Thursday 1 July 2021

A New Dawn?

Having been freshly reappointed to the post for a further two years, here is the latest blog post from HM Chief Inspector of Probation Justin Russell:-  

01 July 2021 – A new dawn for probation?

This week marks a fresh start for probation and a welcome one, as private sector and public sector colleagues come back together as the unified, public sector Probation Service.

I pay tribute to the team that has led this major transition programme in HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) and to the regional probation directors who have helped to implement it. Having led a major change programme in my past life, as a Director at the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), I know just how many moving parts there are to keep track of as thousands of staff and tens of thousands of cases – not to mention buildings and ICT systems – move into a new organisation. And this one has so far (fingers crossed) gone remarkably smoothly.

This is the fourth major structural reorganisation probation has gone through in 20 years. In the longer arc of history, it marks the final step from probation being an entirely locally run and funded service to being an entirely national one, with probation staff now all government civil servants. Whilst that may have its advantages in terms of a standardised operating model and job roles, there is a danger that local innovation and initiative may get squeezed out too. Community Rehabilitation Company (CRC) leaders I spoke to had welcomed the greater autonomy they had been granted to experiment with new ways of doing things and had responded with some significant and welcome innovations. For example, in introducing opportunities for people who had previously been on probation becoming staff and volunteers, and by using community venues for appointments with people on probation. It’s important that regional directors and local heads of service retain the ability to experiment and build local partnerships.

As I have said previously the Transforming Rehabilitation model was fundamentally flawed. Many feared this from the start, and our inspections over six years only confirmed these concerns. Squeezed budgets meant falling probation officer numbers – staff under relentless pressure and unacceptably high caseloads. This inevitably resulted in poorer quality supervision, with over half of the cases we inspected in the private sector probation companies being unsatisfactory on some key aspect of quality.

Merely lifting and shifting large volumes of cases from the private sector into the public sector won’t improve the quality of work that probation staff are able to do. Vacancies for probation officers must be filled and staff properly trained for their new responsibilities. Structural change needs to be backed by sustained investment for there to be true improvement. After many years of cuts – a 40 per cent real terms reduction in probation funding per case supervised by 2019 – the injection of £150m of extra resource this year and last has been welcome but that needs to continue into the next Spending Review period. Real transformation is a long-term commitment, and unification is just the beginning of that journey – but it’s a very welcome first step.

--oo00oo--

We might as well publish the following from the bumper Napo 'reunification special' here:-

JUNE 26 2021 - A MILESTONE FOR PROBATION

As we reach a huge milestone for probation – June 26th -the date we unify the system, welcome over 8000 colleagues, and together, create our new Probation Service Amy Rees and Sonia Flynn share their thoughts on the future of the reunified service. 

The new Probation Service will take the best from the old system, stabilise the probation landscape, ensure core services are properly delivered whilst also seizing the opportunity these changes present to innovate and improve the way we work to ensure we can better achieve our key aims. A huge amount of work has gone in to making the transition happen smoothly and on time involving many people from across the NPS and CRCs. Once these structural changes are complete, our focus will then be upon our path to delivering excellent probation services, implementing our Target Operating Model and ensuring our highly skilled probation staff have the right tools, training and support to assess, protect and change people on probation.

Amy Rees, Director General of Probation and Wales said:

“I am really looking forward to June 26th and welcoming everyone to our new Probation Service. I am confident that through our reforms, we are creating a stronger, more stable probation system that will deliver excellent services to protect the public, reduce reoffending and support victims of crime. This last year has presented unprecedented challenges for us all and I am extremely grateful to all our probation staff for their continued hard work, commitment and professionalism which has enabled our core services to continue whilst we also progressed with reforms and our organisational recovery. I am so proud of our incredible staff across the NPS and CRCs and I know that together we are going to create a truly brilliant new Probation Service”

Sonia Flynn, Chief Probation Officer added: 

“We are simplifying probation delivery, making it easier for those we work with and bringing together probation staff and resources to deliver effective reform. We have got over 8,000 passionate and dedicated people joining us and a key part of our new probation service is ensuring all our staff feel fully supported, while investing in their skills, capabilities and ways of working to enable them to do their jobs to the highest standard. I would echo Amy’s thanks to everyone for all they have done during a very challenging period against the backdrop of the pandemic and I am really excited to see what we can achieve together as a new unified service”

14 comments:

  1. The king is dead, long live the king. How these functionaries move seamlessly between regimes. How it all becomes 'new opportunities'. All the so-called innovations that risk being stifled - well, they are not innovations: they were commonplace in probation 20 years. ago.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Amy's thanks are noted. I want the increment pay I am due and the pay rise I am worth. Fie on them

    ReplyDelete
  3. "a 40 per cent real terms reduction in probation funding per case supervised by 2019" - Wow! nearly as harsh as the 60% reduction in nationally agreed EVR grudgingly paid by the CRCs.

    What it really shows is the reality of the Tory view of the Probation Service & those we work with, despite their blatant lies & empty rhetoric.


    "We are simplifying probation delivery" - how the f.u.c.k. can probation be *simplified*??? Probation is not fast-food delivery - it is a collaborative & complex inter-relationship between supervisor & supervisee. It requires skills, talent, compassion, strength, knowledge - things the 'excellent leaders' have no concept of, nor would they know them if they were put in a blender & delivered via Virgin Enema (apparently available with an Experience Voucher)


    "making it easier for those we work with" - Point Made. Probation is not meant to be "easy"; it never was supposed to be "easy", or "easier".

    Its a tough gig to be faced with addressing one's failings or moments of weakness, to make a shift in behaviour, to recognise you have caused pain/loss/distress.

    Such guff makes it blindingly clear the 'excellent leaders' have no understanding such things because they are, of course, never wrong.


    "I know that together we are going to create a truly brilliant new Probation Service" - and *I* know you are going to create another Holy Horlicks of a fuck-up.

    It is all so predictable.

    This blog & its archive holds THE transcript of the TR catastrophe, where every fail, every sleight-of-hand, every pile of stinking bullshit & every lie has been laid bare.

    Last time probation was subjected to such biblical promises La Dame at HMI Probation hinted but failed to speak out explicitly until it was too late.

    Justin has caught his safe underpants on exactly the same nail as La Dame caught her elegant bloomers, and he is now perched on exactly the same fence.

    "I pay tribute to the team that has led this major transition programme in HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) and to the regional probation directors who have helped to implement it."

    And he says this knowing they are the exact same 'excellent leaders' that fucked it up in the first place. This isn't coded language from an esteemed civil servant, its abject fear at the prospect of losing a £150K a year job & some kind of ennoblement.

    This is yet another catastrophe-in-waiting. We know it. They know it.

    "And the losers will be..."

    drum roll ... l o n g breathy p a u s e...

    "Yes, its the frontline staff & those who are directed to use the service, their victims & the wider population in general!!!"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Justin Russell writing in the bumper Napo 'reunification' special:-

      “If there’s one thing I’d like The Probation Service to achieve, over the coming years, it is to use the opportunity of reunification, and additional investment, to focus on quality and – above all – on the quality of the relationship between individual probation practitioners and the people they supervise. This is at every single stage of supervision, from sentencing – assessments and effective sentence plans that manage risk and encourage desistance from crime – to effective interventions that work with people on probation to deal with the problems they have and prevent them from offending again in the future. This is a focus for us as the Inspectorate and will continue to be in the future.”

      Delete
    2. There are lots of things lots of us would like the Probation Service to achieve - including some of the sentiments expressed by Justin - but when the same old gangmasters are running the shitshow it aint going to happen; & Justin in his role as HMI Probation Inspector should have the cahonas to say so. His remit must surely stretch from lowliest practitioner to highest decision-maker? If it doesn't, why not?

      La Dame managed a more critical view as she was leaving the building, but it was too late to make a scintilla of a difference - and she had been suitably ennobled by then.

      Its the same with many - personal gain comes before professional integrity &/or the courage to speak out against the disgraceful moral vacuum that is the NPS/HMPPS/MoJ/Tory government.

      Delete
  4. No travel warrant? No problem!!

    "A furious judge ordered a sex offender to walk 14 miles to court after he failed to turn up for his case – claiming he couldn't afford the bus.

    Judge James Burbidge QC told Ricky Portman, 41, he should stop spending his benefits on alcohol after he complained he had no money left to travel to court.

    A warrant was originally issued for Portman's arrest after he failed to turn up for a hearing at Worcester Magistrates' Court on 14 April.

    Portman, of Bromsgrove, Worcestershire, also failed to attend another hearing at Worcester Crown Court on 10 May and then again on 16 June.

    His solicitor Ilana Davis told the judge: "He had no means with which he could get from Bromsgrove to Worcester."

    The judge responded: "He can walk." "

    ReplyDelete
  5. Its every bit as bad as the previous split. Staff not coping, no time to do the training, problems with IT. Crc staff paid less tha nps staff through no fault of their own. Nps staff not wanting to work with crc staff, but everything in managements eye is wonderful.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. By email:-

      Hi Jim,

      I’m unable to post direct but just want to correct the impression that all CRC staff coming into the Probation Service will earn less than NPS colleagues, this simply isn’t true. One northern CRC paid their staff greater salary awards than given to NPS for at least two years so they are on larger equivalent salaries. I have been told this amounts to £600 pa difference purely down to the pay awards during the split. PO

      Delete
    2. Not a chance what area please I don't believe any CRC paid more during 5he split. No way can you tell us the employer's then.

      Delete
  6. Saw this on tweeter this morning - it made me chuckle:

    "They lie; they cheat; they claim everything is their's; they bully & moan; they're massively overpaid; they disregard rules about covid-19; they thrive on tribal nationalism; they are cynical opportunists...

    #toryministers or #footballers ?"

    Reminded me of the 'excellent leader' syndrome that blights the probation world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I dont think footballers would welcome the comparison. Manager and team of England footie seem to be setting a very good pro-social model of behaviour. Welsh Footie fans for quite a while now, have established a reputation of being generous, cheerful and kind.

      Delete
    2. In life they may be grand folk but on the pitch, for which they are paid ridiculous amounts of cash [the average wage of a Premier League footballer is just over £60,000 a week], they pretend to be fatally injured, they stamp on others' feet, they commit cynical fouls (shirt pulling, pushing, tripping), they take throw-ins about 50 feet from where the ball went out, they try to 'win' penalties by diving, etc etc etc.

      So while taking the knee is laudable, little else is "pro-social" because almost everything else is simply cheating - which is what tory ministers (if not all of the westminster bubble) do best.

      Delete
  7. Comedian/person david Mitchell's view of the hancock saga:

    "I mean, it’s not very nice to stare through people’s living-room windows, but if it interrupts a murder, overall that’s a good outcome, isn’t it? The very moment the would-be murderer is led away by the police to grateful neighbourhood applause would be an odd time for the householder to take out a restraining order against the nosy witness."

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jul/04/so-nice-of-matt-hancock-to-quit-his-only-thought-was-of-us

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mitchell does even better with this:

    "It was like a hit-and-run driver who’s been chased for miles across the country by the police, has crashed his car into a primary school, legged it over several walls and fences, stolen some clothes from a washing line as a disguise, splashed through a duck pond, hidden in a sewer and been dragged out by the arse covered in shit, then turning round to the arresting officers and calmly saying: “I’ve decided that the responsible thing would be to turn myself in.” "

    ReplyDelete