Wednesday, 28 April 2021

MoJ Obfuscation

Another interesting example of MoJ obfuscation and secrecy from Inside Time:- 

Prison alcohol course dropped

An offending behaviour course used in prisons to help men convicted of drunken aggression has been dropped.

The Alcohol Related Violence (ARV) course was offered in English and Welsh prisons for men seen as a high or medium risk of reoffending. Using cognitive-behavioural techniques it sought to explore previous and current alcohol use, teach skills to prevent relapse into drinking, and spot patterns of how drunkenness can escalate to violence.

However, earlier this year it was removed from the list of programmes approved for use in English and Welsh jails by the Correctional Services Accreditation and Advice Panel (CSAAP).

The Ministry of Justice said the decision was taken because “there was limited uptake for this programme and the demand for this type of intervention was being met through alternative health services and the wider Offending Behaviour Programme”.

The ARV course will be “absorbed” into alternative courses, so any prisoner who had been due to join it is likely to be offered a place on another course instead.

ARV was one of 22 programmes approved for use in jails by the CSAAP. The panel has attracted controversy in the past because its membership is secret and it does not disclose what was discussed at its meetings – and because it can approve courses for use with prisoners before there is firm evidence as to whether they work.

It previously approved the use of the Sex Offender Treatment Programme, which was suddenly dropped in 2017, five years after an unpublished internal research report had identified that men who had taken the course were more likely to reoffend than those who had not.

The MoJ made no announcement at the time it dropped ARV. The move only emerged when it was omitted from an updated list of CSAAP-approved prison courses published on the MoJ website this month. It is not known whether a research study has been carried out on the reoffending rates of people who have completed the ARV course – and, if so, what the results were.

Courses addressing alcohol use which remain approved for use in prisons include the Alcohol Dependence Treatment Programme, Breaking Free, Building Skills for Recovery, and Control of Violence for Angry Impulsive Drinkers.

--oo00oo--

Another revealing article by Maya Oppenheim in the Independent:-

The rising levels of self-harm in women’s jails in the UK are “worryingly high” with some therapeutic services cancelled during the pandemic, a new report has warned. The study, carried out by the Prison Reform Trust, found the government has failed to meet almost half of the pledges it committed to in its 2018 Female Offender Strategy.

Researchers, who shared the report with The Independent exclusively, discovered the government has fully rolled out just 31 of 65 promises despite the strategy being published almost three years ago. The charity warned the recent announcement of 500 extra prison cells being built in women’s jails reverses one of the strategy’s fundamental aims to reduce the female prison population - saying they would not be required if they had managed to actually implement the failed action plan.

Peter Dawson, the Prison Reform Trust’s director, told The Independent: 

“There is little point having a good plan if you don’t deliver it. That requires a timetable, resources and measures of success. None of these are in place. Instead, the government seems to have abandoned the idea that its female offender strategy can deliver its explicit and most important outcome – a reduction in the imprisonment of women. It is prepared to find £150m for new prison places to meet the cost of policy failure, but only a pittance to secure its success. The large majority of women are sent to prison for non-violent offences to serve sentences of less than one year. It is time for the government to double down on its aim to send less women to prison by investing in community alternatives and limiting the use of pointless short prison sentences.”

----//----

A previous report by the Prison Reform Trust found 80 per cent of women in jail were serving sentences for non-violent offences. Other studies have found high numbers of female prisoners have suffered domestic abuse, while many suffer from mental health issues - with campaigners frequently warning women in prison are often victims of much more serious offences than the ones they have been convicted of.

Dr Kate Paradine, chief executive of Women in Prison, told The Independent the government had “lost its way” since the Female Offenders Strategy was formulated.

She said: “Its proposal for 500 prison places flies in the face of all its own evidence that says the vast majority of women in prison do not need to be there. We know 95 per cent of children have to leave their home when their mother goes to prison and building more prison places will only shatter more lives and unnecessarily separate families. There is another way, one that we know works. The government can listen to the evidence, implement its own strategy and divert the £150m set aside for these new prison places into community-based services, like Women's Centres, that tackle the issues, like domestic abuse, that sweep women up into crime in the first place - keeping families together.”

The latest research, which is based on the most recent data available, shows out of the strategy’s 65 commitments, 31 have been fully achieved, 20 partially achieved, while there has been zilch progress or quantifiable implementation of 14 pledges. But researchers noted even in instances where commitments were met via publication of guidance or instructions, there is a dearth of information showing whether it is successful.

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “We want to see fewer women going to prison and are investing millions in our female offenders strategy to achieve this through community sentences, addiction treatment and women’s centres. Custody will always be a last resort - the new prison places will improve conditions with more single cells and greater access to education and employment, helping women to get their lives back on track.”

--oo00oo--

Blog Update

As regular readers are aware, comment moderation has been in place for some time and it looks likely to be permanent I'm afraid. It destroys much of an opportunity for discussion, but the paucity of probation-related comment as opposed to anti-Johnson and government stuff means I'm deleting much of it.

I have no problem calling out lying bastards wherever they may be in political life, or indeed examples of home grown cronyism, corruption, right wing political crap etc, etc, but I'm not letting it take over the blog at the expense of the core purpose - keeping the probation ideal alive.

I've completely given up with the union, politicians, journalists and now academics. The ever-smaller band of 'legacy' probation officers are inevitably moving on either literally or figuratively as the bright new recruits seemingly can't wait to embrace the MoJ/HMPPS command and control ethos and even if they are unhappy, are too shit-scared to say anything publicly, even anonymously.

Yes I'm angry and yes I'm fed up - but I've also got better things to spend my time on and therefore this platform will continue to wind down. However, I will reserve the option to kick it back into life from suspended animation at any time and when I feel there is something useful to say and in furtherance of the probation ethos so clearly disappearing from sight.

Addendum 

Interesting to note that only a few hours after publishing this post, a very lively discussion has started on Facebook with news that updating case notes within 24hrs is to become a 'target'. Quite understandable from a professional point of view and a longstanding National Standard, but noteworthy that rather than do something about high caseloads, HMPPS command and control ethos dictates other approaches. At time of writing, the topic has attracted 63 comments, including the status of a review of the Workload Management Tool, but all such supposedly hidden from public view.       

14 comments:

  1. Unification - perhaps probation staff might consider that, in the words of an old song, "the light at the end of the tunnel... is the front of an oncoming train"

    Here is the HMPPS list of OB programmes & associated guff from 8 April 2021 (might have already posted it when it was released?):

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/offending-behaviour-programmes-and-interventions

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Programme effectiveness and accreditation

      Evidence shows there are common features of effective offending behaviour programmes. Evidence also shows what is ineffective and what we should avoid doing.

      Programmes that are:

      poorly designed or run

      targeted at the wrong people, and/or

      delivered by poorly trained staff

      This can sometimes increase offending.

      Accreditation gives confidence that a programme:

      * is designed based on the best available evidence

      * is monitored to make sure it is delivered as intended

      * is evaluated to show the outcomes

      Accreditation

      The Correctional Services Advice & Accreditation Panel (CSAAP) helps HMPPS to accredit programmes by reviewing programme design, quality assurance procedures and findings, and programme evaluations. They make recommendations about whether to accredit to the HMPPS Accredited Programmes and Interventions Delivery Strategy Board (APIDSB). HMPPS is accountable for decisions to accredit programmes.

      CSAAP members are independent, international ‘what works’ academics and practitioners. They include criminologists, psychiatrists, psychologists and sociologists. They review programmes against a set of criteria, drawn from the principles of effective interventions.

      Delete
  2. https://www.governmentevents.co.uk/event/offender-management-providing-a-whole-system-approach/

    wonder what this will reveal?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OVERVIEW

      In 2019 the Government reported that reoffending costs society £18 billion a year and accounts for three quarters of all crime that is cautioned or sentenced. Covid-19 has put additional strain on offender management, causing concerns around longer prison sentences due to a lack of access to work or assessments that might allow for earlier release. However, the pressure from the pandemic is an opportunity to evaluate offender management holistically and look for best practice and innovative strategies to reduce reoffending, create safer communities as well as overcome the challenges presented by Covid-19.

      48% of adult offenders are reconvicted of another offence within one year of release

      The Safe Homes For Women Leaving Prison Report October 2020, revealed that nearly 6 out of 10 women leave prison homeless

      60% of prisoners leave prison without an identified employment, education or training outcome

      Between 2019 and 2020, 65% of men and women released from prison without settled accommodation had reoffended

      Join us at The Offender Management, Resettlement and Rehabilitation Conference to hear the latest policy updates and insights on post-incarceration and in-community offender management. A series of best practice case studies cover a wide range of topics, including managing probation, rehabilitation, and resettlement of offenders. This conference will also include discussion of effective multi-agency working, focusing on a joined-up approach to support offenders transitioning back into their communities. Breakout networking will provide the opportunity to discuss integrated offender management and the additional pressures of Covid-19 with colleagues, to share challenges and solutions.

      Why attend:

      ✓ High-level keynotes from leading experts across the public sector
      ✓ Practical case studies relating to rehabilitation programmes, resettlement and diversion schemes for young offenders
      ✓ In depth discussion of reducing reoffending rates
      ✓ Networking with speakers and senior colleagues
      ✓ CPD (gain 8 hours of CPD points towards your yearly quota)

      Only £389 - Book now!

      Delete
  3. Sorry JB but you have done a Stirling job. Kept the only beacon watch tower open all the time. The management defected for the money on offer . Napo sold out to survive in their jobs and the staffing has changed morphing and apeing this nasty selfish righteous almost evangelical bash the lower classes bash offenders and cut all resources. Probation has been subsumed into beaurocrysy . The future is a new breed and we have seen the best and now the end . The union colluded while very just a few really fought.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If the offending behaviour programmes that are rolled out within the CJS really did have an impact on an individuals behavior by themselves, then they'd be part of the education curriculum.
    In my opinion, programmes such as alcohol and drug courses are pointless on there own, they need to be one part of a bigger picture.
    Individuals undertaking such courses are often released homeless or returned to the same social settings they were in prior to any intervention, which just destroys any value or impact the programme may have had.
    I personally find it pointless to get someone to acknowledge they have a problem with things like alcohol and drugs, identify what needs to change, but provide no means or avenue to effect those necessary changes.
    That really is where probation with its social work ethos was important.
    Most people that offend because of alcohol or drug misuse already know what their problem is, and likely already know a great deal about their issues. I see little point in just reaffirming their problem and throwing them out the gate again.
    Offending behaviour programmes if they are to have any value need to be one component of a much bigger package.
    On there own, I think they're a bit of a con!

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
  5. I love this blog for the probation content but have to admit finding the constant anti-Tory and anti-Johnson diatribes from some contributors a bit tedious. I always think if people want that then they can to the Guardian website or wherever. Whereas this blog is the only place to go for anything probation related.

    On the subject of programmes being withdrawn, rather than seeing that as a failure isn't it actually a form of progress? I see comparisons with the vaccination programme where emerging research about blood clots with the AZ vaccine doesn't mean that vaccine is a failure, rather just that we have more knowledge about how to target it better. Isn't it the same with programmes that are basically a form of treatment?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @19:51 Please Note - these comments are inspired by your post. For clarification: no anger is directed at you personally.

      I am angry. In fact I am very angry. Because:

      • I lost my Probation career as a direct result of politically expedient bullshit
      • Many hundreds of other skilled & experienced people also lost their Probation careers
      • The political aspects of that decision were exacerbated by the mindless greed of lickspittle collaborators with no thought for anyone but themselves
      • The trade union/s did not protect or care for their membership
      • There is no longer a professional or independent Probation Service underpinned by social work values
      • The remaining state-run agency is merely a collection of procedures overseen by lickspittles, accountants & algorithms

      This blog is Jim’s blog. I have posted a fair few times about probation-specific issues, about probation-related issues & about contextual issues, e.g. what might be described as “anti-tory diatribes”. I have trusted Jim to publish/not publish as he sees fit & have never whined about his decisions. Its Jim’s blog.

      Context is everything. The inertia, the lack of foresight, the I’m-alright-Jack that accompanied the political rape & pillage of the Probation Service & the rise of the culture of bullying is exactly the attitude & behaviour that is now being demonstrated in the UK while Johnson & co rape & pillage the country as a whole. The abject fear of speaking out – or the total disinterest in the wider picture – means the silence is deafening and the thieving lying bullies simply fill their pockets.

      I have posted about ‘programmes’ for a long time. I have been critical of them because it is CBT-lite delivered by, mostly but not always, people who are not trained to deliver CBT interventions.

      The group process is a complex process. Psychologists (not all of whom are good) spend years in study & training; not in a fast-track agency-orientated target-driven NVQ.

      Sex offender programmes & violence reduction programmes run by probation/prisons have been withdrawn because they have increased offending behaviour. This pseudo-CBT therapy was seen as a cost-effective means of “treatment” (pack 'em in, tick 'em off) as well as a cash cow, & in order to achieve this the work was mechanised. It was also medicalised to give it credibility but… it has consistently failed to discriminate between suitable & unsuitable candidates, it has failed to be delivered within the strict conditions of groupwork & it has caused more harm than good.

      There will always be examples of fortuitous occasions when the group mix was in that Goldilocks zone, when it was just right, and when (with competent facilitators – yes, *more than one*) the outcomes were very positive. But that’s not a “treatment programme”. That’s a lottery.

      Its important to recognise that programmes “in the past” were not the medicalised proscribed-by-rote interventions we now understand as the programme of ‘programmes’; that they were often cobbled together by Probation staff, assisted by friends/colleagues in academia. Nor were they a commercial enterprise.

      Is an electronic tag a form of treatment? It’s a means of enforcing & reinforcing changes in behaviour.

      Is “rehabilitation” a form of treatment? It’s a means of implementing changes in behaviour.

      Is gaol a form of treatment?

      Room 101 was seen as a form of treatment.

      Delete
    2. I don't see much of a biological adjustment to known factors consequential of science based facts connected at all to the best guess estimate culture of whether a programme will impact if at all on offending behaviours.

      While being critical of the posters on the Tories calling their commentary diatribe is in itself exactly the droll horrible read we have to endure too. I like to see open platform and others who see the government's games. Without this we cannot get a sense of what will happen in probation. I guess JB let your style of importance through which is a pity.

      Delete
    3. Totally agree with the negative/progress part of your comment Annon @ 19:51.
      But I think leaning toaards offending behaviour programmes as being a form of 'treatment' is way off the mark.
      Is criminal behaviour something that needs treatment? If it is, then why is it acceptable to provide that 'treatment' from the CJS?
      Treatment is a healthcare issue, not a justice issue.
      If offending behaviour requires 'treatment' then it's an illness and has no resolution to be found in the CJS.
      Whilst I welcome your comment, and hope it may spark some debate, I'd like to think that offending behaviour is a supremely far more complex issue then just a course of antibiotics.

      'Getafix

      Delete
    4. Offending behavior is complex gtx . Home relationship finance
      Education employment purpose conscionce and the like. All these set by the Tories. All restricted to the working class the poor the council kids and offenders stuck in traps of societal stagnation . Dare I say probably supported by the post at 1951. If you want to stop offending we need a fairer society more wealth and less snobbery.

      Delete
  6. 123me - I'm hoping you can be persuaded to carry on contributing - maybe a guest blog? Good to hear you are keeping in touch with former colleagues - perhaps we can sort a chat sometime? Contact details on profile page. Cheers, Jim

    ReplyDelete
  7. I am also a CQSW trained Probation Officer. A bit short of retirement but it is definitely something I am considering sooner than I anticipated even a year ago. I find myself getting so annoyed with the dispassionate, at times, brutal people management. The only thing that seems to matter right now is convincing everyone that we are back to pre-covid business.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hope the break is doing you some good, JB

    "Or maybe the real scandal lies with us, the electorate, still seduced by a tousled-hair rebel shtick and faux bonhomie that should have palled years ago. Americans got rid of their lying, self-serving, scandal-plagued charlatan 100 days ago. They did it at the first possible opportunity. Next week, polls suggest we’re poised to give ours a partial thumbs-up at the ballot box. For allowing this shameless man to keep riding high, some of the shame is on us." - Jonathan Freedland is a Guardian columnist

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/apr/30/scandal-charge-sheet-johnson-wallpaper-lying


    And there's the rub - its not about wallpaper or sofas or Carrie. Its about the lies & the deception & the peoples' inertia.

    TR suffered from a similar condition. Its almost as if the offence is so great it can't be acknowledged lest it blows one's mind.

    Probation staff will recognise that concept - the perpetrator in complete denial whose offences are so dreadful, or so prolific, that they can't even begin to accept the enormity of what they've done without falling apart.

    For those who haven't seen a human being simply 'unravel' before their very eyes, I can confirm its a distressing & unforgettable experience.

    ReplyDelete