task, also part of Interswerves Appraisal objectives!! 


As part of Interswerves model we're supposed to have a "directory of  local) services" run by 3SC which is not fit for purpose but supposedly we use them for RAR days as they are "supposed" to be services that are locally commissioned by PS3 to provide CRC's services (really?) - one service on there is "phone FRANK" again REALLY! I'm sure courts would love to hear that we completed RAR days by phoning FRANK! - I totally agree with you it make me ill, however what makes me feel worse are the management that were previously Probation Officers that have sold their soul's to Interswerve and now appear to have no sign of professional nor personal integrity.

*****
Well said. Interswerve are a deplorable company but always try to hide behind a made up image that they actually care. Do they seriously think that we are unable to see through their greedy bullshit. I wish they would F off and take their daft interchange model with them, they could try using it on their cleaning contracts.

*****
Here's the thing with PF/Interserve. MCRC now has such a terrible reputation with Crown Court judges, District Judges and lay Magistrates. It really is bubbling under the surface. Directors, or ACOs in old money, have been called to account by the Recorder and District Judges for such poor quality of cases not being managed. They are rapidly loosing confidence.. So the bemused directors cobble together a very telling email to staff outlining the 'reputational damage' this is causing and people need to sort this out as a matter of absolute importance. Essentially waving a big stick. 


They, bless their poor corporate souls, fail miserably in recognising that the IT is so poor, the new PSOs are not trained, those poor sods have re located from admin, accommodation and HQ posts that were got rid of during the great run down of Trusts are now holding 70-80 cases with the most half-arsed on the job training, no idea about OASys sentence plans, RMPs, breach reports, evidence to support breaches, when to breach, HDC, ROTL etc etc etc.... Then, surprise surprise, these people leave in droves, and the cases left behind are by any standard in an absolute mess. 

The good old boys and gels who now hold nice fancy titles like Interchange Director are literally clueless..... completely out of their collective depths. The so called DOS (Directory of Services) to support RAR activity..... well it is merely just a poor quality spreadsheet that is at best described as embarrassing and at worst... well its just criminal. So what do you do when you are handed another dozen or so re-allocated cases that on inspection really does turn your blood cold? You draw a line under the past management and move forward. Sod reputational damage if it is in a unrecoverable mess, then send it back from whence it came saying not in my name... or return it to court in your name but having to expose the mess..

This is left at PSO/PO level to sort with that great management default phase ringing in your ears "Just do your best".... leadership at its very best... Yvonne T, if you happen to read this blog, I know you or at the very least your bright young things do... either hand back the keys or come down to the coal face and turn over some stones and see for yourself..

22 comments:

  1. Happy Easter Jim and fellow blogees - crazy I know ( possibly two much fizz yesterday ) but I'd like to hope that the reason for the delay in the results of the review is they're making a thorough / independent of everyone involved ( NPS /CRC's management ) investigation and that they're looking at all options other than what we expect ( throwing more money at the greedy corporate companies that are the CRC's ) - one can live in hope !!!!!! that I (and my other poor colleague's )don't have to suffer any more of Interswerves bull shit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can assure you that there is a lot of thinking going on but next to no consultation. The CRCs are the only ones involved. Prison colleagues in particular have no idea what's being discussed and Trough the Gate services just stagnate whilst NOMS (or whatever they are calling themselves today) work our how to get CRCS to deliver when there is no money.

      Delete
  2. Remember this article from The Guardian in December 2016 when Liz Truss was calling for the rapid completion of the probation review. Rumour has it that it is the den of fools that is the blunder prone MoJ who have been given an ultimatum by the privateers who are apparently saying that Grayling sold them a pup and if they do not get substantially more money then they are walking away and suing for compensation. Truss realises that the cost of giving the CRC owners what they want will be huge including having to publicly admit that there were no savings to the public purse in getting rid of Probation Trusts in pursuit of her predecessors personal ideological objectives and short term political point scoring rather than acting in the longer term public interest. What has been created out of the mish mash is an increasingly fragmented and divided service that is less accountable, potentially more costly and grossly inefficient and ineffective. Importantly all the new organisations are poor employers to work for and staff who need to be motivated to be effective are clearly demotivated.

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/dec/06/liz-truss-calls-rapid-completion-probation-privatisation-review

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The justice secretary, Liz Truss, has ordered the rapid completion of an official review into the failing performance of the government’s privatisation of the probation service.

      Truss told MPs that the review into the privatised probation companies’ performance introduced by her predecessor Chris Grayling would be completed by April and would include a major overhaul as well as measures to improve the service.

      The announcement comes after highly critical reports by the chief inspector of probation, Dame Glenys Stacey, that found companies were struggling to deliver the supervision of 250,000 offenders a year.

      Tory MP Bob Neill, who chairs the justice select committee, has said probation service “risks heading for a car crash” and the 21 community rehabilitation companies have reported they are making a loss on almost all their seven-year contracts worth £3.7bn.

      Truss told the House of Commons on Tuesday: “Our probation officers do a vital job in turning offenders’ lives around. The prisons and probation minister is conducting a comprehensive review of the probation system focused on improving the quality of our probation services.

      “As with our plans for prisons we want a simpler, clearer system with specific outcome measures such as getting offenders off drugs, improving educational standards and getting offenders into apprenticeships and work.

      “We also want to see closer working with the prison service. We will set out our more detailed plans after our review is completed in April.”

      A joint review by the chief inspectors of probation and prisons into the performance of the part-privatisation of the probation service in June identified multiple failings in “through the gate” services, including the release from prison of one in three offenders without anywhere to live and no one in a sample of 86 offenders being given help in training, education or employment.

      The probation service was split in 2014 into 21 community rehabilitation companies, supervising medium- to low-risk offenders, and a public National Probation Service (NPS), supervising high-risk offenders.

      The “transforming rehabilitation” revolution, as it was dubbed, was introduced by Grayling when he was justice secretary. It included a pledge to provide supervision for the first first time for 50,000 short-term prisoners on their release without any significant extra funding.

      Stacey said last month that while the caseloads for the NPS were climbing, the companies’ caseloads were much lower than anticipated and they were supervising between 6% and 36% fewer offenders with a consequential loss of income. Many companies were considering whether they could continue to afford their current staffing levels. Very little innovative work was going on.

      Delete
  3. pick on Interserve day I see! A District Judge from Liverpool Mags called for a face to face meeting with managers and the result is a new Enforcement protocol is being written as we speak - just what we don't need! What the DJ isnt aware of is that whilst he may feel there's too many acceptable absences, case managers are legitimately doing as they have been told by managers ie: all low/med cases are to report once per fortnight for the first 8 weeks then afterwards by professional judgement - this was on a documents issued by IMs at the start of the contract.

    Too many cases and not enough staff has contributed to the 'slippage/drifting' of cases, it's simply impossible to keep on top of all the incoming new Orders. Phones are regularly going unanswered as otherwise you'd never get anything else done. I know curfews are being given in some instances because there's more faith from sentencers in them being enforced unlike those with probation requirements.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interswereve deserves nothing less than a big kick where it hurts, it should be pick on interswereve day everyday its nothing less than they have earned.

      Delete
    2. The TR contract in October 2014 was for £600m and their largest for several years. You can see the others they have won here http://www.interserve.com/investor-centre/contract-wins

      This is what they claim.....

      'We are a successful, growing, international business: a leader in innovative and sustainable outcomes for our clients and a great place to work for our people.' errrr OK right Anyone actually seen any evidence of this? Great place to work? Anyone? Come on the CEO thinks it's great

      Delete
  4. It's about time the criticisms of front line managers and even some of the executives involed were tempered with a bit of understanding. The managers in CRCS are being asked to deliver the impossible with no resources. Most are also under significant stress and for very poor pay. The poorly directed email is simply a desperate attempt to deal with the volume of poorly thought out change that most managers have never seen before.

    Most SPOS and directors will put on a happy face and tow the party line. This doesn't mean that they agree with anything that's going on or aren't trying their best to resolve it.

    Management are not an enemy here. The government created this mess. CRC owner have completely been sold a pup and have every right to pursue funding that will allow them to deliver services. Whilst PSR gets kicked further and further away it's your managers who have to hold it together in the hear and now whilst those above them try to plan for a completely unclear future.

    So cut your managers some slack. Try checking what time all those emails come out and realise they are working all hours for no additional reward. Also try to accept that as literate adults you should be able to read a f9cument and ask the pertinent questions rather than being spoon fed. If managers aren't explaining things it's because they are too busy dealing with the nonsense that comes out of MOJ contract teams or trying to make the impossible happen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nuremberg defence!

      Delete
    2. The beef I have had with managers and continue to have is that they put all their energy into doing the bidding of their 'pay masters' misguided ideas and not enough energy into resisting those ideas and upholding those work practices which have been proved to work well for service users and staff. If our managers had had the backbone and critical faculties to work with their staff and with each other to stand up for those ideas over the years we would all be in a better place. Sitting on the fence as managers continue to do shows what poor leaders they are. I have Seen very few exceptions to this. I can understand if managers are frightened to speak up. That is why they need to stand together. Start with the small issues and test your strength. And all of us at the bottom of the heap can do the same in team meetings in a bottom up role modelling exercise for our managers.

      Delete
    3. It is not the CRCs who have been sold a pup, the CRCs are the pup that we were all sold. Picturing them as an Oliver asking for 'more please sir' in some Dickensian misfortune is disingenuous to say the least.

      Delete
    4. 0053 completely and utter just plain wrong. Must be a senior manager talking.

      Delete
    5. That went well 00:53 - what say you now, pray?

      Delete
    6. Oh dear 00:53, I am sorry but the clue is in the title, Interchange Manager. it is absolutely your responsibility and moral obligation to manage. You may well have a case for poor pay but do not take the position/post of Manager without taking on the responsibility. If you feel like your staff that the Interchange Model in its current guise is not a workable model: say so! Don't tell us ,stand up in your SMTs and say so, explain why in articulate and lucid terms why. However, if you buy into the model then say so and explain to us why you do and give us a decent clue as to how to implement such a model, with the tools that have been provided to us to the standard they (Our masters) want. JFDI is not a management tool it is the last hiding place of poor management

      Delete
  5. Anon 00:53 spoken like a true manager !!!
    I agree with anon 09:12 that managers that say that they give a damn about what's wrong and whats not working within CRC's should stick together in resisting absolutely ridiculous models ( dare I mention the Interchange model ) - I'm pretty sure staff witin your teams would applaude and support you , there are a lot of us that at every opportunity stand up and be counted in team meetings / briefings etc that are willing to say it as it is to the powers that be ( I'm sure my card was marked some time ago and that even though my comments / suggestions / observations are well met by colleagues
    not so by management as that would mean an acknowledgement that none of this is working ) - unfortunately all staff see are very blinkered managers feathering their own nests and doing everything in their power not to be seen to be " rocking the boat "

    ReplyDelete
  6. GE17. Not just opposition to government Brexit plans solved but all opposition to a Conservative agenda neutered for 5 more years. Classic, checkmate.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wouldn't be surprised if the GE will see the probation review pushed back significantly

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes either push beyond june/july or sneaked out before depending on what they are doing. If delayed private companies wont like that as desperate for more money. If before massive changes and some sort of bung. Dependant on who blinks first really.

      All in all, still shite

      Delete
  8. "He said: “Overall, this case shows that there must be reform of the Probation Service.

    “The Probation Service was simply unable to force Mr Williams to take the support he required because he had served out his sentence.

    “This has to change and former prisoners must be required to undergo monitoring, or at the very least treatment, until officers are confident they no longer pose a threat to society.”

    http://www.caerphillyobserver.co.uk/news/964124/argoed-murder-islwyn-mp-calls-for-reform-of-probation/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's the kind of batshit crazy nonsense I'd expect from Philip Davies MP. I'm extremely disappointed to hear a Labour MP 1) not knowing the law and 2) calling for the law to be ignored!

      Delete
  9. "As we wait and see if the rumours are true regarding the long-awaited Probation Review being kicked into the long grass"

    Yep - GE17 trumps everything. Maybe not just an Easter epiphany?

    ReplyDelete
  10. 'Most SPOS and directors will put on a happy face and tow the party line. This doesn't mean that they agree with anything that's going on or aren't trying their best to resolve it '
    - no , it just means they're entirely cynical, expect us to do the impossible when they don't believe in it theirselves, and just focus on bettering their own position

    'Management are not an enemy here' - no, they just do the enemy's work for them

    'CRC owner have completely been sold a pup and have every right to pursue funding that will allow them to deliver services' - so it's okay to win contracts by offering to do the job for next to nothing, sack half the staff, and then whine that you aren't getting paid enough?

    'it's your managers who have to hold it together' - by which you mean require us to do the impossible

    'So cut your managers some slack' - No. They look at the impossible tasks put before us and collude in blaming us when it can't be done.

    if it wasn't for the collusion of cynical, self interested managers TR could never have happened

    ReplyDelete