A New Year and it's pretty likely there will be a new government by May, so the pressure is on to try and influence things. This from Rob Allen:-
Will 2024 be the Year of Prison Reform?There’s growing recognition across the political spectrum that radical change is needed in criminal justice. This year’s converts to the cause include John Major who argued in May that “we over-use prison and under value alternative sentences; ” former Labour Home Secretary David Blunkett “struck by the genuine meltdown in the criminal justice system”, and perhaps most surprising of all, leading Brexiteer Lord Frost who recently wrote of a duty to revamp our disgusting prisons.
But how should a new government set about addressing the myriad problems facing the penal system?
Some, like Justice Committee Chair Bob Neill think we need a “proper and honest debate about what prison should be for, who should go there and the costs”. While it might be tempting to try to persuade the public that the approach we’ve been taking for decades is not working, there’s no guarantee what conclusion they’ll reach.
After all, for Frost, getting a grip on the crime problem means sending more people to prison, not fewer, for short sentences and “minor” crimes. Neill himself supports a proposal from think tank Policy Exchange for mandatory minimum prison terms of at least two years to be imposed on ‘Hyper-Prolific Offenders’ a measure which could overwhelm prisons with people convicted of theft. There may be little evidence behind Frost’s view that unless people think they might actually end up in prison, there will be no deterrence - but many probably share it .
Instead of a debate, what’s needed is some systemic change to drive and oversee reform. As former Lord Chancellor David Lidington put it, the politics of prison reform “is horrendously difficult for governments of any party”, if it means spending more on prisons at expense of other, more popular public services and/or reducing significantly the numbers we send to prison.
So, let’s find ways of taking the politics out of it.
One way is to look at New Labour’s post 1997 reforms. They inherited a slow, cumbersome, and inconsistent approach to children in trouble, both in custody and the community. They set up an expert Task Force to establish priorities, subsequently creating the Youth Justice Board to oversee local multi agency work with offenders and to commission and set standards for secure establishments.
Outcomes haven’t always been perfect by any means, but it marked a major structural overhaul which remains in place, focusing attention and investment on a neglected area and keeping politicians at arm’s length. The prison and probation service arguably now needs this kind of external supervision and oversight if they are to have any chance of overcoming the current crisis and adopting a genuine rehabilitative agenda.
A new government should immediately commission a Criminal Justice Task Force to establish what changes are most urgently required. In prisons these are likely to involve action on training and recruitment of staff, the development of regimes and improved reintegration. Reducing the 600 people who leave prison each month without a home seems an obvious target.
On the community side, restoring probation’s place as a primarily local agency looks inevitable. While a recent report from the House of Lords Justice committee cautioned against yet more large-scale restructuring in the coming years, it’s call for much stronger links between probation and local treatment and other social services in fact argues for just that.
A new government could also alter the ways funds are made available for criminal justice services in order to create stronger incentives for local agencies to prevent crime and reduce imprisonment. At a macro level, with two proposed new prisons struggling to get planning permission, some of the funds earmarked for more custodial places could be switched to strengthen capacity in the community – hostels, restorative justice programmes and women’s centres would all benefit from expansion.
At a micro level, if localised multi agency probation services succeed in keeping people out of prison, a proportion of the costs they have saved could be transferred to them. Creating such a virtuous spending cycle would help further enhance the way local communities can safely supervise and reintegrate people outside prison. A new Criminal Justice Board could be set up in law to monitor the system as a whole, working alongside the current inspectorates.
A further measure would be to revisit the role of the Sentencing Council whose guidelines were in part originally intended to keep a lid on the prison population. It hasn’t achieved that in part because New Labour backtracked on explicitly linking sentencing levels with available resources, in part because courts have found ways to sentence more and more harshly. Requiring government to submit its criminal justice proposals for independent scrutiny by the Council could bring down sentence inflation as could a more rigorous obligation on courts to follow the guidelines.
A College of Policing review published last month found that on average, custodial sanctions increased reoffending compared to noncustodial sanctions. It said that “it is likely that individuals who are in custodial settings are more exposed to risk factors associated with criminal activity and behaviour and have less access to protective factors to protect them from this behaviour”.
There are strong reasons for looking to drive down the numbers who go to prison and drive up the standards for those who do go. Let’s hope a new government has a plan to make it happen.
Rob Allen
--oo00oo--
It's also worth noting what is number one the following wish list for politicians posted on Twitter by former Governor John Podmore:-
1.Take probation away from prison & localise it
2. Implement the Corston report.
3. Redeploy HQ managers to prisons to support Governors.
4. Give prison officers 6 months training
5. Stop building new prisons and invest in community punishments.
6. Transfer resources from HMPPS to HMCIP and increase his powers
7. Create proper local prisons managed by local communities/ separate off a nationally managed long term high secure estate.
8. Import new leadership
9. Open more approved premises & invest in move- on accommodation
10.Tackle corruption & SOC in prison like you really mean it
11. Allow wings/parts of prisons to be fun solely by drug & alcohol service providers
12. Allow pre-release prisoners in open prisons mobiles & computers
13 Stop hurting HMPpS workers...
ReplyDeletewas podmore enjoying a small one when he wrote this list?
ReplyDelete"11. Allow wings/parts of prisons to be fun solely by drug & alcohol service providers "
14. Oust AED’s before they wreak havoc in probation.
ReplyDelete15. Disband OMiC and IOM.
16. End vetting and employ people with convictions.
17. Pay probation officers better wages and overtime.
18. Redeploy non-frontline probation practitioners to the frontline.
19. Redeploy the SLT to the frontline. They failed.
20. Implement Advise, assist and befriend. It works.
As much as I'd like to start 2024 on a positive note I can only say that the great ideas Rob, John and others have will never come to pass. The whole CJS reform programme is just one tabloid frenzy away from doom. Probation will continue to justify revenge over rehabillitation and prisons will go to hell in a handcart. That is the current climate.
ReplyDeleteMay I suggest to our readers that they scan the Labour Party’s recent publications on their plans for the Criminal Justice System. There are no plans to change the current arrangements for the way “probation services” are delivered. In fact I found very few direct references to the Probation Service in any of the literature. What has been published is really nothing more than the tired platitudes of reclaiming streets and communities, placing victims at the centre of the process (whatever that means) and stopping crime before it occurs. Which sounds preposterous but at least recognises that work is required in the pre-criminal space. That’s not to say that any new government won’t address the probation shambles but don’t be fooled into thinking that it is a foregone conclusion.
ReplyDeleteSubmitted to a post from November last year on AI so re-published here so as to be noticed more readily:-
ReplyDeleteI agree with comments above, in particular EM contracts. I suspect, the push for this is a perfect mutual benefit for police force areas. It’s heavily promoted presently in my PDU- I suspect other areas too. It’s sold as a risk management package-especially trail monitoring. At this point I am not heavily against this notion or advocate of free movement for all. It’s just the subterfuge with which it’s sold to PP’s. It can’t stop A going to see B, in the same way a restraining order fails to do so but, it’s hard evidence for police and their conviction rates rise, that’s if the technology is reliable. The reliability is an issue, particularly as one contract is ending and another commences. I have POPs where equipment has failed and multiple docking stations are remaining to be collected.
However, I see that this will be adopted as part of most orders from court, as it’s attraction to sentencers and government is its punitive, cost and information gathering element- over and above what a community order with UPW, DRR etc., which are all costly in comparison but the truth is nationally that these orders are riddled with inconsistencies. Static Covid-19 crime figures provide the raw data to allow government(s) the legitimacy to pursue alternative processes in this period of austerity (unless there’s an election of course!). The other element, I see, is the lack of need for probation staff to manage these orders, in whatever guise they come. These can be managed and enforced by EM staff- it’s those currently who recall prisoners subject to HDC. I see the PSO role diminishing, with concentration towards HR offenders being managed by PO, in the long-term with even more outsourcing.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/m0011tsq
ReplyDeleteAward-winning drama exploring the psychological impact of murder. Inspired by a real forensic psychologist and her work in secure prisons.
Risk-averse probation gets a very clear & unambiguous acknowledgement when Finn is speaking to Dr Alex... & the ageing prison officer clearly identifies that he's being put out to pasture so younger cheaper staff can be brought into the prison &, when it all starts getting loud, they just bang everyone up because they're scared.
DeleteDr Alex Bridges is an expert forensic psychiatrist and psychotherapist, assessing and treating perpetrators of serious crime.
This gripping drama explores the psychological impact of murder on perpetrators and follows the fortunes of participants in a Long Sentence therapy group.
How thin is the line between love and hate?
Dr Alex Bridges ….. Lolita Chakrabarti
Anthony ….. Lorn Macdonald
Finn ….. Reuben Joseph
Dani ….. Elysia Welch
Sound Design: Fraser Jackson
Series Consultant: Dr Gwen Adshead
Series format created by Lucia Haynes, Audrey Gillan, Eileen Horne, Gaynor Macfarlane, Anita Vettesse and Kirsty Williams.
Thanks to Victoria Byrne, Barlinnie Prison, Vox Liminis Distant Voices Project and Prof Fergus McNeill.
Junior drs , tube staff on strike , concessions will be made take note passive probation staff
ReplyDeleteWell the junior doctors have good specialist unions. The officials heading their unions are credible and useful.
DeleteProbation has Napo!
When you are 25 the money probation pays is ok but you soon want to move on because you realise it’s 90% admin and hoop jumping and 10% bullshit. All those videos of people making a difference by brainwashed actors no longer seems attractive and known to be fantasy. They will not strike for more money. It is not a job you want to do long term anymore as it is pointless and ineffective. All the smart people are getting out. They might as well let the voluntary sector supervise low risk people and let the police supervise high risk offenders at least probation would be out of the civil service stranglehold. Better than being part of the stifling prison service.
DeleteFrom Twitter:-
Delete"Hard agree, walked away a couple of years back. But vol sector not seeing “low risk” cases escalate would be a massive blind spot. Mappa teams will end up working in house with the police & be subsumed in policing culture."
The trouble with your proposal 01:45 is that it assumes a "voluntary sector" would be free to work in the ways that motivate it, with the necessary resources, including enough volunteers. Volunteers not interested in legitimising their vigilante ambitions. Which brings us to the Third Sector, aka outsourcing but not to the Private Sector, Much of our work already gone down that route. That sector is full of either the right organisations but constrained by inept and cheapskate commissioning by HMPPS to deliver ineffective and of course bureacraticly driven "interventions": or the wrong organisations pulled together to fulfill the cheapskate commissioned work by cynically gaming the targets, and both paying even worse wages than the public sector. There's an unwieldy long sentence for you, which is topical.
DeleteSo unless Probation is detatched from the prison service - and that is absolutely crucial - it is going to be extinguished in all but name.
All the research evidence proves over and over again that professional Advise Assist Befriend practice is effective. HMPPS and Government are neither interested or listening. How to win that argument against that cabal is the key.
It would help if Napo made the case more strongly and strategically yes. But it would also help if Chief Inspectors of Probation, eg Stacy and Russell, didnt wait until their curtain calls before calling out the current model as unworkable. It would help if MPs of every stamp could elequently make the case before they have left office eg Gauke and Stewart.
Given that everyone in a position of power seems to know the answer but finds it too politically difficult to do the right thing, it would really help if there was cross party collaboration, and it just might be that the prison crisis, also being called out late in the day, but more headline grabbing, might be an opportunity.
There is a crack in prisons and probation, maybe must maybe the light will get in
1918 yes you mean probation has Napo not the membership Napo don't represent us anymore.
DeleteMAPPA, IOM, Vetting, we’re already in the police culture mate. Have been for a long time. Police are now the ‘offender managers’ and probation just a recall service they use to put people back in prison.
DeleteFrom Twitter:-
Delete"Sorry to read this . Managerialism-Bureaucracy is everywhere. French #universities = same nonsense. We used to be teachers/researchers. Now our main role, & time, is to justify armies of bureaucrats' salaries & fill useless documents. At a huge useless cost for taxpayers."
11:28 Napo does represent you whether you are a member or not, as their recognition does is not dependent on membership numbers. What we should do is join Napo and make sure our voices are heard through the democratic structures and processes. That is also the way to rid ourselves of the lacklustre incompetent officials who are supposedly working night and day to further the interests of members and the probation profession (not the officers who actually do the day job plus Napo duties). The other thing to consider is joining the Probation Institute that has come a long way and has a seat at many a table in the MoJ that the officials in Napo cannot be bothered to sit at. They have been quietly plugging away and have gained much credibility recently in professional and academic circles as steadfast defenders of the profession. Their influence should never be underestimated, and they are a positive part of our probation world and do good things within it.
Delete09:42 Probation is already going to be part of the prison service this year in the probation operations directive. That is why the have appointed area directors. That is why those directors spend a lot of their time talking to those running prisons at HQ. I’m surprised the penny hasn’t dropped yet. They have steadily made the probation service part of the prison service. It’s happy and is happening and unions have already been notified. It’s a done deal Barr the official announcements. It’s over budget though so some staff will be redeployed eventually. So all this nonsense about fighting and striking etc is just pathetic Welcome to OneHMPpS
ReplyDeleteOver budget? Explain please, I presume that means cutting staff at some level?
DeleteOr recruiting less qualified staff and paying them less.
DeleteFrom Twitter:-
ReplyDelete"Probation contribution used to be really valued by both Magistrates and Crown Courts, which is why it is so sad that Probation contributions to Pre-Sentencing has declined so much recently."
See how easy that is. Need staff, increase wages. The Probation service should learn from the supermarkets.
ReplyDeleteSainsbury's has announced pay rises from March as supermarkets continue their battle to retain workers.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-67883985
Meanwhile the police are reconfirmed as still institutionally racist.
ReplyDeleteWhy is a known racist organisation still leading the Probation Service on IOM, MAPPA and vetting of probation staff?
https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/jan/05/head-of-britains-police-chiefs-says-force-is-institutionally-racist-gavin-stephens
It is not so long ago that a blog revealed an ex cop pquip who was reported for racist views had been fast tracked promoted in Northumbria. It would seem that this is now a badge of honour and no longer one of shame.
ReplyDelete