Wednesday, 11 August 2021

What Chance Prison Reform?

As Frances Crook prepares for her departure from the helm at the Howard League, in typical fashion she did not mince her words in yesterday's Guardian Opinion piece on the shocking state of our prisons, describing them as 'the last unreformed public service'

I always blanche at hearing that phrase because look where 'reform' has got the probation service and of course it's a term often used by politicians as perfect cover for imposing their ideologies. Sadly, just like probation, and indeed all parts of the criminal justice system, it's far too often been seen as a useful political football to kick around in pursuit of popular political gain. With such a rotten and morally corrupt political environment at present, I see absolutely no chance of things improving. 

By their nature, prisons are secretive institutions, traditionally highly suspicious of any external involvement or scrutiny. Of course it was precisely for this reason that historically probation was so important having its own distinctive ethos, identity and line of accountability. A different perspective was brought to the party and that had to be healthy for such a closed, uniformed institution. Regrettably, under the guise of 'reform' the 'silos' were broken down and the Prison Service were permitted to take control of the Probation Service completely under tight HMPPS control. 

For any chance of things changing and the prison population reducing, probation must regain independence and once more reassert its distinctive ethos and role. Frances Crook knows this and did her best to argue the case. Unfortunately we were all let down by inept, inexperienced and ineffective leadership in other parts of the criminal justice system.               
 
The reform of prisons has been my life’s work, but they are still utterly broken

Prisons are fundamentally unjust, but a small, ethical and compassionate system would transform lives

Nobody really cares about prisons. They are so far removed from the experience of most people and they are, apparently, full of horrid people. Occasionally, the media will run stories about rat-infested cells or suicide rates, but because so few people have anything to do with prisons, the stories soon fade and life for those on the outside continues as normal.

But prisons matter. It matters who goes into them. It matters what happens inside them. And it matters how much they cost. Although prisons too often function like black holes into which society banishes those it deems problematic, the state of our prisons tells a story about all of us. Prisons reflect society back to itself: they embody the ways we have failed, the people we have failed, and the policies that have failed, all at immense human – and economic – cost.

As chief executive of the prison reform charity the Howard League for the past 35 years, reforming prisons has become my life’s mission. In October, I will leave my work with one sad but inescapable conclusion: prisons are the last unreformed public service, stuck in the same cycle of misery and futility as when I arrived.

If a time traveller from 100 years ago walked into a prison today – whether one of the inner-city Victorian prisons or the new-builds where the majority of men are held – the similarities would trump the differences. They would recognise the smells and the sounds, the lack of activity and probably some of the staff. It is not only the buildings that have stayed the same – it is the whole ethos of the institution.

Prison is an unhealthy place. Most prisoners have come from poverty, addiction and social deprivation cemented by decades of failed social policy. Many arrive with long-term health problems, and in prison their health deteriorates further. While life expectancy and the quality of life for much of the country has advanced significantly in the past three decades, prisoners are considered “old” at 50. In the 12 months to June 2021, 396 people died in prison custody – some from Covid, some from suicide, many from “natural causes” that few of us on the outside would consider natural in middle age.

Even before prisons were locked down during the pandemic, it was normal for men – who make up 95% of the prison population – to spend almost all day in their cells. Wing-cleaning or an education class might occupy a few hours on a weekday. A shower every few days might offer brief respite. Men spend the day, and sleep, in ill-fitting, saggy prison uniforms, unwashed for days on end, waiting to be released.

Mealtimes provide structure, but not sustenance. Breakfast is a pack of white bread, a small bag of cereal and a small carton of milk, provided at tea-time the day before. (Inevitably, it is consumed that night.) They wake hungry, without food until lunch at about 11am – usually a small, soggy baguette, a packet of crisps and an apple, if they’re lucky. One hot meal comes with stodge and vegetables cooked beyond the point of identification at about 5pm.

The sheer monotony of life inside does nothing for the mental health challenges many prisoners face. Addictions worsen, with drugs readily available across the nation’s prison estate. Lockdown may have ended what little human contact prisoners had with the outside world. It did nothing to stem the flow of narcotics.

On release, many face homelessness and joblessness and may well have lost any family contact they had before incarceration. The people we step over in the street, for whom we sometimes buy a sandwich or a cup of coffee, are often people recently released from prisons. It is hardly surprising that about half of those released are reconvicted of a further offence and end up back inside. It is a merry-go-round but without cheer.

Minister after minister has done nothing to address the central question haunting our prison system: what is it all for? Each new secretary of state arrives with a new idea – improving a handful of prisons, building a few new ones, or getting people on to sex offender courses – and millions are duly splurged on the latest fad. But it does not face up to the problem that is the prison system as a whole.

At the heart of prisons is the fact that they are fundamentally unjust. They embed and compound social, economic and health inequalities. They disproportionately suck in men from poor, Black and minority ethnic backgrounds. They do nothing to help people out of crime. We only have to look at the internal punishment system to see that unfairness is the name of the game, with Black people significantly more likely to be physically restrained and punished than their white counterparts.

The whole system needs radical overhaul, starting with a swingeing reduction in the number of people we imprison. Custody is the most drastic and severe response the state has at its disposal and should only be used in exceptional and rare instances – either for the most egregious crimes, or when someone poses a serious and continuing threat to public safety.

Abiding by that principle would virtually empty our prisons of women and children, and drastically reduce the number of men behind bars. Most women are either on remand or serving a short sentence. Many are survivors of domestic abuse. Vanishingly few have committed violent crimes that warrant incarceration; fewer still could be reasonably considered to pose an ongoing threat to society. They, along with the 500 children who are currently incarcerated, should be managed in the community by specialist local authority-run services that provide the support, rehabilitation and education that will save them from further imprisonment. Thousands of men would benefit from similar support, whether that’s community addiction services, decent housing or mental health facilities.

The number of people in prison in England and Wales today sits at 78,600. That number could and should plummet – and swiftly. Margaret Thatcher – no softie on criminal justice – managed with less than half that number of prisoners. The Netherlands has drastically cut its prison population and is closing its prisons. A shrunken estate could be transformed so that prisons become places of purpose where people receive holistic support, quality care, meaningful skills and education, in an environment that is as similar to the society they will eventually re-enter as possible.

Over the past 35 years, I hope that I have contributed to making things just a bit better. I am most proud of the work we have done with police forces to reduce the arrests of young people, saving hundreds of thousands of children from experiencing the trauma and lifelong damage of being arrested. But the state of our prison system, the leviathan that continues to devour lives and resources and contaminates political discourse, remains my most bitter regret. A small, ethical and compassionate prison system would save the taxpayer a fortune, change lives and transform incarceration for good. It does not have to be like this.

Frances Crook is the chief executive of the Howard League for Penal Reform

23 comments:

  1. Judging from the response to your question, Jim: Nil.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Could I re-visit a cryptic comment from yesterday:

    "we are asked to vote for a flower to represent the Probation Service"

    really?

    While staff are not being paid as per their contractual right
    while people are being shuffled & shafted
    while IPP prisoners languish in custody because there arent any programmes to attend
    while those who lied or covered up about SOTP remain in well-paid influential positions

    those who choked the life out of probation now want people to choose a flower that represents NPS?

    How about Oleander (Nerium oleander)? Known for its striking flowers, the plant is very bitter & all parts can be deadly.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bit díssapointing not to read bundles of celebratory comments on here. One of this country's greatest exponents against failing policies and standing up for those jailed. A true reformer and political commentator and great asset a real friend to the reform for decent criminal justice process. For me at least Frances is powerful voice of reason and super intelligence yet no comments is sign of the times. I wonder if the illiterate and ignorant Napo clique will by now have been directed to ensure they write something to celebrate Frances contribution and often pave the way for direction that nafo have borrowed from. Nafo you need to comment here thanking and appreciating Frances for her Stirling unflinching stand. Unlike Mr Lawrence of the cowards corner. Anyway good luck to Frances justice is poorer without her brain on the case. Not likely to be filled but certainly remembered .

    ReplyDelete
  4. Via email:-

    Evening!

    As I said to you a couple of weeks ago when I emailed, certainly myself and plenty of colleague are always interested just living in the stifling world of the civil service doesn’t allow us to state that in public!

    I do hope others haven’t attempted to comment and it hasn’t gone through? I have to believe others read it and thought the same as me! I possibly sound a bit grumpy but that’s my reality right now here goes;

    Having attended a Howard League conference at the very start of my career, I have since followed Frances Crook’s career and the work of the Howard League with admiration. Throughout TR and to date, both Frances as an individual, and the Howard League have been part of a relatively small group of allies who openly spoke up for probation when TR was proposed, who provided a critique of Torie apathy towards our profession and indeed engaged with our union - even this October, Frances Crook will speak at the Napo AGM. I therefore clicked on this article with interest, but was sadly left somewhat disappointed.

    In Frances Crook’s contribution, it is suggested that custodial sentences are used only in ‘exceptional and rare instances’ and that instead; “They, along with the 500 children who are currently incarcerated, should be managed in the community by specialist local authority-run services that provide the support, rehabilitation and education that will save them from further imprisonment. Thousands of men would benefit from similar support, whether that’s community addiction services, decent housing or mental health facilities.”…

    What is being described here is the exact role of the probation service and youth offending teams. Surely what Frances Crook (and every other criminal justice commentator, campaigner, practitioner and academic) is acutely aware of, is that without a stable, properly funded and de-centralised probation service, the prison system proposed in this article will simply never exist. What a shame that this small but incredibly important detail was not made by such a well respected advocate of the probation service.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Minister after minister has done nothing to address the central question haunting our prison system: what is it all for?"

    They have, Frances. Its just not the answer you or I or many others were hoping for. Their answer is simple:

    "To progress my parliamentary career, to raise my ministerial profile and to enfranchise powerful, wealthy friends in business so I can enjoy a most comfortable retirement with a portfolio of consultancies, non-exec directorships & speaking engagements."

    Did anyone really imagine being Home Secretary/Justice Secretary/Prisons Minister was about justice or prisons or prisoners or rehabilitation...?

    The one true thing this last ten years of Tory rule has shown us?

    How being a Member of Parliament is all about the Member of Parliament.

    Its NOT about the constituency.
    Its NOT about the people of the country.

    Its all about their parliamentary careers, their ministerial ambitions, their financial security, ingratiating themselves with the powerful & the wealthy, ensuring their salaries are never below par, ensuring their expenses are always covered.

    There is another expose from this last ten years; that the modern Civil Service performs one vital task, i.e. to ensure that MPs, and Ministers in particular, are assisted in their ambition using whatever means is available to them, e.g. not exposing the lies, joining in with the lies, cosy arrangements to expedite Ministers' vanity projects, etc.

    Some 'old hat' senior civil servants had other ideas such as integrity, but most have since been elbowed into early retirement with golden goodbyes to enhance their platinum pensions. Those who remain have simply 'adjusted' their belief-systems to suit.

    Frances has fought hard - and hats off to that, ma'am - but she hasn't done badly for herself either.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Frances Crooks departure is a sad loss for all parts of the CJS. Its hard to believe however that someone who has dedicated so much of their life to championing the causes that Frances has can simply walk away from it all. I feel Frances Crook may have much to say and do yet. It's in her blood.
    As for prison reform? The diabolical and broken state of our prisons I feel is just a reflection of how badly our society is broken. The old saying "knowing the cost of everything and the value of nothing" has never been truer.
    Everything has been deprofesonalised and compartmentalised. Very few can dream of a career nowadays, instead their focus is on employment, doing a job not not having a career.
    The prison service, like probation and many other areas has suffered from deskilling and the draining of experience. New entries on accelerated promotion programmes just solves number problems, but it brings with it a whole new set of problems as within a few years those with little experience are leading and training those with no experience.
    With 2500 new probation workers entering the service I wonder if things in probation will be better or worse in 5years time?
    Prisons are in an awful state, but so is everything. Prison reform is essential, but it need to start from this side of the wall.

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes indeed gtx. I recall my last year or so and in some shock at the lack of general knowledge and experience of promotions. Worse was that most of the promoted were already identified as established liars. There is no minimum.standards today which is not surprising when you look at the calibre of the divisional directors.

      Delete
    2. "But Frances Crook, chief executive of the Howard League for Penal Reform, said: "Why is the Probation Service recalling people to prison but apparently not competent or able to judge what they are doing is lawful, whether this person will be lawfully detained?"

      https://www-bbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-58172332.amp?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16288400880649&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.com%2Fnews%2Fuk-england-beds-bucks-herts-58172332

      'Getafix

      Delete
  7. Guardian letters:-

    Frances Crook has been a voice of reason in the charity sector for 35 years (The reform of prisons has been my life’s work, but they are still utterly broken, 10 August). Like her, I have led several charities to make some sense of imprisonment and to help people come back into the community better, not worse. She is right that reform is at the bottom of the agenda for recent governments, irrespective of the fact that it costs us all a lot of money.

    How many people know that a year in prison costs about £40,000, somewhat more than private schools? The total cost of the roughly 80,000 prisoners in the system is more than £3bn a year. Budgets have been cut year after year and all but the most basic education projects have largely ceased to exist. I chair the board of a small charity, Sussex Pathways, which provides volunteer key workers who work on a release plan with prison residents on a one-to-one basis for about three months, looking at an individual’s needs including housing, health, addictions, education, family ties, employment and so on. The reduction in the likelihood of reoffending is about 80%, whereas without this support, it’s the exact opposite. It shouldn’t just be down to charities to try to mend some of the most challenging of society’s ills.

    Margaret Carey
    Hurstpierpoint, West Sussex

    It’s beyond doubt that prisons should do more to help prisoners turn their lives around. To achieve this, the prison system must have education at its heart, turning prisons into centres of learning and giving every prisoner the chance to access educational opportunities that are right for them. This means making a broader range of courses available, including vocational courses, GCSEs, A-levels and university degrees. But it also means transforming the culture of prisons to make education a priority, not an afterthought. Evidence shows that engagement with education improves the chances of getting a job on release and reduces reoffending. The forthcoming prisons white paper is a chance to recognise this.

    Jon Collins
    Chief executive, Prisoners’ Education Trust

    I have a lot of sympathy for Frances Crook because I was the adult education adviser for Lancashire’s local education authority for 20 years and had responsibility for education in the six prisons in the county. I was able to make two modest contributions to life in prison, one of which I think is embedded and the other was short-lived. The small success was to persuade governors to include a literacy test in their initial assessment of prisoners and, surprise, surprise, around 30% of the intake was illiterate. If we provided courses during the day, the prisoners lost out on the meagre wages they were paid for work done in the prison, and it was not popular to run classes in the evening as this was considered to be recreation time.

    The short-lived introduction was a joint exercise with the probation service to appoint liaison officers, who would visit a prisoner prior to release to check if they were involved in vocational studies that they could not complete. They then introduced the ex-prisoner to a local college to enable them to complete their course. The posts were eventually the victims of cuts. Change is not part of the vocabulary of prison governance.

    David Selby
    Winchester

    ReplyDelete
  8. More Letters:-

    I was saddened to read Frances Crook’s article. I only wish that before she retires from the Howard League for Penal Reform she might visit Dumfries prison. My two visits there – with a Quaker group and a U3A branch – were uplifting. It has a fine education section where they teach prisoners to read and write, an excellent room for prisoners to play with their children (under supervision), kitchens where prisoners are taught to cook and can serve a meal to their families, and a wonderful woodwork shop where they make items for the local area, like a swing for a person in a wheelchair who was going to a park.

    They are fortunate to have a football pitch (with coaching from local club staff) and gardens that produce 15% of the prison’s food. I felt really proud of the town’s forward-thinking establishment of correction with its positive, helpful ethos. If only they were all like that.

    Helen Keating
    Gatehouse of Fleet, Dumfries and Galloway

    We all owe a debt of gratitude to Frances Crook for her work on behalf of justice and decency. Her article is a catalogue of horrors that exposes the real criminals in our society. Instead of incarcerating the weak, damaged and vulnerable, we should be handing out sentences to the politicians and their friends who have produced this sorry state. The pilferers from the public purse, the chummy contract awarders, the austerity ideologues. What hasn’t been ruined by their greed and fanaticism? Housing, education, youth services, mental health provision, local government, probation, libraries, the NHS – nothing has been left untouched by hypocrites who blame the victims of the wicked activity of an overprivileged few.

    Kevin Donovan
    Birkenhead, Merseyside

    Very few of our prison population have an MPhil degree in criminology from the University of Cambridge, as I had, before getting banged up in “the last unreformed public service”, as Frances Crook describes it. I had dared to grow and supply some “demon weed” (cannabis) for myself and others, so did an 18-month sentence with Her Majesty. With time on my hands I puzzled about it all, and my plea is for offenders to be treated as well as household waste, ie sorted and redirected.

    Rather than prisons being general dustbins for all manner of rejected mankind, let us at least sort through this supposed “trash”. There is a world of difference between the dangerous criminal psychopath or terrorist and the poor, illiterate, confused, persistent petty offender. They need to go by different recycling routes for any effective outcome; such differentiation “inside” as exists is woeful.

    The radical overhaul and shrunken estate Crook proposes would indeed be transformational, but as the system acts as a mirror reflecting an inchoate state, it will, I fear, continue unreformed as the leviathan devouring lives, resources and our taxes too.

    Roderick Anderson Read
    Ely, Cambridgeshire

    ReplyDelete
  9. More:-

    People in prison and those drawn into extremist groups invariably have mental health problems emerging from a disadvantaged history. They may join an extremist group to feel they belong somewhere, or take drugs to block out bad thoughts and become aggressive, ending up locked in cells for most of the day in prison. They are neither understood nor helped with their underlying issues. When I was in detention over 50 years ago, it was a place you learned how to do the next burglary or drug deal better. Nothing’s changed in that time other than you are isolated for longer, exacerbating mental health issues. More mental health professionals in prisons and in Prevent would help, but it’s an emotional understanding across the board that needs to be driven by politicians.

    Baden Smith
    Gestalt psychotherapist

    Frances Crook’s excellent article should be compulsory reading not just for the secretary of state for justice but for all government ministers, prison governors, judges and anyone involved in the administration of justice. We should all take to heart the words of Fyodor Dostoyevsky: “The degree of civilisation in a society can be judged by entering its prisons”, words which are as true today as they were 150 years ago when he wrote them.

    Michael Darlow
    Bradford-on-Avon, Wiltshire

    ReplyDelete
  10. Via email:-

    Unreal expectations

    From this, Police Chief Constable Shaun Sawyer:

    “Firearms Licencing is heavily regulated, heavily monitored. If someone comes to notice for a criminal incident or mental health issues, then often we will take the firearms”- (revoke the licence) –“assess and return them. That happens every day in the United Kingdom. What policing can’t do is just trawl social media looking at peoples private lives and What Ifs”

    This is a horrible crime, and the trauma in the families affected and the local community must be almost unbearable. There is much to be said and reflected on, not least the “reassurance” from police that this was not an act of terrorism, there is an active debate to be had on that alone.

    But in the sanctity and focus of your blog Jim, lets just reflect on the confidence with which a senior leader in the police service said that his service cannot be expected to foresee every eventuality in every case, despite routinely minimising risks on a daily basis.

    Pearly Gates

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's as maybe pearly but the police should be regularly monitoring guns and weapons the registration of which give them a clue as to who have the tools to rampage and murder. It would be better spent time than police chasing motorists for a 1p0 pound speeding fine and writing punt letters making accusation. The police fucked it up here and something has to happen to expose them. The Devon police have farmer lazy attitude to real crime. Drugs are rife in Devon. The police prosecute untrue cases and do what they like . It must lead to the chief inspectors resignation.

      Delete
  11. From Ch4 News website:-

    It took less than 10 minutes for 22-year-old Jake Davison to gun down five people, including his own mother and a three-year-old girl, before turning his weapon on himself.

    Plymouth is a city still in shock in the wake of the mass shootings, with flags flying at half mast.

    Police have confirmed that Davison held a valid firearms licence and they are now investigating his computer hard drive and social media posts in an effort to piece together what happened.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Before anyone reacts, this is not a pro-gun post, but for information.

      There is much confusion & misunderstanding about UK legislation relating to guns & gun ownership. Every news channel I've heard so far seems to be mixing-and-matching shotgun certificate & firearms licence. They are very different.

      The age-old 'guiding' principle was that pretty much adult could apply for & be granted a shotgun certifcate unless there were reasons not to issue one (e.g. a previous custodial sentence, health) and one referee is required. Shotguns are defined in law, as is the ammunition they use, e.g. no rifling of the barrels, semi-auto shotguns limited to three-shot capacity.

      An individual has to have good reason (e.g. vermin control, competition shooting), written evidence & two referees if they want to apply for a firearms licence - which allows them to hold legally defined weapons including rifles, handguns, various related hardware & the more powerful air-rifles; although the list of prohibited weapons in the UK is quite extensive.

      In my experience our local police regularly check gun ownership, review certificates & licences & take action to remove guns; and its a high bar to have gun ownership reinstated once its been revoked. They are very keen to temporarily suspend a certificate or licence & remove all guns whilst they make further enquiries if they have cause for concern.

      PUBLISHED DATE: August 14, 2021

      USA, Jan to Aug 2021: Tot.Gun Violence Deaths incl. malicious/wilful/accidental: 27,529

      https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/


      "In the year ending March 2019, there were 9,787 offences in which firearms were involved; this is a 4% increase compared with the previous year.

      There were 33 fatalities resulting from offences involving firearms; this is three more than the previous year."

      https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/offencesinvolvingtheuseoffirearms/yearendingmarch2019
      ___________________________________

      UK knife crime:

      44,285 - Police-recorded offences involving a knife or sharp instrument in the 12 months to March 2021

      275 - Police-recorded murders involving a knife or sharp instrument in the 12 months to March 2020.

      23 - children aged just 17 or younger were murdered with a knife or sharp object in the 12 months to March 2020.

      https://benkinsella.org.uk/knife-crime-statistics/

      Delete
    2. Data is a bit messy, probably better to use comparable year data. It seems difficult to find any clear UK data beyond 2019 for any gun-related deaths:

      * USA 2019: wilful/malicious/accidental deaths = 15,448
      (this figure excludes suicides)

      * UK 2019: deaths resulting from offences = 33

      Delete
    3. Get off that's pro gun to me. In fact this killer had his licence returned recently. By the plods failure to click onto this guy's psycho state. In any case your wrong there was a time not so far back the plod were handing certificates out like confetti and Reginal Ronald kray could.have had one. Mick mouse and all the cast of the asylum if they wanted.

      Delete
    4. Whatever the legal requirements needed to hold a firearm and obtain a licence, and for whatever reasons a licence maybe issued, nobody should be able, or be permitted to keep a pump action shotgun in their house on the middle of a housing estate.
      I have to wonder how many other firearms are being legally held in two up two down terraced houses around the country?

      'Getafix

      Delete
    5. @15:59: context & perspective is required.

      Getafix:

      "According to the most recent figures for England and Wales, there are 156,033 people certificated to hold firearms and they own 617,171 weapons." (excluding shotguns)"

      Shotgun certificates cover 1.4 million shotguns.

      "Statistics for Scotland show that 70,839 firearms were held by 25,983 certificate holders in 2020. 46,703 people in Scotland are certificated to hold shotguns - and 133,037 weapons are covered by that scheme."

      And then there are the unregistered/unlicensed weapons:

      "The Small Arms Survey estimated there were 978,000 unregistered firearms in England, Scotland and Wales in 2018"

      So in 2021 there are probably more than 3 million guns of various types in the UK, of which I'd guess its now likely that more than a million are 'whereabouts unkown'.

      Delete
  12. https://www-cambridge--news-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/cambridge-news/prisons-dead-end-cambs-womens-21295317.amp?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16289362847717&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cambridge-news.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fcambridge-news%2Fprisons-dead-end-cambs-womens-21295317

    ReplyDelete
  13. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regional-reducing-reoffending-plans

    Regional Probation Directors have each produced a Regional Reducing Reoffending Plan for their region.

    ReplyDelete
  14. In case you ever wanted to know who they are & what they looked like:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hm-prison-and-probation-service-organisation-chart

    ReplyDelete
  15. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-partnership-framework

    "Diversity and Inclusion are at the heart of Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) values: Purpose, Humanity, Openness and Together. As a part of our values it is our responsibility to ensure that we deliver faith and belief inclusive services to victims and witnesses of crime, people on probation and members of the public who come into contact with the justice system."

    ReplyDelete