Friday 17 May 2013

Chiefs - A Word in Your Ear

Eavesdropping on peoples twitter conversations continues to amaze me and just recently has served to highlight the almost complete gulf in knowledge between Chiefs and frontline staff. We've always know this of course as Head Office's became ever-larger and distanced from the realities of practice. Gone are the days when the likes of a former chief such as Sir Graham Smith carried on seeing clients even when he reached the top. Why, we even have chiefs now who have no probation background at all, so a certain disconnect is likely, is it not?

I'm aware that Chiefs often make a big thing about getting round to see staff in field teams, and by the way I hate that bloody awful term Local Delivery Unit. Who thought that one up? It sounds like a Tesco home shopping depot. Anyway some Chiefs make an even bigger thing about spending a day on the 'shop floor.' A whole day FFS! At least in the excellent BBC 'Back to the Shop Floor' programmes we saw Chief Executives spend a number of weeks actually trying to understand what really goes on in their business's. 

Unless Chiefs go through every stage of preparing a full Standard Delivery Report for court, right from first interview with the client, through brain-numbing completion of the OASys and then soul-destroying attempts to get a half-decent report ready for court, in my view you have no authority to say that you know what the hell is going on in your Trust. 

The imposition of OASys has been the biggest disaster for probation practice ever, without doubt, and OASys R, the supposed improved version, has simply made things intolerable. Guys, it is impossible to get a half-decent-looking report fit for court through OASys R!   

But all is not lost because news reaches me that in one Trust at least, North Yorkshire, hard-pressed colleagues have resorted to extreme measures and reverted to writing reports on blank sheets as word documents, just like we used to. Oh what bliss that must be for those lucky people, and the sentencers who will be reading the finished result! I defy anyone to say it is nothing less than a 100% improvement on anything OASys-generated. Psychology and Psychiatric reports are not prepared in this way, so why are ours?

If I listen carefully I might be able to hear voices asking how the hell we got into this situation? I guess the answer is quite simple. People who design this crap are not practitioners, not the end-user as the jargon would say and hence have absolutely no idea what is needed and how it works. I suppose a 'disconnect' is present to use more jargon. 

It's been some time since I ranted about OASys, but the subject is now very much 'alive' as they say following national roll-out of OASys R. Why Heather Munro and Sarah Billiald to name but two Chiefs are now fired-up to take the unwelcome message to the bosses down there in London. But there has been serious misgivings about OASys ever since it's imposition upon us. Why is it that NAPO some time ago highlighted the fact that only 25% of our time was spent productively on client contact? Answer - OASys. 

OASys is a vast, cumbersome and time-consuming assessment document that probation staff are forced to fill in on all current clients. It has to be updated regularly and 'shared' with prison staff if clients are serving prisoners. But it's not just a pain-in-the-arse to fill in. It's also pretty useless as a method of getting information out and quickly. If you really want to know about a case without losing the will to live trawling through endless pages of formatted text boxes on screen, you have two choices. The first and best is to have a word with the officer who has or had the case. The second and still better by miles than trying to look at bloody OASys, is to look at the file. There you will find the primary sources for much of the OASys content anyway, but more importantly all the bits that have been left out. 

Yes I know I'm antediluvian, but seriously there will always be a place in my view for a good old-fashioned Part B summary, but not necessarily on pink paper. In effect when you get a call from a colleague needing information quickly about a client, what you give them in no more than 20 minutes is a verbal Part B summary. So why don't we commit that to paper, or electronic equivalent guys? Now how about that for a radical suggestion to take to NOMS HQ Heather and Sarah.

The No10 petition is still available to sign here.          

18 comments:

  1. I see nothing antediluvian in your assessment of OASys. It's a dumb document. I never regarded it as an aid to assessment. It was more about data gathering for Whitehall number crunchers. I think OASys, though, was important in creating and perpetuating myths about risk assessments and management, a pseudo-scientific tool that could allegedly join all all the dots and make the world safer.

    All good assessments require are, first and foremost, a conscientious and curious assessor, criminological knowledge and practical experience of supervising a range of clients, thus deepening ones understanding of risks and needs in the process. It does not need a template, just a blank piece of paper. OASys is a con trick.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well it's gratifying to hear I'm not the only one who thinks OASys is crap and as you say has distorted the whole risk assessment business by giving the impression that it's somehow scientific and accurate. To say this is regarded as being close to heresey of course and all newer colleagues simply cannot imagine how we managed without it.

      Cheers,

      Jim

      Delete
    2. Believe you me there are plenty of newer colleagues who also think its a pile of shit Jim. Great blog by the way. I've long given up on napo for information or inspiration

      Delete
    3. Thanks a lot - also gratifying to know there are rather more heretics than I dared hope for!

      Cheers,

      Jim

      Delete
  2. I think you intended Sir Graham Smith, not Peter

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Quite right - mind elsewhere, now corrected thanks.

      Cheers

      Delete
  3. Recently qualified officers (though not exclusively) have a commitment to completing Oasys as 'evidence' of a 'risk assessment' having been completed-this often overlooks 'niggling' feelings about a case which are difficult to quantify and even harder to record which mean that they often end up in the ludicrously named tag INTBDTO-it is so true that those who expound the virtues of this (now) even more unwieldly system are those who have (a) never had to use it or (b)those who have used it but only once to prove a point and who do not have several reviews waiting to be completed by the end of the week

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A very good point, thanks. If I had my way, I'd force every manager right up to the Chief to fill in several bloody OASys assessments and keep them at it until they begged for forgiveness!

      But maybe I'm getting a bit sour in my old age.

      Cheers,

      Jim

      Delete
  4. I like to think of OASys as a 42 page assessment document that, after 3 hours of close scrutiny and cross-referencing irrefutably confirms that the big grey thing with the tusks and the long nose is, after all, an elephant.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very good - yes I like it when it confirms what was blindingly clear from the beginning - definitely got a problem with drugs. lol

      Cheers,

      Jim

      Delete
  5. Jim

    You will be pleased to learn that the new providers won't have to use OASys. See there are some good bits to privatisation!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes that's the supreme irony of privatisation - the poor bloody public service is left saddled with OASys - and it was time-consuming OASys that made probation so inefficient and ready for privatisation.

      Delete
    2. Naming of parts.

      A trend trending here for all those optimistic mutualising Trusts - aquire a crass name like Harmoni (surely something an offender would name a child), SODEXO, etc. So much sexier than the Bingo & Bongo Probation Trust. So much more likely to catch a Minister's eye. Nevaeh anyone?

      Delete
    3. Oh yes I like it! I feel there's scope for a competition here - any more suggestions guys?

      Delete
  6. Steady. Don't knock the private sector too much - a couple of tubes of SODEXO really sorted out my hemorrhoids. Bu-bum.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Oh the delight recently when due to some glitch I could not access OASYS for 4 weeks and had to do a full PSR in Word...........good job I knew how to do it, some more newly appointed colleagues looked horrified at the prospect of how hard I would find it. I really enjoyed it, proper flow, constructed as a whole, missed out the pr-done stuff about 'of so many offenders with etc etc'. I only hope the Judge enjoyed reading it. No horrible graph.....(now there is meaningless rubbish, quasi scientific c**p!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh you lucky person - 4 weeks without OASys! What I'd do to just go back to freestyle reports - do you know I could dictate them straight into a dictaphone in no more than an hour - rough draft typed up by a proper typing person - and corrected and polished in another 30 mins max. In an emergency full report including interview in 2 hours at a push. With OASys 8-10 hours at least. That's progress.

      Cheers,

      Jim

      Delete