Monday, 10 August 2026

Guest Blog 108

I can't help but wonder if our current Criminal Justice System has reached a point where it's now beyond repair, and a whole new system needs to be created across the board? Apart from the chaos of the early release scheme, I read this week that prison wings are being closed under the guise of renovation to hide staff shortages and high levels of sick days being taken.

I read too that the MoJ may have to close down more prison space because of dangerous levels of radon that is affecting several of our victorian prisons as the building materials used are starting to decay through age.

I also read that whilst the MoJ are struggling to release prisoners early, they have at the same time decided to increase prison punishments, increasing the number of added days a prisoner can be awarded from 42 days to 84 days.

https://insidetime.org/information/mean-spirited-and-unjust-why-the-mojs-new-rules-risk-undermining-rehabilitation/

It seems that every policy that is introduced has an alternative policy that works against it. Within my social group there is a retired probation officer (CQSW) who is very left wing in their views. There is also a retired prison officer (10 years a block screw) and extremely right wing in their views. There is also a couple of ex-cons (old lags now and also long retired) who's views stretch in betwwen. 

However, regardless of political opinion, everyone is on the same page with the CJS. It was never perfect, but it worked well. More importantly, it was respected. The police caught the offenders and brought them before the courts. The courts heard the case, weighed up all the circumstances and decided on the most appropriate punishment. If that happend to be imprisonment, then the convicted person would serve two thirds of the total sentence and be released without any post sentence supervision. For those sentenced to two years or longer the possibility of being granted parole after one third existed, and if granted release, came with the provision to engage with probation services. No consent, no parole.

The public respected this process. There was never any outcry that someone hadn't been given long enough, or someone was being released early on parole. There was never any media or victims making headlines demanding that someone serve the amount of time that they wanted to see them serve. 
The system was respected. The sword and the scales, and what ever decision the courts arrived at, or who ever the Parole Board released was just acceped as part of the overall process.

Probation was respected too. It worked to resettle and rehabitate those being released on parole, not by enforcement and control, but by support and encouragement.

The CJS needs to go back to somewhere near to what it was. Each agency needs the freedom to do it's own job and achieve its own specific purpose, what it was designed to do. The CJS needs to assert itself and not be driven by the court of public opinion because pandering to one group will always upset another group. It may not of been perfect, but there was a time when it all worked so well, and its really not all that long ago.

'Getafix

10 comments:

  1. The emergence of social media has made faith in the criminal justice system impossible and heavily backed by a gutter press. The emotive now rule and the juicy human interest stories create outrage. These days everything is about feelings and completely subjective. I don't think it's possible to 'go back'.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Today's reform commitments to criminal justice seem spot on to most observers would you believe it ...

      Delete
  2. How hmpps works.

    1. they make shit up
    2. they publish it
    3. they later use it as evidence as to why they did shit, but...
    4. ... there's always a get-out clause in case the shit really is shit

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a78c8f50a700895e2d79fe8/Justice-transcribe-report-29-july-2026.pdf

    "Ministry of Justice
    Transparency Data
    Justice Transcribe Data

    Between 7 October 2025 and 29 July 2026, over 1,200,000 meetings were summarised using Justice Transcribe.

    Probation Workforce Transformation (PWT) within HMPPS has advised that, as a broad operational assumption, use of Justice Transcribe may save around 10 minutes per meeting.

    Applying this assumption to 1.2 million meetings gives an indicative total of approximately 200,000 hours.

    This is an illustrative estimate only.

    It is not a formal statistical estimate and does not account for variation in meeting length, meeting type, user practice or summary quality."
    _______________________________________________________

    "Between 11 Feb 2026 & 8 Aug 2026 I bought tickets for 52 lotto draws. This figure represents the number of draws made and number of tickets bought.

    A broad operational assumption says that at least £2million can be won in each draw's jackpot.

    Applying this assumption to 52 draws gives an indicative total of £104million in winnings.

    This is an illustrative estimate only.

    It does not represent what is in my bank account."

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1. what they pay judges

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a748cf8bde92a23046b248c/judicial-salaries-2026-2027.pdf

    2. daily sitting fees

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a748cfd5a472b60f4ea6cec/judicial-fees-2026-2027.pdf

    3. daily fees for those who fancy a day's work after retiring

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a748d175a472b60f4ea6ced/judicial-sitting-retirement-fees-2026-2027.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  4. Alongised the sentencing act, they've also rejigged the prisoner cat system (to confuse, obfuscate or hide shit?)

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a70951faec8358a34958bd5/tprs36-operational-guidance.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  5. Annon@ 08:02 makes a very valid point, social media has huge influence on all our lives, and often dictates the narrative and has a major influence on political decision making.
    But if those that are incarcerated by the state are seperated into the deserving and undeserving, not by legislation, but by the court of public opinion, then surely we are going back to mob rule?
    Social media vigilantism?

    https://www.theguardian.com/law/2026/aug/10/andy-burnham-prison-early-release-scheme-pc-andrew-harper-killers

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Notable TV Shows and Novels
      * The Killing Vote (2023 Korean Drama): Citizens receive a mobile text poll asking if notorious criminals who slip through legal loopholes deserve the death penalty; if over 50% vote yes, a masked vigilante kills them.
      * Gray Justice (Novel by Alan McDermott): An ex-soldier kidnaps criminals and sets up an online system where the general public votes on their ultimate fates and punishments after the formal justice system fails.
      * The Verdict / The Accused series (Various indie dystopian book and media tropes): Stories where online platforms or reality TV setups let users log in and "delete" or sentence accused individuals via live public tallies

      Delete
    2. And Trump TV has twice the audience of America's got talent for his Saturday night showing of "The Running Man".

      Delete
  6. What I'd like to know is whether the redesigned system about to be implemented is one people wanted or support? If the point and remit of OFPS was to reduce unnecessary work where exactly has that work been reduced? Or has it? Has Justice Transcribe and removal of PSS relieved the burden?

    Their fanfare policy is early termination and supervision packages and not seeing people at all like under probation reset..so it seems the "unnecessary" or "dispensable" elements of our role is contact with people on probation!! So not endless case recording, data, not OASYS or administration, or meeting impossible targets...all these things have remained untouched in preference for delivering "probation with less contact or no contact at all".

    Is it just me or have I completely missed the point here about what the future model will be when implemented in October?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually supervising/helping people is not really what they want us to do anymore sadly. I think NAPO should push for Delius, Oasis and Outlook to be frozen at 6pm every evening and only APs and designated out of hours SPO'S should have access to deal with emergency recalls. Then, HMPPS would really see just how much unpaid overtime has been keeping this shit show running. .

      Delete