Sunday 26 June 2022

What Chance?

Clearly the current RMT dispute and rise to fame of Mick Lynch their General Secretary has very effectively turned a spotlight on wages generally and the sharply rising cost of living for everyone. Despite the best endeavours of both the government and much of the media to deliberately distort the basis of the dispute, it's quite likely Mr Lynch's plain speaking style will win the day and probably the claim. So, with other employment sectors rapidly joining the fray, including criminal barristers withdrawing their labour from tomorrow, where does this leave probation? 

I was particularly struck by this recent contribution:-   

The difference between the RMT union and Napo is that RMT members are more likely to honour a democratic vote to strike. From experience as a Napo member over 25 years to 2012, many members seem to take a democratic vote to strike as optional thus resulting in a lack of solidarity. As an occasional reader of this blog I note a constant thread of criticism of Napo and in particular of Secretary Lawrence. I ask you how can any trade union can function effectively without a membership committed to taking industrial action when required. Jim's blog is a great resource informing Probation staff and the wider world; however I feel that some commentators let it down by constantly sniping at Napo. I urge staff to join Napo, get involved, steer secretary Lawrence's efforts and give him some muscle in wage negotiations. As things stand, employers know that probation staff are a pushover and so you get shafted.

Of course it's long been true that probation staff have been very reluctant to strike and I'm afraid it's hard to escape the conclusion that as a result you get shafted. In May a joint union pay claim was submitted:-

UNISON, Napo, and GMB/SCOOP have submitted the following three-year pay claim on behalf of members in the Probation Service: 
  • A three-year award to cover 2022, 2023 and 2024 pay years
  • An increase in the value of all pay points of 3% above the Retail Prices Index (RPI) of inflation on 1 April 2022, 1 April 2023, and 1 April 2024
  • An increase in the value of all Probation Service cash allowances of 3% above the Retail Prices Index (RPI) of inflation on 1 April 2022, 1 April 2023 and 1 April 2024
  • Shorter pay bands allow staff to reach the top of their pay band in a shorter time
  • Removal of pay band overlaps
  • An increase in the HMRC Fixed Profit Car Allowance
PROBATION NEEDS A PAY RISE

While a wage keeping pace with the cost of living each year would have risen by 42.9% (compound) since 2010, pay in Probation has risen by just 1% over the same period, which means that thousands of pounds have been cut from the value of staff wages.

By ‘pay rise’, we mean an actual increase in the value of pay points. It is these values which have only gone up by only 1% in the last 12 years for probation staff.

Do not confuse your annual increment with a pay rise. Your increment is a contractual entitlement, not a pay rise.

Here is how probation staff compare with their police staff, local government and health service colleagues in relation to actual increases in the value of their pay since 2010:
  • Probation Staff: 1%
  • Police Staff: 15.8%
  • Local Government Staff: 14.6%
  • NHS Staff: 14.2%
Remember, staff in the police, local government and the health service have had their increments in addition to the pay rises above. It is no wonder that leaving probation for a job in a different part of the public sector has become so attractive.

COST OF LIVING CRISIS

Inflation is currently running at 9% (March 2022) which is the highest level in three decades. For the value of probation staff salaries not to fall back even further, they must at least keep pace with predicted rises in the cost of living, which Treasury forecasts put at 7.4% in 2022[1].

Staff have experienced an enormous surge in costs over the last year, including:
  • A 29% increase in gas bills;
  • A 21% increase in petrol prices;
  • A 19% increase in electricity bills;
  • A 10% rise in the price of buying a house and a 9% jump in rent for a new rental property.
These demands on pay packets will be even greater against the background of the 1.25% increase to National Insurance contributions over 2022/23.

--oo00oo--

I notice that Napo is showing solidarity with RMT in their current dispute. When they win, I wonder what chance there will be that probation staff will take similar action? Past behaviour is usually a strong indicator of future behaviour, so I'm guessing there will be some huff and puff; many staff will leave, but sadly most will be resigned to being continually shafted, now as mute second class civil servants. Probation has been very effectively neutered.

31 comments:

  1. “As things stand, employers know that probation staff are a pushover and so you get shafted.”

    Because the main probation Napo (formerly National Association of Probation Officers) is a pushover and it’s leadership less than useless.

    Simply put, if Napo had been more effective over the past 10 years it’d have a stronger membership.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Napo and the RMT are not comparable. One union has a credible, committed and consistent leadership that gets results. The other has Ian and Tania.

    ReplyDelete
  3. https://www.aol.co.uk/benefit-claimants-made-longer-hours-053608207.html

    Ms Coffey said: “Once you get a job, if you’re working fewer than the equivalent of nine hours a week, we still expect you to be coming in and looking for work... The more people that we see in the job centre, dare I say it, the more work coaches we will need."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Two comments/observations from me: 1 unless the probation unions get 90% or more of staff to be members then strike action will always be doomed to fail as the non members will simply pick up the extra work in a strike. I reckon no more than 40% of practitioner staff actually belong to a union. 2 can a three year claim realistically be made for RPI plus 3% when no one can say what RPI will be in years 2 and 3 and therefore how can it be costed?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If Napo wasn’t so expensive and shite more staff would join.

      Delete
  5. https://inews.co.uk/news/public-sector-workers-can-expect-three-percent-pay-rise-minister-insisting-excessive-hikes-cant-be-tolerated-1707595

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ironic when between 2010 and 2022 MP salaries increased from £65,738 to £84,144. https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/mp-pay-rise-2022-politicians-salary-increase-uk-tax-rises-energy-bills-1492279

      Delete
  6. https://bright-green.org/2022/05/23/why-we-all-need-to-resist-the-tories-latest-anti-trade-union-laws/

    ReplyDelete
  7. Theres a pretty good article that can be accessed from the probation institute website.
    It explores the impact on probation services of introducing supervision for all prison leavers and also incorporating the under 12mth cohort.
    It's a lengthy read (19 pages), but for those that feel the jobs just gone wrong , or feel it's now just become a nose to the grind stone job of relentless never ending processing, I think it's a must read.
    Me? I just think theres too many people on probation for it to be able to function effectively.

    https://www.probation-institute.org/news/running-on-the-treadmill-practitioner-experiences-of-mass-supervision

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Abstract
      This article explores the impacts that the addition of individuals serving short sentences has had on daily practice and working culture for probation workers. These practitioner perspectives are explored through the lens of ‘mass supervision’, providing a new insight into the harms and implications for its inherent deskilling qualities and constraints. This empirical research underlines three main themes related to the harms caused by mass supervision: firstly, that it inhibits innovative practice; secondly, that it necessitates a more limited model of supervision that undermines practitioner autonomy and the reach and scope of the supervisory relationship; and thirdly, that mass supervision corrodes the values of probation staff, leaving many experienced practitioners struggling ethically, practically and emotionally. The experience of mass supervision is compared to a treadmill by several practitioners and employed as a metaphor to analyse practice in the confines of mass supervision as generic, monotonous and relentless.

      Delete
    2. "it inhibits innovative practice... it necessitates a more limited model of supervision that undermines practitioner autonomy... it corrodes the values of probation staff"

      Exactly how NOMS/HMPPS wanted it to be.

      But sadly without the profiteering they had hoped for for their CRC chums (who, if all had gone to plan, would have been waiting outside the revolving doors to welcome their pet civil servant with an open chequebook).

      Delete
    3. It all slipped away when officers as a coherent group could not provide any proper explanation as to why a psr required a minimal 8 hours for preparation. It slipped further back to just verbal reports on the day because successively there was no consistent professional backstop on the production of reports. The argument being qualified means nothing. The management stripped the function out asunder and we let them.

      Delete
    4. We didn’t let them. We had no power to stop them. Unions are there to represent staff. Napo was too busy with its internal struggles. Unison was busy elsewhere.

      Delete
  8. We all know that the Probation Service no longer functions in a healthy way, doesn’t adequately keep the public safe or successfully rehabilitate the vast majority of our clients. Nor does it provide a safe or healthy place for staff to work. So I ask, how, as a group, we can come together to bring about change in a constructive and meaningful way. We know the unions are ineffective so it’s time to take a different approach. I suspect many reading this blog have views as to how to bring about collective change. I would love to hear your views.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Only Timer - "We all know that the Probation Service no longer functions in a healthy way, doesn’t adequately keep the public safe or successfully rehabilitate the vast majority of our clients"

      The above implies probation was once positive. Could you elaborate - when was it, what did it entail, and what changed ?

      "So I ask, how, as a group, we can come together to bring about change in a constructive and meaningful way. We know the unions are ineffective so it’s time to take a different approach"

      As we know, unions were smashed by Thatcher, and her fanboy Tony Blair wasnt keen on them either. Sir Keir appears to be following this trend and is threatening to tell off mp's who attend pickets. We have to demand our unions represent us, or else start new ones that have workers rights centre stage, like RMT is, and unaffiliate from the labour party, which the Bakers Union recently did, and I think CWU and Unite have reduced funding.

      "I suspect many reading this blog have views as to how to bring about collective change. I would love to hear your views."

      Probation staff have to build solidarity across the whole service, not just amongst probation officiers - I remember a lot of closing ranks back in 2013/2014 rather than thinking how cuts and privatization might impact people in supporting roles like a cleaner, support worker and admin, or service users. Build solidarity with other workers like in the NHS, local authority, and transport.



      Delete
    2. There lies the problem. Probation wasn’t designed to “keep the public safe”.

      Delete
    3. The RMT cannot be allowed to be left fighting on their own. As many fronts as possible need to be opened to pile the pressure on the entire political establishment in order that they start to fracture and break apart. They have moved into open class warfare and we must respond.

      Delete
  9. Anyone working in transport can join RMT. Is Napo the same, or do you have to be a probation officer to join ? Which is similar to the nurses union. Micky Lynch is speaking up for all sections of the rail industry, not just drivers, and it wouldnt be a problem if he was. Furthermore, he also speaks up for the wider working class.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How many more times?

      Mick Lynch of the RMT is NOT speaking for the drivers

      https://aslef.org.uk/

      Delete

    2. I know hes not, thats why I said "Micky Lynch is speaking up for all sections of the rail industry, not just drivers."

      I mentioned it not being a problem if he was because that would still be justified, as much as the media are trying to say that because they get ok pay they should shut up and be happy with their lot. The job has high occupational hazards, way higher than probation, and its proper graft. Probation work is of course a social good, although as a strand of social work its very petite bourgeois.

      Delete
    3. Any how, back to original question - can anyone working in probation join napo, or just probation officers ? RMT is for all transport workers, so properly inclusive, not shallow neoliberal buzzword inclusive.

      Delete
  10. I think Mick Lynch speaks to all sectors and every working person in the country.
    I support the right to withdraw labour or take other forms of industrial action as a method for obtaining better working conditions and pay.
    But I have a problem with probation.
    Successful industrial action might mean better conditions and better pay for the employee, but it doesn't change the model.
    There's something in me that that thinks that any successful industrial action won by today's probation service would only serve to consolidate the current model, and legitimise the services trajectory for the future.

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
  11. Even Barristers are getting in on it. Meanwhile silent probation unions can’t secure more than 2% in the past 12 years.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61946038.amp

    Barristers in criminal cases have gone on strike across England and Wales in a long-running dispute over pay.

    Eight out of 10 cases at London's Old Bailey were disrupted by the walkout, barristers outside the court said.
    Justice Secretary Dominic Raab said the strikes will "delay justice", as courts already face a backlog of 58,000 cases.
    Barristers have rejected a proposed 15% rise in their fees for undertaking legal aid work and will be taking action over the next four weeks.

    Members of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) have said this is too low and called for a minimum 25% wage increase.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I have stood on Napo picket lines and watched members and non-members cross. Probation staff seem incapable of solidarity. So, staff moan and moan about deteriorating conditions while lacking a collective resolve to take action, I do not blame the Napo leadership on this. The fact is not all members will honour picket lines, yet they join because they perceive there are membership benefits. In present times Napo needs a committed membership that will not run away at the first sound of gunfire, but march towards it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You mean they lack a spine. Cameron comes in about 2010 and makes sweeping welfare reforms, something that directly impacts service users, and probation are silent, but when Grayling implements privatization probation kick off, although in a closing ranks, lets forget about the un/lesser skilled non-probation officer staff kind of way. As an aside, many of the PO's where I worked were thoroughly indoctrinated by ideas about 'deserving and undeserving poor', black male pathology (what we could call racist), and other negative views. Back to the topic of solidarity, I distinctly remember a regional manager coming to visit our office and it more or less consisted of PO's stroking each others egos.

      Delete
    2. I know many didn’t honour picket lines because they knew it’d amount to nothing. They knew Napo would achieve nothing and they were right.

      Delete
  13. ‘Increments are a contractual right’ never forget many CRC staff never advanced through the increments. I stayed on exactly the same wage from 2012 until 2021.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Increments are contractual. Only because of a collective agreement . The Tories will smash all this up and the current general secretary has already varied our terms but accepting in his recommendation to adopt performance related pay. In the form of appraisals and when they get that sorted increases will be denied the agreement is already in place.

      Delete
    2. https://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jun/28/tuc-issues-workers-rights-warning-over-post-brexit-trade-deals?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIKAGwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16564054331315&csi=0&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fpolitics%2F2022%2Fjun%2F28%2Ftuc-issues-workers-rights-warning-over-post-brexit-trade-deals

      Delete
  14. The Times today (wednesday) reports that government departments are considering redesignating 'civil servents' and calling them 'public servants' in an attempt to prevent the massive cull of civil servents announced by Jacob Rees Mogg.
    I'm sure if that would have legal implications on employment status?

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/civil-servants-renamed-dodge-staff-cuts-3vsr9jvq6

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not really an employer can call you what they like it's up to you if you leave over a title . This government are enslaving workers the old protections arguments have been agreed away . The white pages axed.

      Delete