We’ve all read your cry for help on behalf of probation. And yes, it must be heard. But I can’t help wondering, who exactly are you talking to? Because frontline probation officers don’t need reminding how bad things are, and the public doesn’t really know what we do. We live it every day, as do those in prison and on probation needing our support. What we don’t hear from you is where the buck actually stops.
And perhaps you find that hard to say, where that buck stops, since the top table of HMPPS and the Ministry of Justice changes hands quicker than a brown envelope in the back room of a casino, or a foil packet in a back alley.
Here’s the reality for probation: when you conclude there are “failings in public protection,” we get the blame. When you warn of “further serious failings without urgent reform,” we get the blame. When you say staff “don’t understand enough about risk,” we get the blame.
You cannot in one breath acknowledge the government’s repeated press release that probation is under immense pressure, “with hard-working staff burdened with high workloads,” and in the next follow the same approach implying those same officers should have done more. That contradiction and the consequences lands squarely on us, along with the endless actions, tick-boxes, briefings, and unpaid overtime that follow.
Your own reports already spell it out: probation is broken. Years of privatisation, de-privatisation, restructuring, pay freezes, devalued training, and haemorrhaging expertise have left the probation service in pieces. The role of the probation officer itself has been twisted to serve prisons and political headlines. At times, we play second fiddle to the police, social services, and charities. Some days, probation staff aren’t even sure what probation is meant to be anymore.
And yet, strangely, your reports still praise probation leadership. How is that possible when every probation region is rated “inadequate” or “requires improvement”? Leadership cannot be doing well if the service is collapsing on their watch. Name me one probation leader who has spoken out honestly about any of this, just one.
Meanwhile, on the frontline, caseloads of 40–80 people (many seen weekly) have become standard. We deal with bulk prison releases with no notice. Policy shifts without consultation. SFO reviews and HMIP inspections breathing down our necks. Professional registration and standards piling more weight on our backs. All of it with fewer staff, less time, insulting meagre pay “increases,” and not a single voice championing us.
We are tired. We’ve had the same conversations in staff rooms, with unions, on this blog, at the Probation Institute, with the Prison Reform Trust, even with your own inspectors, about probation pay, conditions, pressures, identity, recruitment, retention, discrimination, probation’s subservience to prisons, and the relentless scrutiny. A colleague in Preston was almost murdered, and still nothing changes.
Instead, we get the same political theatre: Gauke’s fag-packet sentencing notes. Timpson’s novelty rehabilitation speeches. Endless reviews that lead nowhere. Another Justice Secretary talking tough on punishment, tagging, and “public safety.”
The reality? Frontline probation will see none of the £700m “promised,” nor the benefit of the thousands of recruits that never arrive. And as every probation officer knows and will have told your inspectors from Northumberland to Newquay, what people actually need is housing, addiction support, access to healthcare and jobs. Tagging, political soundbites, sabre-rattling, and Ai solve none of that.
Working in probation today feels like a mix of an abusive relationship, Stockholm Syndrome, and a forgotten cold-war system. We’re told to do more with less. To patch up the failures of the entire Criminal Justice System. To JFDI and shoulder the problems and risks when things go wrong. All while our pay stagnates, our professional status collapses, our role evaporates, and literally nobody wants to hear our opinions when we probably hold the best solutions.
So yes, Mr Jones, probation needs urgent reform. But if you are truly crying for help, then cry about this, not at us, but for us. Probation officers deserve a voice unfiltered by inspections, politicians, or “leadership” spin. We know the realities, we carry the risks, and we’re the ones left to pick up the pieces when policy fails. If there is to be a cry for help, let it come from the people trying against all odds to do the job.
Anon (Probation Officer)
And perhaps you find that hard to say, where that buck stops, since the top table of HMPPS and the Ministry of Justice changes hands quicker than a brown envelope in the back room of a casino, or a foil packet in a back alley.
Here’s the reality for probation: when you conclude there are “failings in public protection,” we get the blame. When you warn of “further serious failings without urgent reform,” we get the blame. When you say staff “don’t understand enough about risk,” we get the blame.
You cannot in one breath acknowledge the government’s repeated press release that probation is under immense pressure, “with hard-working staff burdened with high workloads,” and in the next follow the same approach implying those same officers should have done more. That contradiction and the consequences lands squarely on us, along with the endless actions, tick-boxes, briefings, and unpaid overtime that follow.
Your own reports already spell it out: probation is broken. Years of privatisation, de-privatisation, restructuring, pay freezes, devalued training, and haemorrhaging expertise have left the probation service in pieces. The role of the probation officer itself has been twisted to serve prisons and political headlines. At times, we play second fiddle to the police, social services, and charities. Some days, probation staff aren’t even sure what probation is meant to be anymore.
And yet, strangely, your reports still praise probation leadership. How is that possible when every probation region is rated “inadequate” or “requires improvement”? Leadership cannot be doing well if the service is collapsing on their watch. Name me one probation leader who has spoken out honestly about any of this, just one.
Meanwhile, on the frontline, caseloads of 40–80 people (many seen weekly) have become standard. We deal with bulk prison releases with no notice. Policy shifts without consultation. SFO reviews and HMIP inspections breathing down our necks. Professional registration and standards piling more weight on our backs. All of it with fewer staff, less time, insulting meagre pay “increases,” and not a single voice championing us.
We are tired. We’ve had the same conversations in staff rooms, with unions, on this blog, at the Probation Institute, with the Prison Reform Trust, even with your own inspectors, about probation pay, conditions, pressures, identity, recruitment, retention, discrimination, probation’s subservience to prisons, and the relentless scrutiny. A colleague in Preston was almost murdered, and still nothing changes.
Instead, we get the same political theatre: Gauke’s fag-packet sentencing notes. Timpson’s novelty rehabilitation speeches. Endless reviews that lead nowhere. Another Justice Secretary talking tough on punishment, tagging, and “public safety.”
The reality? Frontline probation will see none of the £700m “promised,” nor the benefit of the thousands of recruits that never arrive. And as every probation officer knows and will have told your inspectors from Northumberland to Newquay, what people actually need is housing, addiction support, access to healthcare and jobs. Tagging, political soundbites, sabre-rattling, and Ai solve none of that.
Working in probation today feels like a mix of an abusive relationship, Stockholm Syndrome, and a forgotten cold-war system. We’re told to do more with less. To patch up the failures of the entire Criminal Justice System. To JFDI and shoulder the problems and risks when things go wrong. All while our pay stagnates, our professional status collapses, our role evaporates, and literally nobody wants to hear our opinions when we probably hold the best solutions.
So yes, Mr Jones, probation needs urgent reform. But if you are truly crying for help, then cry about this, not at us, but for us. Probation officers deserve a voice unfiltered by inspections, politicians, or “leadership” spin. We know the realities, we carry the risks, and we’re the ones left to pick up the pieces when policy fails. If there is to be a cry for help, let it come from the people trying against all odds to do the job.
Anon (Probation Officer)
100% yep. good work anon po.
ReplyDeleteYup, you've explained the situation better than Napo ever have, I wish the BBC or Guardian would publish this on the front page....thank you
ReplyDeleteIf this accurate reflection of probation in the 21st century is not listened to we are in danger of imploding……we need SPOs and HOC to stand up and say No to the MOJ but will they? I doubt it really and there in a nutshell is the gap between the empty rhetoric of ‘ good leadership’ and the reality of what is happening on a day to day basis………
ReplyDeleteHaha, nobody listens to SPOs. And the more vocal SPOs always seem to disappear. They’re not allowed in the ivory tower either.
DeleteI don’t know if Martin Jones will get to read this or whether Anon (Probation Officer) would want/hope that to happen ? Certainly, I will share this via a twitter link with my MP and if invited in person to share its contents. I accept it probably wont make any difference but at least it’s something . In these circumstances somethings feels better than nothing
ReplyDeleteI can confirm Anon PO would be very happy if this was shared far and wide. In an ideal world Mr Jones, HMIP, would acknowledge and reply too.
DeleteI wonder if Anon PO might be in Eastbourne on 16th October for a drink in Wetherspoons?
DeleteForget the reply. Heard it all before. We want them to take responsibility!
DeleteI'd encourage 'anon po' to stay as far away as possible from eastbourne at that time. Imagine...
Deletes/he is reported as having a cheeky vimto in 'spoons with (variously) osama bin laden/yahya sinwar/muammar-al-quaddafi/jeremy corbyn/sarah ferguson:
* armed response call-out
* person identified as bringing hmpps into disrepute
* monster labelled as imminent threat to the state
* tasered/shot/dismembered by anti-terrorist unit
* remains are held in Belmarsh
* blunkett's IPP policies are reinstated
* sentence of 255 years imposed
And all because... s/he told the truth.
I oppose genocide.
I'm as terrified of Yvette Cooper as Bibi & the IDF.
Cheers Jim, I hope to see you there.
DeleteAnonymous 18:46, cheers too ;-)
Beware the Ides of October... 'SpoonsWatch activated!
Delete"Given the fact that senior HMPPS leaders will be in attendance at Eastbourne and contributing to the Agenda, we are pleased to announce that Napo members who wish to enrol at AGM, may now apply for two days of Professional Development time. Our appreciation [and your location] has been relayed to the employer."
DeleteAs trump was to Dohar, so napo is to Eastbourne - : )
From Twitter:-
ReplyDelete"This is how my therapist described my relationship with probation before I left. It’s taken me a long time to realise they were the problem not me."
hmpps/moj - they not know what they do - can we ever forgive them for killing probation?
ReplyDeleteCould not agree more with Anon PO. An accurate reflection of desperate times and powerfully expressed. This is how it feels to do a job 'against all odds' including your own management.
ReplyDeleteIt's a different job than anything from 80 never a memory now 90s not so much millennials no things had long shifted to computers remember the bug fears. Then 10s and now 20s all gone now we account no longer is aab in memory let alone recall as an agency mission.
ReplyDeleteMaybe Mr Jones, Timpson, and all the others driving policy at HMPPS HQ could reflect on parts of the following article,
ReplyDeletehttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7409932/
'Getafix
Highlights
Delete•Twenty years ago, the Probation Service in England and Wales was widely regarded as world-leading.
•Since then it has been weakened by a series of politically driven and poorly evidenced changes.
•A badly flawed and ideologically driven privatisation programme implemented in 2015 has done serious damage.
•The recent decision to end this failed programme is an opportunity to redesign better.
At the beginning of this century the Probation Service of England and Wales (these two countries have separate Governments but form a single jurisdiction for criminal justice purposes) was regarded as one of the strongest and most advanced in the world. Twenty years later it finds itself under-resourced, understaffed, organisationally fragmented and partly demoralised, with little idea how it will look or how it will be run a couple of years from now. This is largely due to a series of decisions taken by politicians which were (believe it or not) intended to improve the Service, but which were not adequately informed by evidence or by an understanding of practical realities. The story of how this happened is an object-lesson in how not to do criminal justice reform and is summarised here in the hope that it may act as a warning to other jurisdictions.
Anon PO, that is a great post and really captures where we are all currently at.
DeleteI think my biggest takeaway from that article is that probation was originally a "conditional suspension' of punishment, such a shame political pressure then decided probation had to become the punishment, and people wonder why the recall rates are so high and engagement levels so low...why would anyone want to engage with punishment?
DeleteWhat actually killed probation was that silly generation that got the buzzwords evidence based practice and evidence based reduction. Focusing this metric screwed all the good works we celebrated change no matter how small. 90s management in their ma courses destroyed us.
Delete“Risk management” and “public protection” didn’t help us much either. I recently read these two quotes in an article that really resonates with me.
Delete“Probation has strayed from its rehabilitative mission. The emphasis on risk management has, at times, transformed Probation into a tool of punishment and control, rather than a means of rehabilitation.”
“Probation centred on punishment and public safety will falter, whereas probation focused on rehabilitation and reintegration will thrive.”
Indeed yes indeed but how to educate authority ?
DeleteBy the way, I can confirm that Martin Jones has read this heart-felt letter as he 'liked' and re-tweeted the following:-
ReplyDeleteMartin Jones (CEO) liked your post
"I don’t know if Martin Jones will get to read this or whether Anon (Probation Officer) would want/hope that to happen ? Certainly, I will share this via a twitter link with my MP and if invited in person to share its contents." 1/2
Martin Jones (CEO) liked your reply
"I accept it probably wont make any difference but at least it’s something. In these circumstances something feels better than nothing." 2/2
“By the way, I can confirm that Martin Jones has read this heart-felt letter as he ‘liked’ and re-tweeted the following:-“
DeleteLet’s be blunt: a ‘like’ is PR, not action or repair. Do we really expect anything from Martin Jones, probation leaders or justice ministers? For years it’s been too little, too late. They and their predecessors have had endless chances to fix probation and failed every single time. The hypocrisy is galling, they rely on staff goodwill and dedication to keep the system afloat, then use that very same goodwill as cover for their own failures. Too often we see probation staff expected to fawn over the top brass, applauding at work or union conferences the same people pulling the rug from under them. Saying the right thing takes seconds, it’s not leadership, it’s theatre. They sit in their ivory towers, trading applause for accountability, while frontline staff bend the knee and carry the weight of their neglect. I don’t expect leadership from them, because leadership would mean real change, and that’s exactly what they refuse to deliver.