Thursday, 28 September 2017

No Prison Reform Without Probation Reform

I notice that the Prison Reform Trust have just offered some considered advice to HM Treasury and in a well-argued document make some very sensible suggestions regarding ways in which to reduce the current high prison population.

What astonishes me though is how any considered piece of political and penal pleading like this can completely ignore mention of the probation service. I've said it many times before, but it's becoming quite clear that 'probation' as a concept; a process; a worthy field of enlightened endeavour, is simply being slowly and insidiously air-brushed out of existence.

In a 20-page document, probation is only briefly mentioned in terms of the ridiculous mandatory 12 month supervision introduced by TR for all short-term prisoners. Why is it that prison reformers don't understand that there can be no prison reform without probation reform? The mess we are currently in was largely brought about by the destruction of probation by TR. This is how probation is dismissed by the report:-     

Recall 

Following changes introduced under the Transforming Rehabilitation reforms as part of the Offender Rehabilitation Act 2014, anyone leaving custody who has served two days or more is now required to serve a minimum of 12 months under supervision in the community. As a result, the number of people recalled to custody following their release has increased dramatically. The recall population has increased by around 750 people since the changes were introduced in February 2015. 6,390 people were in prison on recall at the end of June 201742, and over 8,100 people serving a sentence of less than 12 months were recalled back to custody in the year to March 2017. 

Despite these additional pressures on HM Prisons and Probation Service, there is no evidence as yet that mandatory supervision has had any impact on the reoffending rate of short sentenced prisoners—the principle justification for its introduction. 

An earlier pilot at HMP Peterborough, which was often cited by the government in support of the extension of mandatory supervision, was a voluntary scheme, and so its participants were self-selecting. As such, it provides very little evidence for the likely impact of a mandatory period of statutory supervision on rates of reoffending. The Prison Reform Trust would like to see a return to the principles which underpinned the pilot at HMP Peterborough by making the supervision of short sentenced prisoners voluntary.  

Here's a synopsis of the report from the Pison Reform Trust website:-  
 
Projected rise in prison numbers means government cannot build its way out of a prisons crisis

The Prison Reform Trust has today (25 September) published its response to HM Treasury’s consultation on this year’s Budget, which highlights concerns about the viability of the Ministry of Justice’s prison building programme in light of the projected increase in prison numbers. Since May this year growth in the prison population has been extremely strong—rising by over 1,200 places in only 13 weeks, and it remains higher than at any other point in the last four years.

Prison population projections, published last month, revealed that the population is expected to grow by around 1,600 above current levels by 2022. They also reveal that projections published last year, on which plans will have been made for the prison estate, were significantly more optimistic—with a gap between the 2016 projection and the 2017 projection of around 2,000 additional spaces by the end of this year.

The practical implication of this change is dramatic. Under the government’s prison estate transforming programme (PETP), it had planned to replace old inefficient prisons with new prisons that are cheaper to run, through committed investment of £1.3bn during the current spending review period. The eventual savings were anticipated to contribute to the Ministry of Justice’s overall savings plan.

However, the additional and unanticipated rise in prison numbers, together with the new population projections, raise serious doubts about the sustainability of the PETP programme. Without the option of closing older prisons, as now appears inevitable under the current population projections, no funds are released to run the new prisons planned—still less to finance the building and running of new prisons that will be required over and above the 10 committed by the previous government.

In order to relieve pressure on HM Prisons and Probation Service and avert the likely shortfall in available capital to build and run new prisons, the submission outlines immediate and practical steps which the government can take to deliver an incremental and sustained reduction in our prison population. This includes:

  • Expediting the release of people currently serving the Indeterminate sentence for Public Protection by introducing new legislation to convert them to fixed length sentences, starting with the shortest tariff lengths where the greatest injustice has occurred.
  • Reducing the large numbers of people recalled to custody after release by replacing mandatory supervision of people serving prison sentences of less than 12 months, with voluntary supervision.
  • Limiting the use of custodial remands—More than one in 10 people (10,328) remanded in custody in 2016 were subsequently acquitted. A further 14% of people (13,224) received a non-custodial sentence.
  • Revising the sentencing framework to reverse the effects of sentence inflation over the last two decades.
  • Implementing the recommendations of the Lammy review to reduce disproportionality in the criminal justice system.
  • A full roll out of a national liaison and diversion scheme to ensure people with mental health needs and learning disabilities get the treatment and support they need.
  • A particular focus on effective community approaches for women offenders.
  • A distinct approach to young adults and recognition of maturity at all stages of the criminal justice process.
Our submission highlights the recent success in the youth justice system in reducing numbers in custody. The number of children imprisoned fell by two-thirds between 2007 and 2014, whilst proven offences by the same age group also fell by 72% during the same period.

Commenting, Peter Dawson, Director of the Prison Reform Trust, said:
“The dramatic and unanticipated rise in the prison population has torpedoed the Ministry of Justice’s new for old prison building plans. We can expect that HM Treasury will not be prepared to bail out the justice department again. The government has to start looking at practical solutions now to reduce prison numbers.”

16 comments:

  1. This won't help with reducing the prison population either.
    And does it give private companies only interested in profit total control over both supply and demand?

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4927688/Private-firms-given-powers-arrest-people.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Private firms may be given new powers to arrest people in a controversial move that has raised alarm. The proposals would allow, for the first time, staff from companies such as G4S to arrest members of the public for failing to pay fines imposed by the courts. The plans would see HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) privatising part of its compliance and enforcement operations in a deal worth £290million.

      The measures were slipped out as a tender by the Ministry of Justice during the summer. Under the proposals, the Government could transfer all services carried out by Civilian Enforcement Officers, who are civil servants employed by HMCTS, to the private sector. This would include the arrest and detention of individuals who fail to pay off their debts and haul them to court.

      The courts can already allow authorised agencies, including private firms, to send bailiffs to a person’s home to seize possessions to encourage them to pay debts. But this would potentially be a sweeping expansion of the powers – covering so-called warrants of arrest, which are issued by JPs to compel an indivual to attend court.

      The tender document, published in August, said: ‘As part of this procurement exercise, MoJ would also like to explore the potential transfer of service of all warrants currently executed by Civilian Enforcement Officers.

      ‘Civilian Enforcement Officers are authorised to execute warrants of arrest, commitment and detention issued by a magistrate covering fines and community penalty breaches.’

      Nearly 200 civil service jobs could be transferred from the civil service under the proposals. The consultation was due to end today.

      Hundreds of millions of pounds in fines and fees imposed by courts on criminals have not been paid.
      Sums owed by offenders in England and Wales have rocketed by almost £200million in just two years, according to official statistics. Unpaid charges soared to £747million in the year ending September from £557million in the same period in 2014 – an increase of 34 per cent. Some of the money will be compensation that criminals were ordered to pay their victims.

      A HMCTS spokesman said: ‘We take the recovery and enforcement of court fines very seriously. Courts already have the power to issue warrants through enforcement agencies, and we have robust processes in place to ensure agency staff comply to the same standards as HMCTS staff. While no decisions have been made, we are in discussion with providers to extend the work of enforcement agencies and will make further announcements in due course.’

      Delete
  2. It's just my personal observation and opinion, but I also think that probation as a concept has been washed away.
    Strangely however, I think the more probation service becomes an agency of enforcement, the police service are taking on more of a socially orientated focus.
    Where probation is shedding itself of partner agencies, the police force are developing more partnerships with mental health services, addiction agencies and housing.
    It's an odd thing to say, and no doubt many may disagree, but the police force may now be able to direct people towards better avenues of support and assistance the the Probation service can.

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I seem to recall the Chief Constable of Greater Manchester said a couple of years ago that "he now employed hundreds of social workers".

      Delete
    2. I completely agree with this sentiment. I now wonder what the Probation Service is for. Police, custody healthcare, liaison and diversion teams are all doing a much proactive job of what Probation used to be, and Probation is just a hollow shell of what it should be and should have been. It seems to me that Probation is just a way of managing the prison population. There is really nothing positive that can be said about the service, especially now.

      Delete
  3. This article regarding locum social workers is informative by itself, but I'm minded to consider if some working in probation services, especially those employed by agencies would be prudent to check their own employment status.

    http://www.communitycare.co.uk/2017/09/27/time-running-good-true-umbrella-companies-locum-social-workers-warned/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The use of umbrella companies by locum social workers will face much greater scrutiny, especially from recruitment agencies, due to new legislation that comes into force at the end of September.

      The provisions in the Criminal Finances Act 2017, which become law on 30 September, primarily target companies rather than workers, making “relevant bodies” criminally liable for failing to prevent third-party associates facilitating tax evasion.

      Tax expert Carolyn Walsh, from CWC Solutions, told Community Care that, from 1 October, “everyone and his dog will be required to police the system for HMRC”.

      She said that the law change would be “more a problem for the agencies”, rather than locums, if they had referred people to umbrella companies “without monitoring the way that they operate”.

      “The locums who have gone with shady umbrellas will be landed with tax demands and penalties,” she said, “but the agencies which carry on paying those umbrellas knowing they operate something other than straightforward PAYE schemes are liable under the new piece of legislation which carries hefty fines.”

      Agencies say that HMRC’s increasing involvement in their industry means locums must not be complacent about their tax affairs. They claim locums risk investigations and financial penalties if they stay with ‘too good to be true’ umbrella schemes.

      Due to the imminent introduction of the new law, Facebook discussion groups used by locums have recently seen posts from social workers who have suddenly been told by their agencies to switch umbrellas, or run the risk of legal action from HMRC. As was the case after the IR35 changes in April, some workers are reporting that they face “massive” pay cuts.

      Gary Chatfield, managing director of the HCL agency, described the new regime as a “nail in the coffin” for umbrella companies that avoid paying tax and said that firms like his were now “essentially doing the work of HMRC”.

      “The onus is on my organisation to do enough due diligence that we are satisfied, that HMRC would be satisfied, that the correct amount of tax will be paid,” he said. It was no longer sufficient for locums simply to state in writing that they were not operating via any tax avoidance schemes, he said; agencies would in many cases have to see pay slips to back such statements up.

      Delete
  4. So many of these recommendations echo what Baroness Corston said way back when. Govt at the time accepted the recommendations then failed to implement 99% of them so I can't see the Tories with their ideology of prison works despite all evidence to the contrary, doing anything productive, positive and reasonable about the situation

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Tories are doing things for prisons. It's just not whats needed.

      http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/two-days-riots-walton-prison-13680716

      Delete
    2. Rioting prisoners have caused two days of chaos at Walton prison. Inmates are reported to have set fires and carried out protests on anti-suicide netting during the trouble.

      Two prisoners were injured during the disturbances - said to have been sparked by the attempted enforcement of a smoking ban. Two separate outbreaks had to be tackled by staff on Monday, with the Ministry of Justice confirming they were resolved by 9pm. A third incident then broke out yesterday.

      The trouble led to firefighters being called in and for Walton jail chiefs to run a “restricted regime”. Ambulance crews were also requested to help deal with the incidents, which all took place on the same wing. The two injured inmates did not need hospital treatment and no staff have been injured.

      The outbreaks involved a small number of prisoners, the MoJ said. Unconfirmed reports suggest B-Wing was on lockdown on Monday after cells had been set on fire, that inmates had climbed onto rooftops within the complex and had protested on anti-suicide netting.

      It has been claimed the trouble erupted due to efforts to enforce a smoking ban at the Hornby Road prison, which has the potential to hold 1,300 prisoners across eight wings.

      Delete
    3. Riots at many, many prisons in Eng&Wales over the smoking ban with £m's of damage to wings etc. Barely a squeak in the press. Tornado teams are non-stop at present, so overtime at enhanced/ special rates must be costing MoJ a fortune. A quaintance working in a NW prison has been under lengthy lockdown in riot gear until early hours on three occasions in last 6 weeks.

      Delete
  5. Puzzles me why barely a squeak in the press? Sometimes I wonder if reading this blog and listening to former prison officers is overly distorting my perspective. The alternatives being some sort of silence conspiracy and / or failure for these incidents to be of any popular newsworthy consumerist concern. Very, very peculiar indeed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Watch this space! Likely to be some interesting articles coming out soon. You don't need to remain silent..speak to your local MP and let them know what is happening.

      Delete
    2. This isn't the post truth age, the truth is out there in great smelly bog like proportions but the powers must be immune from its rancid odour, surely they must?

      Delete
  6. There is a panic going on about lack of prison places - HDC requests to NPS/CRC are now going through HQ inbox to ensure the 10 day deadlines are met and quality of returns improves. There is talk of bringing back ECL (releasing 28 days early) and altering HDC criteria to reduce automatically excluded cases

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wasn't 'Through The Gate' meant to sort all this out...?

    Oh yes, it didn't as it was a load of badly thought out tossed off bollocks.

    Perhaps we can house the prisoners on Twitter - that's what the majority of senior management care about these days, giving themselves a pat on the back and reporting positive propoganda so that the public can see how good they are.

    ReplyDelete