Friday, 17 April 2015

Unions Threaten Strike

Napo website this afternoon:-

Probation unions threaten strikes over job cuts

On 16th April, the Probation trade unions, Napo, Unison and GMB warned the permanent secretary Ursula Brennan that members may be forced to ballot for strike action if she did not intervene over plans by the French multinational Sodexo to axe up to 46% of its staff in the 6 Community Rehabilitation Companies it took over on the 1st February 2015. Sodexo announced recently that 500+ jobs are at risk across its contract as it plans to replace highly skilled staff with biometric machines and mass call centres to supervise offenders in the community.

The unions, who strongly oppose the massive job cuts have also warned the permanent secretary that unless Enhanced Voluntary Redundancy agreements reached with Ministers last year were honoured in full, their members would be looking to ballot for strike action. Napo said that the National Offender Management Service (NOMS), the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) and Ursula Brennan in particular had an obligation to intervene after they “signed off” the deal to privatise the probation service despite strong opposition and expert opinion which said it would not be safe to do so.

Ian Lawrence, General Secretary for Napo said “We warned the Permanent Secretary not to sign off the CRC contracts as we had real fears that Transforming Rehabilitation and the outsourcing programme were not fit for purpose. Sodexo’s operating model of replacing highly skilled staff with machines and call centres to supervise offenders is dangerous and will put the public at risk.”

All three unions have asked for the Permanent Secretary to clarify if the MOJ knew about the redundancies when Sodexo submitted their contract bid, or if Sodexo has sought approval from the Secretary of State for the job cuts since the contracts were signed.

They have made a direct appeal to Ms Brennan to instruct Sodexo to halt the planned job cuts until the public and staff can be assured that Sodexo’s plans have been fully scrutinised from both a staffing and a public safety point of view.

Lull Before the Storm

"There are no new topics for discussion because there are no new topics for discussion: CRCs have gone to ground and no new info forthcoming. The service that was is broken. Give us all a break. We'll be back on form soon enough."


"There's been mention today of 'no new news' and CRCs having 'gone to ground'. Information through from BeNCH CRC last week gives revised end state staffing of 276 rather than the 254 initially announced. This includes a 5% increase in the number of PSOs.

Unions were formally advised by BeNCH last week that it has commenced 'the redundancy process' and a 45 day consultation period declared. Those first to be considered are 'back office' staff; the 'grapevine' indicates that some staff have received letters indicating their post is at risk. The decision making process for compulsory redundancy is likely to be appraisal based.

Here's hoping the blog will get back on track sharing valuable information in respect of how all of those affected by this travesty are being affected."



"Catch 22 advertising for caseworkers and senior caseworkers for South West prisons but no mention of salary scales at all. Closing date 21st April, we've been told that the CRC is expected to start on May 1st! Good luck getting anyone in post by then. Does anyone remember Prison Service Plus by the way? Came in all guns blazing several years ago, offering through the gate support for accommodation, jobs and training, benefits, drug and alcohol referrals - they targeted those easiest to help and disappeared after a couple of years having pocketed as much as possible from the European funding on offer."


"Some areas have recruited internally for TTG which takes preference, leaving other areas very short staffed with no immediate solution in place. One community team halved."


"Anyhow, man down the pub is on fine form again, he says Addaction can't play nicely with Purple Futures anymore and have gone home to sulk ....falling out over the money....NOMS not too happy and putting a brave face on things but when Sec State made a BIG deal over "partnerships" I bet he was thinking longer term than months. 

This forum is still open for wiley correspondents to keep the home front informed - just get out there and scout about for the info and let Jim know."

Monday, 13 April 2015

Help Requested

I wonder if I could appeal for assistance in relation to these recent requests? The first concerns a contribution reposted this morning from a couple of days ago:-
"A solicitor has just successfully argued for a custodial sentence because due to his client currently being on remand, if he were to get a CO/SSO then he would not be eligible to the £46. Magistrates decided to sentence to 28 days custody saying the case was 'very interesting'. This is ridiculous - had he been given the CO/SSO he'd have still got exactly the same support as he will upon release - only thing missing would've been the £46 - oh and we would not have had to pay for his incarceration."
It would be enormously helpful if any person knowing the details of the case could contact me in confidence please. The second request is in relation to a young person interested in probation, as follows:- 
"I am 18 years old, and I am currently a careers coach for Future Frontiers.
Future Frontiers is an organisation that employs students to work with young disadvantaged children in secondary schools as careers coaches. The aim of Future Frontiers is to equip disadvantaged young people with the information, skills and mindsets to be able to realise their career aspirations and maintain the motivation to achieve their full potential. I was lucky enough to be paired with an amazing young girl in a school called Xxxx Xxxxxx in Xxxxxxxxxxx, London. After working with her over the past 4 weeks, she has decided to pursue a career in Probation and Law.

I have been looking for a professional probation officer or counsellor that has plenty of knowledge and love for their job, to speak to her. I was wondering if you would mind being involved in a brief interview with her over Skype? She would just like to ask you a few questions about the profession. The Skype interview should last only about 15-20 mins on the 27th April 15:05-15:45, or if that day is not possible, 11th May between 15:05-15:45."
The timings could prove problematic, but it just might prove possible for some enthusiastic colleague and I can put you in touch. In both cases, my contact details can be found on the profile page. Thanks.

Bleak Futures Week 15

They better hurry up & offer VR. There is not a single person who I know who wants to stay, everyone is talking about getting the hell out.

*****
I feel sick to the stomach as I read that Sodexo statement:

"We had planned on the basis that the majority of exit would be on compulsory terms, seven months after contract commencement, i.e. 1st September 2015, as per the National Agreement."

Says it all - couldn't be more explicit if they tried - it was planned. The slash & burn, the seven month wait to move to compulsory redundancy, the fact it was written into the agreement. IT WAS PLANNED. So come on Napo, Unison, MoJ, NOMS whoever else sat around that table - OWN UP!!! Who got paid what to put together this travesty of an arrangement whereby "the majority of exit would be on compulsory terms, seven months after contract... as per the National Agreement."

*****
NAPO and Unison have many questions to answer - but I doubt the membership will attempt to hold either to account.

*****
One NAPO branch has lodged a dispute but where is NAPO as a whole? Surely this should be taken up as a whole? Just because some CRC areas have not announced redundancies or biometric machines yet does not mean it won't happen in future. If as a union we fail to back our Sodexo led colleagues, then we may as well stop paying our sub's.

*****
Don't think anyone is being critical of reps my friend, more about Napo HQ. Why is there not a coordinated, across board condemnation of Sodexo's actions? NAPO as a whole should be lodging dispute and every branch member should be supporting action. But we know neither will happen. PS I am not in a CRC led by Sodexo but doubt my shareholder will be much different.

*****
Can only speak for myself but I am definitely suffering from post transformation stress disorder and that it is no laughing matter.

*****
I have seen some details of the pay offer which is an oxymoron: no wonder IL was tight-lipped and no wonder all the rhetoric is now on the Pay Ice Age, which gets the unions off the hook. How much have union officials seen their salaries grow in the past five years?

*****

Ian lawrence is not fit for purpose yet he still receives 70k a year and has achieved very little for members. After Napo paid off the last GS for his alleged antics in office and the current GS decisions, or lack, resulted in the JR fiasco and subsequent costs, I'm wondering why we still pay our subs?

*****
As a long serving PO not had am increment for 20 years and no payrise for many a year so let's remember, you get to the top of the scale by sticking around for decades and it used to be referred to as retention, preventing experience evaporating into the ether! We've all been shat on, so let's be sensitive towards each individual in the organisation!

*****
I think it's pretty pathetic to focusing on who gets what from this pay offer. In the round, it's an insult to everyone and that's where the fire should be directed, not on differentials. But there will be no fire because the leadership has given up on pay and the membership moans and groans but there is no groundswell of anger that demands action.

The decline in pay reflects the gender balance and deprofessionalisation of the workforce. Wages will continue to fall until the market rate is reached. At present I am not aware of any recruitment shortages. The calibre of probation is changing and the days of being reasonably well-paid are over, unless you are a sycophant doing well for yourself.

*****
15 years qualified and earning less than some of my peers. Lack of pay progression affects my pension. I will be retiring in 6 years time and at this rate I still won't have reached the top of my pay scale on my retirement. We should not let the pay offer divide us further but fight for fair and equal pay for all.

*****
I love how people are still debating the latest pay offer and bemoaning where they are on the various scales. This time next year those scales won't exist. It won't matter.

*****
I agree: pay scales and increments won't matter. Pay is going to plummet and then we will see what collective effort the disparate and divided probation workforce is capable of.

*****
Just because we face the bleak future you point to, does not mean we should just accept this. I will fight till the end of all this and will be voting no to acceptance. I am well aware it will make little difference.

*****
Good to hear of a 'new and angry mood developing'. The sooner the better...

*****
Letters due out this week for colleagues in the at risk pool going to offices with options regarding VR etc. In our Office, sickness is up and colleagues aren't waiting for their letter, they've put in their notice already. Wonder who will do the work until they sort out the estates and IT? Temping agencies could get busy again very shortly.

*****
South Yorks, letters received today delivered by hand. Those in the oversubscribed pool under 55 got their voluntary redundancy figure, those over 55 offered early retirement, not both.

*****
I've got a little temper on me - it is something I'd do - stuff em I'll just quit - sometimes it's not always about the money. I just hope they don't work their notice.

*****
Well I don't get any money as I don't have enough service and unless you have worked there for ever the redundancy package or early retirement isn't worth waiting for. If you need a job then you can't afford to wait for someone to make a decision about your future.

*****
Sodexo's responses are entirely plausible. It all looks ok on paper but so much of it will not work in the community (i.e. without enforced sobriety and locks), with chaotic offenders and with the expected increases in caseload. The devil is very much in the detail.

*****
"those that need less resources like housing, out of hours interventions will automatically be selected for the closest to change group. Those with greater needs will form the furthest from change groups, and although more needy, will get no assistance."

Spot on. "Closeness to change" is just a new buzzword way of avoiding allegations of "creaming" and "parking". Which is not to say that we haven't always worked in different ways, depending on how motivated someone was, but at least there was an attempt to deliver to the minimum standard of the order as required by the court. These new ideas - particularly with the RARs - will remove all of that.

*****
Nick Hall talks about meeting staff, giving details, managing the change. It's all framed in the emotion-free language of mangerialism. There can be no acknowledgement, that after all the upheavals and anxieties of the split and the struggles to maintain business as usual, he will now take a chainsaw to his loyal, hardworking workforce. He may try and communicate, some empathy off the record, but he can't go 'on message' with this miserable betrayal. But he is only following orders – and that's how they do it – through being conscientious puppets for unscrupulous puppeteers.

*****
A solicitor has just successfully argued for a custodial sentence because due to his client currently being on remand, if he were to get a CO/SSO then he would not be eligible to the £46. Magistrates decided to sentence to 28 days custody saying the case was 'very interesting'. This is ridiculous - had he been given the CO/SSO he'd have still got exactly the same support as he will upon release - only thing missing would've been the £46 - oh and we would not have had to pay for his incarceration.

*****
He might well get less support being an ORA/PSS case than if he were given a CO or SSO, because the requirements are very different. There's not even a pretence in my area that we can offer the same levels of contact. Hope that £46 is worth it.

*****
NAPO and UNISON need to start a clear campaign to re-nationalise the Probation Service. The need is clear to those in the know and the evidence will build week on week. Advise Assist and Befriend the whole caboodle, even bringing back the good old Fighting Fund. Back in the day the universities acted as the gatekeeper to the profession. Bring that system back or using technology we could Skype interviews and let the whole team make the appointment. The Unions second campaign should be to end managerialism and kill off the parasites.

*****
We have been told that Sodexo were meeting with the MoJ last week to discuss the issue of EVR, specifically in relation to onward redundancies. Sodexo say they can't afford this and were surprised to be told that our CRC terms and conditions, which they inherited, provided for EVR. They wanted MoJ view, I gather. Has anyone heard anything as to the outcome of these discussions?

*****
Recent Managers briefing gave the impression that successful bidders in our area (Sodexo) "misread" the EVR aspect, & are (as suggested above) whingeing to MoJ & trying to wriggle out. If true, Sodexo legal team are due a kicking. Wonder if they'll take high risk strategy of JR?

Sad, if true. So keen to trouser vast sums of taxpayer money that they miss a key element of the contract, and rather than act honourably they try to weasel out of the responsibility they bought into. Also it was thought they were trying to strongarm NOMS over the delays/impossibility/delay in IT compatibility, presumably trying to extort more cash from the UK public purse. Didn't they make a 'pledge' about their public duty? Hard to know what the truth is anymore.

*****
I think the 'lack of information', whilst frustrating, is linked to the fact that a lot of this is being made up as they go along. Much of the problem is a manifestation of the indecent haste we have talked about before on here. Mistakes were and are being made, mostly at the expense of staff. It is important to note that the Sodexo team at the heart of this is no more than a tiny handful of fallible human beings who are, themselves, being kettled down paths they barely comprehend. It is the blind leading the blind and, unsurprisingly, the 'expertise' is a lot more limited than they would like to admit.

*****
Bleak (Purple) Futures in Hampshire rewording policies on the database without any consultation. Introduced inferior pension arrangements without any consultation, refusing to say whether they are going to 'Sodexo' their workforce. They have a conference next week but refused the union a stall. Low morale amid disorganised working practices.

*****
A No Smoking Policy introduced in our PF area - service users and staff have to go beyond the perimeter of CRC premises for a whiff and this even goes for vapours!! Apparently it looks unprofessional. So the job's bloody stressful enough and we can't even use what helps take the edge off it. Also, we're not against chatting to service users but if we're having a quick smoke we don't really want to be getting into conversations with them if you know what I mean.

*****
Mr Nick has used a lot of words an tried to suggest he has offered answers, seems to me it's just more of the same. We'll do all we can to look good, but in reality, we cannot provide any answer, because we don't actually understand the questions!

We dreaded 1.6.2014, we dreaded 1.2.2015 and now 1.5.2015, and 1.10.2015 not too far off and it's a shambles! The good news, the privateers have underestimated our clients and their legal representatives, but then I guess, trying to understand the service you're currently trying to shaft, means you take your eye off the ball! Fuckwits!

*****
You are right. In fact the most demanding clients usually come in the lower risk groups. I think introducing private companies is not a bad thing in principle, but the problem here was that none of the companies had any understanding of the client group. They were bidding in the dark, which is high risk for them. For me the key will be the effectiveness of the auditors and compliance staff who hold the CRCs to account. If they are allowed to do a good job, then the prospect of private profit for companies who don't understand the sector disappears pretty fast.

*****
Wise words. Sodexo's only focus is money so I doubt if they've any 'small print' that's going to cost them pennies. My feeling is that if they are talking to the MOJ about EVR, it's because they are now in a position of considerable power and as a consequence of that position they're trying to 're-negotiate' terms to access a few bob more. Any disagreement regarding contract terms should also have union involvement. They're looking for MOJ backing for the action they want to take.

*****
Any news from the discredited charities? Shelter, NACRO? I wonder how one of my clients being sanctioned for 6 months sits with Shelter who are now co-responsible for managing him.

*****
Finally I am out!! Got a new job as a housing engagement officer today, 3k better money than my current 24k probation service officer post, and it seems a great job for a reputable not for profit company that is in growth. No caseload and lots of opportunities to progress. I'm told that I was up against 6 really strong candidates and that my personality and skills learnt whilst working for Probation secured me the role. Have a look into housing roles people, our skills to this role are very transferable and the money is decent. Probation Officers could go for senior housing officer posts which have a similar wage structure.....

*****
In our Sodexo owned area so many have expressed interest in leaving they could easily achieve 60% cuts to staff numbers. And most of those who say they'll stay seem flat and low in mood, citing mortgages, children or other financial commitments rather than any desire to do the job anymore. Its so very sad. To Grayling, Spurr, and all those who were involved in TR and privatisation;

I hope you're ashamed of the damage you've done to the probation service as an organisation, and to the professional lives of thousands of staff. In almost 40 years of my working life I have never before witnessed such blinkered, destructive, divisive behaviour towards a dedicated and successful workforce. It is a scandal.

*****
In the letter to Sodexo, Napo mentions that the bad news was broken just before Easter. This releasing of bad news on Fridays or before bank holidays, is a common tactic. They don't release it on Mondays because they don't want everyone talking about it in the workplace and potentially influencing each other. Better to let individuals stew in their own juices at home where they may be a little more vulnerable without the support of colleagues. They are cynical. I hope all union members will see this as an opportunity to demonstrate solidarity, as in these situations the only strength is that acquired through unity.

*****

All the above evidences that the problems being experienced by 'Probation' are entirely the consequence of poor procurement by the MoJ and a complete lack of knowledge and commitment on their part to the concepts around rehabilitation. They DO think Probation is a community prison and DO believe that everywhere is London.

*****
True. Rehabilitation never really took off within the Prison Service because it was always very low on their list of priorities. We are now seeing Prison Probation staff replaced by Prison Officers once more. This means that anyone allocated to Probation type work can now be called upon to do general Prison duties. Because they can, they inevitably will so almost NO rehabilitative work will take place IN prisons and, with Sodexo et al's approach, NO rehabilitative work will take place in the community. All because Carter couldn't see that zoo keepers were not the same as Vets.

*****
I don't think there is anything in the union's letter to Sodexo that is likely to lead to a turnaround. Important as they are, equality impact assessments, workload weighting tools and H&S may bark but they won't bite Sodexo and there are tiptoe routines for procrastinating on all these issues anyway. As for 'members' anger', this opinion piece will achieve only crocodile tears from Sodexo and business necessity mantras. In releasing this letter, I hope it's not just public relations, but that the unions will keep the membership fully informed of all developments, stay on the offensive, and not go quietly.

*****
My understanding is there will be national meetings between Napo and Sodexo. There will also be local JNC rep meetings with CRC and Sodexo with liaison between national and local Napo reps so Branch meetings ought to be means of getting updates.

*****
I suppose I am making a slightly different point to being updated through the usual channels. The Napo leadership have chosen to release a letter in advance of a meeting, which I think is good. However, this letter could have been disseminated through the branch structure for branches to update members. The letter is stridently angry and suggests Napo and the other unions will not be supine in the face of these proposed compulsory redundancies. It's not commonplace for Unions to release these shopping list letters in advance of a meeting and I read it as a kind of throwing down the gauntlet.

Maybe it's an opportunity for the union leaderships to stay loud on this issue, show there will be no appeasement with regard to these proposals and that more of this type of communication across the membership may have a mobilising effect and reach those who fail to engage at the branch level.

*****
"That loyalty and commitment now sees hundreds of them at risk of losing their livelihoods without the guarantee of the protections for Early Voluntary Redundancy as enshrined in the National Staff Transfer agreement that we are maintaining should be available for the life of the CRC contracts."

I'm afraid that I don't hold out much hope for EVR being upheld when the unions' strongest gambit is that its a scenario "which we are maintaining should be available". No sign of: "a position which is legally binding"; or, "which you signed up for"; or, "which you are responsible for upholding"...

Maybe I'm TR-war-weary, maybe I'm suffering from compassion-fatigue, but it does feel like the unions are waving dead flowers in the air, like there's no conviction in the argument. Akin to the JR scenario it feels we'll just get trampled on and made to pay the price, whilst the bullies get away with it yet again.

*****
Yes, the position is weak and that's reflected in the beseeching language. The only power is collective action to oppose compulsory redundancies, and maybe anger will be translated into industrial action. But it's a big maybe. More likely, it will be death by a thousand cuts. It will be interesting to see what line the unions champion.

Saturday, 11 April 2015

Bits and Pieces 4

Firstly, can I thank people for keeping the blog ticking over during my recent absence and inability to access the internet. I'm hoping normal service will resume this weekend. Whilst away, I notice the trade unions are about to open discussions with Sodexo and here is their starter for 10:- 

HARBHAJAN SINGH BRAR
HR Director
Sodexo Justice Services & Central Functions
Sodexo
One Southampton Row
London WC1B 5HA

(By e-mail, hard copy to follow)

9 April 2015

Dear Harbhajan,

Proposals for Staff Redundancies in Sodexo owned CRCs
In anticipation of our scheduled meeting on the morning of Monday 20 April to discuss the proposed redundancies announced in the Sodexo-owned CRC’s, we would be grateful if you could provide the following information or answers to a number of key questions:

  • The number of proposed redundancies in each CRC, broken down by job title/function
  • Details of any equality impact assessment which Sodexo expects its CRC’s to carry out during consultation on the redundancies
  • Whether Sodexo is required to obtain the permission of the Secretary of State to the redundancies, as special shareholder, given the fact that these redundancies could not have been identified at bid stag
  • Details of the consultation which Sodexo plans to carry out with your CRCs’ statutory partners in relation to the proposed redundancies and your proposed operating model
  • Details of any Health and Safety risk assessments which have been (or are to be) carried out on the proposed operational model.
  • Will a delay to the IT and Estates strategy impact on the capacity to deliver the proposed operational model with the reduced staffing numbers?
  • Has any work been carried out to assess the workloads of those staff who will remain? Has Sodexo developed a workload measurement tool to evidence that CRCs have sufficient capacity to function safely?
  • We understand SODEXO has awarded itself the role of providing corporate back office support services to the CRCs you own. What procedures have the CRCs undertaken to determine the outsourcing of these sub-contracted services?
  • We understand SODEXO has an operating model designed to create the "Rehabilitation Revolution". How does the composition and timing of these proposed staffing reductions contribute to, and synchronise with, the roll out of your plans for improved outcomes and realisation of PbR bonuses?
Members anger
You will not be surprised to hear that the announcements made by your CRC Chief Executives’ prior to the Easter break, have been received with considerable anger and resentment by our constituent members who are working in the newly formed Community Rehabilitation Companies under your ownership.

This unwelcome news has compounded the demoralisation that is being experienced by them after seeing the service they have given loyal service to broken up in an ill-conceived social experiment. That loyalty and commitment now sees hundreds of them at risk of losing their livelihoods without the guarantee of the protections for Early Voluntary Redundancy as enshrined in the National Staff Transfer agreement that we are maintaining should be available for the life of the CRC contracts.

We are urging the company to think long and hard before embarking on a job reduction programme of this magnitude which, we believe, represents a serious risk to operational efficiency and the management of your clients and as a consequence also creates serious doubts about your capacity to maintain the requisite standards of public safety.

This letter which I am copying to Colin Allars and Ian Poree of NOMS following my recent discussions with them, has been sent as an interim response at national level by the three unions representing staff within the CRC’s owned by Sodexo. I can confirm that Ranjit Singh will be the lead contact for Napo for the operational issues that are emerging at local level. Ben Priestley and David Walton will I understand be acting similarly for Unison and Scoop GMB respectively.

We look forward to your reply.

Yours sincerely,
Ian Lawrence

General Secretary
Napo - on behalf of Napo, UNISON, GMB/SCOOP

Meanwhile, The Guardian have been busy sampling the waters and it should come as no surprise to readers of this blog as to what they've found:-

 Probation service split: ‘staff are staring into the abyss’


“I’ve been in this job for 25 years and I’ve never known morale so bad and so low … You just don’t want to go to work on Monday mornings. We’ve just had enough.”

John, a National Probation Service (NPS) probation officer in the south of England, has seen many of his colleagues resign since the service was split in June 2014. Some 70% of probation work has been outsourced to private companies and charities, while the rest – supervision of the most dangerous offenders – remains within the public sector, under the remit of a new NPS.

The 35 probation trusts in England and Wales have been replaced by 21 community rehabilitation companies (CRCs), run by private companies with payment-by-results contracts that kicked in from February 2015. Existing staff have been split between CRCs and the NPS, with many teams now operating alongside each other.

There have been serious consequences. Employees on both sides, many of whom went on strike in April 2014 to protest against the changes, complain of tension, division and a hierarchical work structure. There are more processes, more paperwork, a more intense workload – and absurdities. “It’s getting stupider by the minute,” says John. “I sat in an office yesterday with four managers … and discussion was around whose coffee and tea was put into whose cupboards.”


Divided teams
More seriously, physical and virtual divisions have been created, with screens put up in some offices. “There is this idea that because we’re separate organisations now we can’t allow the other organisation to see our work because it’s confidential, which is absolute nonsense because six months ago we were all working together,” says John. “There’s no flow of information, no knowledge sharing. It’s this huge demarcation that’s being created.”

John is also worried about proposals to turn workspaces – which in many places CRC and NPS staff share – into open-plan offices. “When you’re talking about some of the people we work with in the NPS, people who commit murder and rape and armed robbery ... it’s going to be a recipe for disaster.”

Napo, the probation officers’ trade union, opposes privatisation, arguing that the probation service had been doing a very good job. It won an excellence award in 2011, a first for a public sector organisation. In 2013, the Ministry of Justice rated all 35 probation trusts in England and Wales as good or excellent.

According to Napo, at least 500 probation officers have left since the start of the reform programme. Su McConnell is one. A manager in what was then Devon and Cornwall probation trust, McConnell officially resigned in December 2014, but had been off work with stress since April.

“I had worked for the probation service since 1986, and I’m incandescent about what’s being done to the institution,” she says. “I was trying to manage a team and that team was just being split up, and I could see it; careers were being wrecked. Some staff who had invested a decade of training to do the thing they wanted to do were suddenly staring into the abyss.”

McConnell’s team was divided just before Christmas 2013. Most applied for roles in the NPS, seeking better terms and conditions as well as clearer career progression and job security. A long period of uncertainty had left the staff anxious, with many too afraid to take time off sick in case it counted against them in the selection process, says McConnell.

Splitting up specialist services
One of the consequences of the split is that the bulk of the supervision of domestic violence offenders has been outsourced while sex offenders, deemed higher risk, are managed by the NPS. Prior to the division, McConnell managed a specialist team trained to deliver programmes for both types of offenders. “The modus operandi of these offenders is not dissimilar – they’re manipulative and complicated to work with,” she says. “A lot of the theory and the practice of how you treat them is not dissimilar.”

Having always had a professional interest in domestic violence probation work, she was horrified by the changes, perceiving that corners were already starting to be cut in terms of budgets and staffing levels, not least because the majority of specialists would end up in the NPS. McConnell escalated her concerns as far as justice secretary Chris Grayling, to no avail.

CRCs supervise 200,000 low- to medium-risk offenders, while the NPS supervises the remaining 31,000 high-risk offenders. Under the Offender Rehabilitation Act, which came into force in February 2015, an extra 45,000 offenders a year who are released from prison sentences of less than 12 months will be supervised for the first time. This group has the highest rate of reoffending, with almost 60% reoffending within a year.

Overloaded IT
Clare, who works for a CRC in the Midlands, does not feel equipped to deal with the extra work that will be coming her way. “The IT is just not fit for purpose. It’s no good: you lose your work, things don’t work properly, it crashes, reports just disappear,” she says.

Many probation staff complain of an increase in bureaucracy, monitoring and tick-box exercises since the split. New risk assessments have been bolted on to existing systems, duplicating the workload and placing greater strain on already ancient IT.

The private companies that have taken on CRC contracts are not allowed to access NPS records, due to security and privacy concerns. Not only does this make Clare’s job more difficult, but she feels it has been deprofessionalised. “You can feel like the role has been dumbed down,” she says. “I don’t see myself staying in it anymore, and this is a job I thought I would spend the rest of my life in.”

Andrew, whose probation career began in 1983, now works in a CRC in the north of England. He believes the government has created a two-tier workforce. Contracts require CRCs to have appropriately trained staff, but there is no definition for this and no requirement for qualifications.

Workloads have also increased. Probation officers are assigned less time to deal with lower-risk offenders, meaning that newly transferred CRC staff, with no high-risk offenders on their caseload, must supervise a greater number of people than they are used to. But most of all, Andrew is fed up with the uncertainty of reform. “We’re a long way away from knowing what the system will look like,” he says.

The workload is set to increase with the supervision of offenders serving less than 12 months in prison – those that breach the rules will end up back in the courts system, putting more pressure on officers like Michael.

Inadequate training
Michael says court reports are wanted at increasingly short notice, there is inadequate training to prepare staff for new processes and systems and he is being asked to deal with matters above his pay grade, without sufficient information about offenders’ backgrounds, history or previous convictions.

“More and more we are being asked to help with the sentencing of people without really doing any background checks,” he says. “Either we’re going to collapse under the weight of it all, or there’s going to be a big mistake made somewhere in the court when someone is sentenced – like a domestic violence case where someone gets out instead of being in prison and they manage to murder their partner. Someone’s going to get hurt. That’s the big fear.”

Sodexo, which runs six CRCs in England and Wales, recently announced plans to replace staff with machines – ATM-style electronic kiosks to which offenders will report in, and which Ian Lawrence, Napo general secretary, has said are “downright dangerous and will put the public at risk”. Sodexo’s probation staff have been told to expect job cuts of more than 30% in the next year.

It is changes like these, alongside a less generous pension scheme and fewer career advancement opportunities in CRCs, that make Andrew – and many others working in probation – fearful for the future. “It is simply a massive and dangerous social experiment that will not, and cannot, work,” he says. “It will be future victims that pay the price and future governments that will have to do something about it.”

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “It is vital that offenders are managed safely and securely in the communities in which they live.

“The National Probation Service is tasked with protecting the public from high-risk offenders and the 21 community rehabilitation companies are working to turn around the lives of medium and low risk offenders.

“The vast majority of staff are working at the same desks, in the same teams and using the same IT systems as they were previously. Crucially, they are able to call on their experience and knowledge of working with offenders to continue protecting the public.”


Finally, I see Harry Fletcher has felt moved to produce not one, but two blog posts today:-

TAG SNAGS

The enquiry into Serco and G4S and their tagging contracts will be completed very soon. The private companies believe that their previous actions and activities may well have fell within the conditions of the contract. They were contracted to tag someone if instructed to do so by a court and to remove it when the court stated that the tag period ended. The orders normally lasted for 90 or 120 days and the companies received a fixed fee for each order. If an offender died was jailed or ran away during the duration of an order the company was paid unless the court cancelled the order. There would seem therefore if this is the case to be a problem with the conditions of the contract. A number of officials appear to have either left or changed posts.

When the new contracts were let last year no one company had sole responsibility of all aspects of the work. One supplied the kit, another the software, a third the phones and another did the fitting and monitoring. Enforcement however was taken away and given to the state run National Probation Service (NPS). Hitherto anyone absent for 2 hours or more, found tampering with the tag or removing it was automatically breached and sent back to court. Now however the process is determined by the NPS.

Around 28,000 orders were in place at any one time during 2013/14 with 25 to 30% breaching that is 7,000 to 8,000 per year. Up to a third receive short custodial sentences. Under the old rules all went back to court but under the current procedures about half seem to reach court the rest get warnings. It is expected that tagging will sharply increase now that Probation has been privatised perhaps to as many as 75,000 at any one time by 2020. However the new rules on enforcement will result in less pressures on prison numbers as fewer defaulters will end up inside.

PREDICTION PROBATION

Predictions made at least 15 months ago about the likely impact of the privatisation of the Probation service in England and Wales is becoming a reality. In February 2015 the supervision of low and medium risk offenders, around 100,000 individuals were sold off in lots to the private sector. This included work with domestic violence perpetrators.

In Private Eye and elsewhere Harry Fletcher now Director of the Digital Trust forecast the end of positive interventions for offenders and there replacement by a huge increase in electronic tagging, staff reductions and the introduction of reporting centres and check in biometric machines instead of 1 to1 supervision.

Many new providers have already said that they will be shedding staff from September 2015, maybe by as much as 25 to 30%.The main tagging companies are preparing for a significant expansion of the market and report centres where offenders will sign in are very much on the agenda.

The state retains responsibility for supervising high risk offenders but the number of new court orders deemed high risk and therefore suitable for the National Probation Service is often less than 15% of the total.

Although in the short term the NPS did take on a 100 or so extra staff to deal with writing court reports, the impact of further cuts across the public sector post-election and fewer cases seem inevitably to lead to less supervisors.

A service that won Excellence awards just 3 years ago is now demoralised and in deep trouble. But more tags and reporting machines mean that the New owners can both cut costs and keep the Government happy and make competitive profit margins for shareholders.

Thursday, 9 April 2015

Sodexo Special 2

First here's more from Nick Hall, CEO of Northumbria CRC:-

"Good morning everyone

Further to my last email I provided you with what I can only describe as headline figures regarding future staffing requirements. These were based on a set of more detailed figures which I shared with managers who in turn will have shared these with you. These more detailed figures are:

Managers: current 26, proposed 13.5 initially & 11 post OMS
Band 4: current 59, proposed 31 initially & 26 post OMS
Band 3: current 92, proposed 81 initially & 71 post OMS
Admin: current 50, proposed 32 initially & 24 post OMS
Back office: current 47, proposed 24 initially & 21 post OMS

I had hope by now that I might be in a position to confirm where we had got to with staffing but as of today I have still not agreed these figures and discussions are still ongoing with Sodexo. I will of course keep you posted on any conclusions reached regarding staffing numbers as soon as possible, but in any event you may already be aware that Dave Gardiner and I will be visiting teams after the Easter break. I'm pleased that we have managed to get these in the diary quickly as they will give us an opportunity to talk in more detail. Hopefully by then I will be able to confirm a lot more of the details that you so rightly need to have.

I have included my previous email below as it emphasises the context in which I am sharing this further detail so it’s important that you can read both together."


Then all your questions answered:-

The following Q&A covers a summary of the most frequent questions asked at the staff briefings that took place across the CRCs in January and February, and those which can be answered generically across the CRCs.

It is worth highlighting that some of the questions asked at the staff briefings have already been answered in previous weekly MTT Q&As, so we do encourage staff to read back through the previous answers to find responses to your questions.

If there was questions asked at the staff briefings that you feel have not been answered in the generic responses contained below, please feed these questions through your management team or continue to use the mailbox - AskCRC@sodexojusticeservices.com - where we will publish responses through the MTT Q&A or individually where appropriate.

OPERATIONS 

Can you explain how the Responsible Officer workloads will change?

Workloads will depend on complexity and priority for resource allocation. We expect the Responsible Officers based in the Hub to manage a larger workload than those based in the community.

What are Sodexo’s plans for Unpaid Work?

There will be no change to how Unpaid Work currently operates within the CRCs. In the future, we will look to compare best practice within each of the CRCs that are owned by Sodexo.

Will we still need to use Oasys?

Yes. The risk of harm assessment will come from OASys, though we plan to incorporate it in the new Offender Management System.

What are the plans for women’s services (Essex)?

We will be working alongside your senior management team to develop women’s services provision. The list provided at the staff briefings for Essex was not an exhaustive list. It’s important we now review existing partnerships and the work of staff within the CRC to ensure good practice is not lost.

We currently have a domestic violence multi-agency group running within our CRC, will this continue?

It’s vitally important that key local relationships continue and your CRCs are looking at what this is to make local decisions going forward.

What are your plans for staff safety?

Health and Safety will remain, as now, the responsibility of CRC local management. Sodexo has a strong health and safety culture and will work with CRCs to integrate systems and share best practice.

Have you considered Computer Assisted Therapy as part of your operational plans?

This did not form part of our operational solution. However, we welcome your ideas and would ask that you share these with your local managers for them to feed up and discuss between the CRCs when given the opportunity to do so.

Does the “Closeness to Change” assessment contradict Nacro’s “hard to reach” policy?

No. We believe the “Closeness to Change” assessment tool is an innovative way to help assist practitioners to know when an offender is likely to be ready to change and when more help is likely to have the most impact. We are committed to tackling reoffending, so that must include accessing the most entrenched offenders. But we can’t meet every need for everyone all the time, so setting intelligent priorities is crucial.

There was little about the assessment of and how we manage risk during the presentation. Can you clarify why?

The presentation focused on the new changes to ways of working. The assessment of risk and role of protecting the public remains an integral part the CRC.

Labelling those we supervise as ‘offenders’ which is a contradiction with ‘desistance’ – we have worked towards ‘service user’. What are your views on this?

We have used the term offender within our presentation as this was the term used in the bid specification. We understand that each CRC uses different terminology and we are happy for CRCs to continue using whatever they are familiar with.

Will IOM teams be kept?

Within the model there is an override which will ensure local IOM priorities are recognised so that resource allocation is right. As now, CEOs will take part in annual reviews of IOM locally, but the principles it has put into practice – joint working, setting clear priorities and responding to local need for example – are all central to the approach we have tried to describe.

We have very specific women’s provision at the moment, what plans do you have with regard to women’s services?

The bid contained clear principles for how we deal with the issues women offenders face. We now need to check out how this maps across to what is currently in place locally. Delivery varies widely between CRCs and we will go carefully to make sure there is no break in provision.

Will the term “mobile working” mean more home visits?

We think home visits have an important role in some cases and we want mobile working to make that easier to achieve but it will not be the sole focus.

Will we be expected to move offenders around in our own cars?

We have no plans to change existing local policies.

What is the future of the Women's Safety Officer role?  

We will look at individual roles as part of due diligence and workforce planning, alongside your senior management team.

Could you please provide more detail about the 8 RAR elements?

The following outlines a menu of eight interventions in relation to the RAR:

1. New Directions: initial meeting, assessment, achievement plan, induction (delivered by CRC & Supply Chain)

2. Motivation Engagement Module: focused on those not assessed as not close to change (delivered by CRC)

3. One-to-one supervision: and 4) Offending Behaviour group work modules: portfolio to be developed in CRC, taking account current SAR delivery, new options, information sharing across CRCs. Can include accredited programmes (delivered by CRC)

5) Community Integration Service: CIS provider will deliver, coordinate and broker services across a range of community support pathways (delivered by supply chain)

6) Mentoring & Family Support: can include both high and low intensity mentoring services (delivered by supply chain)

7) Restorative Justice: an essential element of our RAR offer. Recognition that CRCs have models in place and liaison with PCC required to develop further

8) Kiosks: allows offender to report in, to give and receive information, for those who reach a point where face-to-face time is less frequently required and/or good pattern of compliance achieved. To be developed in 2016.

CRCs are reviewing their RAR offer to map against the above and progress suitable RAR elements for each CRC in the future. This work is currently being carried our by members of your senior management team.

What roles will service users play in helping to shape future operating models and services?

We think this is crucial, and many CRCs have already made great strides in this area. We have an agreement with User Voice to establish democratically elected User Councils, where they do not already exist in a CRC, and to help in generating improved rates of return for the User surveys which are contractually required. But the potential scope for local innovation in this field is great, and we expect user involvement to grow throughout the life of the contract.

Can you explain the plans to introduce kiosks in 2016?

Sodexo uses kiosk technology in all of our prisons. Prisoners access a touch screen kiosk using a fingerprint reader and pin code. It is a great way of increasing prisoners’ ability to complete tasks for themselves, for example book visits, order canteen, view notifications, top-up pin phone accounts, order their menu etc. This not only allows prisoners to be responsible for managing more of their own life, but also gives Prisoner Custody Officers more time to focus on the quality aspects of their role, rather than a number of desk based administrative tasks.

The same principle applies in the community. We want to use kiosk technology to allow for a number of tasks especially by offenders who have successfully completed a proportion of their order or licence. Kiosks can also provide a good means to communicate simple messages and receive requests or information back. They are a good means of preventing impersonation, for example in CP, and can be a portal to access a wide variety of useful information for offenders.

The technology is not new, and has been used for many years in New York, where we observed it. The feedback is that it has freed more time for staff to spend with more complex offenders, with a reduction in reoffending rates. But there was also positive feedback on the impact for less complex cases – in particular, the prospect of moving to kiosk reporting was used as an incentive to compliance.

CONTRACT

How do you make money on the contract? 

There are two elements to how we will make the CRC contracts successful.

The first element of payment is Fee for Service income from delivering court orders, licence requirements and the resettlement service in custody. Delivering to the right standard, and so avoiding “service credits” (fines) under the contract, is the first task.

The second element is our ability to be successful in reducing reoffending and this is where the Payment by Results part of the contract comes into play. We need to increase both the number of people who stop reoffending altogether and also reduce the rate at which those who reoffend decide to do so.

In addition, we think CRCs have a wealth of talent and knowledge which should allow them to expand the scope of what they do during the life of the contract by bidding for other work. Sodexo’s corporate expertise in business development should help CRCs to make the most of such opportunities when they arise.

Finally, Sodexo has a very high client retention rate based on our reputation of delivering quality services. As we develop the CRC contracts over the next seven years, we will be aiming to achieve successful contract delivery in all CRCs so that when the CRCs are tendered in the future, we have a strong case to retain these contracts.

What is the definition/formula for reducing re-offending?

Reoffending will be measured against a baseline of outcomes in 2011. Each year of the contract reoffending rates (as measured by reconviction) will be compared to that baseline, adjusted for the characteristics of the caseload, to assess whether we qualify for a “PBR” payment. To receive any payment, the “binary” rate – that is the number of people who don’t reoffend at all – must be lower than a certain threshold. If it is, then individual reductions in reoffending short of complete desistance, also qualify for a payment.

What is the innovation fund and when will it be available?

We have set aside some money for each CRCs CEO to use as an innovation fund. We will be liaising with your CEO about when this money is available and it’s worth noting that it will be at their discretion, about where and how it’s best used.

How will we know we are meeting our performance targets?

A company called Optimity Matrix will be able to provide more frequent and real-time data about how CRCs are performing in relation to meeting the requirements of the contract. This will assist in ensuring CRCs are putting the right resources to the right people and at the right time. Matrix are also visiting the CRCs to understand how they currently gather data in terms of meeting their performance targets and have picked up on some really good practice already.

PARTNERSHIPS

What is VCS?

Voluntary and Community Sector.

How will the relationship with the Voluntary and Community Sector partners work?

As part of the bid specification, providers were required to increase the CRC budget into the supply chain (or Voluntary and Community Sector).

CRCs will contract manage the relationships with the VCS partners to ensure we are both meeting the needs of the business. Additionally, we believe the increased relationships are useful for co-attendance at meetings, feedback, information sharing and working group ventures.

In practical terms, there will be close liaison between supply chain providers, managers and the Responsible Officer with the latter being regularly updated with offender’s progress and information.

Will the supply chain have similar ethics that match those of Sodexo?

We have carefully selected our supply chain and believe that they provide ethically-based services for offenders which match the values of Sodexo and the CRCs.

There seems to be a significant shift of work into the supply chain. What impact will this have on staff currently working in the CRC?

The majority of the supply chain’s work will be focused on the Through the Gate and community integration services. They will focus on the delivery of bespoke specialist services which will complement the roles of the CRC staff, rather than replace it.

HR

Will job titles change?

Due to the change in requirements of the CRC and the service delivery model, there are likely to be some changes to the nature of roles.

How do Sodexo work with unions and what is the process for registering disputes?

We have strong relationships with Trade Unions across our business. In particular, within Justice Services, we have partnership agreements in place with the several unions that operate within our prisons. We will be aiming to develop good communication with the recognised unions in the CRCs. However, it is worth emphasising that the CRCs are the employers and the main ongoing union relationships remains with them, including any dispute registration and resolution.

What does the shared services centre provide and what will remain within the CRC?

The shared services centre provides transactional work in HR, Finance and IS&T that is required for many of our sites across the UK & Ireland. This includes: grievance & policy support, employee details monitoring, recruitment processes, payroll transactions, procurement services, credit management, accounts payable, management accounts and IT service desk. (Please see MTT Q&A - Issue 9 for more detail about the HR shared services function)

During our current due diligence process, we are considering which of this work can be transferred to shared services and which of this work remains within the CRC. These findings will be shared with you soon and you will be fully consulted on any implications this may have to roles within the CRC.

What is Sodexo’s approach to part-time working?

Sodexo has a flexible approach to employees who wish to work part-time hours, providing the request to do so meet the needs of the business. CRC senior management will continue to be responsible for requests for part-time working within their CRC as per existing procedures.

What are the plans for recruiting into roles that are required during this transitional stage?

We are very aware that each CRC needs to run business as usual. However, we are requiring that any vacancies in the CRCs over the coming weeks and months are advertised on a temporary or fixed-term basis , given due consideration to the upcoming workforce restructure. Decisions on whether to recruit or not are to be taken by each CRC senior management team.

Do Sodexo adopt a performance related pay scheme, linked to their appraisal system?

The national agreement is that the terms and conditions of your current employment, as detailed in the NNC handbook, remain unchanged. As CRCs are unable to vary these terms, there are no plans at this stage to implement a scheme which financially incentives performance.

Will there be the opportunity for one-to-one conversations with members of the MTT team?

The MTT team do not have plans to routinely meet with staff on a one-to-one basis. All concerns should be raised with managers in your CRC with whom we are working closely.

Will annual leave and weekly hours be the same?

Yes, these are part of your terms and conditions. Annual leave is protected under the national agreement and we have no plans to change the level of annual leave entitlement you receive. It may be necessary to change some annual leave year start and end dates, for administrative purposes, but in this case you will be informed of the need to change and we will ensure that the number of holiday days you receive are unaffected.

If there are any requirements to change weekly working hours due to the requirements of the new operating model, in the future, staff will be consulted with on this in line with normal CRC processes. 

Can the shared service centre cope with the additional CRC caseload?

This is why we are undertaking a phase of due diligence. This will allow us to understand what roles are being carried out within the CRCs and by whom, then decide which of this work can transfer over to the shared service centre.

We will be mindful of implications of TUPE (Transfer of Undertakings, Protection of Employment) legislation when we look at changing service provision. It may be that some staff transfer with the work into the Sodexo shared service centres, and should this be the case, we will communicate and consult with those staff affected. If required after TUPE considerations we may need to put additional resource into shared service centres, any new roles created would be advertised and CRC staff would be welcome to apply for these roles if they wish.

Will local IT support remain within the CRCs or will this transfer to shared services?

It is likely that IT roles will be required within each CRC. We are currently understanding local requirements as part of our due diligence and workforce planning phase of the change programme.

Our CRC has a staff council. Does Sodexo approve of these types of group?

We understand every CRC has different operations, working groups and engagement activities that staff feel a part of and would like to see continue. If a group, such as a staff council, is well received by staff and meets a purpose, then there is no intention to change this. It will be for the CEO and senior management team to decide what methods of consultation and communication work well for your CRC, alongside the trade union representation method of consultation.

What pension scheme will new employees of the CRC be given the opportunity of joining?

New employees will be offered the opportunity to join Sodexo’s pension scheme. Those who were employed in the CRCs prior to share sale (1 February 2015) will remain eligible for the Local Government Pension Scheme (subject to the terms of the LGPS Admissions Agreement).

Will CRC staff be given the opportunity to move to work within Sodexo’s prisons?

We openly advertise all Justice Services vacancies on our website www.sodexojobs.co.uk. Should this be something CRC staff are interested in applying for, we would encourage staff to do so. As a company, Sodexo does look to develop, retrain and retain staff, and provide the opportunity for colleagues to move into different roles across our business.

A move out of your existing CRC to direct employment with Sodexo would constitute a change of employer and the associated terms and conditions for the new post would be offered.

Are you considering staff on temporary/fixed term contracts when you are undertaking due diligence?

Yes. The undertaking of due diligence will allow us to compare the more generic data that we received in the data room last year, compared to what the actual staffing numbers are in each CRC at the current state. This will include staff who are employed on temporary or fixed term contracts.

What is retention rate of staff (in Sodexo)?

74.1% across the Sodexo business.

Car leasing is important for those having to move locations. Does Sodexo run a car leasing scheme we can access?

Any change of location will be dealt with in accordance with your terms and conditions of employment and in accordance with CRC processes for handling any such change in base location. We are not aware of car leasing schemes being operated in CRCs and would not intend to introduce such a scheme.

Will CRC staff be able to TUPE into roles that are being advertised by the partner agencies we will be working with?

Where a change in service provider occurs, we will be working with our partners organisations to consider whether TUPE applies to any staff undertaking that work. If TUPE does apply then your CRC will be communicating and consulting with your at the earliest opportunity.

If partner organisations are advertising roles and you are not identified as being covered by TUPE, then you are free to apply but this would be a personal decision to leave the employment of the CRC.

LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT

What are your plans for a PQF replacement qualification and how will Laurus be involved with this?

The Probation Qualification Framework is due to change in 2016. In the bid specification, the opportunity arose to introduce a PQF replacement which better meets the needs of the CRCs. In light of this, we have worked with a company called Laurus to develop a PQF replacement and the awarding body, Skills for Justice Awards, have now accredited a new level 4 certificate in community rehabilitation as a direct replacement for the PQF level 3 award.  It is our intention going forward that CRCs will enrol team members requiring qualification onto this new award. However, it may be necessary in the short-term to offer some PQF3 awards to maintain compliance.

Will there still be roles for local delivery of Learning & Development?

As part of due diligence we are working to understand more about the Learning & Development model and roles that currently exist within each CRC. Once this process is complete, we will work alongside your senior management team to propose the best way to deliver Learning & Development to the CRCs in the future. Once we know this your CRC will be able to discuss the proposal with any staff who may be impacted by any changes.

What core training will be provided to staff?

We are currently undertaking a needs analysis of the training that is available within the CRCs. We realise that there will be new training elements that staff will be required to complete as we move to the new operating model. However, in addition to this, we will also explore the opportunities available from Sodexo’s existing in-house catalogue of learning and development solutions. As part of this, CRC staff will be given the opportunity to access Sodexo’s learning management system, Ingenium, later in the year.

ESTATES

Can you clarify the office relocation plan? For example, have you considered employees travelling times?

Over the coming weeks and months, we will be working alongside your management team to understand the workforce and geography of each CRC we have won, before decisions on office locations are made. However, we do plan to move to new office locations between October 2015 and the end of the year.

Will there still be a head office within each CRC?

We are working alongside your senior management team to plan a new estate model, which includes where staff across the CRC will be based and the requirement for a head office. It is likely to be in the same location as the Hub.

In the new estates model, who will provide facilities management of buildings?

It is proposed that Sodexo will “self supply” (an FM role within the CRC) the FM Services required for each property.

Can you explain the difference between the Hub, local management offices and neighbourhood centres? Who will be working from each and what are the functions?

Hub – A new head office and administration support centre. Staff are likely to include members of the senior management team, middle managers relating to the new Hub model, administrative staff and some practitioner staff.

Local Management Centres (based on LDUs) – Designed to be offender facing, with group meeting rooms, open plan flexible working areas and one-to-one meeting rooms. Staffing is likely to include: middle managers, practitioner staff (PO/PSO), programmes facilitators and some locally based CP staff.

Neighbourhood Centres – Designed for face-to-face meetings with offenders and includes a smaller open plan working area for staff to drop-in to.

When moving to the new estate, will programmes delivery be considered?

Yes.

ICT

How will Sodexo achieve the new ICT systems at such short timescales and how is their solution not something that could have been developed previously by NOMS?

Sodexo has an existing relationship with IT company, Unilink, who developed the technology we use in all of our prisons and who we’re working alongside to develop the new OMS system we plan to introduce into the CRCs. We commenced work on developing the new OMS system with Unilink around five months ago to help us reach our target delivery date of October. As explained at many of the staff briefings, we do expect the IT solution to be better than what you currently use and it will enable a more flexible and mobile workforce. We will aim to develop and improve the OMS system throughout the duration of the contract. We’ll be looking for suggestions and ideas from staff within the CRCs to help us develop the system in the future.

Will you be consulting with staff over the development of the new IT systems?

Yes. It is our intention to get the views of CRC staff so that we can develop our IT system based on the needs of the users. It is important to stress that our initial “front end” system is being worked on to very tight timescales, so while we expect to have something that is workable and an improvement on current IT systems, we do stress that it’s a 7 year contract and we’ll look for staff’s input throughout the duration to develop the system and make improvements.

What do you mean by mobile working?

The OMS system we are working towards implementing will be web-based, meaning staff will only require a wifi connection, which allows greater flexibility in where they wish to work. This fits well with our new estates model, in particular our ‘neighbourhood centres’, some of which we’ll look to co-locate with partners.

The new system reduces the need to be connected to a cable, giving staff more freedom to work in the community.

Will supervisors overseeing community payback be provided with hand held technology?

No handsets are currently being developed for CP supervision. However, we believe that the solution we are developing will allow future access to this sort of technology to support the supervisors. At this stage we are working with the NOMS Accreditor to approve the system currently under development and will look to other technologies after we have deployed the new system.

Can the new case management system avoid the term ‘offender’ (labelling etc)?

During the tendering process, we referred to our system as an Offender Management System to differentiate from our existing Custodial Management System that is used across our prison estate.

There is a lot of information coming through regarding hot desking – how will this affect people with disabilities who have Access to Work equipment – e.g. desks, monitors, keyboards, mice, seats, etc.?

CRCs will continue to consider the needs of individuals and support them as appropriate where adjustments may be required to their working environment or equipment. Your senior management team will work alongside members of the mobilisation team to understand any impact of the new operating model, in particular the new technology and estates strategy, and make reasonable adjustments for staff who require Assistive Technology to carry out their roles.

FINANCE

If staff are expected to work in their communities more, how will things like expenses be considered, especially in the more rural locations?

Expenses for working within the communities will be reimbursed in line with local policies. We may consider harmonising the expense policy in the future to provide a consistent and standard process across all of the CRCs. If we chose to do this, it will be in consultation with your trade union representatives.

COMMUNICATIONS

How will we promote who we are and what we do?

Over the duration of the contract, we will work together to ensure we promote the work of the CRCs in the community and build on stakeholders understanding of what the CRCs do. This will partly be done locally, but will also be a benefit of having six CRCs, so we can share how we promote the achievements of the CRCs.

Some of our communication tools are no longer fit for purpose – how soon will we be able to have a replacement for the intranet?

We are currently working with your communications team to identify what communications methods are used within the CRCs and find out what contracts are in place for intranets and websites. We will work together (members of the MTT team and your local communication team) to propose solutions that fit-best across the CRCs to ensure we maintain effective communication methods.

MANAGEMENT

Can you explain about conflict of interest between getting paid to keep people out of prison and also owning several prisons and getting paid to accommodate prisoners?

We don’t see a conflict. We have no influence over sentencing policy and the Government decides what prison capacity it needs and how to procure it. Our approach to imprisonment is the same as it is to the work of CRCs – we want to reduce reoffending.

Can you clarify the leadership structure, both within the CRC and above that?

At a CRC level, the CEO and senior management team will have responsibility for the contractual and operational delivery of the CRC.

As highlighted at the staff briefings, Sodexo does not operate under large headquarters operations, so above the CEO of the CRCs, is Trevor Shortt, Director of Operations for Community, who is part of a small Executive Team for Sodexo Justice Services.

The Mobilisation, Transition and Transformation (MTT) team structure is temporary. It’s been put in place to help deliver the transition to the operational solution and support the CRCs with the change plan over the next 12 months.

Will the communication between the CRCs and prison service improve?

Our experience is that relationships are generally positive and remind you that the key contact with Governors/Directors of prisons remains your CEO. We understand the challenges currently faced within the prisons, but your CEO and management team will keep them informed about our service model, in particular the Through the Gate services, coming on stream from 1 May 2015.

Some of us live close to HMP Northumberland and have friends and family who work there now or have worked there previously. We have heard a lot of negative reports about recent changes. What assurances/confidence can you give us that Probation won’t change in the same negative ways?

In the short time HMP Northumberland has been managed by Sodexo, we are proud of the progress the prison has made and how it is being operated.

With any public to private sector contract, the new owner is likely to face increased media scrutiny, which has been the case with HMP Northumberland. However, we are approximately 15months into a 15 year contract at HMP Northumberland. It is a prison we see with great potential to grow into a fully operational ‘working prison’ that provides opportunities to for offenders to challenge their offending behaviour and to reduce reoffending.

LEGAL

Who is responsible for public liability insurance?

CRCs are responsible for public liability insurance cover.

And finally, here's a graphic example as to why we are where we are provided by a reader of the Northampton Chronicle and Echo:-

Does anyone know what a "probation officer" does? Make friends with criminals because they are desperate to get a grip on reality? If they all disappeared no-one would notice or care. Over promoted social workers.

Tuesday, 7 April 2015

Bleak Futures Week 14

To my mind redundancy announcements at this time is a tactical move by Sodexo. Many are not going to hang about to see if the axe falls on them, and many will already be looking for alternative employment. Come August, much of the saff reductions wanted by Sodexo will probably have been met by staff leaving off their own back, and of course Sodexo will have to pay them nothing.

*****
Sodexo are the first to announce, but unlikely to be the last. Extrapolating from these figures is going to put the redundancies in the thousands, not hundreds and so I cannot see alternative employment filling the vacuum.

*****
Am I right in thinking that compulsory redundancies pay more than voluntary, due to the fact that you are being made unemployed rather than voluntary as you are making yourself unemployed? Also, once you get compulsory redundancies you are entitled to benefits.

*****
Completely backwards. The vol. redundancy payments are higher to incentivise those who are willing to go 'at a price' before making people compulsorily redundant. Without the higher payments, everyone will just take their chances and play the odds.

*****
Voluntaries are offered to entice people to go sooner to save company £££ (eg staff like higher management). Sodexo have no real incentive to offer voluntaries.

*****
Coupled with the fact that the National Agreement clause (16) on enhanced redundancy only applies to voluntary redundancies, I would imagine it is in Sodexo's interest to wait until after end September 2015, when they will be able to make compulsory redundancies without being obliged to offer enhanced terms.

*****
S.Yorks Napo and Unison formally registered a trade dispute today over failure to apply staff transfer agreement in respect of EVR and apparent denial of VR enhanced or otherwise to over 55s.

*****
Brilliant! That is what we need. Hope others follow suit. This is what the staff transfer agreement was for. I was really exasperated by all the "it's worthless" "the unions have sold us down the river" bleating. Please get behind your unions.

*****
Naive - We had local disagreements foiled by poorly voted strike action. Sodexo consulting on the agreement won't bind anything. They can still sack. It will just cost a little more now lose a little profit overall. Oh no you're right they will see their insensitive approach and give us a rise and less work. Wake up the fight was lost already.

*****
Keep an eye on Catch 22, who will be delivering through the gate services for CRCs within months. Case manager role at HMP Doncaster paying £16,489 to £22,673.Senior case manager, from £19,527.37 to £26,849.36 per annum.

*****
Bloody disgraceful. I doubt at that price you are going to get anyone with passion and commitment. You pay for what you get.

*****
You will though. What you may also get is inexperience and a less well trained staff group. You may get staff that become quickly disillusioned or see their post as a "means to an end", maybe a step towards a public sector job... one day. Catch 22 have been a threat waiting in the wings for a while now.

*****
Gutless CRC CEO's and SMT going along with the Sodexo salami slicing. Ultimately it is the CRC who is our employer and the contracts sit with the CRC. When are they going to wake up and grow some balls and realise the risk sits with them if delivery goes tits up because they have no skilled staff left. I've already heard them whining about it not being their fault and blaming the private company. The private companies have shares but it is the CRC management who are accountable for employee matters and delivering on contract. It will be the CRC who faces a tribunal and are expected to deliver. Come on NAPO it's time to wake up, you've been caught with your trousers down again.

*****
I left Probation 5 years ago just when this bollocks was kicking off and moved into a completely unrelated field. It was the best move of my life. I am happier and healthier. There comes a point when you just have to accept the government sees the Probation Service as 100% expendable and move on. Stop flogging a dead horse.

*****
But what "unrelated field"? I know people say they have moved on but where to? Apart from a few who have gone into Social Work no-one has said what they are doing now. I am genuinely interested in knowing. I accept the notion that we have lots of transferable skills but can anyone show where they have proved the point, especially if they have no other experience than Probation?

*****
It's hard to answer this without 'outing' former colleagues if you want the detail that I think you are looking for. However, substance misuse agencies, children's charities, mental health agencies, arts organisations, travel agencies, big solicitors firms, universities and colleges and own businesses have all snapped up people I've worked with very quickly. Most of them now earn more than they did in probation. Hope that helps a little bit, check out indeed or some other big job sites and you might be surprised at what's out there. Good luck!

*****
What you learn in Probation is how to think quickly, navigate incomprehensible IT systems, solve problems, communicate on all levels and interpret a myriad of laws and policies. You'll be welcomed by many, many employers. Don't panic!

*****
I'd steer clear of substance misuse and mental heath. They're hardly a bag of laughs or gold. I think people in Probation are so worn down they've lost the confidence or energy to make a move out. If they make you redundant after all of this you should be thankful that someone has made the move for you. Sorry if that pisses some people off but I think there's a lot of Stockholm Syndrome about. JUST GET OUT!!!

*****
I work in IT now. I re-trained. It was totally worth it. My years in Probation gave me anxiety the doctor said PTSD. I don't know about that but I was medicated for the first two years after I left. Even reading this blog is raising my blood pressure. This isn't a smug "look at me & my better life" post but really really there is a better life out there. Just leave. It's not worth it, I promise you.

*****
Thank you. I agree with comment about confidence. I think I have done this for so long it is hard to see a role outside of Probation.

*****
I understand. You're so very qualified for so many things out there. It's going to take a paradigm shift away from you holding your nose to the grindstone and feeling the constant fear that if you stop, all the cards will fall to loving yourself enough to take a little time to plan a future. Book holiday now, use the time to fix your CV and apply for other things. And for Gods sake see a counsellor privately. The toll this job is taking on you can in no way be underestimated. Not just you, every PO reading this.

*****
I think it's disgusting what they're doing. Essex had a meeting with the Chief Officer yesterday and its bleak, 50% of admin staff to be axed, a central "hub" aka Contact Centre in Chelmsford, OM3 and 4 grades are alleged to be "safe" but for how long? It just stinks and to add insult to injury, staff cannot apply for Enhanced Voluntary Redundancy!

There are plenty of staff (including me) who would jump at this but once again any opportunity to do so is denied, which is insulting as I want to go but not without a pay off! I'm taking my 6 years of expertise, knowledge and skills elsewhere as I'm actively seeking alternative employment, interviews are flooding in! Having Neighbourhood Centres and a central hub is awful, how can you gauge risk by telephone?? This is a dangerous and shambolic system and I'm ashamed to be involved in it but I have no choice and without a decent financial recompense to leave voluntarily I want out.

Sodexo don't care about or value experience, all we are to them is a disposable commodity or a mere number. How will decisions be made to get rid of staff? We've been told it's based on appraisals and sickness, but who really knows? The only certainty I can foresee is offending will escalate if not managed correctly and this will seriously affect their PbR figures, so then what?? It's too hideous to contemplate and won't be reversed come the election (regardless of who is elected). Sad times indeed for a once decent and respected service!

*****
I'm pretty compliant with any sanction imposed on me as a consequence of offending, so I could soon be a kiosk reporter if they're introduced in my region. The kiosk wont be able to tell I guess if I've lost a stone in weight since our last 'interaction' which would indicate to a humanoid that my drug use is increasing significantly.

The kiosk won't be able to tell if I'm scruffy looking, which might suggest to a humanoid that I've lost my most recent address. The kiosk wont be able to tell if I've lost my benefits and have no money. The kiosk wont be able to tell if I've got black eyes because I've been involved with some altercation. And the kiosk certainly wont be able to see the bag of shoplifted goods at my feet that I picked up on the way to report.

Oh! I've got to provide it with all this information? With a risk of recall to custody and 10 days withdrawal pain, I DON'T THINK SO!! I would however like to thank the MOJ for all its recent efforts. I no longer leave prison with just £46 in my pocket, now I'll also get all the support that a kiosk can give me. I just hope they'll dispense chocolate bars as well!

*****
Are people aware that various SPO, PO, PSO, and Practice Manager jobs are being advertised in Kent, Surrey and Sussex CRC? The mind boggles whilst in the midst of all this. Their provider is Seetec Group - what do they know that Sodexo don't? Or am I missing something - they already have a staff of approx 650....

*****
Meanwhile, down at the MoJ they're recruiting a whole new team of IT personnel, starting with four new team leaders @ £90,000 a year. Here's the opening drivel:

"The Ministry of Justice is one of the largest government departments. Our work spans criminal, civil and family justice, democracy and rights. We work to protect the public and reduce reoffending, and to provide a more effective, transparent and responsive criminal justice system too. At the heart of this, is our commitment to deliver a justice system in which the public are truly confident.

To achieve this, we’re transforming the way we work. And that puts our Technology and Digital teams at the forefront of a radical overhaul. We’re making our technology and digital services simpler, clearer and faster. There are a number of roles in the MoJ Technology Directorate and we need inspirational and forward-thinking leaders to drive this."

*****
what are Areas doing for RAR? - there's nothing in our Area and isn't it the 1st May that it's all meant to commence? I have people on RARs but all I'm doing is giving supervision which is NOT a RAR. I have a horrible feeling they are going to turn us all into programme tutors.

*****
That's the point - they are making them and we don't have any activities set up so it's still supervision. Nothing set up for TTG unless managers gonna pull a rabbit out of the hat - 1st May's round the corner!!!

*****
Coming through thick and fast now. What Pillock would introduce a RAR when to commence 01/02 when most funded projects are coming to an end and any local agreements with partners are out of window because of probation sell off. Who? Yes that would be the April fool himself.

*****
St Giles will be running TTG in Wales. Interviewing for a Team Manager this Wed. Tough for those unable to attend as StG won't reschedule, only the 1 interview day. Half term and Easter hols many people are away. Surely they haven't got someone in mind?

*****
They simply do not understand the whole ethos of public service do they? These idiots, Maude included, just continue to show their true colours. I was sooooo proud to be a public servant serving my community as a probation officer and it is all blown to the wind.

I believe that the power to remove someones liberty, either in custody or by complying with community penalties, MUST be only a function of the state. Furthermore, one that must never be outsourced, it too important. The very idea that others (shareholders and senior managers of the companies on performance related pay) can £profit from crime and the victimisation of my fellow citizens is totally anathema. This is the principle of public service for me and to remove this kills altruism. Perhaps this is the moral high ground and perhaps it is so for a reason!

*****
I have been trawling websites concerning the use of Bio-metrics and it could fall flat on it's face if people decide to say 'no'. From what I can see, with the exception of passport and the police, people can opt out. As is human nature people when offered to report to kiosk people are going to ask 'what's in it for me?' if the answer is reduced travel/expense then yes, probably the uptake will be good, but other than this, I can't see any reason why people would choose it. Sodexo appear to be putting all their easter eggs in one basket regarding this initiative.

*****
Precious little detail in any of the Working Links presentations to staff as part of their roadshows across Wales and the West Country in the last few weeks. The main thing seemed to be a video of people who'd used to work for small, local service providers until they were swallowed up by Working Links, now seemingly press-ganged into telling us that WL aren't that bad. And a lot of talk about lots of job opportunities within WL which don't involve working for the CRC (followed by the CRC CEO hastily saying he wouldn't allow any secondments because we haven't enough staff).

*****
I have much respect for Paul Senior, but his association and unwavering support for the Probation Institute puts him massively down in my books. Paul talks about principles and values and yet not once have Probation Institute publicly opposed TR. Not once have they supported the same professional who took action to strike in order to defend the same principles and values which he and Sue Hall talk so much about. Not once have they publicly acknowledged the stress and pressure staff have been placed under. Not once have they opposed the under 12 months supervision as a breach of human rights and an outright attack on communities and civil liberties. So - Excuse me if my comments offend. Yes they are designed to offend because I’m offended by the hypocrisy and double standards in which they and PI promote their self-interest and self-serving agenda. Paul and Sue should be ashamed of themselves.

*****
If you want evidence-based policy, consider the number of Tories in the Commons and the Lords who got themselves out of tricky corners by asserting their probation credentials by asserting their support – financial and political – for the Probation Institute, supported by probation chiefs and the unions. They knew it would play well to the gallery and it was often quoted in the same sentence as '£46 in your pocket'. The professors et al are 'useful idiots'. These people are not on the frontline, they are not facing redundancy; on the contrary they can look forward to research commissions. They are far removed from the fallout and from their vantage points, like giggling Greek Gods, they can look on as lesser mortals are skewered. The whole thing is an insult and a betrayal.

*****
CRCs bought the contracts on the basis that they had autonomy to develop their own 'innovative' approach to reduce reoffending. To that end how can the PI dictate what it is or isn't right for the CRCs to do? The PI is nothing but an extra layer of insulation designed to buffer government from fall out from really bad policy.

*****
Like it or not the PI is probably the best and perhaps the only, potential means of securing some common professionalism across the CRC's. If it is to achieve this it cannot denounce the profit making providers, however repugnant they might personally or individually consider the profit motive may be.

*****
It's the profit makers that will decide what the 'common professionalism' is going to be, not the PI.

*****
I don't disagree, but if there is a voice they'll listen to other than their shareholders it's the PI, and for now at least the CRCs are buying in.

*****
If a professional body cannot criticise the profession it represents, it has no credibility. It is like a university than cannot fail any of it's students. It undermines itself.

*****
You know that supporters of the Probation Institute are scraping the barrel for justifications when professionalism is redefined as 'common professionalism'. This means deprofessionalization and it has happened in all public services that have been opened to the market. It's a major issue in education as there is no requirement for free schools to employ qualified teachers.

Common professionalism can only mean one thing: lowering standards, deregulation, and lowering wages. This is what free schools can do: set their own pay and conditions for staff; employ teachers without qualified teacher status; determine their own admissions arrangements; decide upon their own curriculum; set the length of terms and school days; and operate independently of the local authority and outside the local family of schools. These are the 'freedoms' that CRCs will claim for themselves and they can market it all under the name of common professionalism, as blessed by the probation institute.

The NPS does not need the probation institute, but the CRCs do. You need a body that is prepared to 'independently' give its endorsement to new arrangements that are motivated by profit, but with the backing of the PI these changes can be promoted as innovative. The PI in effect becomes a public relations arm of the CRCs and this is epitomised in the new terminology of common professionalism. Which is why those who in their hearts know the whole project is dubious, but believe they can ride the tiger, are 'useful idiots' to the CRCs.

*****
I had, originally, had hope for PI but once they started to allow the employers to pay for their staff membership it was, IMO, doomed! After a year they still have just over a thousand members. It would be interesting to know how many were paid for by CRCs! I suspect well over half. Many of the others are academics & some within MOJ who never worked in probation & have been involved in TR!

There is no way PI will oppose cuts in staff and introduction of machines! Despite all their talk of defending ethics & values. I paid for my membership last year (turned down employers offer to pay) won't renew or let CRC pay for me this year! Unfortunately I also don't hold out any hope for NAPO doing anything!

*****
'They' have wanted to get rid of people who stand up and challenge, especially those who invented and developed probation for years. 'They' are now very close to achieving it. Limited education, exam factories that suggest success but are only so because of their ability to create people who know so little they just accept what is. Probation people challenged their ability to abuse, take advantage and profit. They had to destroy it, it has taken a while but not long in the greater scheme of change...