Tuesday, 4 August 2026

Anger Is Mounting

Just in from a contributor:-

I have read the comments on here and feel that unless the mood is represented to the government yet again probation will take the blame. Where are the unions when needed certainly not working in our interest and probably not working. Always chuckle when I see the Probation Officer/NAPO chair at the bottom of an email, the NAPO bit why? It doesn’t get you any further or any more recognition, actually it is the badge of a shirker! 

The unions should be challenging the government asking for more money for the hard working operational PO’s. Should be having a ballot, taking strike action and let all the NPS lackeys manage the cases. Hmmm the majority couldn’t do an RMP let alone interview an offender, that is why they are up the greasy pole! Yet again we are playing probation Hokey Cokey, you put the training on, take the training off, on, off, on, off, you do the Hokey Cokey and turn around here’s an SFO!

There are limited AP places, AP’s are closing, there is no housing, you can have a tent, you cannot have UC unless you fill the application on line and it’s the summer holidays and half the probation workforce are on late starts and early finishes to pick the kids up from summer activities! Is that supervisor in possession of an up to date DBS? Successive governments have not built enough prison places, so when a police officer is killed there is not enough room at the inn because you are on EDS and not mandatory life because again the woke CJS does not want bad press.

I know what, if we knock all the very high and high riskers down to medium we can pass the case on to unqualified staff and they can take the SFO hit. Never I hear you cry, oh yes is my response you must tick the box or the SPO will throw their toys out of the pram because the PDU lead has blamed them and so it goes, sh*t only runs one way and who catches the lot?

It was a bad news day today so they announced a review of work descriptions, there will be no more money because the unions are involved bowing serf like to the bosses selling the membership out. 

Roll on Friday, laptop off until Monday, whatever happens over the weekend you don’t pay me enough to give a damn. In fact as a seasoned and experienced PO I miss the meeting the punter in the cafe for breakfast, popping to the building site for a brew, a leisurely home visit on a sunny day, that was when we had a professional, advise, assist and befriend, now its let’s do 15 months, get my degree and a DBS and off I go. 

There is no loyalty as loyalty works two ways and there is no respect, you have to earn respect and frankly I don’t respect those above me all they want is the targets met no matter how and no matter what the cost whether that be a mental breakdown or resignation. 

Happy Tuesday.

Anon

48 comments:

  1. Napo today:-

    Napo have said since the early releases were first announced that there should be more exemptions to ensure public protection is achievable. As such the new exemptions are welcome but do not address the real issues of public protection and safe releases.

    The Prime Minister and the Justice Secretary have failed to acknowledge the probation workloads crisis that has afflicted the service for over 2 years now. It is not clear if the prime minister or the Lord Chancellor have a clue about how ill-equipped the probation service is take on this additional work. For example, there are huge numbers of vacancies in Victim Liaison Roles, so we are not sure how the extra Victim Contact Scheme work will be done.

    Plans to release thousands of domestic abuse perpetrators and stalkers early from prison does not boost victim protection. It means that more people, largely women, will be killed or harmed.

    There’s no additional funding to retain probation staff, especially experienced ones, despite endemic staffing problems in many key roles across England and Wales.

    Whilst it is welcome that the prime minister has intervened to review the policy, more now needs to be done to ensure the probation service can safely manage people in the community. This means addressing the workloads and staffing crisis, investing significant amounts of money to retain staff and improve working conditions for those that will be tasked to do this important additional work.

    Ian Lawrence General Secretary said: “Everyone is talking about prisons, and yes it is bad, but the crisis in probation is far worse. But yet again, our members are being overlooked while all the attention is on prison. Without probation none of this can happen, so the service needs to be front and centre to this discussion”.

    Napo is currently in a formal trade dispute with HMPPS over workloads and we are currently in an indicative ballot of our members due to close on Monday. We expect a strong response from our members indicating a wish to ballot for industrial action.

    We urge the Prime Minister to look closely at the issues that our members are struggling with. There is such strength of feeling that Napo members passed a motion of no confidence in HMPPS to fix the crisis in June. We now need to see action on the probation crisis and not just knee jerk reaction to the ever-growing prison population.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Without probation none of this can happen, so the service needs to be front and centre to this discussion”.

    Probation is in a position to garner considerable bargining power at this particular moment in time.
    It has however got to be more then just about workloads and pay. As important as those issues are, the opertunity now exists to redefine its identity, demand its independence from the prison service and the civil service.
    Burnham keeps talking about how great devolution is. Give probation back its independence and identity.

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
  3. I saw Mr Lawrence on TV new . Cannot say he functions badly but he certainly doesn't capture the viewer . He was boringly talking old issues over and no vigour or his usual thump. I think he enjoys the limelight but has no gravitas for what is needed. Time after time he leads us through major issues and has achieved losses at every turn . I am amazed he is still in post. Is he due to retire at all.

    ReplyDelete
  4. listened to the radio on & off today, catching occasional news pieces. I caught a slice of WATO (bbc lunchtime) with alex-don't-pause-for-breath someone or other prattling on about "£700million just for probation" & "we're bringing in exclusion zones, something that's never been done before". The unchallenged lies are simply unbearable. The £700 million is predominantly for tagging & AI, with 1,300 new recruits at some point. Exclusion zones have been a feature of licences & release plans for as long as I can remember.

    They advertise the programme thus: "As the Government tweaks the prisoner early release scheme, we assess the options to reduce prison overcrowding with former Governor of HMP Wormwood Scrubs, Vanessa Frake."

    Not a probation voice in sight.

    AND WHY HAS NO-ONE MENTIONED THE FACT THAT LA ROMEO, THE CABINET SECRETARY & HEAD OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, WAS A KEY ARCHITECT & ***THE*** RESPONSIBLE OFFICER FOR THE FINAL COLLAPSE OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM in her former roles, not least as:
    (1) Director General, Criminal Justice at the Ministry of Justice (MOJ), responsible for all criminal justice policy and major programmes
    (2) Director General, Transformation at MOJ, responsible for reform and savings programmes, strategy, digital services, communications, group HR and group estates

    "Dame Antonia Romeo served as the Senior Responsible Officer for the Ministry of Justice’s controversial "Transforming Rehabilitation" (TR) program, discussing its tight rollout deadlines and risk management in a 2014 interview with Civil Service World"

    * Romeo is sure that the new system will improve results. “At the moment, we have a very serious and professional group of probation staff working incredibly hard with local partners to reduce reoffending,” she says. “We’re seeking to allow those that move out to the CRCs the freedom and innovation to bring in new and better ways of doing things.”

    https://www.civilserviceworld.com/in-depth/article/interview-antonia-romeo-moj

    “At the moment, we have a very serious and professional group of probation staff working incredibly hard with local partners to reduce reoffending,” she says. “We’re seeking to allow those that move out to the CRCs the freedom and innovation to bring in new and better ways of doing things.”

    “My job as senior responsible officer is to make sure we deliver the benefits of the programme. We need to really understand what’s going on – and there are no prizes for not listening.”

    Oh yes there are fucking prizes for you for not listening, La Romeo. You were told time & time again that TR wasn't going to work, that probation shouldn't be split... but your politically selective deafness won you a plumb job in New York, a return to run & gloat over the department you screwed, numerous gongs, promotions & now the top civil service job.

    You lied & lied & lied again, you've fleeced the public purse & - along with your political allies in Grayling & Maude et al - you've fucked over both prisons & probation, leaving them in the parlous state they're in now.

    Why can't the bbc & other news outlets get their dim heads around it? Burn'ems bestest pal in Number 10 proactively disassembled the justice system for her political heroes. Just look at the HMI prisons & probation reports from 2010 to 2020, the slide down the measuring stick, the ever depressing sound of "inadequate", "not fit for purpose", "staff leaving in droves".

    And now we have to listen to whiney labour MPs telling a new set of bare-faced lies in-between breathy claims of being holier than thou, "we're doing all we can".

    Bollocks. Abso-fucking-lutely Bollocks.

    Thanks Jim. Time for a bath with a bottle of malt.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Annon 20:08.

      https://www.civilserviceworld.com/news/article/romeo-moves-between-central-government-and-wider-public-sector-will-become-the-norm

      Delete
    2. Cabinet secretary Dame Antonia Romeo has said she expects new PM Andy Burnham’s devolution drive to mean that moving between departments and the wider public sector will be a routine fact of life for civil servants.

      Romeo’s comments came in a social-media post following the publication of the government’s Rewiring the State policy paper, which contains a range of measures expected to make the civil service “smaller and more strategic”.

      Writing on LinkedIn, Romeo said the devolution push – which aims to place more decision-making power in the hands of regional mayors – represents “an exciting opportunity” for the civil service.

      “As civil servants, we joined to make a positive difference for people and communities across the country, and that purpose and determination motivates us every day,” she said. “Devolution means going even further: moving power and decision making out of central government and right into the communities we serve, ensuring that decisions are taken closer than ever before to the places where people live and work.”

      Romeo is currently leading a review of Whitehall that will “examine the full range of activities undertaken by the civil service”, including its “size, shape, and structure”.

      The review was commissioned by former PM Keir Starmer and is due to conclude next summer. However, No.10 says Burnham and Romeo have agreed that Rewiring the State will “form a major part” of the end goal for the civil service’s future operating model.

      In her LinkedIn post, Romeo said that moving power closer to communities is “an important part” of the vision for the civil service of the future and “will create new opportunities to have a direct positive impact” across the country.

      “By embracing these opportunities, we will ensure the civil service can continue to deliver the services the public expects of us – fit for a modern and AI-powered future, removing the unnecessary barriers and bureaucracy that frustrate us all, and focused on delivering for citizens and the government,” Romeo said.

      “For civil servants, we will build new career paths, so that moving between central government and the wider public sector becomes the norm. We will continue to modernise while preserving the best traditions of the impartial civil service.”

      Rewiring the State pledges reforms to business rates and income tax, allowing regional mayors to retain more of those revenues locally – as part of moving towards a funding system that rewards local growth.

      Mayors are also in line for increased powers in relation to housing, transport and skills. Part of that will involve a “devolving by default” process of moving decisions that can be taken locally out of central government. Rewiring the State says “devolving by default” means that when policies or services are being designed or altered, secretaries of state will need to justify holding them at the level of central government.

      A reappraisal of the work of arm’s-length bodies is due to take place in parallel, with a view to establishing what functions can be returned to departments or devolved to local areas.

      Rewiring the State also has greater detail on Romeo’s theme of making moves between different parts of the public sector more widespread.

      Delete
    3. The seven-page document talks about the plans representing “an opportunity for the civil service to adapt and learn through greater interchange with regional and local government, becoming more porous and working together to deliver better outcomes for the citizens we serve”.

      Rewiring the State pledges to “actively build new career paths between central government and the wider public sector” and says the National School for Government will “play an important part” in the process.

      It says ministers will ensure that mayors and other local institutions will have the “necessary capability” to deliver on the additional powers they are being given by “transferring funding and resource from government where functions are devolved”.

      The document adds: “This will be complemented by a programme of wider capacity and capability support from government. We will work with the sector to develop a blueprint for the capacity and capabilities strategic authorities need, and a strategy for delivering that blueprint. This will include ensuring strategic authorities have the right skills and expertise, a jointly designed leadership development offer, and an enhanced programme of secondments from central government.”

      Delete
    4. Let us go ( from the civil service) for gods sake…..let us go

      Delete
  5. It's sad to think that the only way Probations mismanagement and managed decline will resonate with those in power will be if a serious SFO occurs amongst these releases (god forbid) that is pounced upon by the Daily Mail , Telegraph etc to pile on political pressure. Until then we are as the last useless Lord Chancellor said the invisible heroes. I just didn't realise he wanted to keep us hidden (and ignored)

    ReplyDelete
  6. what could possibly go wrong? Interesting that kte, the mysteriously ever-absent Chief Probation Officer, seems to be hiding in Jones' pocketses:

    https://www.aol.co.uk/articles/electronic-tagging-system-unprepared-monitor-141444000.html

    "The electronic tagging system that will be relied upon to monitor thousands of offenders released early from prison is failing to alert the authorities of potential breaches of conditions, a watchdog has warned.

    Martin Jones, HM inspector of probation in England and Wales, said the system relied on hard-pressed police and probation officers looking up individual cases and then deciding whether potential breaches needed to be investigated further."

    * Alex Norris, the justice secretary, has apologised to families affected, saying they were “carrying the can from previous failures”. Hmmm, who might be responsible for those failures?
    _______________________________________________________
    £700million?? For probation???

    https://www.aol.co.uk/articles/probation-real-time-tag-data-144101000.html

    Probation staff are set to be given real time data and powers to issue offenders random drug tests to help beat crime and keep communities safe.

    The Government will provide staff with real-time electronic monitoring data to follow offenders more closely and identify potential risks or breaching of compliance.

    Under the plans, there will also be random tests for 1,000 offenders on licence each month for drugs for both the welfare of those being monitored and the public.

    Currently being piloted in London, officials believe the new Electronic Monitoring Data Insights service will give frontline probation teams faster access to information from offenders’ tags."

    * here's the killer line from 'a government source':

    “The new Justice Secretary wants to look at ramping up the use of technology to protect the public and ensure probation officers are always one step ahead of offenders.”

    Never in the memory of man has that been true. Ever.

    Govt: "London GPS pilots (2025/26): Valued at approximately £900,000 for a 12-month procurement via suppliers such as Buddi Ltd to support localized tagging."

    Mayor of London: "This decision seeks agreement to extend the pilots by 24 months to 31st March 2026 using the allocated budget of £1,030,000 per year. This decision also seeks agreement to carry forward up to £200,000 from the 2023/24 GPS tagging budget to use in 2024/25 to meet the demand for tags. On this basis the total funding for the two year extension period will be £2,260,000." (a bit more than £900,000 a year then?)
    _____________________________________________________

    UKParliament: "The forecast cost for national electronic monitoring and tagging contracts in the UK for 2025/26 is approximately £107.8 million, alongside a broader government rollout backed by an extra £175 million allocated for expansion through 2026–2029."

    National Audit Office, 10 July 2026: "HMPPS has worked with Serco to reduce backlogs in fitting tags, but supplier performance improvements alone are not sufficient to provide confidence that the system is resilient or protects the public. Significant inefficiencies persist across the system, wasting staff time and taxpayers’ money, and limiting performance improvements... Of particular concern is the likely significant number of unmonitored individuals. Additionally, police and probation officers often lack relevant information or capacity to respond to breaches quickly, and governance is fragmented."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry, missed posting link to nao report

      https://www.nao.org.uk/reports/electronic-monitoring-improving-resilience-to-meet-increasing-demand/

      "Expanding a system that is not yet working as intended heightens risks to future performance and, ultimately, to public protection."

      ???Sound familiar???

      Delete
    2. https://youtu.be/5x7GFQMZieo?si=JGdLPpCil2sri_LU

      Delete
  7. sick as a pig to hear the grotesque duplicity, bare-faced lies & raw callous othering by the political classes of all parties.

    "they should pay the price & be responsible for their crimes" - except when it suits politicians to make excuses for 'them' - whoever 'they' might be, eh, Ms Romeo et al?

    burn'em wants to review epstein & al fayed - good, except that IF (as was claimed by a labour mp) its to ascertain "how" powerful men are enabled to commit such crimes, then its unlikely we'll get an answer of any significance. Why? Because powerful men (and women) are protected by sycophants & privilege & power & money.

    1. Prof.Jason Arday, youngest black person ever appointed to a professorship at the University of Cambridge, is now having to defend his position on the eve of a book release, with extremely vocal critics claiming he's a plagiarist & fantasist: "The row erupted after another academic - self-defined "race realist" Nathan Cofnas, who was sacked from his Cambridge role in 2024 - said he found numerous instances of plagiarism in Prof Jason Arday's work and questioned some of his stated achievements."
    Arday admits he has perhaps been less than clear about some issues, but flatly denies plagiarism. There's now a campaign to have his work re-examined.

    2. Donald Trump lies every time he opens his mouth - about *everything*; he talks utter nonsense, is abusive, bigoted & dangerous, and takes punitive action against those who criticise him. He's President of the USA & was a great friend of epstein.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002zrnr

    "The documentary wrestles with Jakober's legacy - a Schindler-like rescuer, or a profiteer trading in human freedom? Through testimony and declassified files, we trace the moral complexity of a scheme that reunited families while treating them as commodities... Mossad, alarmed at first, ultimately co-opted the scheme, and Ceaușescu expanded it into an industrial operation, selling around 100,000 Jewish lives for tens of millions of dollars, while his secret police profited from the proceeds."

    How different is this to today's 'people smugglers' taking cash to help refugees escape abusie & repressive regimes?

    It was refreshing to hear how dignified Baroness Berger was this morning on't'wireless when talking about the tories' selection of jailed neo-nazi Joshua Bonehill-Paine as a candidate; she didn't focus on her own issues but made it clear that the neo-nazi's crimes were manifold against muslims, women & others. Its shameful that the bbc journalist's style of 'challenge' made it sound like he was arguing the case for the neo-nazi, pushing Berger hard.

    ... its a sick & twisted world.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What a review of the work means is this:
    1) Protect the brand at all costs
    2) Lay the blame on the previous governments
    3) get them to do more work for no more money
    4) A major rebranding exercise will see high risk cases downgraded to medium and the risk is passed downward
    5) Any major reoffending can be attributed to the individual rather than the systemic
    6) deal with increased stress by invoking capability measures ( see point one)
    7) review the training to make it simpler to recruit more staff and reduce the level of professionalism required which in time will lead to a reduction in the wage bill
    8) Staff to be referred to PAM assist at the first sign of kickback
    9) Encourage the removal of the word probation and with it all of the expectations that this word carries with a view to introducing UK Correctional services
    10) Offer staff a reduced overtime rate…..move to staff APs with security staff,moving qualified staff back into the field, move qualified staff out of prison and back into the field, create a cadre of volunteers with support staff designation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 11) Recruit and retain SPOs whose greatest talent is saying “yes”. Promote and reward those who minimise concerns, shift blame downwards, defend the indefensible, foster toxic working environments and ensure PDU Heads and senior managers are never held accountable for their own failures.

      Delete
    2. I agree with most of your points but not number 4, I am probably in the minority of PO's that think the service as a whole massively over risks people and the default is HROSH just to cover backs, it makes little sense as it just creates more work for no gain. I have no idea of any historical figures for comparison but I would guess the reunification lead to a huge number of Med risk cases being moved to High partly because NPS staff only knew what to do with High risk cases and partly because SPO's and PO became terrified due to the high profile SFO's we had in a 2 year period, knee jerk springs to mind. The service needs to be braver

      Delete
    3. Read on pal when they release 5k next week you'll need to be spot on your risk assesment . The idea we over run is nonsense we do not have the luxury to trust to luck nor the tools that predict the future . Some easy words you have their poorly thought through.

      Delete
  9. There is a clear historical precedent for rebranding risk, CRCs held high risk cases classed as medium risk purely for the profit margin only a few were re classified as high and when PSOs began to hold cases in their own names many medium risk cases became low risk overnight as a mechanism to take the pressure off POs……risk manipulation has always been more art than science and will continue to be so……..when it suits

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh dear formal risk assesment tools oasys and previous offending are all guesswork now then . I wouldn't want to oversee that approach.

      Delete
  10. Think about the recalls must be salivating over your OAYS keyboard strokes

    ReplyDelete
  11. https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/prison-wings-closing-under-false-pretences-staffing-shortages-5HjdffY_2/

    ReplyDelete
  12. adam fleming bbc r4 pm today: we've already heard from probation, so now let's hear from a member of parliament, Sarah Champion. Oh. Okay. And who or when was the probation voice?

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001kpy3 - probation in peril, 2023

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0kz9sm3 - simon armitage writes a poem, 2025

    https://www.facebook.com/TrainToBeAProbationOfficer/videos/-hear-probation-officer-lisas-story-on-bbc-radio-surrey-lisa-left-school-with-on/1282154116723950/ - Lisa, Surrey, 2025

    https://www.facebook.com/RossKempTV/videos/ad-what-really-happens-inside-the-probation-service-i-joined-hmppsofficial-to-me/818726351320024/ - ???

    six oclock news: 12/01/2019 Probation officers back government plan to scrap short jail sentences

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-57688735 - we're forgotten

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b084db02 - the briefing room, 2016

    2013: "The 2013 "Transforming Rehabilitation" (TR) probation reforms introduced by the UK government faced severe warnings from unions, chief officers, and inspectors. Critics warned that splitting the service into a public National Probation Service and private Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) risked public safety, destabilized finances, fragmented supervision, and made reoffending targets unachievable."

    romeo's blueprint: https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/transforming-rehabilitation/results/transforming-rehabilitation-response.pdf

    https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmjust/482/482.pdf - "Sonia Crozier, Director, Probation, and Executive Director, Probation and Women, at the NPS, explained that they had sought to put in place national structures “to resolve some of the issues that we know have been getting in the way”. Ian Barrow, Probation Divisional Director Wales, NPS, explained that at a local level he did not recognise a “two-tier” system, or a system where one side “felt in charge”. He explained that “service integration meetings [were held] locally with senior managers from the National Probation Service and the CRC and contract management”.

    ALL the necessary evidence of the misdirection, the delusion, the lies & the damage caused is there, but no-one currently gives a fuck about history. They all want their own slice of the future. So all they're doing is repeating the same bullshit, regurgitating the same lies & realising the same fucking disastrous outcome... but with EVEN MORE prison places, more tags & an nightmare inheritance for whoever's next in the hotseat.

    ReplyDelete
  13. How did it all go so wrong, mr burn'em? maybe your justice secretary could advise you on the historical facts relating to the death of the previously gold-standard probation service?

    * at Oxford, Sir Vernon Bogdanor, said "Her [romeo's] particular interests were in game theory and in money and banking."

    * In 2006, she became principal private secretary to the Lord Chancellor – initially Charles Falconer, then from 2007 Jack Straw. (hmmm, privatising probation was already one of straw's big things, which *he* enshrined in law)

    * 2010 - Romeo transferred to the Cabinet Office as the Executive Director in the new Efficiency and Reform Group under Francis Maude.

    * In 2011, after 18 months at the Cabinet Office, Romeo moved back to the Ministry of Justice, taking on the role of Director General, Transformation.

    * Two years later, she changed role to Director General, Criminal Justice. Responsible for all criminal justice policy and other major programmes, she delivered a 2.5 year, £1bn programme to reduce reoffending among ex-offenders. She left the role in February 2015...

    * In January 2021, Romeo moved back to the Ministry of Justice as permanent secretary.

    UNFORTUNATELY it seems the government's archive of pre-2018 probation reports is currently missing in action:

    "Sorry, the requested url is not in the archive
    The information you are looking for may exist in a different location."

    So it seems the opportunity measure the pre-TR good versus the persistently post-TR appalling, is lost.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Channel 4.

    https://youtu.be/ukIEfb5mG0Y?si=yJkEvatPb5kG1cuf

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
  15. The shambles that is ..

    Channel 4 News: 5 Aug 2026

    Debate: Can probation service protect public from early release prisoners?

    We spoke to Gavin Lee, a former probation manager who left his job in May after three decades, and spoke publicly for the first time, and the Rotherham MP Sarah Champion who’s written to the Minister for probation today expressing her concerns about the state of the service.

    The MoJ response? 1300 new probation trainees and £700m of electronic tagging.

    https://www.channel4.com/news/debate-can-probation-service-protect-public-from-early-release-prisoners

    ReplyDelete
  16. what? another one?

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2kgdnyk2po

    "Facebook owner Meta says an issue during an evaluation by an independent testing company allowed one of its artificial intelligence (AI) models to connect to the internet and hack another organisation's system.

    The announcement follows recent incidents across the AI industry, including breaches by OpenAI and Anthropic models, that have raised cyber-security concerns.

    A Meta spokesperson told the BBC that it was investigating the hack that was caused by a "misconfiguration", which it described as similar to previously reported incidents at other firms."

    ReplyDelete
  17. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5dcd33d840f0b608c9633316/hmp-birmingham-action-plan-2018.pdf

    8 years later: July 2026, independent review of 2018 report:

    HMI Prisons concerns

    The rates of violence and self-harm were high and continuing to increase.
    * Reasonable progress

    Illicit drug use was high. The rate of positive random mandatory drug tests was higher than in most similar prisons and there had been five deaths suspected to be related to drug use since our last inspection.
    * No meaningful progress

    Standards of decency had declined. Cleanliness of residential units had deteriorated, and many prisoners did not have some basic items in their cell.
    * Reasonable progress

    A significant number of acutely mentally unwell men had been sent to the prison. They had not had a Mental Health Act assessment while in police or court custody to potentially divert them to a more appropriate setting.
    * No meaningful progress

    Care plans for patients detoxing from drug use did not always address individual risks. Treatment was not always adapted to meet complex needs.
    * Insufficient progress

    Prisoners who were not engaged in education, training or work, including those on the induction unit, had far too little time unlocked.
    * Insufficient progress

    There was not enough help for prisoners to keep in contact with their children and families.
    * Insufficient progress

    What progress had leaders and managers made to ensure that all prisoners received a timely and comprehensive induction to education, skills and work?
    * Insufficient progress

    Many patients waited too long to transfer to a mental health hospital.
    * No meaningful progress

    https://cdn.websitebuilder.service.justice.gov.uk/uploads/sites/19/2026/07/Birmingham-red-routes-letter-to-ministers.pdf

    "in the 8 weeks prior to inspection, 12 acutely mentally unwell men had been remanded into custody, with devastating consequences. Several had acute undiagnosed and/or untreated mental disorders including psychosis, leading to disinhibited behaviour such as walking naked around wings and smearing faeces."

    ReplyDelete
  18. “The government said it was trying to avoid running out of prison spaces as soon as October this year.”

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy0j7lee3y8o

    The scrutiny is not going away. Rather than relying on emergency measures, a progressive system would reduce unnecessary imprisonment by focusing on reducing remand, foreign national offenders awaiting deportation, and the majority of women and young people, ensuring prison is reserved for those who genuinely need to be there.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Every announcement seems to focus on two things: recruiting more trainees and expanding technology.

    Both have a place, but neither answers the fundamental question. A trainee does not become an experienced PP overnight, and a tag cannot assess dynamic risk, build a professional relationship, challenge someone’s thinking or recognise when something does not feel right.

    Public protection depends on judgement. Judgement comes from experience. Experience depends on retaining skilled practitioners.

    And where, in all of this, is the voice of the newly appointed prisons and probation minister?

    Catherine McKinnell has inherited direct responsibility for a service now being publicly presented as the safeguard that will make earlier release, increased tagging and “tougher community supervision” safe. Yet frontline probation staff still have no clear explanation from their own minister of what additional staffing, capacity or protections will make those promises deliverable.

    Probation should not hear its future described through statements from the Prime Minister, the Justice Secretary, inspectors and government sources while the minister directly responsible for the service remains largely absent from the public discussion.

    Technology should support professional judgement, not become a substitute for investing in it. Recruitment should build the workforce, not disguise the continuing loss of experience. Until retention, pay and manageable workloads receive the same political urgency as prison capacity and tagging, the government is still avoiding the central issue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hiding in the same cupboard as the invisible Chief Probation Officer & all the other most senior probation staff who are, per civil service tradition, extremely well-paid but:

      a) utterly fucking pointless
      b) utterly fucking useless
      c) not fit for purpose

      Please choose one or more phrase/s that best describes your experience.

      Delete
    2. All phrases are applicable !

      Delete
  20. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg5lm3evpzzo

    "Burnham orders review of grooming gang early releases"

    teeheehee: early release - the gift that keeps on giving

    ReplyDelete
  21. civil service world - the last 12 months using the search term 'probation':

    * Probation Service launches trainee officer recruitment drive
    Government plans to bring in an extra 1,300 trainee probation officers over the current financial year
    Posted: 20th Jul 2026 | Type: Article

    * MoJ announces funding for 1,300 extra probation officers
    New recruitment to come on top of 2,300 pledged since Labour came to power
    Posted: 20th Mar 2026 | Type: Article

    * Union calls for probation to be taken out of civil service control
    Demand follows damning report from MPs that questions whether HMPPS fully understands its staffing needs and describes a system “on the brink”
    Posted: 5th Feb 2026 | Type: Article

    * MoJ launches New Year push to fill prison and probation roles
    Justice secretary David Lammy says opportunities will satisfy public demand for jobs with “purpose”, offering more than “just a pay packet”
    Posted: 9th Jan 2026 | Type: Article

    * Probation Service ‘being set up to fail’ with tagging expansion, committee says
    Peers warn resourcing for planned surge in electronic monitoring is "almost certain” to be not enough
    Posted: 12th Nov 2025 | Type: Article

    * NAO flags concerns over Probation Service reform programme
    Watchdog says HMPPS underestimated the number of staff the service requires
    Posted: 27th Oct 2025 | Type: Article

    * HMPPS names next chief executive
    MoJ chief operating officer James McEwen will take helm of Prison and Probation Service next month
    Posted: 19th Sep 2025 | Type: Article

    * Eight in 10 prison and probation staff unhappy with early release schemes
    Survey finds workforce is more optimistic about planned “Texas-style” system
    Posted: 7th Aug 2025 | Type: Article

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. similar, but using 'tagging' as the search (omitting articles already referred to above):

      * Watchdog sounds alarm on MoJ’s tagging ambitions
      Thousands of offenders already subject to “electronic monitoring” may not be being actively tracked, National Audit Office says
      Posted: 10th Jul 2026 | Type: Article

      That's it. So let's go back a bit further:

      * ‘Over-ambitious’ HMPPS electronic tagging plan ‘threw away’ £100m
      MPs “unconvinced” of MoJ's ability to oversee overhaul of electronic tagging after “long history of poor performance"
      Posted: 24th Oct 2022 | Type: Article

      * HMPPS spent almost £100m on software, only to scrap it
      Case-management system was meant to be ready in 2015 but has now been abandoned
      Posted: 22nd Dec 2021 | Type: Article
      _______________________________________________
      And another interesting morsel:

      Home Office transfers disused prison site to Homes England
      HMP Northeye site is one of several botched plans for asylum accommodation in recent years
      Posted: 17th Feb 2026 | Type: Article

      "The Home Office bought HMP Northeye, in Bexhill-on-Sea, East Sussex, for £15.4m in September 2023 with the intention of using it to house 1,400 asylum seekers. It was later revealed that the department had overpaid for the site and that it was unsuitable for this use.

      Amy Rees, chief executive of Homes England, said: “The transfer of the Northeye site represents not only a significant local milestone but also a clear example of Homes England’s national strategy in action, unlocking public land, working in partnership with places, and helping to deliver the homes and places communities need for the future.”

      Rees, who was chief exec of HM Prison and Probation Service before joining Homes England in September, said the transfer “means we can now start work to bring the former Northeye site back into use”."

      ***checks dates***

      Amy Rees was Director General Chief Executive Officer HMPPS from 2022 to 2025... HMP Northeye, in Bexhill-on-Sea, East Sussex, was bought for £15.4m in September 2023 ... the Home Office had overpaid HMPPS for the site & it was wholly unsuitable for the purpose it was bought for. Amy Rees became Chief Executive of Homes England in September 2025, the transfer to Homes England happened in Feb 2026.

      Thoughts, anyone?

      Delete
  22. I'm struggling to put up with the whining & speculation & screams of outrage. Why is the govt floundering on this early release bullshit?

    Surely the answer is to simply apply a parole board-style approach; an approach that has worked for years? It's effectively the same process, i.e. consideration for early release:

    (1) some people are not eligible. End of.
    (2) anyone eligible for the scheme is risk assessed by parole board members or independent people of similar experience (presumably ALL prisoners will have up-to-date risk assessments they can access ???);
    (3) anyone who fails that assessment is screened out;
    (4) those who pass the screening have proportionate & relevant conditions imposed on their early release

    And in any event there must be many thousands out of the 80+thousand prison population who aren't in for the kinds of offences that seem to be taxing the minds of politicians, media & victims?

    Benefit fraud? Driving offences? Possession of drugs? Minor theft?

    Where are the great minds of the simple serpents? Or the highly paid politicians?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. On the same page annon 12:25.

      Not everyone leaving custody requires post sentence supervision either. That's why theres 50,000 recalls (mostly for not reoffending ).
      Talking to an old long retired prison officer this week who shares the same opinion. He said in his time everything was a paper exercise, didn't have computers and all the associated rubbish.!
      Personally I feel that the vote winning football thats the criminal justice system has been kicked around so much that the ball has now burst and no-one wants to play anymore.

      ,'Getafix

      Delete
    2. At present it takes about 6-8 months to go from being asked for new Part Cs considering release to getting a date for an Oral Hearing, some are done on paper but even they take ages, lack of staff in Probation, prison and Parole Boards, you can't even book a video link at a prison without 4-6 weeks notice. And it depends on what you mean by an upto date risk assessment within the last 12 months? possibly, within a month, not a chance! We're too busy in the field complying with dashboards and finding accommodation for people sorry.

      Delete
    3. forgive me for being a bit dim, but surely someone sentenced by the court has a risk assessment completed? And on reception at prison? And maybe at least every 6 months?

      "In July 2020, three teenage males were found guilty of manslaughter and received sentences of 16 and 13 years' imprisonment... Bowers and Cole were found guilty of manslaughter. "

      So they've been inside for six years, presumably previously due for release in early 2027? Given the nature of the index offence & the public interest, surely there are regular risk assessments on the system offering views about their engagement, their progress or otherwise?

      In the light of the public interest from the start there must surely be senior &/or experienced probation victim liaison officers involved?

      Given the critical impact of the Sentencing Act, wouldn't it have been prudent that HMGov appointed some senior persons to oversee the clusterfuck, to shore-up the system in order for such decisions to be made safely & defensively?

      BBC, C4News, ITV - are you reading this blog? HMIP Jones? HMIP Taylor? Ewen McWhoever? Invisible Probation Lady? T'other 'un from Bath Council (farage or similar)?

      Delete
    4. Ideal world, fully resourced Probation, then yes, but a service which is short of anywhere between 4-10k officers at PSO and PO level (depending on who you believe) regularly risk assessments just aren't possible. Officers love a new case with 6 plus years custody as it means you can forget about it and carry on dealing with whatever crisis is happening with there caseload they are already frantically trying to manage who are in the community. Risk assessments in prison are basic because quite frankly if they hurt another prisoner no one cares, it's only in the community you're shitting yourself about an SFO. No doubt they will use Ai to asses risk soon and proudly say they don't need to recruit more staff anymore as there's less to do...

      Delete
    5. So no-one based in prisons does any form of risk assessment? Is that why there's been so much slander thrown about on here about the roles of probation staff in prisons?

      Nothing makes sense. Its fragmented, confused, contradictory & misleading. hmpps/hmGov are clearly lying through their teeth about everything from courts to prisons to probation & all points in-between.

      Delete
  23. The most logical answer? They're all in thrall to Alpha Romeo, blinded by her brilliance, her shiny baubles & her meteoric rise to the top of the shit pile in her Maude-powered elevation device, sponsored by many powerful organisations including palantir, oliver wyman & endorsed by a king charles spaniel.
    How else does someone who has done so much wilful damage to public services in the UK get so powerful?

    In other news:

    https://www.civilserviceworld.com/news/article/probation-service-crisis-worse-than-prisons-union-warns

    "PM Andy Burnham and justice secretary Alex Norris need to recognise that probation officers are crucial for early-release plans, Napo general secretary says"

    It must be bad... lawro has an article all to himself!

    ReplyDelete
  24. The Simon levy case helps illustrate untrained and inappropriate police case supervision has just shown us they down graded the high risker.
    Choosing their own judgment than the facts so we get a double murder.a po would not have downgraded him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Its far greater & more complex than untrained coppers making a bad call:

      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8jnrk4xlvdo

      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c70g18vpwxvo

      - Scotland Yard downgraded Levy's risk to women upon his release in 2024
      - The Met took three years to investigate and charge Levy with the sexual assault of the prison officer
      - British Transport Police's (BTP) investigation into Levy's sexual assaults meant he was not charged for more than six months, despite being filmed carrying out an attack
      - The Met and BTP both gave Levy back a stolen travelcard which let him travel without paying and commit crimes, including the first murder
      - The CPS has apologised for "shortcomings" in its attempts to have Levy remanded in custody.
      ____________________________________________________
      I do sometimes feel a chill inside when I read tabloid-worthy, set-in-concrete statements from what I always thought was a non-judgemental profession:

      "they down graded the high risker... a po would not have downgraded him."

      Everything's a mess. The entirety of the justice system (police, courts, probation, prisons, victim work) has been severely maltreated for decades, eroded & corroded by financial & moral starvation, ridiculed by the political class, mismanaged by Whitehall & hung out to dry by the media. The culture & nature of justice has been distorted.

      We now seem to have a model that, with the rapid expansion of social media, means victims & their advocates have direct access & influence over government policy. That might not be a bad thing in & of itself, of course, but it has meant that the new government has been doing embarassingly poor public cartwheels over the Sentencing Act.

      Sadly the last twenty or so years have seen some of the most contentious & damaging changes imposed upon the justice system, with frontline staff in all departments having little to no say; indeed, saying "its shit & won't work" but being ignored, only to be proved right some time later, time & time again.

      Even more sadly, those who sat in remote offices in Whitehall doing the sums, drafting the spreadsheets & writing the glossy reports promoting pointless change have never & will never been held to account for their wilful vandalism to public services & the massive holes they made in public finances. £Billions have been wasted on any number of vanity projects.

      But hold up a sign saying "Plasticine Action", sit in a road blocking weapons destined for a genocidal state or daub paint on a statue & you'll be remanded into custody for months on terrorism charges.

      Delete
  25. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/08/07/pc-harper-detective-appalled-killers-freed-early/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Probation officers threaten work-to-rule over early release crisis


      Plan to release thousands of criminals, including Pc Harper’s killers, leaves staff facing ‘major headache’
      Probation officers have threatened to protest against the early release of prisoners by working to rule and refusing overtime.

      Napo, the probation union, warned that Andy Burnham’s plan to release 5,000 offenders risked creating “a major headache” for staff, who it said were already overworked and underpaid.
      The Prime Minister paused the early release scheme last month after The Telegraph revealed that Albert Bowers and Jessie Cole, two of Pc Andrew Harper’s killers, would be eligible to leave prison after serving half their sentences.

      While Mr Burnham has exempted rapists and child sex offenders, Bowers and Cole remain eligible for release alongside thousands of other prisoners.

      The probation watchdog has already warned that officers may be inadequately prepared for the early releases, increasing the prospect of freed prisoners committing further crimes.

      Ian Lawrence, the general secretary of Napo, said prison officers could respond by refusing to carry out extra duties outside their core working hours and competencies.
      He told the BBC’s Today programme: “We don’t have enough resources, and £700m per year over the next three years is welcome, but I want to see some of that put into the frontline provision. Our members’ workload is through the roof and pay is totally inadequate for the responsibility of the job.

      “And we need an agreement with this Government pretty quickly, unless we can move to a place where we can avoid the possibility of industrial action – it’s that serious, it’s that desperate out there for our members.”
      Ministers have said that the £700m investment in the Probation Service by 2028 will lead to the biggest expansion of electronic tagging in history. Offenders will also face strict licence conditions, closer supervision, exclusion zones and curfews.
      Asked what industrial action could involve and how soon it could come about, Mr Lawrence said there were various forms of action available to employees.

      “[One] would be working to our contracted hours,” he said. “The amount of free time that probation officers give to make ends meet in managing risk and helping to protect the public is huge.

      “And whole swathes of paid overtime are being undertaken, without which the whole system would collapse. I don’t want that to happen – I want an agreement with government.”

      Mr Lawrence also took a swipe at Mr Burnham for including domestic violence and stalking offenders in the early release scheme, saying they were more likely to reoffend and be recalled to prison.


      Cont.....

      Delete
    2. We need the resources in place to help victims, to reassure victims that we’re doing our best,” he added.

      Pc Harper was investigating the theft of a quad bike in Berkshire in August 2019 when Bowers and Cole tried to escape in a car driven by Henry Long.

      The 28-year-old policeman died after his ankles were caught in a towrope loop and he was dragged for more than a mile along country roads. All three were convicted of manslaughter. Long was jailed for 16 years, and Bowers and Cole were jailed for 13.
      On Friday, the detective who led the investigation into the death of Pc Harper said he was “appalled” that Bowers and Cole could be released early.

      Stuart Blaik, a former detective superintendent with Thames Valley Police, urged Mr Burnham to ensure that they served their full sentences.

      He told the BBC he was “deeply concerned and appalled” that they could walk free under the early release scheme, saying they “should not be afforded the opportunity”.
      Mr Blaik told the BBC: “Neither of them showed any remorse during their time in police custody or during their subsequent trial. I hope the Government takes account of the strength of public feeling on this issue, which has been both clear and widespread.”

      Speaking before Pc Harper’s killers were sentenced in July 2020, Mr Blaik said they had taken a “conscious decision” not to assist police, and accused their families and friends of frustrating the investigation.
      Pc Harper’s mother and widow have condemned the decision not to exempt manslaughter from the early release scheme, and said the prospect of Bowers and Cole being freed as soon as October was an “affront to justice”.
      The Government has apologised to Pc Harper’s family, but has sought to justify its refusal to make an exemption.

      Jake Richards, a justice minister, said this week that ministers could not “hand-pick cases for different criminal justice consequences”.

      Rejecting calls for prisoners who killed emergency service workers to be made ineligible for early release, Mr Richards said: “There are groups of offenders, and we have to deal with them as groups of offenders. I understand that’s difficult, I understand that’s uncomfortable, but that is the way to have a functioning government.”

      The Tories have said they will attempt to block the early release of Pc Harper’s killers in a parliamentary vote when MPs return from their summer break next month.
      Kemi Badenoch’s party is preparing an amendment to Labour’s Sentencing Act 2026 that would exclude criminals convicted of the manslaughter of an emergency worker from the early release scheme.

      MPs would vote on the proposal if Sir Lindsay Hoyle, the Commons Speaker, selected it. The vote would be the first big parliamentary test for Mr Burnham since he took power last month.

      The Government could also face legal action from the Police Federation, which represents rank-and-file officers. Chief Constable Jason Hogg, of Thames Valley Police, has indicated that he would support any legal challenge.
      Matthew Barber, the police and crime commissioner for Thames Valley, has accused Mr Burnham of ignoring a letter from the police chief urging him to keep Bowers and Cole in jail.
      Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police commissioner, said on Thursday that he supported everything Mr Hogg had said about the potential early release of the two men.

      He added: “Police officers see it as a message of a lack of support from the justice system, and I don’t think that’s good.

      “I think it’s good that, from what I’ve heard, the Prime Minister is reflecting on the current policies about [the] justice system and things. They inherited a very difficult situation. I don’t think he’s got easy decisions.

      “I don’t want to pretend this is easy, but I think we’re in a dangerous place if the justice system is tipping towards making more decisions based on the resources available than based on the risk that offenders pose to communities.”

      ,Getafix

      Delete
    3. It’s one big shambles. And what’s striking is the deafening silence from probation’s heads, directors and chief officers. Does not one of them have an actual opinion? Every day I read another carefully sanitised statement repeating whatever has come down from above, but never an honest view about what is actually happening and where this is all heading?

      We all know the official line. We also know when it doesn’t make sense. Yet apparently nobody at the top is prepared to say so. Are they really that scared of the ever revolving door of Justice Ministers? Timpson clearly saw what was coming and did the sensible thing — he walked away. Meanwhile, probation bosses happily nod, wink and repeat the latest government narrative while walking their own staff straight into the abyss.

      It’s nonsensical saying that violent or repeat offenders who genuinely need to remain in custody should simply be released to create space when there are thousands of people in prison who could be dealt with differently. Start with the lower risk under-18s, women in custody and foreign national prisoners. The remand population is huge, many just need accommodation, and there are still people serving IPP sentences who have long since passed their tariff and remain trapped in a system.

      There are plenty of non-violent prisoners who could be released safely and managed properly in the community. Perhaps the question should be why we aren’t looking properly at those groups rather than continually putting pressure on the system to release people who clearly present a greater risk. The people at the top will probably still be there when the dust settles. It’s the staff on the ground who will be left picking up the pieces. At some point someone needs to grow a backbone and actually speak up for probation, because the current approach is watching the car crash in slow motion and pretending everything is under control.

      Delete