The mistaken release of Hadush Kebatu is a symptom of a failing system
The problems in criminal justice run far deeper than one high-profile error. The dramatic rise in prisoners released in error is just one aspect of a collapsing criminal justice system, argues Cassia Rowland
Prisons are rarely at the top of the political news cycle – and when they are, it’s never good news. The mistaken release of Hadush Kebatu, the former asylum seeker whose charge and conviction for sexual assault triggered violent unrest in Essex this summer, was the last thing the government needed in a week already full of negative headlines. But the dire state of prisons means it was just a matter of time until something like this happened.
Prisons are failing at their most basic requirements
In this year’s Public Services Performance Tracker we highlight just how bad things are in prisons. Prisons are often dangerous and overrun with drugs. A quarter of prisoners are kept in cells that do not meet fire safety standards1 and rates of violence are skyrocketing. There were more than 30,000 assaults in 2024 – equating to one incident for every three prisoners. And more than one in ten of those are serious, including those resulting in concussions, burns and broken bones.
Conditions are inhumane. Prisoners struggle to get toilet paper for their cells or sometimes have to choose between a hot meal and a shower. Two-thirds of prisoners are locked in their cells for at least 18 hours a day, with little access to education or employment. In this context, it is little wonder that prison releases have also been affected. The number of releases ‘in error’ has jumped dramatically, rising to 262 in 2024/25: more than double the previous year and almost four and half times what it was ten years before.
The blame for mistaken releases can partly be laid on staff inexperience. More than half of prison officers in March 2025 had been in the job less than five years, compared to just 22% in March 2010. A quarter had less than two years’ experience.4 Inexperienced officers may be more likely to make mistakes and are less likely to have the confidence to speak up if it seems like something’s not right.
Calculating a prisoner’s release date has also become much more complicated. Until 2020, almost all prisoners serving a fixed length sentence were released halfway through their sentence, serving the rest under probation supervision in the community.
Now, some offenders are released automatically after 40% of their sentence, some after 50%, some after 66%; others simply become eligible to apply to be released after half or two thirds of their sentence. The operational guidance for calculating when a prisoner should be released is 144 pages long – and doesn’t even cover the emergency early release measures used over the last two years.
But the biggest reason for the increase is the capacity crisis and the emergency release measures governments have been forced to adopt to manage it. Since the 2000s, successive governments, of all stripes, have failed to build enough prison places to meet growing demand while the Ministry of Justice suffered steep cuts during the 2010s, including both day-to-day spending and prison maintenance and expansion.
Under the Sunak government, prisons took an ad hoc approach to early releases, letting prisoners out days or weeks early at very short notice to free up space as they needed it. Labour’s scheme to release most prisoners after 40% of their sentence has been fairer and more predictable, but has still made it more complicated to figure out when prisoners should be released. The churn in the prison population has also risen sharply, with more people coming in and out of prison and lots more people being recalled to prison after release. This again makes it more difficult keeping track of who is coming into prison and when they need to be released.
The government needs to keep focusing on fixing the systemic problems
We don’t know exactly what went wrong in this specific instance, and it was a particularly serious failing given the seriousness of the offences and because Kebatu should have been deported, rather than simply being released a few days or weeks early. The justice secretary, David Lammy, is right to want to know precisely how this happened.
Given the increasing complexity of calculating prisoners’ release dates, introducing additional checks is probably sensible – depending on what exactly they are. Having all ‘high profile’ releases reviewed by the Ministry of Justice, as has been suggested, seems like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut, but there may be other safeguards that can be introduced without creating unnecessary admin.
The most important task, however, is getting the prison system back on its feet. That means reducing pressure on prison spaces. The Sentencing Bill, currently making its way through parliament, will help with that, but capacity will remain on a knife edge until at least late 2027. Crucially, making a success of the reforms requires substantial investment in community sentences and rehabilitation, to provide courts with an effective alternative to prison and keep people from bouncing in and out of custody. Without that, the prison system will remain under acute pressure and further errors like this one will be more and more likely.
Cassia Rowland
Related content The crisis in prisons
We can only hope that one day, somewhere in these politically & financially dubious institutes for the temporary use of PPE graduates, a head will finally split open from headbutting the same brick wall hour after hour, day after day, thereby allowing the scales to fall from their eyes & the toxic contents to spill down the drain:
ReplyDelete"The dramatic rise in prisoners released in error is just one aspect of a collapsing criminal justice system, argues Cassia Rowland... the biggest reason for the increase is the capacity crisis and the emergency release measures governments have been forced to adopt to manage it... Since the 2000s, successive governments, of all stripes, have failed to build enough prison places to meet growing demand... The most important task, however, is getting the prison system back on its feet."
Then if we're still awake/alive after wading through the tedious bluster & filler & statements of the obvious, we might reach a single sentence thrown in at the deep end which teases the faintest glimmer of an alternative and which, ironically, begins with the promise of something decisive or of vital importance:
"Crucially, making a success of the reforms requires substantial investment in community sentences and rehabilitation, to provide courts with an effective alternative to prison and keep people from bouncing in and out of custody."
Oh.
"Before joining the Institute for Government, Cassia was Strategy and Insight Manager at Crest Advisory, a specialist crime and justice consultancy and think tank. She has led projects across the country working with central and local government, police forces and Police and Crime Commissioners, covering issues ranging from serious violence to fraud."
"Calculating a prisoner’s release date has also become much more complicated."
ReplyDeletehttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2eppqd2nyo
sarkozy released 3 weeks into a 5 year sentence
What might IoG make of this?
1. lammy would explode with rage (again)
2. lammy would offer a Gallic shrug (cos its a chum)
3. trump would sue sarcozy, lammy, canal+ AND TF1
Problems in staffing prisons go back many years and include the introduction of a two tier system for pay, terms and conditions known as ‘Fair and Sustainable.’ (FAST).
ReplyDeleteEssentially, you could on undergo career progression if you agreed to a new contract of employment which offered lesser terms and conditions. The old hands quite rightly refused because of the impact upon pensions and as a consequence, we’re not allowed to apply for permanent promotion, although many were given ‘temporary,’ or ‘acting,’ positions which they kept for years.
What happened next was that young or inexperienced officers, denied pay progression because of austerity applied for promotion to grades they wouldn’t normally be qualified for, and in the absence of any competition, they got the job.
The problems on the wings became enormous and over time, the longer serving members of staff left or retired. This is a part explanation for the exodus, but of course, as with probation, the problems are multi-fold and the solutions complex.
The most obvious solution in my mind would be, don’t try to screw your staff and introduce change by negotiation, consultation, and listening.
Who knows, the idea might rub off on other areas of the CJS.
found this on my travels:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cglg5zjje76o
"A police scheme to screen people in custody for signs of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has provided a "lightbulb moment" for offenders, the officer leading it has said... The initial pilot in Cumbria started last November at Workington police station ... Cumbria was just the second force in the country to introduce the pilot, following on from City of London Police... "We've screened 56 people in total since the project was implemented and when we combine those that indicate either highly likely or possible, ADHD is [indicated in] 80% of people."... Sarah Templeton, CEO of charity ADHD Liberty, said there was a clear link between the condition and offending... She explained many people end up in the justice system because of their "natural ADHD traits".
"When I say natural, I mean things like being impulsive, not thinking of the consequences, having very low boredom thresholds, wanting everything immediately and having no patience"... "
Sounds a damn sight better investment than spending £shittillions on building prisons & tagging.
????? Why aren't probation involved ?????
(can't have those woke idiots getting involved)
But those who haven't committed a crime have to wait 12-48 months for an ADHD assessment. Something is wrong here.
DeleteIts so unfair how the criminal class gets everything & we get nothing! Before you know it we'll be employing criminals as well as immigrants, while our boys & girls are left to rot, roaming the streets chugging on illegal vapes, tying flags to lamp-posts, chanting at a travellodge (Armando) and showing how they removed their tags on tiktok.
DeleteTroll.
Deletehttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11/11/prison-service-must-wean-itself-off-cheap-migrant-labour/
ReplyDelete'Getafix
There’s a new row within the Government. This time Shabana Mahmood, the Home Secretary, is rejecting pleas from her old department to exempt prison officers from new visa rules introduced in the summer. Under the new scheme, skilled worker visas will only be issued for employees earning a salary of over £41,700, a substantial increase from the previous level of £29,000.
DeleteThis means that most prison officer roles outside of London would no longer qualify for skilled worker visas.
Why does this matter? Many people will be surprised that foreign nationals are allowed to staff our jails at all. Indeed, prison officers have only been eligible for skilled worker visas since October 2023. How many foreign nationals can there really be working on the frontlines in our jails?
Astonishingly, prisons have recruited over 1,000 officers from overseas in the past two years, with the vast majority of foreign hires coming from Nigeria. Indeed, according to Ministry of Justice data, 11.5 per cent of all officers hired in 2024 come from Nigeria, with Ghana a distant second on 2.1 per cent. It seems that very many Nigerians apply to work in the prison service, as they represented 29 per cent of all applicants last year.
To put this 1,000 foreign national staff in perspective, there were 22,702 frontline prison officers according to the last published statistics. Staff turnover is high. In the last year, while 2,453 frontline officers were hired, 2,823 left the prison service. This is why our jails are desperately hiring. They can’t hold on to staff. And in the last two years foreign nationals have become a significant source of new officers.
From speaking with senior civil servants on condition of anonymity I understand that the foreign hires are particularly concentrated in a few jails, with some having over 20 per cent of officers here on visas. This means that if their visas are cancelled some prisons may very quickly find themselves forced to close wings and send inmates elsewhere.
Reports of foreign national officer quality are mixed. I’ve heard stories of officers whose English language skills are so poor that they are functionally unable to do the job, and only really able to lock and unlock cells. Some are well-regarded, arriving with good experience and a solid work ethic.
Of great concern though is how effective vetting can be. While the Ministry of Justice insists that foreign national hires “are required to provide a criminal record certificate” as part of the hiring process, it’s unclear what checks are done to ensure the validity of this document, a matter of particular concern when applicants come from countries known to have high levels of corruption.
The truth is though that we shouldn’t need to hire them at all. A trainee prison officer will start on a salary of between £30,000 and £40,000 depending on location. It is a job open to 18-year-olds without any qualifications. It offers a secure job, a career path and a civil service pension. So why is it so hard to hire young Britons into these roles? The youth unemployment rate is rising, up to 14.5 per cent according to the latest statistics. This means almost three million young people are “economically inactive”. Surely 3,000 (0.1 per cent) of them would make suitable prison officers.
Across the British economy, we have made entire departments and sectors dependent on hiring migrants. This has accelerated since the Boriswave, where the Tory government increased net migration to an unprecedented 906,000 in one year. The former PM has recently acknowledged that this was a policy he chose to pursue after Brexit in an effort to suppress wages and stop inflation rising.
DeleteThis is the insanity of mass migration. It is explicitly pursued to drive down wages for native workers. The state is hiring foreigners instead of solving the problem of vast youth unemployment, and creating the bizarre situation where ministers of the Crown are pleading with the Home Secretary that they be allowed to hire more foreign prison officers. Something which was only made legal two years ago has become foundational to the survival of our prison service.
It’s not good enough. A government spokesperson told me “working in prison is an extraordinary job and we are always looking for people who want to help keep the public safe”. If so, our jails should be able to staff themselves from the British population. If there are issues with hiring and retention then prison leaders need to improve conditions for staff.
They’re going to have to. I understand that the Home Secretary will not budge on this. Good. It’s time for the prison service, like the rest of the economy, to wean itself off cheap migrant labour, and start investing in British workers.
David Shipley
Only in the torygraph!
DeleteWarning: After reading this astonishing expose you might succumb to an attack of the vapours.
"Many people will be surprised that foreign nationals are allowed to staff our jails at all... Astonishingly, prisons have recruited over 1,000 officers from overseas in the past two years"
So, now you've been ambushed by this Victorian music hall technique, let's layer on the *facts* from *reliable sources* :
"To put this 1,000 foreign national staff in perspective, there were 22,702 frontline prison officers according to the last published statistics... From speaking with senior civil servants on condition of anonymity I understand that the foreign hires are particularly concentrated in a few jails"
And now, before your very eyes, they slip in the *opinion* (piggybacking on the *factual*) :
"Reports of foreign national officer quality are mixed... Of great concern though is how effective vetting can be... a matter of particular concern [arises] when applicants come from countries known to have high levels of corruption... I’ve heard stories of officers whose English language skills are so poor that they are functionally unable to do the job, and only really able to lock and unlock cells."
BUT before you can think the word 'racist':
"Some are well-regarded, arriving with good experience and a solid work ethic."
And the final reveal, the real reason for the article, the naked rage of the Right:
"The truth is though that we shouldn’t need to hire them at all... Across the British economy, we have made entire departments and sectors dependent on hiring migrants... This is the insanity of mass migration. It is explicitly pursued to drive down wages for native workers... our jails should be able to staff themselves from the British population..."
Here comes the Labour endorsement (yep, that's what it says):
"I understand that the Home Secretary will not budge on this. Good. It’s time for the prison service, like the rest of the economy, to wean itself off cheap migrant labour, and start investing in British workers."
British Gaolers For British Prisoners!
Anon 14:01 Yes I was amazed it escaped the pay wall. "British Gaolers For British Prisoners!" Love it!
DeleteBBC News website:-
ReplyDeleteA total of 91 prisoners were freed by mistake between April and October this year, according to new government figures.
The data for England and Wales was published by the Ministry of Justice, as ministers face pressure over accidental releases after a number of high-profile cases in recent weeks.
Justice Secretary David Lammy told MPs the figures were "symptomatic of a prison system under a horrendous strain", saying the Labour government had inherited a "crisis" from the Conservatives.
But shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick said "the confusion created by Labour's botched early release scheme", which was brought in to ease prison overcrowding, was partly to blame.
The number of accidental releases has been increasing in recent years.
A total of 262 prisoners in England and Wales were freed by mistake in the 12 months to March, according to the latest annual figures, up 128% from 115 the previous year.
The latest data released by the Ministry of Justice covers a seven-month period between 1 April and 31 October.
The department said the figures cover any prisoner who is released when they should have remained in custody, where the individual or a third party did not deliberately play a role in the error.
It said the data was not directly comparable to annual figures, with the possibility of seasonal effects on releases and late recordings.
The department added that figures for recent months could change over time and in the past revisions "have tended to be upwards".
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/nov/10/ai-chatbots-stop-prisoner-release-errors
Deletehttps://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6913247b5dec0071ce49635e/Releases_in_Error_from_1_April_2025_to_31_October_2025.pdf
Deletehttps://www.gov.uk/government/news/deputy-prime-minister-announces-new-measures-to-bear-down-on-releases-in-error-and-keep-public-safe
"Deputy Prime Minister announces new measures to bear down on releases in error and keep public safe
Immediate action to clamp down on mistaken releases from prisons and restore public confidence in the criminal justice system has been announced by the Deputy Prime Minister today (Tuesday 11 November).
A £10 million investment will see the roll out of new AI-powered tools to frontline staff so they can accurately calculate sentences and vital upgrades to the archaic paper-based systems accelerated."
This is my personal favourite pile-o-shyte:
"Simplifying prisoner release policy to standardise how cases are treated and consider whether amendments are required to operational policy."
Artificial intelligence chatbots could be used to stop prisoners from being mistakenly released from jail, a justice minister told the House of Lords on Monday.
DeleteJames Timpson said HMP Wandsworth had been given the green light to use AI after a specialised team was sent in to find “some quick fixes”.
A double manhunt was launched last week after the incorrect release of a sex offender and a fraudster from the prison in south-west London.
Release errors over the past fortnight have been seized upon by opposition MPs as evidence of the helplessness of ministers in the face of chaos within the criminal justice system.
David Lammy, the justice secretary, is expected to address parliament about the number of missing prisoners when MPs return on Tuesday.
It is understood that AI could be used to read and process paper documents; help staff cross-reference names to ensure that inmates are no longer hiding their past crimes behind aliases; merge different datasets; and calculate release dates and sentences.
At present, many of these jobs are being completed by inexperienced staff using calculators and reams of paper.
Responding to questions in the upper chamber on Monday, Lord Timpson said: “The number of releases per prison varies dramatically. In HMP Gartree, they average two releases a year, whereas … in Wandsworth it is 2,000.
“But that is why the digital team last week went into HMP Wandsworth to look at what are the opportunities for some quick fixes to embrace digital technology.
“We had the AI team that went in and, to give you a couple of examples, they think an AI chatbot would be really helpful, and also a cross-referencing for aliases, because we know some offenders have more than 20 aliases.”
He added: “We’ve given the team the green light to get on with that.”
O've just finished being entertained by Mr Slow at the despatch box. Lame lammy limped through his statement, explaining to all what a marvel of modern science he truly is. he wasn't buying a suit; he wasn't going to speak until he knew what he was saying; he's convened all manner of magnificent people; he's released data no-one's ever known about before; and he's found another £10million for an AI project to assist the lower grades with their counting skills.
ReplyDeleteWhy did we ever doubt him?
Yes awful I just watched him too he was controlled this time though disappointingly he sort of tried to look cool but you can detect a real. Lack of substance. Who on earth knew there was an accelerate course to pm . Clown of the Boris order it's not just the Tories completely inadequate for the role. Put me in mind of napos blustery leader full of hot air know nothing.
DeleteNo pay rise ?!
ReplyDeleteLetter from Office of the (deputy) Prime MInister
DeleteDear Probation staff
I had a plan when I became (deputy) PM (and justice person) which meant you were going to get a £10million bonus to share for all of your hard work, commitment & loyalty shown while the tories gave you fuck all for ages but, sadly, some dumbass low grades in the prisons have let a load of FNO paedos out by mistake (see how I'm getting a grip on the jargon, guys), so we're now having to invest that £10mill in an idiot-proof AI system that can count. Apparently Lord Cobblers knows someone who knows someone.
More good news soon.
Peace Out
Davey.
p.s. Did you like the suit? Nice tailoring, yes?