On Friday in Cambridge and delivering the 27th Bill McWilliams lecture, Lord Timpson mentioned he was going to Wales on Monday. Well, we now know why. This from BBC news website:-
Not priority to devolve probation says UK ministerA UK government minister has been accused of pouring "cold water" on the prospect of the Welsh government taking control over probation and youth justice.
The Labour-led Cardiff administration has been pushing for further devolution on criminal justice - calls that Westminster colleagues have promised to consider. But Prisons Minister Lord Timpson has told a committee in the Welsh Parliament it is not "a priority" while the criminal justice system is "in crisis".
Labour MS Jenny Rathbone said the comments were very disappointing.
Lord Timpson says the criminal justice system faced "huge pressures" and there needed to be "stability" before "further changes" were considered.
Under the system of devolution established in 1999, the Senedd and Welsh government have never had control over criminal law. Various reports, including one from the former Labour Prime Minister Gordon Brown, have called for more devolution on criminal justice including youth justice and the probation service.
Last summer's Welsh Labour manifesto said the party would "explore" the devolution of probation "to enable them to be more locally responsive". It was planned as part of a strategic review into probation and added it would "consider" the devolution of youth justice.
Speaking to the Senedd's equality and social justice committee, the Prisons' Minister Lord Timpson told MSs that "we need to be in a much more stable position before we can think about further changes".
Mick Antoniw, the former chief legal adviser to the Welsh Government, says there are "volumes of evidence" that devolution of probation "needs to happen and quickly".
The Labour former counsel general told the committee that there was "no logical response to that other than we've had a decade of delay on actually looking at the enormous accumulation of evidence".
Questioning Lord Timpson, he said: "What you seem to be suggesting is that we are going to go through that process of just continually looking at the evidence without ever really coming to a proper conclusion."
Former Plaid Cymru leader Adam Price added: "Are you ruling out for the foreseeable future the full devolution of executive and legislative powers?".
Lord Timpson said he wanted to "stabilise" a "bruised" service but added: "I'm not ruling anything out, I'm not ruling anything in. "What I'm focused on is trying to sort out the crisis in our justice system."
After the meeting committee chair, Labour MS for Cardiff Central, Jenny Rathbone said the committee was "very disappointed".
"The Welsh government has already started the groundwork to prepare because it believed there was a realistic prospect that these aspects could be devolved soon," she said. "This is in stark contrast to Lord Timpson's evidence before the Committee today which seemed to pour cold water on the prospect."
So Wales joins “Outlier England”!
ReplyDeletehttps://probationmatters.blogspot.com/2025/07/outlier-england.html?m=1
Isn’t this what happens when political agendas override common sense? Real reform should come from those who do the work and live the experience, not from those who meddle in it or profit from it, far removed from the frontline. It feels fitting to reference the author of Outlier England, who put it well in another quote. “The way forward in shaping wider solutions for probation strategies to improve re-entry, resettlement, and rehabilitation should come from frontline supervisory practitioners and those successfully ceasing offending and completing periods of supervision.”
Deletehttps://www.probation-institute.org/news/probation-and-community-supervision-a-magic-journey
Looks like it!
ReplyDeleteI guess we’ll all go back to burying our heads in the sand.
DeleteIt would have been interesting to see how a devolved probation service would have developed outside of central control.
ReplyDeleteParticularly when rehabilitation seems to becoming a " newfound concept" (again!).
I'm struck by the Lords report that thinks prison should be about rehabilitation and reform, which seems to have raised the question of "what are prisons really for?"
Seems a fundamental question, but personally I think the CJS has become so broken it's fundamental questions that need to be asked.
https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/commentary-and-opinion/what-are-prisons-actually-for/5123924.article
https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/519/justice-and-home-affairs-committee/news/208335/prisons-need-to-have-reducing-reoffending-as-their-core-purpose-says-lords-committee/
'Getafix
A bit rich Lord Dimpson saying "we need to be in a much more stable position before we can think about further changes" considering they are constantly tinkering and making changes to suit the needs of the Prisons, maybe its my age but I'm getting lost as to who goes to prison, when they can come out, who gets recalled and who i say is being recalled but please presume he can come out as soon as you fancy it, who low impact, resetteed and ineligible for everything until the next new thing coming soon to a Probation near you....
ReplyDeleteHahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!
ReplyDeleteNothing changes... same old shyte.... who'd have thought status quo would be so popular?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3352xv1gzlo
ReplyDeleteTroubled jail now one of the most 'impressive'
Yet another triumph for the excellent hmpps-led probation:
ReplyDeletehttps://hmiprobation.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/document/an-inspection-of-probation-services-in-gateshead-and-south-tyneside-pdu-2025/
Fieldwork started May 2025: Score 4/21 (~19%)
Overall rating: Requires improvement
P 1.1 Leadership Requires improvement
P 2.1 Assessment - Rating: inadequate
P 2.3. Implementation and delivery - Rating: inadequate
P 2.4. Reviewing - Rating: inadequate
Gateshead and South Tyneside Probation Delivery Unit (PDU) was last inspected by HM Inspectorate of Probation in 2022, when it was rated as ‘Good’ overall. The PDU had strengths and had made some progress against previous inspection recommendations. However, we saw a concerning decline in the quality of some of the work undertaken, especially in practice to keep people safe. Reasons for this included staffing challenges, including periods of high staff sickness, workload pressures on middle managers, and a lack of professional curiosity from an inexperienced practitioner group, whose learning needs were not fully understood.
DeleteThis assessment is wholly consistent with all recent PDU inspection reports and indicates the challenges on the probation frontline.
At the time of this inspection, it was pleasing to see that most practitioners’ workloads were reasonable, and leaders were taking a proactive approach to engaging staff. Leaders were actively managing sickness absence and staff felt managers were invested in supporting their professional development.
Staff were engaged and motivated to do what was best for people on probation. This was driven by meaningful activity to engage people on probation, with staff dedicated to listening to, and acting upon the voices of those being supervised. This translated into our casework, where we saw strong practice to engage people on probation in sentence delivery. At the assessment and planning stages of sentence management, PDU staff generally understood the offending-related needs of the individuals they were supervising and what work they needed to complete with the person. This was supported by strong working relationships with services to help people to change. Some partner agencies were present in probation offices. This facilitated conversations and information-sharing.
However, work to keep the public safe was the weakest area of practice across all our standards. In several cases, essential information had not been gathered from social services or the police, which weakened attempts to keep women and children in particular safe from abusive behaviour. As we see too often, when PDU staff received information that indicated a risk to actual and potential victims, they did not always follow it up or use it effectively to assess and manage risk.
DeleteThe PDU will be disappointed with the overall outcome of this inspection; however with the appropriate attention, it can make the necessary improvements needed to deliver high-quality work to keep people safe from harm.
Martin Jones CBE
HM Chief Inspector of Probation
24 PDU reports published May’24 to May’25
ReplyDeleteaverage % score = 16.5%
6 PDU reports published May'25 to July'25
avg % score = 16%
"On 26 June 2021, the Probation Service unified creating 12 Probation Service regions containing 108 Probation Delivery Units (PDUs) and other non-PDU business units."
Just another 78 to go then?