Thursday, 16 May 2024

Time For a Serious Discussion

Yet again prisons, probation and the criminal justice system finds itself in the limelight.. It's all an unholy mess, its election year and politicians are wading-in. What on earth can be done to fix it? A serious discussion would be a good start and here are some ideas floated recently by Rob Allen:-   

What is to be Done?

It should now be clear to all that the prison system is facing a very serious operational crisis. It’s at its most acute in local prisons like Wandsworth where the Chief Inspector, summarising his findings as death, drugs and despair, found a jail failing at the most basic level, with no reliable roll to ensure that all prisoners are accounted for and a degree of despondency he’d not seen before.

But we should be troubled too by an unnoticed local watchdog report on Long Lartin, a high security prison, where much of the existing surveillance technology is obsolete or unserviceable and the emergency control room cannot properly monitor the wings. “This limits its ability to deploy timely assistance in emergencies and seriously compromises the safety of prisoners and staff”.

In a custodial estate of 120 prisons, there will always be a number where the challenge of too many prisoners, too few staff or crumbling infrastructure become overwhelming. As the Prison Governors Association has pointed out, the relentless and growing demand for cell space leaves almost no scope to grant temporary relief to places like Wandsworth by reducing their capacity.

Extending early release provisions and using police cells may buy the system some time but without proper resettlement support some of those let out early, may be back inside all too soon.

Probation has been “reset” to enable it to focus on its highest priorities but the National Association of Probation Officers has issued a breathless warning of “early release chaos”- and an increasing risk to public safety- without offering much in the way of alternative solutions.

What more could be done? In the short term, there’s a need to close more tightly the entrance to the court and prison system as well as throwing opening the back door. Developing the use of Out of Court Disposals would for example reduce pressure on the magistrates courts.

Given the concentration of overcrowding in local jails, guidance from the Attorney General, Lady Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor could be issued encouraging alternatives to custodial remands whenever possible, if necessary, monitored with an electronic tag.

Larger sentencing discounts for early guilty pleas could also reduce periods spent both on remand and under sentence. The Justice Ministry are reviewing this but need to get on and act.

The Sentencing Council should expedite too the publication of their guideline on the imposition of community and custodial sentences which could result in fewer short jail terms. More urgency should be given to enacting the Sentencing Bill which would introduce a presumption that custodial sentences of 12 months or less will be suspended.

A more radical measure would be to ask courts to keep out of prison all offenders who have successfully spent their remand period without being locked up. Their sentences could be suspended, deferred, or postponed depending on the circumstances.

As for sentence lengths, the Sentencing Council should for most offences be asked to revise its guidelines to bring the average back down to where it was 10 years ago. After all, most of its guidelines have not been intended to raise the “going rate” but for whatever reason that’s what’s happened with disastrous consequences for the prisons where the increased terms are served. Many of those being released early, will have served longer than they would have in the recent past.

None of this will be politically easy and, in an election, year creating a much needed cross party consensus seems fanciful. But surely someone in Labour must recognise that the prison crisis is likely to be theirs to resolve before too long and it’s in their interest as well as the government’s to prevent it getting even worse. There are of course many reforms a new government should introduce to create a more sustainable, effective and humane justice system. But the priority now its to keep it functioning and safe.

Rob Allen

--oo00oo--

Can Probation Keep Us Safe?

BBC 1 Panorama May 23rd 9.00pm

When dangerous criminals leave prison, the Probation Service should monitor them and keep the public safe. But is it up to the job? As convicted criminals across England and Wales are released from prison early to tackle chronic overcrowding, Panorama investigates the Probation Service and asks if it's doing enough to manage high-risk prisoners. Serving probation officers warn that their caseloads are putting public safety at risk, and families whose loved ones have been murdered by convicted criminals on probation ask why the system failed them.

11 comments:

  1. From Google.

    "45,569 releases from determinate sentences and 465 from indeterminate sentences. In 2022, there were 45,569 offenders released from determinate sentences, a fall of 2% from 2021. There was a 12% fall in the number of releases from determinate sentences of '4 years or more', as compared to the previous year.27 Apr 2023"

    There are more people being discharged from prison each year now then what the total prison population was in 1993.
    I find that quite a shocking statistic.
    Prison should be the place of last resort, not a place to shove someone for any minor infringement.
    Any serious attempt to fix the mess our current CJS is in must include a change in the narrative that gets pushed to the public by politicians and press.
    I'm sure you can be tough on crime without imposing the last resort as your default position.

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
  2. I’m taking us back to these two blog posts and all the blog posts like it. Probation did keep us safe. It kept us safe by supporting and rehabilitating offenders, and by putting risk management measures in place to restrict and monitor offenders.

    The Probation Service has since been decimated by NOMS, Transforming Rehabilitation, E3, Probation Unification, OneHMPps, Probation Reset, ECSL, OMiC, Prison Senior manager control of probation regions, civil service control, …

    How can probation and probation officers do anything effective if the service is under resourced, underpaid and poorly represented? I saw Ian Lawrence, head of the largest probation union on the news last night. The newscaster had to drag the points out of him. He barely mentioned the probation service more than once. “Our members”, “our members” he bleated, but not once did he explain they are overworked, overwhelmed and underpaid probation officers.

    Monday 23 February 2015
    Guest Blog 26
    Advise, Assist and Befriend.

    http://probationmatters.blogspot.com/2015/02/guest-blog-26.html?m=1

    Tuesday 30 August 2022
    Carry On Advising, Assisting and Befriending

    http://probationmatters.blogspot.com/2022/08/carry-on-advising-assisting-and.html?m=1

    ReplyDelete
  3. Where is our so called Chief Probation Officer Kim Thornden-Edward’s in all this?

    When addressing the House of Lords, the late Lord Ramsbotham stated, the “Probation Service has no senior probation official in the ‘ridiculous NOMS’. So an awful lot is being said and done about the Probation Service without there being any proper Probation Service advice at the heart of what is happening”.

    We now have a senior official, a Chief Probation Officer for all England and Wales. We have a HMIP Probation Inspectorate and a Probation Institute too. But none speak for the Probation Service.

    We are all alone. The little P in HMPpS.

    ReplyDelete
  4. An inspection of Norfolk PDU, rated 'Inadequate'

    Inspectors were concerned with the breakdown in the senior strategic relationships with Norfolk PDU and partners involved in the safeguarding of children. The PDU had not been carrying out its statutory duties to attend or contribute towards the Local Safeguarding Partnership and relationships between probation practitioners and social workers were sometimes fractured. This means some children are at risk of harm which needs to be resolved as a matter of urgency.

    The report highlights some positive work in the delivery of Mental Health Treatment Requirements (MHTRs). Evidence collected by the provider shows that the people who had completed these sessions always felt their emotional wellbeing had improved.

    Elsewhere in the report, it is noted that the services for women on probation at Norfolk PDU were concerning. Women were not always assigned to female practitioners, and the absence of a commissioned rehabilitative services (CRS) contract for substance misuse meant many people were not getting sufficient support.

    An inspection of Suffolk PDU, rated 'Requires improvement'

    The report again highlights the workload pressures on Senior Probation Officers (SPOs). As was highlighted nationally in a thematic report published January 2024, the workload of SPOs at Suffolk PDU is too great and managers spoke of difficulties in supporting a new cohort of staff whilst undertaking tasks related to human resources. These demands made it difficult for SPOs to provide adequate management oversight of cases.

    Leadership had a proactive relationship with partnership agencies such as Suffolk Constabulary, the youth justice service, and the Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH). Information relating to people on probation through these agencies was available to staff but was not routinely used to shape subsequent practice. 

    Inspectors found that whilst there were positive examples of practitioners understanding and analysing the motivation of the people on probation in complying with their sentence, this positive assessment did not result in adequate planning to support desistance. 

    ReplyDelete
  5. As someone who manages referrals for approved premises I can confirm that they are full of high risk prisoners released under the early release scheme

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course. Lots of high risk prisoners get early release. Many high risk are early released homeless too. It’s in the guidance that allows it. Same as high risk offenders on probation are having supervision suspended after completing two thirds.

      Delete
  6. Probation or even prison cannot be ‘fixed’ in isolation. It needs universal services to tap into. It needs strong and effective partnerships to support people with their mental health and addiction. There needs to be safe and adequate housing. It all goes hand in hand.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Jim. Have you seen this?

    Can Probation Keep Us Safe?
    Panorama

    When dangerous criminals leave prison, the Probation Service should monitor them and keep the public safe. But is it up to the job? As convicted criminals across England and Wales are released from prison early to tackle chronic overcrowding, Panorama investigates the Probation Service and asks if it's doing enough to manage high-risk prisoners. Serving probation officers warn that their caseloads are putting public safety at risk, and families whose loved ones have been murdered by convicted criminals on probation ask why the system failed them.



    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001zhqg#:~:text=When%20dangerous%20criminals%20leave%20prison,and%20keep%20the%20public%20safe

    ReplyDelete
  8. Everyone who has written on this blog makes reoccurring points, of being crushed by endless restructuring, micromanaged though largely ignored by HMPPS/Civil Service and alongside this, a wilful disregard for probation staff, moral, what works and clearly what doesn’t.

    I pose a question; if we cannot support offenders/ex offenders through the evidenced backed befriend and assist model, and we are tied to our desks completing endless referrals for accommodation that doesn’t exist, and the remaining time completing OASys, spending on average, 7.5 or an 8 hour day simply inputting data, how can we safely manage and successfully help those on probation?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I expect it's the element of "successfully help" that is intended to be finally destroyed, leaving only a monitoring and enforcement role of curfew and tag related orders and high caseloads.

    ReplyDelete
  10. In response to the notion of "managing offenders", I remember back in 2008 or thereabouts, a grizzled, tired probation officer said to me that the probation service couldn't manage to shit in their own hand, let alone "manage" someone's offending behaviour.

    And here we are in 2024, a national service collectively incapable of almost anything... courtesy of those deluded career managerialists who didn't have the skills to manage their own bowel movements, not least because they found it easier & more satisfying to shit on everyone else; staff & service users alike.

    ReplyDelete