Saturday, 31 October 2026

System That Still Works

This made me reflect on the journey we've been on and why it's all gone so wrong:-

Probation caseloads:
2002 191,400
2003 199,200
2004 209,500
2005 224,100
2006 235,000
2007 242,700
2008 243,400

And all that with nowhere near as many staff 'onboarded' & trained 'at pace', the earliest version of crams, no embedded oasys 'til 2004, PSRs, Lifers, coffee &/or fag breaks, team meetings, annual leave, travel & subsistence, prison visits, home visits AND continuous professional development. Tell that t' young 'uns of today an' they won't believe yer.

I asked AI what it was like being a Probation Officer in the past?

Being a probation officer was defined by a strong ethos of "advise, assist, and befriend," offering far more personal autonomy and face-to-face social work focus than today's heavily bureaucratized systems

Autonomy and Offices: Officers typically had their own private offices, personal filing cabinets, and dictaphones for transcribing case notes with the help of dedicated clerical staff.

The Ethos of Friendship & Support: Supervision leaned heavily into social work, building long-term personal bonds with clients. Officers often went above and beyond their formal remit—helping clients find jobs, managing local clothing stores, or using office befriending and emergency funds (often small cash allowances up to £10) for food or housing. 

Court and Fieldwork: Working the courts (Magistrates' and County Courts) was a central, hands-on duty. Fieldwork was heavily "patch-based," meaning officers regularly ran weekly reporting centers and drop-ins away from the main office, sometimes supported by local volunteers. 

Resources & Tools: Technology was just beginning to shift: electric typewriters, early photocopiers, and fax machines were just arriving, and records relied heavily on physical card indexes and micro-cassettes. 

Broader Culture: While the job offered high professional independence and a sense of community impact, institutional environments like prisons—where officers also spent time—could be gritty, rough, and subject to the social tensions of the era.

This led me to reflect on a key aspect of probation in the past - it was of course not a sentence. This then led me to this:- “Advise, assist and befriend”: Client Perspectives on Probation from the 1980s to Present-day, a paper about probation in the Irish Republic, which in turn drew my attention to this:-

The Criminal Justice (Community Sanctions) Bill 2014 is a piece of Irish legislation designed to update the Probation of Offenders Act 1907, broaden community-based sanctions, and reform alternative sentencing. But it has never been enacted, so the 1907 Act remains in force. So I wondered if that still meant probation was not a sentence in Ireland. Here's what AI says:-

In Ireland, a standard probation order is historically and philosophically structured as an alternative to a sentence, rather than a sentence itself. The primary reasons Ireland maintains this distinction are rooted in its foundational legislation, judicial philosophy, and the unique legal benefits of the non-conviction framework.

1. The Legal Framework: The 1907 Act
The primary legal basis for probation in Ireland remains the Probation of Offenders Act 1907. Under Section 1 of this Act, when a court decides to use a probation order, it explicitly chooses to do so "in lieu of imposing a sentence of imprisonment"

The Mechanism: The court binds the offender over on a recognizance (a legal promise) to be of good behavior and to return to court for sentencing only if they fail to comply with the probation terms

The Logic: Because the individual is being given a chance to avoid punishment, the law views the probation period as a deferral of sentencing, not the execution of a sentence.

2. The Benefit of Avoided Convictions
In the Irish District Court, if a judge finds that the facts of a minor offense are proven but chooses to issue a probation order, they do not proceed to a formal conviction.

By keeping probation structured as a pre-sentencing alternative, Irish law allows individuals—particularly first-time or minor offenders—to avoid a permanent criminal record. This preserves their employment prospects, travel opportunities, and social reintegration. 

3. Clear Separation of Non-Custodial Sanctions
Irish criminal justice relies on a distinct hierarchy of non-custodial options:

Alternatives to Sentencing: Conditional dismissals and probation orders under the 1907 Act (which avoid a recorded conviction in the District Court).

Sentences Served in the Community: Community Service Orders (CSOs), fines, and suspended sentences.

Because Community Service Orders (introduced via the Criminal Justice Act 1983) and fully suspended sentences already serve as distinct, formal "community sentences", there has been less legislative pressure to redefine the traditional 1907 probation order.


So, AI confirms that, unlike other parts of the former United Kingdom, Eire chose to stick to a bloody system that works:-

The statutory foundation for probation and conditional discharge in Ireland remains largely based on the Probation of Offenders Act 1907, though it operates alongside modern criminal justice legislation.

Core Legislation: The 1907 Act is still in force and active in the Republic of Ireland (unlike in England, Wales, or Scotland, where it was repealed by later mid-century acts). It is maintained and updated in administrative consolidations by the Law Reform Commission.

How It Works: Under the Act, judges can dismiss a proven charge or place an offender on a probation or conditional discharge order based on factors like character, age, health, or the trivial nature of the offence. In the District Court, a dismissal under Section 1(1) of the Act means the charge is proven, yet no criminal conviction is recorded (though a record of the dismissal is kept).

Conditions: The individual must agree to be of good behaviour, avoid further crimes, and follow any specific directions (such as addiction treatment or training courses).

Consequences of a Breach: If the person breaks the conditions of the order within the set period, they can be brought back before the court and dealt with (which may lead to a conviction or sentence for the original offence).


9 comments:

  1. Interesting editorial in the probation journal today about this very subject.

    Sentencing reform and the new probation requirement: What's happened to need and responsivity?

    “There is no doubt that something needs to be done to deal with the ongoing workload pressures in probation, and that something needs to happen to reduce the prison population. Both services have been in crisis for several years, and it is this situation which has led to reforms which can so easily be seen as kneejerk reactions to a crisis situation rather than a well-thought-through strategy to rethink what probation (and prison) should actually be for. But we should also be wary of the word ‘reform’. My reading of the Sentencing Act is that it is less a reimagining of probation's purpose and more a rationing of its resources, albeit dressed in the language of proportionality. Need and responsivity appear to have been written out, and I would argue that a service that can no longer answer a request for help has not been made parsimonious: it has been made less able to do one of the main things that justify its existence.”

    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02645505261500991

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. By the time this Editorial goes to print, the majority of the provisions in the Sentencing Act 2026 will have been implemented, albeit with some amendments. Whilst much of the public debate has focused on the changes to release timescales, the Act has significant ramifications for probation. When examined through the lens of how risk is being used to allocate resource, the reforms may result in the shedding of the rehabilitative purpose of risk management which gives probation its meaning.

      The progression model means that custodial sentences will be split into three: the period of time spent in prison, a period of ‘intensive supervision’ immediately following release and a final period of ‘reactive management’. My reading of the Intensive Supervision Period is of supervision that is increasingly characterised by control and surveillance through a presumption for electronic monitoring and a new suite of ‘restrictive measures’. The final third will be limited to ‘reactive management’ so that routine contact for standard risk tiers during the final third of a custodial sentence is now effectively prohibited. Thus, Stage 2 of a sentence must now absorb the majority of active probation contact hours. Any rehabilitative work – which practitioners know takes time, and needs to be done at the right point in someone's life – must now take place in the immediate aftermath of release from prison and in a tightly curtailed time period.

      Add to this changes to supervision packages and the new probation requirement, and we start to see a significant shift in the way people on probation are being managed. The new tiering system means that people on Community and Suspended Sentence Orders will have a fixed maximum number of appointments across a sentence depending on what Tier they fall into. There were always concerns with the Rehabilitation Activity Requirement (RAR) that the practitioner relationship was being sidelined by the use of ‘the language of contact, management, and oversight [rather] than supervision, motivation, and support’ (Robinson and Dominey, 2019: 453). Such language also predominates Government publications on the new Probation Requirement and the tiering system. On the other hand, a recent evaluation of the RAR (Ministry of Justice, 2026b) highlighted significant issues with the sentencing of the Requirement as well as delivery and the new Probation Requirement does appear to remove some of these problems.

      Delete
  2. Could this be our future Halloween?

    https://weartv.com/news/local/florida-probation-officers-inspecting-certain-sex-offender-homes-for-halloween-safety

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Florida Department of Corrections says it's conducting more than 5,000 home inspections statewide to ensure sex offenders under felony supervision aren't a threat to kids.

      These restrictions only apply to some convicted sex offenders. The home checks are designed to make sure sex offenders who are currently on probation are following court-ordered Halloween restrictions.

      The FDC supervises more than 7,000 of these individuals, many of whom live in Northwest Florida. They're prohibited from passing out candy and putting up decorations.

      Their porch lights must be turned off and they must close their blinds.

      Delete
  3. I should have posted this on previous blog, sorry JB:

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6ae3075682273a0adc7b829f/Electronic_Monitoring_in_action_joint_inspection_-_action_plan_-_October_2026.pdf

    "This action plan forms the MOJ and HMPPS response to the Electronic monitoring in practice: criminal justice joint inspection"

    Recommendations
    Agreed 12
    Partly Agreed 7
    Not Agreed 0
    Total 19

    ReplyDelete
  4. https://fabians.org.uk/a-bang-a-whimper-and-an-opportunity/

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for reminding us of this. It was posted here back in 2024:- https://probationmatters.blogspot.com/2024/02/a-golden-opportunity.html

      "The renewed media attention afforded to the Post Office scandal sends a very strong signal to all organisations that not listening to frontline staff can result in human misery, organisational dysfunction, and reputational damage. The history of probation in UK over the last decade reflects many of the mistakes made by Post Office management in discounting the realities of frontline service. Despite being told frequently by unions and serving and experienced staff and managers that partially privatising the service – and, more recently, merging probation and prisons – would not work, ministers in the Ministry of Justice made and are continuing to make disastrous decisions because of a ‘we know best’ culture."

      Delete
    2. More of sumcchey here, more recently, worth a listen, and a call for the promised review of probation governancem and the localising of probation, from Rob Allen at the close: https://www.transformjustice.org.uk/news-insight/ep65-prison-in-the-community-probation-in-crisis/
      Yours aye
      Pearly Gates :)

      Delete
  5. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6ae86fdf713f8880fe546285/JiN_Pocketbook_2026-10-31.pdf

    Also:

    Population and Capacity Briefing for Mon 2/11/26

    Population 86,883
    Headroom 2,018

    Home Detention Curfew caseload 2,794

    The Operating Margin is currently set at:
    Overall Estate 1640
    Adult Male 1460
    Female 120
    YCS 60

    ReplyDelete