Whilst probation remains tied to HMPPS and MoJ control, there's very little hope that resources will be directed towards community sentencing options when it's realised just how serious the prison crisis is. Of course its also well known that the MoJ are not very good at either project management or the contracting out of services. This from the Independent:-
Revealed: The eye-watering cost of letting prisons crumble
The ageing prison estate is in a dire condition after years of neglect, but the cost of outsourcing basic repairs is spiralling out of control, with shower upgrades in one prison set to cost taxpayers £7.8m, Amy-Clare Martin reports
Taxpayers are footing the bill for “eyewatering” and grossly inflated repair costs at prisons across the country as the government scrambles to keep overcrowded jails running after decades of neglect, The Independent can reveal. Private contracting costs for basic upgrades are “out of control”, the Prison Officers’ Association (POA) has warned, describing the situation as a “public disgrace” that is failing to deliver value for money.
Meanwhile, prison conditions are worse than ever, with a soaring maintenance backlog approaching £2bn, having doubled from 2020 to 2024. Some prisons are so dire that in 2023, a German court refused to extradite a criminal to Britain due to fears over inhumane conditions. A quarter of prisoners in England and Wales are locked in jails which are not fire safe, while hundreds are held in cells without toilets and forced to defecate in buckets and bags if there aren’t enough staff to let them out to use the toilet overnight.
Labour MP Kim Johnson said: “The taxpayer has been paying twice over: first for underinvestment and bad contracts, then for the premium of reactive maintenance and emergency measures.”
It is feared hundreds of millions have been spent on exorbitant private sector contracts dished out by the Ministry of Justice, whose procurement has been slammed as “reactive and expensive” by the public spending watchdog. An investigation by The Independent has uncovered tens of millions worth of spiralling costs for simple repairs and evidence of a sector in chaos, including:
Meanwhile, prison conditions are worse than ever, with a soaring maintenance backlog approaching £2bn, having doubled from 2020 to 2024. Some prisons are so dire that in 2023, a German court refused to extradite a criminal to Britain due to fears over inhumane conditions. A quarter of prisoners in England and Wales are locked in jails which are not fire safe, while hundreds are held in cells without toilets and forced to defecate in buckets and bags if there aren’t enough staff to let them out to use the toilet overnight.
Labour MP Kim Johnson said: “The taxpayer has been paying twice over: first for underinvestment and bad contracts, then for the premium of reactive maintenance and emergency measures.”
It is feared hundreds of millions have been spent on exorbitant private sector contracts dished out by the Ministry of Justice, whose procurement has been slammed as “reactive and expensive” by the public spending watchdog. An investigation by The Independent has uncovered tens of millions worth of spiralling costs for simple repairs and evidence of a sector in chaos, including:
- A project to upgrade 50 showers at HMP Wandsworth, estimated to cost £13m. The MoJ later said the price came out lower than forecast at £7.8m (£6.5m plus VAT), the equivalent of £156,000 per shower
- A new £12m healthcare centre not in use three years after its scheduled opening date due to fire door issues, unfinished cabling and problems with an air conditioning unit
- £196m worth of upgrades at HMP Liverpool, HMP Birmingham and HMP Guys Marsh left in limbo after the building firm collapsed
- Temporary boilers in use for seven years at HMP Lincoln, which the prisons inspector warned cost more than a permanent replacement
Steve Gillan, general secretary of the POA, said: “If the general public knew the charges for basic things to be done... it’s eyewatering, and at the end of the day, they are the taxpayers paying for it. It is not value for money, and it’s an absolute disgrace that taxpayers are footing these bills, which are out of control. No one seems to be very transparent about what’s going on.”
The union, which represents 32,000 prison staff, insists the Conservative government’s decision to privatise all prison maintenance in 2015 was an “utter disaster” as prisons descended into further disrepair. Basic prison maintenance contracts were awarded to two firms, although one collapsed three years later, while larger upgrade and infrastructure projects are put out to tender. More than 4,100 cells have been lost to dilapidation since 2010, despite an overcrowding crisis that means every cell is needed.
Offset against the 6,500 new prison places completed by 2024 – way below the government’s target of 20,000 – this means the net number of available cells has only increased by 1,005 places. The cost per place to protect a cell from being lost to disrepair is between £8,600 and £12,700, the prison service estimates, compared to around £220,000 to build a cell at a new prison. HMP Millsike, a 1,500-cell category C prison in East Yorkshire which opened in March, cost an estimated £400m.
The POA has been lobbying Labour to make good on its manifesto commitment to usher in the biggest wave of insourcing in a generation and bring works back in-house, but fears the government is set to continue the private sector model.
“When you report a problem, it can be anything from six weeks to two months until the very basic stuff is fixed,” Mr Gillan said. “When I used to work on the landing at Chelmsford, you used to phone up the works department, take round a little slip and it would be done the same day.”
Squalid cells
When a local pressure group began to investigate conditions inside overcrowded HMP Wandsworth, which was subject to an urgent notification last year after inspectors found prisoners were spending 22 hours a day in squalid cells, they were met with resistance when they raised questions over the sky-high cost of upgrades. They also questioned why a newly constructed £12m healthcare centre at the south London Victorian prison was not in use three years after its scheduled opening date of October 2021.
The Independent Monitoring Board had also demanded answers over its opening date in its last two annual reports and criticised the project as a “major failure of procurement” because it has no residential beds, despite “totally inadequate” provision at the prison.
In response to a freedom of information request, the prison service revealed the delays were caused by fire door issues, cabling and telecommunications issues, and problems with the air conditioning unit in the pharmacy. It said the centre, which cost £12.48m (£10.4m plus VAT), was finally in use in March this year.
£156,000 for one shower
It also emerged that a proposed £13m project to upgrade a shower block will replace just 50 showers and take almost five years. This later came out lower than forecast at £7.8m (£6.5m plus VAT), the MoJ said, which is the equivalent of £156,000 per shower.
When the Wandsworth Prison Improvement Campaign pressed for more information, it was told that the prison services “do not have the capacity to respond to your latest set of questions”. The letter, dated April 2025, from Ian Blakeman, a director at His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) London, concluded: “We do not consider that there is benefit to HMP Wandsworth or the prisoners detained there in continuing this correspondence.”
Tom Wheatley, the chair of the Prison Governors’ Association, said privatisation has been “incredibly frustrating” for governors who are no longer able to commission repairs. “When I was first a prison governor, the maintenance staff were employees in my direct management,” he said. “I felt in control of that stuff.”
Abandoned plans
Now, governors are at the mercy of their MoJ landlords, while private contractors charge a premium for the inconvenience of working in a prison environment. Some have got so fed up that they have started their own initiatives, using prisoners to carry out repairs.
When he was running HMP Wakefield from 2018 to 2024, Mr Wheatley was left staggered after learning that replacing a single shower in a supervision unit would cost more than £40,000.
He explained: “Contractors in that environment need to be security cleared to a really high standard. We then place lots of restrictions around when they can come in and out, and how long it takes for them to come in and out. They have to be supervised all the time, and then there’s periods of the day where we don’t let them work. The contractor then thinks, in order to do this bit of work at the prison, instead of this being a job that’s going to take two blokes two days, it’s now going to take two blokes six days. And during those six days, you are going to have to turn down other work. So that’s why it’s so expensive.”
It also has major implications when private firms go bust. The government was forced to step in and launch a corporate-style Government Facilities Services Limited (GFSL) when the firm tasked with maintaining prisons across southern England, Carillion, failed in 2018.
A £56m scheme to upgrade HMP Liverpool has been left an abandoned building site after contractors ISG collapsed last year. The building firm was one of the government’s biggest contractors for upgrades and prison expansion, leaving many projects in limbo.
Work has only recently resumed with replacement builders at HMP Birmingham, where ISG was refurbishing 300 cells at a cost of £61m, The Independent understands. The full cost to the government of the firm’s collapse is not yet known. It will also delay efforts to bring 23,000 occupied cells that do not meet fire safety standards up to code by the end of 2027, leaving them at risk of enforcement action by the Crown Premises Fire Safety Inspectorate.
Rats and cockroaches
Prisons inspector Charlie Taylor said he regularly sees prisons with costly temporary fixes that are an “enormous” waste of money, while many are held in squalid conditions inside rat- and cockroach-infested jails. “You often see places with temporary buildings, temporary kitchens,” he told The Independent.
“Very often the prison service is spending more money on hiring kit like generator sets or fridges and things like that than it would by just going out and buying the damn things. That’s just astonishing because it’s an enormous waste of money.”
In a recent inspection of HMP Lincoln, he called for urgent investment to replace the temporary heating system, which was “not fit for purpose”. He said “long delays” with getting a new boiler meant the prison had relied for seven years on a temporary solution that had cost far more than getting a replacement.
However, in its response, the government said the boiler would not be upgraded until pipe replacement works to tackle the risk from Legionella bacteria had been completed, which could take until 2028. In 2017, an inmate died after contracting legionnaires’ disease at the prison.
‘Something has gone badly wrong’
Ms Johnson, Labour MP for Liverpool Riverside, is backing the POA’s calls to bring back maintenance in-house. She fears privatisation and neglect have left taxpayers footing the bill for hundreds of millions in avoidable costs.
“It is abundantly clear that the system is not delivering value for money,” she told The Independent. “When basic works like Wandsworth’s £13m shower refurbishment are scheduled to take five years, something has gone badly wrong with scoping, procurement and delivery. It is the exact kind of opaque, delay-ridden contracting that breeds mistrust within the system.”
A report from the National Audit Office (NAO) concluded in January that prison funding had failed to keep pace with policy, which has seen more people jailed for longer, leading to “reactive solutions which represent poor value for money”.
This includes a focus on building new places urgently at increased costs and contingency measures, including hiring police cells at nearly five times the average daily cost of a prison place. HMPPS spent £70m on the emergency measure, known as Operation Safeguard, between February 2023 and September 2024, but cells were only occupied roughly 4 per cent of the time, the report said.
An MoJ spokesperson said:
“This government inherited a prison system in crisis – with crumbling infrastructure, dangerous prisons and hard-working staff under immense pressure. That is why we are focusing efforts on building 14,000 new prison places – with 2,500 already complete – and have announced a £500m investment into long-term prison and probation maintenance so that we always have the cells we need. A 2023 assessment identified that outsourcing prison maintenance contracts to expert private companies would deliver the best value for the taxpayer.”
It all illustrated we have little hope. I just watched Jess Phillips back covering sliding across all questions on the national safety for women and girls inquiry. Oh I mean rape gangs by Muslim men I won't be part of the very obvious and scandalous cover up that is developing.
ReplyDeleteWhere’s your pay rise ? Ha ha
ReplyDeleteI think the the MOJ has us down as sandal wearing hippy types from the 1960s who can be pushed around from pillar to post on the back of our ‘ commitment’ to doing a good job or because of our belief of ‘ rehabilitation’ above all…….those days have gone,mores the pity we now have an ultra professional workforce hampered by the bureaucracy at the top who are slowly being ground down……this is part of the plan……..the move to drop ‘probation’ from our name …..is the first step towards a rebranding to HM Correctional services, tasked only with monitoring and control………you don’t think so? It’s already been mooted and they are now looking for an event ( the continuing flooding of services on the ground) for example to decide that we are no longer interested or can cope with rehabilitation……….then in order to ‘ help us cope’ the plan will be enacted……conspiracy theory? Well they do sat the time between conspiracy theory to conspiracy fact is about six months !
DeleteYour 100percent correct. Don't be fooled though this storyline is very old. An ex aco from best not say I think went to London ended up in Texas fact finding correctional community officers. Alongside looking at programmes we ended up with a national drink impaired drivers programme USA style. 2012 and before these roles were formally discussed as pipeline .
Deletehttps://uk.news.yahoo.com/major-recruitment-drive-launched-next-060949577.html
DeleteA major recruitment drive is being launched across Greater Manchester to bring in the next generation of prison and probation officers. It is part of the Government’s ‘Plan for Change’ to cut crime, reduce prison capacity, and make communities safer.
DeleteThe campaign is calling on those from all walks of life, and particularly men, who are underrepresented in the probation system, to consider a career in prisons or probation.
It comes as Minister of State for Prisons, Probation and Reducing Reoffending, Lord James Timpson, met with staff at Manchester’s Probation Service to see how they’re testing new ways of working to monitor offenders, protect the public and reduce reoffending.
Lord Timpson, who grew up in the North West, said: “I recently met dedicated staff in Manchester and was struck by their unwavering commitment and the pride they take in their work. This is not an easy job - but it’s one that truly makes a difference.
“This work is fulfilling, it’s impactful, and it’s a powerful way to help reduce crime and protect our communities. I hope more people in Manchester will be inspired to join us in this vital mission.”
Probation officers play a vital role in the criminal justice system, protecting the public and reducing reoffending. Their role includes supervising offenders in the community, assessing and managing risk, supporting rehabilitation, and ensuring that those who break the rules face consequences.
Their work is central to the Government’s efforts to strengthen community sentences and tackle the root causes of crime, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Justice said.
Barry Saunders, a probation officer in Greater Manchester, who previously worked as a baker, said: “This is a chance to join a profession that can help offenders to make positive life changes, cut crime and keep communities safe. It’s a tough job and when I first joined it felt daunting, but if you thrive in a fast-paced environment and enjoy working with complex people this could be the job for you.
“We’re looking for people who care about their local area and want to be part of something bigger. If you want a career with purpose, we want to hear from you.”
The MOJ is also calling for prison officers at HMP Manchester.
Dean Arnold, a head of function at HMP Manchester, said: “I wanted a career that felt more meaningful and something where I could make a difference as part of a strong team. With a background in public service through both work and education, “I’d often walked past HMP Manchester but never seen inside. Joining the prison service was a steep learning curve, but I’ve found the camaraderie incredibly rewarding. There are real opportunities to grow, progress, help people and develop new skills as a prison officer.”
The recruitment campaign will run throughout the autumn, with roles available across Greater Manchester in prisons, probation and community payback.
Full training is provided, and flexible entry routes are available for graduates and experienced professionals alike.
Sorry, almost missed this in the midst of Squealer's proclamation:
Delete"Minister of State for Prisons, Probation and Reducing Reoffending, Lord James Timpson, met with staff at Manchester’s Probation Service to see how they’re testing new ways of working to monitor offenders, protect the public and reduce reoffending."
* TO SEE HOW THEY'RE TESTING NEW WAYS OF WORKING *
Oh? What might they be then?
napo, have you been consulted on this? If so, why haven't you consulted members? If not, why aren't you shouting about it?
Anon 21:51 Could this be a reference to the trial using AI to record interviews and prepare records of meetings - Part C's? I spoke to someone in Eastbourne who explained they were using this for a tial period and how impressed thay were with it.
DeleteAye Jim, it could... but unless someone tells us what's happening in these secret pockets of experimentation we'll never know. Its public money being spent under cover of silence, presumably filling the pockets of undisclosed private companies via "commercially sensitive" gagging orders. Where are the unions' voices in this? Were any such 'new ways of working' disclosed/discussed at conference? If not, why not? They had the Chief Probation Officer (who she?) in the building.
Delete£156,00÷4 = £39,000.
ReplyDeleteSurely for the cost of just one shower, four full time maintenance positions could be created within the prison?
An in-house workshop department?
That's how it worked before austerity cuts.
Have to wonder just how expensive austerity has turned out to be?
It's probably little wonder that the MoJ can't even find the money to pay its fines. Maybe unpaid work would have been a more suitable punishment?
Couldn't make this up!
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/ministry-of-justice-convicted-crime-speeding-single-justice-procedure-manchester-b1254024.html
'Getafix
With that £11billion it’d be most cost effective to buy a one-bed flat each for half the prisoners in custody.
ReplyDeleteProbably could even buy a few small islands and turn them into a paradise of halfway houses.
Repeat offenders are continuing to “cause mayhem” in their communities thanks to the failure of prisons to provide education, training and work that could support rehabilitation and help to break the cycle of offending, warns the Chief Inspector of Prisons in a thematic review published today.
ReplyDelete‘Just passing time’: A review of work and training provision in adult prisons’ reveals a deeply concerning picture of far too few activity spaces for the prison population, poor attendance in classes and work, and a failure to make sure prisoners develop the skills that will help them to stop reoffending. This already unacceptable situation is only likely to get worse as real-terms cuts begin to eat into already stretched education provision.
The lack of adequate purposeful activity has been a failing in prisons for many years, and since the pandemic outcomes have deteriorated further: in the last three years HMI Prisons has rated provision in 94 of 104 closed prisons as ‘poor’ or ‘not sufficiently good’. This thematic review, which took place alongside inspections of 11 men’s and two women’s prisons, reveals that, despite pockets of effective provision delivered by dedicated, creative staff, too many prisoners spend their days locked in their cells, and overcrowding, a lack of workshop space and instructors, equipment failures and ageing infrastructure have compounded the situation.
Many prisoners wait weeks to be allocated an activity space and are often given what is available, rather than training that is relevant to their career prospects on release, motivating them to attend and giving them the skills and qualifications they need to gain employment. For those who do gain a space, there is no guarantee they will be able to attend: regime curtailments, security lockdowns and staff indifference about unlocking prisoners meant average attendance was just 67% in the prisons visited for this review. Even when work goes ahead, full-time jobs generally occupy prisoners for just five hours a day, with many roles split into part-time places to stretch meagre provision further, which fails to prepare them for holding down a job in the community.
It is perhaps not surprising, therefore, that the prison service’s own measures indicate that at least two-thirds of prisoners are not in work or training six months after release. Looming cuts to education delivery in prisons are likely to make matters even worse. The Inspectorate has been told that most jails are facing at least a 20% reduction in their budget and some governors are expecting up to 50%, meaning many teachers and instructors are being made redundant.
We found some examples of effective work and training provision, but the reality was that only a handful of prisoners were benefitting. Far too many spent their days locked in their cells, often in squalid, overcrowded conditions with nothing to do but take drugs and watch daytime TV.
I have serious concerns about the impact of real-terms education budget cuts on already inadequate provision and about the lack of real appetite and ambition for improvement that this represents. The prison service has a duty to protect the public by making prisoners less likely to reoffend when they are released, but too often it is failing to fulfil this responsibility. There is little doubt that many prisoners already leave jail and return to criminality, creating more victims of crime. These devastating cuts are likely to make this situation worse.
The best governors know that jails, and ultimately our communities, are safer if prisoners are purposefully occupied, and that education, training and work play a vital role in motivating prisoners to turn their lives around. Until leaders in the prison service take the provision of high-quality education and training more seriously, it is hard to see how appallingly high reoffending rates can be reduced.
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons, Charlie Taylor
"It is feared hundreds of millions have been spent on exorbitant private sector contracts dished out by the Ministry of Justice"
ReplyDeleteSurely not? We've had rigorous monitoring & control by a succession of ministers & senior civil servants who have nothing if not accountable for their scrupulous management of public funds.
Chris Grayling, Michael Gove, Liz Truss, David Lidington, David Gauke, Robert Buckland, Dominic Raab, Brandon Lewis, Dominic Raab, Alex Chalk, Shabana Mahmood, David Lammy
Ursula Brennan, Michael Spurr, Antonia Romeo, Jo Farrar, Amy Rees, Phil Copple, James McEwen + the army of regional directors with oversight of their portion of the public purse.
How could it possibly have gone wrong?
Purposeful activity and rehabilitation?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.merseyside.police.uk/news/merseyside/news/2025/october-2025/thirteen-people-charged-in-connection-with-conspiracy-to-smuggle-drugs-into-prisons/
'Getafix
Thirteen people have been charged following a joint investigation between Merseyside Police and HM Prison and Probation Service Serious Organised Crime Unit into a conspiracy to smuggle drugs into prisons.
DeleteThe charges relate to allegations of Class B drugs, namely Spice, being conveyed into HMP Frankland and HMP Isle of Wight (Hampshire) between April 2022 and January 2024, and a conspiracy to supply Class B drugs, namely Spice between April 2022 and January 2024.
All will appear at Liverpool Magistrates Court on Tuesday 25 November.
Detective Constable Dave Rutherford said: “We remain committed to working with our partners, including HM Prison and Probation Service, to target those who attempt to bring drugs and other prohibited items into prisons.
“We will continue to respond to all pieces of evidence we receive and would encourage the public to come forward with any information and let us take positive action.”
BBC News website:-
ReplyDeleteHome Secretary Shabana Mahmood has said her department is "not yet fit for purpose" after an internal report labelled it dysfunctional and detached from its core functions.
Mahmood, who took office last month, said the Home Office had been "set up to fail" but said she was working to rebuild it so it "delivers for this country".
Her comments come after a "damning" report uncovered by The Times newspaper found a "culture of defeatism" on immigration and failures making it harder to tackle crime and small boats crossings.
The report, by the former Home Office special adviser Nick Timothy - who is now a Conservative MP - was commissioned in 2022 by the then home secretary Suella Braverman.
Timothy was given access to the department and officials to carry out a two-month review of its effectiveness.
He found "too much time is wasted" on identity politics and social issues at the Home Office, including "listening circles" in working hours in which civil servants meet to discuss their feelings about social and political issues.
He warned that the department's performance was "uneven" with fragmented structures and no single official responsible for the immigration system as a whole.
Among the most serious criticisms was the handling of asylum and immigration. The report described the system as "lethargic", with a backlog of 166,000 asylum cases and interviews often delayed for up to two years.
Timothy found many civil servants refuse to work in immigration because they were either "ethically" opposed to controlling borders or fear the blame when things go wrong.
It said the asylum process took an overly "defensive approach", with "assessments of likely legal challenge, and even the possibility of defeat" used "as a reason not to do something".
He also highlighted chronic problems with data and technology, warning that the department relied on outdated systems that made it "impossible to answer straightforward questions quickly".
Timothy dismissed calls to split up the department, calling it a "distraction from the delivery of core business".
Instead he called for urgent investment in modern, interoperable systems to improve decision-making.
"This report, written under the last Government, is damning. To those who have encountered the Home Office in recent years, the revelations are all too familiar.
"The Home Office is not yet fit for purpose, and has been set up for failure. As this report shows, the last Conservative government knew this, but failed to do anything about it.
"Things are now changing. I will work, with the new permanent secretary, to transform the Home Office so that it delivers for this country."
Mahmood's words echo those of former Labour Home Secretary John Reid, whose warning two decades ago sparked one of Whitehall's biggest shake-ups.
In May 2006, Reid told MPs the immigration system was "not fit for purpose" following revelations foreign prisoners had been released without being considered for deportation.
Reid's warning triggered major reforms that created the Ministry of Justice to run prisons and probation.
A senior source told the BBC that Permanent Secretary Antonia Romeo aims to make the Home Office "the 'blue-chip' department of Whitehall, and the destination department for top talent".
"Antonia will be relentless in transforming the Home Office to get it match fit," the source said.
From Reddit:-
DeleteSome quotes that ring close to home for someone who has been in the CS for quite a while -
“Ask what is going on and you get multiple different spreadsheets from multiple people.” Another said: “It takes a team of people weeks to answer a straightforward question.”
“Operational staff were “undervalued and neglected,” the report said. It found that while a “grade six official” at headquarters on a salary of about £70,000 “might lead a small team working on policy that is neither a ministerial priority nor subject to significant change”, an equivalent Border Force official was “responsible for all passenger operations at Heathrow airport”.
“Departmental record keeping was woefully inadequate, the report said. Officials were often forced to “rely on memory” to find key information. Some officials in the immigration system were reduced to tracking cases on Excel spreadsheets, before these were replaced by an even more difficult to use system.”
“Senior officials often know too little about the operational reality to adequately inform and advise ministers, the report said, and ministers were not given sufficient access to frontline staff who understand the operational reality. In turn ministers find it difficult to trust the system to do the things it says it will.”
These ministers haven’t got a clue. She’ll do exactly what she did to HMPPS… shake things up to grab a few headlines, make things much worse, and then move on to the next promotion once the fizz has gone flat.
DeleteThe problem isn’t just senior officials, it’s also the layers of probation senior managers who keep playing along. Probation needs to stop bending the knee to HMPPS, stop feeding rose-tinted accounts to Ministry of Justice officials and HMIP, and stop rolling out the red carpet for ministers chasing photo opportunities.
We said all of this time and time again.
They won't though will they. Not everyone liked the Trusts pre-TR but at least having Chief Officers in each semi-independent Trust meant they fought back to a degree, not enough and not all the time but at least it felt like they pushed back and had a voice. Now all the managers are too scared and the few that you know hate what they do have no avenue to make a difference
DeleteSo many 'chiefs' in the trust model were cock-a-hoop with their trouser-filling salaries & totalitarian grasp on local power that too few were prepared or able to push back, which diluted the impact of any arguments against. The draw of 'the centre' proved too much for many & they just couldn't help but bend the knee in the hope of a noms/hmpps posting or gong. The right-leaning, highly skilled manipulator spurr & his successors fiddled merrily away in their noms/hmpps ivory tower, stroking the overblown egos of a range of tory ministers while feeding the fragile egos of the wannabes in the trusts. It was a lesson in the ideological deconstruction & reformation of an organisation ; something that blue labour had been working on with successive home/justice secs (straw/blunkett/clarke/reid), culminating in the bunkerbusting 2007 Act.
DeleteI can only speak of a couple of chiefs who aided tr. The ones who were going spoke up as they had sorted deals except London she just waited for the payout. My local chief had his deal but in management TR meetings tried to sell it to senior grades . When challenged by a particularly clever and aggressive tone by a Napo representative the chiefs outburst said it all. Telling him it can't be changed these plans are all being done with graylings friends . No one else spoke up it was fractious but it showed no other person was going to argue it. Tr rolled in national Napo sold out every fighting unionist and management didn't argue.
DeleteProbation Chief Officers enabled TR to happen. They ALL either sold us out or kept quiet to ensure their pensions and enhanced redundancy payments. Some even came back and worked on the TR programme which was paying around £300 a day at one point.
DeleteAt that time CPOs were on something akin to £90k+ and all were offered three years protected pay to push the disaster, safe in the knowledge that if they stayed they trousered a nice little sweetener and if they continued they had showed their masters that they were loyal ………win,win for them but for us at the bottom,deprofessionalisation, the fear of being allocated to a CRC which further supported the destruction of probation despite some great innovative work being carried out by individuals……it stank then and there is another aroma rising re the change to UK Correctional services……..still the quasi police among us will get to wear a cool uniform at long last…..
ReplyDeleteYes I saw that description played out . The destructive crcs were rubbish. It did not matter they could not deliver they were used to break the service up. Their rewards go steal the monies including redundancy cash was a silent promise. Napo did not see employers would renage on agreements. Why not ? Employers never follow agreements it makes Lawrence look both naive and incompetent. He colluded when he failed to challenge at law the non agreed rates or changed offers. The takers undermined the agreements . In just one area pre the agreement the management had already ratified a redundancy policy with Napo local branch that adopted the national agreement rates. These local policies were agreed as protected pre vesting day. That branch protected its members from reduced offers by employers the only branch to do so. Napo central demonstrated their incompetence shown up by one who saw it coming but Napo central ignored the alert.
Deletehttps://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/probation-officers-to-benefit-from-governments-ai-deal/5124849.article
ReplyDelete'Getafix
Note-taking by probation officers will be the next Ministry of Justice function to be assisted by artificial intelligence, the government has revealed. The lord chancellor said today that 1,000 officers are to be equipped with Justice Transcribe, an in-house AI tool which automatically records and transcribes conversations with offenders.
ReplyDeleteThe technology will transform the probation service, David Lammy said. 'We’re cutting the burdensome admin and ensuring frontline staff can spend more of their time doing the things only humans can do – monitoring offenders and protecting the British public.'
Earlier, in his capacity as deputy prime minister, Lammy unveiled a government-wide deal with US pioneer OpenAI, developer of the ChatGPT family of systems. The deal tackles one of several outstanding obstacles to the use of personal data for training systems: for the first time OpenAI will offer services to organisations which require data to be stored in the UK.
'This will enable British businesses to host data on secure, sovereign servers not only enhances privacy and accountability but reinforces national resilience in the face of growing global cyber threats,' the announcement stated. 'This bold step is expected to unlock further investment from businesses by providing them with the confidence that their data is being managed securely in UK, allowing both government and companies to expand their use of AI and accelerate economic growth.'
Earlier this year courts minister Sarah Sackman announced her ambition for the MoJ to become the 'leading digital and AI department in government’. Under its action plan the ministry set up an AI unit charged with identifying possibilities for deploying the technology in areas such as generating transcriptions of tribunal proceedings as well as probation officers' notes.
Earlier this week the government announced that a new AI Growth Lab will provide a safe space for regulators and businesses to test where current rules may be inhibiting innovation and adoption.
OpenAI's founder, Sam Altman, said: 'Civil servants are using ChatGPT to improve public services and established firms are reimagining operations. We’re proud to continue supporting the UK and the government’s AI plan.'
Thank God we are able to edit the notes prior to uploading them to Delius, allows me time to delete all the chats I have about how shite Police, Prisons and Probation are with my caseload
DeleteNo point at all in reams of notes in case records. And if you have to edit it first even less point of it. We’ll all be pressing the summary button and those 10000 words from a 30 minute meeting will be reduced to “attended, next appointment provided”. Ai is not going to help with access to housing, jobs and others services.
DeleteThe release of ai was stated on this blog in the last couple of weeks. 1 to reduce staff and 2 it will double your caseloads it won't free you from a desk. It seems to me at the least most commentators miss the cynical approach from the authority and have to wait for a minister even as thick as lamy is before you start to realise this is no panacea. This is driving efficiencies squeezing the nuts crushing the grapes sweating the most expensive asset that's staffing. As less go to a crowded jail and more are released to community you all going to love ai summaries so you can see the next one as you'll have hundreds . Again you have been able to read it here first.
DeleteManagement have had the ability to alter, amend and edit case notes in DELIUS for years. That’s why whenever there is an SFO they are exonerated and case managers are hung out to dry.
ReplyDeleteI worked with someone who was bullied, and that included, I was told, the altering of notes leading to their dismissal. Despicable, weak management.
ReplyDeleteYes completely believable there are many known examples of aco rewriting appraisals fraudulent conduct. Lying making up stories and all too often get away with it. A few have been caught tho and have had to go. Since the automation of sscl mindless bureaucratic dogma bullies staff out instead. Mindless loop of the prison policies eradicating ours thanks to Napo ignorance. The odd thing is tho prisons don't dismiss for alcohol issues staff are fully sssited on that issue.
Deletehttps://www.nao.org.uk/reports/building-an-effective-and-resilient-probation-service/
ReplyDeleteAt last an official review acknowledging that everything has got worse since reunification in 2021 and that the service only has half as many front line officers that it should have. It also alludes to the fact that they were always aware that WMT never accurately assessed how much time went into each task so caseload 'points' are a fabrication. Come on NAPO, start shouting across the Media about this and get us the pay rise we deserve. No wonder all the top bosses left recently
Absolutely and it’s no secret.
DeleteThe past two decades have witnessed a service marked by fragmentation, privatisation, and eventual reunification, developments that have weakened its identity. Critics of the Transforming Rehabilitation reforms warned these changes would undermine evidence-based practices and restrict professional development. Indeed, the Chief Inspector of Probation later described the reforms as “irredeemably flawed”. The unification process that followed remains “a painful process whose end state remains elusive”.
Napo says nothing proper or useful to anyone. The morning star publish them because they don't fill column. Lawrence is deliberately weak he looking for recognition he wants a gong a place in the lord's he's been quoted for wanting. We all know that's a naive dreamers idiocy. We need a capable union leader . Mr lynch knew how to represent his members. He was so steadfast articulate he got airtime we love to listen to him. In contrast Napo has a whinny bore who tries to sound able but actually does us down.
DeleteReport into probation service by National Audit Office published today highlighting failures of service.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2025-10-21c.828.0
DeleteLiz Saville-Roberts Plaid Cymru, Dwyfor Meirionnydd
There is no escaping the fact that the Bill will heap extra pressure on the Probation Service, which is slowly coming back from being on its knees following the transformation of rehabilitation under the last Government. I would like to put on the record that, last week, I had the honour of addressing the annual conference of the probation officers union, Napo, in my capacity as co-chair of the justice unions parliamentary group.
Speaker after speaker at the conference, including Chief Inspector Martin Jones, warned that probation officers are under unprecedented pressure and simply cannot cope with their current workload. Staff are genuinely worried that the Bill will make that already acute problem worse and will risk destabilising the service further, which will lead to a greater risk to public protection. That is why, as is proposed in new clause 4, an independent assessment of whether the Probation Service has the capability and the capacity to take on additional work is vital.
New clause 4, which is fully supported by Napo, would require the inspectorate’s approval to be provided before extra pressure is placed on our overstretched Probation Service by provisions in the Bill. It would also empower the inspectorate to trigger special measures for probation delivery units or entire regions, and a prioritisation framework that would give probation officers more flexibility to focus on high-risk cases and drop the non-essential and lower-priority tasks that take up so much of their time.
Since those years when there was so much pressure on the Probation Service, probation officers have effectively been penalised for their willingness to take responsibility for risky decisions, which we are going to require them to make. If we are to enable probation officers to do their work more effectively, we must give them the capacity to think through the risks in order to be prepared not to go ahead on the safest possible route.
Currently, only regional probation directors have the power to ask for their region or unit to be put into the prioritisation framework, the criteria for which I am told is based solely on the number of probation officers. Napo believes that criterion to be wholly inadequate, as it does not take into account the grades of the staff or their workloads, and that it must be broadened to take into account probation officers’ day-to-day workload. Resting such powers with directors also disincentivises the triggering of special measures because it leads to accusations of their being allowed to mark their own homework. If the inspectorate had that power instead, there could be an objective, holistic assessment of the full capacity of that area, which would include much broader criteria than is currently the case. I sincerely hope that the Government will listen and support the spirit, if not the specific text, of new clause 4.
an important debate from 21 october that is lenghty but worthy of reading
DeleteWe’re back to the debate about probation identity. Until that is championed and decided then we’ll continue on this merry-go-round.
Delete“clause 4, an independent assessment of whether the Probation Service has the capability and the capacity to take on additional work is vital.”
DeleteAnd see how quick they conclude probation cannot be adequately paid and resourced to do the “extra work”, but Serco, Sodexo and G4S can.
Sarah Pochin Reform UK, Runcorn and Helsby
DeleteI turn to clauses 24, 36 and 37 with respect to licences. These clauses all give powers to the Probation Service to reduce the length of a community order imposed by the judge or magistrate. The Probation Service is underfunded and overstretched already, and the real risk is that offenders will have their requirements reduced by probation officers in order to free up capacity in the service. The probation officer already has discretion on the number of days of rehabilitation required, and it is dangerous to give any more quasi-judicial power to the Probation Service.
The start of the debate can be found here
Deletehttps://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2025-10-21c.812.0
and there are about 16 pages of transcript (click through using 'next debate' until you reach the last page headed:
Title Sentencing Bill – in the House of Commons at 7:06 pm on 21 October 2025.
this might help as a reference
Deletehttps://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/59-01/0299/en/240299en.pdf
"These Explanatory Notes relate to the Sentencing Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 2 September 2025 (Bill 299). These Explanatory Notes have been prepared by the Ministry of Justice in order to assist the reader. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament."