Saturday, 29 November 2025

What Probation Has Become

I published this cartoon from Private Eye on October 9th:-


This came in over night:-

In all my 20 years in probation I've not heard of serious incidents from people on probation to staff....in the past 6 months I've heard of 2. There are posts above about how the recall, tick box, authoritarian, breach first and so called risk management culture leads to resentment, combative practice and poor decisions. We have poorly trained staff led by power hungry monsters. It's not scanners and bag searches we need...its properly trained staff and an overhaul of our entire approach and culture. 

This organisation is sick and unhealthy for both the people working for and using the service. I've literally had my motivation and vivacity sucked out of me by this organisation. Of course I have compassion for the employees involved and such incidents are horrific. But as a good probation officer I want to fully understand what has led two people to making such horrific choices in the past 6 months. Sadly I have no faith that this organisation has the ability to self reflect on its own potential contribution to such terrible acts and behaviour.

On October 9th I published this:-

It was an interesting discussion, I clicked on it when Jim put it up in a previous blog. Gaie Delap used the term "moral injury" to describe the trauma of the injustice she experienced. This term occurs to me whenever I read the comments section in this blog, or when I reflect on why I am still raging at the damage to my profession after retirement, or when I speak with colleagues still in work. 

Just recently one of them, talking about the terrible morale in their office, said "even the new staff, they're hating it. They just dont feel they are helping anyone" It was sort of encouraging to hear that the new recruits, who have never known any different than HMPPS, are there because they want to HELP people, not batter crap into a laptop and breach and recall. I mean, there's the poor pay, and the vicious blame culture too, but right at the centre is the yawning chasm where a solid set of values and sense of justice should be.

Anyway, back to Moral Injury, which depending on where you look for a definition, is a form of PTSD,. Collectively and individually, Probation is a traumatised organisation, and it is playing out in front of us. It plays out in this blog; the rage and the grief, the fury aimed at any and everyone who might have prevented or softened the damage. It plays out in work, the bullying and intimidation meted out by an organisation that, at least at the top, is run by people who sold their souls and they know it. 

Run by "leaders" (now that is a trigger word for our shared condition to flare) who spout guff about "trauma informed practice" but can't or wont translate that into what they do to their staff, like it doesnt tanslate into the work we are told to do. So it plays out in long term sickness and people just voting with their feet and leaving at the first viable opportunity. 

Heaven forfend Probation staff are instructed to name and shame their clientele in public. Such a stark horrible reminder of just how dismal the whole thing is, and where its heading. Question is, can anything be done to turn this tanker around? If so, what?

67 comments:

  1. I think it is in absolute poor taste that you have uploaded a picture stating that staff treat people like shit and then immediately reference two members of our staff being stabbed underneath it.

    What evidence do you have which would indicate that either member of staff that has been injured has treated others like "shit".

    Victim blaming at it's worst this post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Christ, 07:09, if you don't understand the post and the meaning and message behind it, then maybe don't comment.

      Delete
    2. You've mistread the post. Staff are being treated like crap with high workloads, poor pay and conditions. Then also working in unsafe conditions proven by 2 probation workers getting stabbed. We are being treated shit.

      Delete
    3. They’ve not misread the post. The meaning is very clear.

      Delete
    4. 07:09 these two incidents haven’t occurred in a vacuum have they! .

      Delete
    5. Stop victim blaming !

      Delete
    6. I don’t understand why you saying it is victim blaming. Have you know sense? You need a reality check

      Delete
    7. That's no sense . This could be read either way but I think it's too close to people in this line of work. We all strive to treat others well while reflecting we are not well regarded by the employers. Let's work through the examples of good practice as our strength and criticise the appalling management of us the pay negotiations ignorance is one.

      Delete
  2. So now we’re blaming the victim?

    Stop bashing probation. Many do a great job despite the pressures.

    I took more interest in this from “what came in overnight” as more reflective of the situation.

    “Unions, senior managers, HMPPS, ministers, they all need to stop pretending we’re in this together. There’s them, comfortably paid and insulated from risk, and there’s us, doing the work, facing the dangers, and left waiting for scraps of pathetic 2% pay rises.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Define what a Probation Officer 'doing a great job' means? I suspect it's different depending on whether you're asking an SPO, Dep, POM, Victim, Judge or offenders. Unfortunately the average PO/PSO is only judged by their SPO, which means hit your targets and stop questioning your WMT

      Delete
  3. We all got to accept we do not give clients any sort of care service. We direct pursue require . We enter recordings of attendance and responses. Monitoring is always going to distance us away from clients as mistrust is locked in. There is no longer positive probation engagement. We have to adopt ways to both engage the person with sympathy while invoking controls . They will become volatile to what we deliver today and we have to predict this or ensure we can escape when it continually blows up. Social contracting with mutual respect is gone given what we have to feed the computer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No we don’t have to accept that because it isn’t true.

      Delete
    2. Well it is true what's your ostrich next to you say.

      Delete
  4. 09:21 exactly which bit don’t you “accept”. You must be delusional to think to think this is not the case.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with the comment that "came in over night" wholeheartedly.
    Police officers are assaulted and attacted every day. So too prison officers that are stabbed, scalded and have human waste thrown over them on a regular basis. Like it or not probation now occupies the same authoritarian, controlling punitive space as the police and prison officers. If anything, it's not surprise that such an awful assault has occurred, the surprising thing is that it dosent happen more frequently.
    I have great sympathy with the victim in this case. People should be safe where ever they work. I also however have great sympathy with the police and prison officers that suffer similar attacks. I also feel great sympathy for all the victims of SFOs, those raped and murdered. It might be worth reflecting on just how many of those SFOs have been identified as a consequence of probation service failings.
    I feel great sympathy too for all those caught up on an endless cycle of homelessness and addiction and recall being continually processed through a system they can't benefit from, and the only outcome for them is going to be frustration and anger.
    Probation today is defined by its reputation of its past. It was a reputation well deserved.
    It no longer deserves that reputation. Its become a dysfunctional, damaging and destructive organisation for everyone involved in it.
    If probation wants to be just another agency focused on "keeping the shit off the streets" then it has to be prepared for the things that comes with that ethos.
    I would personally argue that we don't actually that agency.

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed gtx. We are not what we was and it beggars belief some staff still seem to think they can practice as was.

      Delete
    2. I read the blog on a regular basis and post infrequently..
      I remain an operational Probation Officer with too many years of work behind me.
      12 months ago I found myself reflecting that the Probation Service was entering the “final throes” of what it once represented in the CJS. It has morphed into a correctional service all but in name.
      The despair, anger and frustrations of some staff is no longer just focused at national and local leadership, also NAPO- it is rapidly becoming operational staff on operational staff. That tells me that things can only continue to fail and fail badly. The blog today demonstrates a willingness to accuse others, when blame may lie elsewhere, somehow missing the point of the bigger picture. What hope is left at all when you can no longer see yourself in your direct colleagues? It strikes me that from now on victims will be found in anyone attached to the operational part of the service in whatever capacity. The service presents as a very sick organisation with no clear direction except to be utterly consumed by HMPPS, combined with the misery of staff being third class civil servants with their pay out of step with other parts of the CJS. Where have all the independent thinkers gone, willing and able to question/ challenge appropriate parts of the system when needed in order to best represent the needs and risks of the cases you work with and of course your colleagues? It is all so far away from the career I was trained into.
      In the last two months I had a very sharp reminder of current expectations of my role-a discussion took place with my manager that included a pointed reminder of the competency framework half way through. Essentially I was told processes were more important than people, I needed to spend much less time with my cases and being late with “data based work was not defensible”. Only then to be promptly allocated another complex case -the reason being-apparently my skills in face to face work are exceptional??? Match that to theories behind abusive behaviour.
      Due to my mortgage, I am having to adapt (or more appropriately be assimilated into) the correctional service and I am bored bored bored..
      essentially more ignored than anything else by those above, seen as eccentric and out of step… except of course when it comes to communicating with those so traumatised by the CJS they are viewed as difficult to manage.

      Delete
    3. Anon 16:29 Powerful testimony - thanks very much.

      Delete
    4. Hugely powerful testimony that I had also hoped/prayed for ALL day I hope that a few others might feel empowered/enabled to speak up/out . So, that those who might be remotely interested might get a little sense of how our Vocation feels right now. Thank you for sharing. I too hope that our Service can re-discover a little of its souls which your response shines. Alongside, ALL our Probation Staff and those impacted by what is happening Take great care . Ian

      Delete
    5. I was the poster of the "comment that came in overnight" - I thank Jim for reposting and for the people who have taken the time to reflect on it. Specific thanks for poster 1629 for giving such a personal and honest reflection. The post wasn't intended as victim blaming...of course we have no idea what the circumstances were of the specific incidents and even if we did there would never be any criticism from me of what those staff members did or didn't do...that would indeed be victim blaming. What 1629 evidences is what I intended to highlight...the approaches of the organisation has consequences.....in 1629's situation they are specifically instructed to prioritise "processes and data based work" over and above spending time with complex people. That approach coupled with a much more punitive and onerous approach to "managing risk" will hsve consequences for both staff and the people we work with. Rates of recall and the proportion of people being assessed as high risk have steeply increased over the past few years. Nobody is blaming individual victims for the context in which they work....what I was questioning is whether the organisation will have the ability to self reflect on or to investigate whether or not this wider context did or did not have any impact on the horrific actions undertaken by the two individuals involved...who of course are always responsible for their actions, but whose actions occurred within that organisational context.

      Delete
    6. Anon 17:29 Thanks very much for coming back - it's all vitally important testimony.

      Delete
    7. Everywhere is like this and while I have sympathy I'm also a realist does the editor still suggest proper decent work is being done or has today's terrible expressions of widely held concerns and frustration not convince anyone that we are being blown out. Our traditional role is defunct and we have to adapt.

      Delete
    8. Anon 17:49 There is decent social work going on, but under the radar and at considerable risk - but it's quite obviously dying and ruthlessly stamped out by various bullying tactics. The evidence is in testimony all over this blog.

      Delete
    9. Acts that are not just involving "considerable risk" but also taking a considerable toll at considerable cost (financially, emotionally, physically & mentally) to decent human beings who are simply trying to do their job. The 'job' of helping people make the move towards managing their lives in a way that causes least harm to others.

      lammy, mahmood, romeo, mcewen & that anonymous woman haven't got a frigging clue. They've all achieved 'success' (as they define it) by rising from privileged platforms through bluster, blagging & bullying others; best bully wins.

      "Lammy grew up in Tottenham in a single parent family unit. At the age of 10, he was awarded an Inner London Education Authority choral scholarship to sing at Peterborough Cathedral and receive a private school education at The King's School, Peterborough."

      "Er, lammy was a london lad!" Yes he can trowel on the london housing estate blather, but from age 10 he was schooled in the warm bosom of elite private education. No doubt a talented man, but not a man who has any concept of the day-to-day work of probation staff; a man with a very short temper & an overblown sense of his own importance.

      British politics is mired in bullying, corruption & protection of status; why did rayner get shovelled out so fast? two-jags was useful because he understood bullying & how to bully from his union days... every posh boy needs a fag to sort out the dirty linen.

      So yes, probation as-was is fuckd - & sadly many more staff will be injured & scarred; whether physically, mentally or morally. The pendulum will swing back, but not for a decade or so by my reckoning... maybe longer. Gird thy loins, soldier.

      Delete
  6. A very sad but chillingly accurate description of the new ethos, it seems as though it's only the experienced staff can see what has happened to probation. Without experience it's gone forever, all by design it seems.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The culture and ethos as changed that much that clients see us in worse terms than police or prison officers , that in no way justifies violence at all but it is within the context of police being attacked on the streets and prison officers on the rwings which happens everyday

    Reply

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anon 18:01 I think it ought to be fairly obvious from the efforts expended on this blog that I believe that the only way the Probation Service can return to being part of a solution rather than the problem is a fundamental re-examination of our current culture and practice. England is an outlier from current best practice almost everywhere in the world - prisons are closing in many areas of Western Europe! Emeritus Professor Rob Canton has stated many, many times that the likely best way to protect the public is to return to something akin to 'advise, assist and befriend'. Do you remember only a few weeks ago the Justice Secretary was suggesting it would be a good idea to photograph, name and shame people subjected to Community Patback! This trajectory is madness and treats people like shit. We're supposed to be about rehabilitation not returning to the bloody concept of the stocks. There needs to be a great row in order to get politicians to listen, or probation will completely implode.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well there was an 18;01 but it's disappeared.

      Delete
    2. ‘Probation is a thing so large in its conception, and so immensely potent in its effect on the
      hopes and happiness of thousands of human lives every year, that it is better not even to try
      to find words of commendation, which might be unworthy of their subject, but to be content
      to make the way clear for its advance, and let its deeds praise it’.

      - L le Mesurier, A Handbook of Probation and Social Work for the Courts, 1935

      Delete
    3. Anon 18:58 As quoted by Lord Ramsbotham in his report "People Are Not Things : The Return of Probation to the Public Sector" see here:- https://probationmatters.blogspot.com/2019/05/reflection.html

      Delete
    4. Thanks JB I'm in no disagreement with you to the idea of going back to what we did . This current blog illustrates there is no place in probation doing the sort of work we know which moves people to a better place. It is clear from the pain colleagues express here they all want to see progressive values put back into our role. You had said that the commentator was wrong. the quote has gone 1801 but after today do you not realise your belief is not well founded given everyone is flat out and do not do what we once were able to and make real decisions. You are wrong to suggest it does.

      Delete

    5. I found this point again here it is. You say the point is wrong how much evidence do you need to form the view expressed here. In context of my daily grind it is you who could not be more wrong and I'm thinking you need an office day to see how bad things have become.
      Anon 17:35 "The old days of forging relations shifting attitude by counselling has long past." You could not be more wrong.

      Delete
    6. You're getting very boring now, and sounding very juvenile pushing a repetitive comment that helps nothing.

      Delete
    7. Well that's maybe but it's important to be right not shut off the general perception . No one doing the job wants it this way . The idea work is going on as was in some places tell us or or recognise the reality. Yes it's boring all sides putting comments down when they are sharing the vicious daily experience enough to put you off the blog as another blinkered rat hole that's how irritating it is to others too.

      Delete
    8. "No one doing the job wants it this way"

      Some *do*, either because they've known no different or because it suits them. The former will likely apply to the newer recruits, while the latter seems to suit 'leadership' (their view of themselves) - or surely they would change it?

      The fact that the role has shifted to control, contain & incarcerate, the data demands have grown out of proportion & the working environment has become increasingly toxic year on year for at least two decades suggests 'leadership' is (1) utterly blind to what's happening, (2) happy with what's happening, or (3) both.

      After countless reviews & changes & reviews & warnings & changes & inspections & changes, the only conclusion is that this is what the 'leadership' have always wanted. This is how it was designed, what they've built & what they wanted all along.

      Overworked, cowed, craven data clerks who record the decline in our communities, in society, & incarcerate those that don't comply with the rules.

      Delete
  9. In line with Fyodor Dostoyevsky-
    “It is said that no one truly knows a nation until one has been inside its jails. A nation should not be judged by how it treats its highest citizens, but its lowest ones”
    Nelson Mandela

    ReplyDelete
  10. The horrific attacks on staff are a wake-up call we cannot ignore.

    While we must never, ever blame the victims of these crimes, we must have the courage to ask what the Probation Service has become. The anonymous commenter who spoke of the "recall, tick box, authoritarian" culture is correct. We have become an arm of the punitive machine, and the results are plummeting morale, "moral injury" for staff, and rising resentment from those we supervise.

    The testimony from the PO told they must prioritise "data over people" says it all. We are being systematically prevented from doing the rehabilitative work that prevents crisis and builds safety. The service is creating the very conditions that make these terrible events more likely.

    This is a failure of leadership and political design. We need a fundamental overhaul, back towards a model of "advise, assist, and befriend," before more people—staff and clients—get hurt.
    ANARCHIST PO 🇵🇸

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 100% apo data over people and we do not do rehabilitative work despite ones mislead .

      Delete
  11. The Connecting Thread - A Failure of Moral Leadership

    Thank you, Jim, and to all the commenters for such raw and necessary testimony. The concept of "moral injury" articulated here is the key to understanding not just the crisis in probation, but a wider sickness in our political and justice systems.

    The anonymous PO's testimony about being told to prioritise "processes over people" is a perfect, chilling example of how this injury is inflicted daily. We are forced to participate in a system that we know is causing harm, betraying the very values that brought us into this work.

    This brings me to a wider point about leadership. We are led by a political class that often seems utterly disconnected from the human consequences of their rhetoric and policies. David Lammy is a pertinent example. As Shadow Foreign Secretary, his stance on the conflict in Gaza—which many legal scholars and international bodies are describing in the gravest of terms—demonstrates a similar failure of moral courage and a comfort with top-down, punitive approaches that disregard profound human suffering. Supporting actions that lead to widespread civilian casualties and the destruction of essential infrastructure reflects a worldview where control and power trump humanity and justice.

    The connection to our world in probation is direct. We are operating under a Ministry of Justice whose ethos is precisely this: authoritarian, punitive, and dismissive of relational work. When our potential future ministers exhibit a similar comfort with dehumanising policies abroad, why would we expect anything different for the justice system at home? The same lack of empathy, the same failure to see the human being behind the "offender" or the "casualty," is the connecting thread.

    The call for an overhaul of probation's culture is a call for a return to moral leadership. It’s a demand for leaders—whether in HMPPS or in Westminster—who understand that true public safety doesn't come from brutalising people either in our communities or in war zones, but from justice, dignity, and a commitment to humanity. Until that changes, the moral injury will only deepen, and our service will continue to fail everyone it touches.
    ANARCHIST PO 🇵🇸

    ReplyDelete
  12. https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5451162-to-try-to-raise-awareness-of-the-shocking-state-of-the-probation-service

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I’ve name changed for this for fear of being sacked, so that tells you a lot about the Probation Service already.

      In June (or possibly July) a Probation Officer was stabbed at an office near to me. She was very lucky to have survived and is not recovered, as far as she will ever be able to. A “full review” was due in August which was released in October and NOTHING has changed. We work with some of the most dangerous people in the country and I think most people would be shocked to hear we have NO security guards, NO metal detectors, NO bag searches, NO training in how to respond to a situation like this. All we have is CCTV and panic alarms. I’ve just received an email that the inevitable has happened and another Probation Officer has been stabbed at work.

      Like the previous incident, I’m sure this will be played down and ignored. The first incident barely made the news.

      At the same time, the endless prison release schemes are adding unmanageable pressure to the Probation Service. Everyone I know is beyond stressed and burnt out, we’re running on fumes. We are also 10000 out of 17000 officers short and staff retention is impossible. Many staff have a 160% caseload!! We are regularly working at night and weekends to try to meet targets as we get in trouble if we don’t.

      Of course all other services are struggling so we are not able to help with things like housing, mental health support, drug and alcohol services, which is making the people we supervise angry and when they have nothing to lose, they don’t care if they go to prison.

      To top it all off, our annual pay deal ran out this year and the unions have been trying to sort a new one for 11 months but the government and HMPPS are ignoring them completely. We should have had an annual pay rise in October, backdated to April but we’ve had nothing and no sign of anything. Some support staff will be on minimum wage, if that (obviously if that’s the case something will have to be done) once the new minimum wage starts.

      So yeah, it’s all a very big mess and there is very little media interest in it.

      Delete
    2. I notice one response suggests action:-

      "I feel for you OP and agree there is very little media spotlight put upon probation services, in contrast to care/ education sector etc. I have a very close friend who works in an ancillary service for people on probation and is surrounded by colleagues who left probation who simply burnt out and had breakdowns due to the pressure. You're dealing with some extremely dangerous people so security should be their first concern. Would you consider writing to a newspaper like the guardian to try and get some media coverage? I'm sure they would be very very interested in what you have to say and you could remain anonymous? Change can only happen when enough people kick up a fuss and whistle blow."

      Delete
    3. The reply is very interesting:-

      "Thanks I’m going to do it this weekend! We are basically social workers who also have to try and [deter] people from committing further offences. Oh and if they do, we are heavily scrutinised so we live in fear of one of our cases committing a serious further offences. I literally get anxiety reading the local Police Facebook page, even at weekends. Oh and the worry that our homeless people will freeze to death, literally, that actually happens or take a drug overdose. I’m always worried about someone, or multiple people at a time."

      Delete
  13. On BBC Radio 4 last night and now on BBC Sounds
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002mys8

    A Journey Behind Bars
    Archive on 4

    Pioneering documentary-maker Rex Bloomstein reflects on more than 50 years of television and radio programmes he’s made about the British penal system, offering a unique insight into the events and issues which has led to the current crisis in our prisons.

    Rex’s ground breaking television series about life In Strangeways prison in Manchester - as well as hugely revealing documentaries about prisoners serving life-sentences, the parole system and the work of the Prison Inspectorate - reveals a prison service under huge pressure.

    His programmes observe prisoners sharing single cells, suffering the indignity of slopping out and being treated with contempt by prisoner officers. He’s been witness to neglect of prisoners’ mental illness and summary justice dispensed to those who break the rules. While he has seen reform and improvements over the years, many of the intrinsic shortcomings persist.

    Former Chief Inspector of Prisons, Nick Hardwick, argues that prison simply does not work. Sir Marin Narey, former Director General of the prison service reveals how his decision to join the prison service, and his commitment to a policy of introducing decency to prison life, was inspired by watching Rex’s 1979 documentary cataloguing the demeaning conditions in Strangeways. And Pia Sinha, chief executive of the Prison Reform Trust, talks about the insidious discrimination which exists in prisons to this day.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Street & home drinking will increase massively in the coming months & years. The recent budget hailed business rate relief but, after a variety of sleights of hand, it seems pubs will face substantial rises in their basic running costs forcing many to close.

    Prepare yourselves for a skyrocketing of drink-fuelled domestic abuse events & public order offences as folk buy cheaply from supermarkets because their local pub has either closed or is forced to charge £10 a pint.

    The next step will be group drinking at home, turning domestic premises into gatherings for friends to drink, make noise, argue & fight; and the growth in illicit alcohol making.

    What a shower of blinkered shyte this blue labour govt is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon 11:22 Just catching up with this consequence of the Budget and negative effect on pubs - very bad news indeed from several standpoints and will do some research. Thanks a lot for flagging it up.

      Delete
  15. Jim in response to 06:49

    This brings us nearly onto the Narey Legacy.

    Reading this powerful and painful thread, it’s clear we are diagnosing the symptoms of a disease that was deliberately engineered into our system. To fully understand "what probation has become," we must look back at the influence of Sir Martin Narey.

    As the former Director General of the Prison Service and a dominant voice in penal policy, Narey was a chief advocate for the managerialist, "what works" culture that stripped probation of its soul. He championed the idea that probation should be a service primarily focused on risk management and enforcement, modelled more on a corrections agency than a social work service.

    His philosophy, embraced and expanded by New Labour and subsequent governments, directly led to:

    · The sidelining of the "advise, assist, and befriend" ethos in favour of a technocratic, target-driven approach.
    · The de-professionalisation of the role, where the ability to input data correctly became more valued than the professional judgement formed through relationship-based practice.
    · The cultural shift that prepared the ground for the eventual dismemberment of the Probation Service through the Transforming Rehabilitation reforms. While TR came later, it was built on the foundation Narey helped pour: the belief that probation was a simple, deliverable commodity, not a complex professional relationship.

    Narey’s vision was of a streamlined, efficient service, but the reality we live with today is its direct consequence: a service that is bureaucratic, morally injured, and unsafe. The "tick-box, authoritarian, breach first" culture so accurately described in the original post is the end-product of that vision.

    He didn't act alone, but he provided the intellectual and operational blueprint for politicians to dismantle a world they never understood. When we talk about an organisation that prioritises "processes over people," we are describing the legacy of Narey's reforms. He is a central figure in the story of how probation was taken from us and replaced with the hollow, dangerous correctional service we have today.
    ANARCHIST PO 🇵🇸

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ANARCHIST PO at 11:53 Oh nice one! That very neatly fits with a blog post in preparation the working title of which is Charge Sheet. I want to name and shame all those who share responsibility for destroying a former gold standard service and creating the utter shower of shit we have today. All names for inclusion welcome.

      Delete
    2. https://probationmatters.blogspot.com/2016/02/a-warning-from-history.html
      ___________________________________________________

      Under the Powers of Criminal Courts Act 1973, a probation order was a community-based sentence that a court could impose instead of sentencing an offender

      Willie Whitelaw -
      The CJA 1982 amended existing law relating to probation and after-care, as detailed in Schedule 11 of the Act, which also set out procedures for dealing with breaches of requirements in probation orders

      Douglas Hurd/David Waddington/Kenneth Baker -
      The 1991 Act changed the status of the probation order to a formal sentence and established the statutory body of HM Inspectorate of Probation

      Followed by a succession of, variously, bullies & incompetents in the Home Sec role:

      Michael Howard/Jack Straw/David Blunkett/Charles Clarke

      1997 OMAct: Probation services: The Act created a new framework for probation services, including the power for the Secretary of State to make arrangements for their provision by private sector entities and the ability to establish probation trusts + Public protection: A core objective is to enhance public protection by providing a framework for managing offenders effectively.

      And then a succession of ideologues as Justice Sec:
      Falconer/Straw/Grayling ... assisted by their sympathetic lock-em-up lackeys in the civil service including narey, spurr, romeo, copple, rees, etc etc.

      Delete
    3. Charge sheet is a very appropriate title. They've changed probation from a rehabilitation focused alternative to custody organisation working within the Criminal Justice System at a localised level, into a nationalised law enforcement agency that sends 3000 people to prison a month!
      Those responsible need a charge sheet and a prosecution for the damage and harm they've caused and continue to cause.

      'Getafix

      Did you ever retrieve your e-mail address Jim?

      Delete
    4. For those who don't believe there's long been a political imperative to discredit & demolish the notion that rehabilitation works, here's a precis of the Blantyre charade by Lord Ramsbotham:

      A chapter of Ramsbotham's book is devoted to the shocking events at HMP Blantyre House, a supreme example of the canker at the heart of the Prison Service.

      "In 2000, this category C prison had an unrivalled reputation under Eoin Maclennan Murray, its governor. It had a liberal ethos and was treated as a resettlement prison. Its reoffending rate was about 8 per cent, compared with more than 50 per cent in the adult prison population. The nature of the regime was not to the liking of Tom Murtagh, the area manager, who sought to introduce practices more appropriate to a closed prison, and failed to deal with requests for increased staffing. Such was his behaviour that the board of visitors wrote to the director-general to complain that the area manager was making life impossible for the governor. Even recent commendations of Blantyre's excellence by Ramsbotham and by a select committee could not prevent Murtagh from taking steps to remove the governor. On Tuesday May 2, Murtagh put 84 police officers in riot gear on standby to search Blantyre on the the following Friday night. But a search could be authorised only by the governor. On the Friday morning, Murtagh arrived at Blantyre, abruptly removed Maclennan Murray and told him that he was to leave the prison and hand over to a new governor immediately. The new governor then went through the charade of "authorising" the pre-planned search. Little of significance was found. The effect on the prison was disastrous.

      More important, in Ramsbotham's view, was the failure of Paul Boateng, the prisons minister, or of Martin Narey, director-general of the Prison Service, or indeed of Jack Straw, the home secretary, to investigate properly what had happened or to accept that a ghastly mistake had been made. Instead, there was an attempt to cover up."

      Delete
    5. Anon 13:19 Had completely forgotten about Blantyre House! Thanks for the reminder.

      Delete
    6. 'Getafix at 13:28 I'm afraid Virgin completely lost it and so I've rather stupidly not been contactable for ages - allsorts may well have gone unnoticed including attempts by press and media - although I'm sure they are aware of my Twitter handle. I really ought to get another email account, especially in view of what's kicking off. Thanks for the nudge - hope you are ok? Your contributions always very welcome and particularly your sleuthing efforts! Cheers, Jim

      Delete
  16. Ending up with their dream whereby the state, through the tendrils of the nps, now controls all aspects of the cjs, including probation and the courts. It may now be too much to turn around, without political will powe

    ReplyDelete
  17. A truly damning charge sheet is being compiled here, and rightly so.

    To the list of names, we must add the architects of the final, catastrophic act: Chris Grayling as the ideologue who wielded the wrecking ball of 'Transforming Rehabilitation', and his hapless successor Michael Gove, who, despite recognising the disaster, did far too little to reverse it. The current incumbent seems content to let the hollowed-out shell of a service limp on, its staff demoralised and its clients failed.

    The shift you describe, from a local, rehabilitative service to a nationalised law-enforcement agency, is the heart of it. The language changed from 'advise, assist, and befriend' to 'enforce, supervise, and recall'. We became not social workers with a statutory footing, but gatekeepers to the prison gates, with recall targets that felt like performance indicators. Sending 3000 people to prison a month isn't a sign of a functioning service; it's a symptom of a system that has given up on redemption.

    The Blantyre House story is the perfect, sickening parallel. It demonstrates that the same contempt for successful, evidence-based rehabilitation existed at the top of the Prison Service. The message was clear: a low reconviction rate was less important than control and conformity. Maclennan Murray was punished for his success, just as the probation service's original ethos was systematically dismantled for its perceived 'softness'.

    They didn't just break a service; they broke a promise. A promise that people could change, and that the state had a role in facilitating that change. The human cost of that betrayal is incalculable.
    ANARCHIST PO 🇵🇸

    ReplyDelete
  18. Sociopaths, however, would not recognise the human cost.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anon 15:10

    Precisely. And that is the most chilling part of the entire debacle.

    The human cost – the broken families, the lost potential, the cycles of reoffending, the despair – is simply not a variable in their calculus. For the ideologue, it's about political dogma and the rigid application of a 'market logic' where it never belonged. For the sociopath, it's about power, control, and the appearance of being 'tough'.

    They see people as units of risk to be managed, not human beings with complex lives to be understood. A recall to prison isn't a personal tragedy and a systemic failure; it's a ticked box, a target met, a risk 'neutralised'. The fact that it often sets someone on a faster track to more serious crime is irrelevant to the short-term spreadsheet.

    The Blantyre House raid was the ultimate expression of this: the violent suppression of a successful, human-centric approach because it didn't fit the controlling, punitive worldview of those in charge. They couldn't measure its value in simple metrics, so they destroyed it.

    The charge sheet, then, isn't just for maladministration or wasting public money. It's for a profound and wilful blindness to humanity, with consequences we are all still paying for.
    ANARCHIST PO 🇵🇸

    ReplyDelete
  20. We seem to be entering a very dark period in history?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anon 16:43

    I came with a compass, to advise and befriend,
    To help a lost soul find a way to the end
    Of a dark, tangled path, to stand by their side,
    With a value of justice, a purpose, a guide.

    But the compass is broken, the map is a lie,
    Replaced by a screen with a blinkless red eye.
    It counts my compliance, my ticks and my checks,
    The weight of the data now bows down my neck.

    “Assist and befriend?” A forgotten, old phrase.
    The mantra is “Process,” and count down the days.
    “Enforce and recall!” the new leadership cries,
    While the light of true help in a deep office dies.

    I’m a social worker, they gave me a caseload,
    Then a lawman’s cold badge and a perilous road.
    I’m told to seek risk in a handshake, a glance,
    And to never, not ever, be given to chance.

    My desk is a fortress of files and of fears,
    Of silent goodbyes and unshed, bitter tears.
    For the man who’s now homeless, the woman who’s using,
    The system’s cold cogs are just brutally bruising.

    I’m haunted by faces, the ones I can’t save,
    From the churn of the recall, the pull of the grave.
    I’m told to show compassion, to practice with care,
    But the culture we have is a soul-baring snare.

    They speak of “moral injury,” clinical, cold,
    A wound that is sold when your conscience is sold.
    It’s the chasm that grows between what’s right and the task,
    The answer you know, but are too weary to ask.

    So the rage and the grief find a home in this blog,
    A cry from the heart, a dis-spirited log.
    Of a service that’s sick, that treats people like shit,
    From the client to staff, who are forced to submit.

    But sometimes, a moment, a flicker of trust,
    A person, not casefile, rising from dust.
    A “thank you” that’s genuine, a small, hard-won start…
    That flicker still beats in my professional heart.

    Though the badge that they gave me feels heavy and cold,
    A story of humanity, waiting, untold.
    ANARCHIST PO 🇵🇸

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OMG. Spot on and captures the situation. A truly inspirational poem this.

      Delete
    2. That’s amazing anarchist po. So true!

      Delete
    3. Wow nice and reflective anarchist. Well done

      Delete
  22. So good, thanks for posting... 16.43

    ReplyDelete
  23. Hi Jim, I've read your blog for 10 years plus, it began as a useful guide to the mystery of Probation to me but this last year has fully decended into a place to shout in the wind although I understand why and have partaken in moaning as much as anyone!

    Maybe this blog could be used to formulate a plan and exchange ideas to really rally staff including those who aren't on here and to look at practical steps to push for change. My view is that will only be through a complete change in NAPO leadership and then a huge push to massively increase membership, if this means slashing monthly fees and visting every office on a rolling basis to extol the virtue so be it. I don't think I've ever seen a Napo rep in my office and I'm based in Birmingham. Just a thought...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon 20:21 Many thanks for both reading and contributing over the years. This endeavour has always been a team effort and in my experience 'goes with the flow'. To a large extent it's agenda responds pretty much to whatever the prevailing mood and discourse is running in the probation world at any given time. Trying to overtly steer and manage things has never borne much fruit in my experience, but believe me I've tried over the years! I've come to accept its role is to try and be a platform for discussion and debate, to highlight the folly of the direction we're being taken in and provide the audit trail for future historians and researchers to understand how and why it's all going wrong. I remain passionate about the probation concept and ethos and know I had the best of times being part of it. I believe it can be an agent for good again, but not as part of HMPPS and the civil service.

      Delete
  24. All government departments, including town halls now have security. We instruct some very dangerous, violent and unpredictable people to attend appointments with us and I have noticed in my 23 years as a probation officer that there is a distinct deterioration in their attitude towards us. Unfortunately, it was only going to be a matter of time until serious incidents occurred. We are told by management that we must take safety precautions, however how can you plan for an incident such as a stabbing in an office? We are on the front line often explaining to offenders why children’s services will be involved with their family and they may lose the right to see their children, why they maybe recalled or that they are now in breach of their order and as a result may go to prison, information that often provokes a reaction. If the ministry of justice really want to keep us safe then offices need security. It is no good telling staff that they need to learn how to manage such a situation, I would rather offenders did not enter the building carrying offensive weapons in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  25. The Line We Used to Walk


    There was a time when probation in England
    stood on the softer ground of hope—
    a practice built on patience,
    on conversation,
    on the simple belief that change grows best
    in the presence of trust.
    Advise, assist, befriend
    was more than a motto;
    it was a way of meeting people
    where they were,
    and walking with them toward where they could be.

    But the centre has shifted.
    Policy, panic, and headlines have pulled the work
    into colder territory—
    a landscape governed by algorithms,
    “risk,”
    and endless demands to monitor, enforce, recall.
    Clipboards now speak louder than compassion,
    and the door that once opened to rehabilitation
    revolves faster and faster
    with unnecessary recalls and shattered confidence.

    The human cost is mounting.
    Two probation officers have been stabbed in recent months,
    leaving colleagues stunned, grieving,
    and painfully aware of the dangers
    that rarely make the news.
    Their empty chairs haunt the office,
    quiet reminders of how exposed,
    how undervalued,
    frontline staff have become.

    Morale is sinking—not for lack of commitment,
    nor courage,
    but because so many feel the soul of the job
    is slipping away.
    The role that once built bridges
    is now asked to build barriers.
    The work that once changed lives
    now too often revolves around
    fear of failure,
    fear of scrutiny,
    fear of blame.

    And yet—
    beneath the weight of it all,
    a stubborn spark remains.
    Call it belief, call it duty,
    call it the memory of what probation once was
    and what, one day,
    it could be again.

    Because the heart of this profession
    was never meant to beat in time
    with enforcement targets.
    It was meant to beat
    for people—
    all their complexity,
    their possibility,
    their imperfect, necessary hope.

    ReplyDelete