Probation Reunification
Update – Staff assignment process underway. CRC members ballot to take place soon on National Transfer Agreement
Whilst Napo members have welcomed the announcement of the Government U-turn on the future of the Probation Service, your union has worked hard to try and tackle the many operational and HR challenges that have arisen following this decision.
A New Staff Transfer and Protections Agreement
Napo and our sister unions have almost concluded formal negotiations on a new Staff Transfer and Protections Agreement (STAP), and will be reporting the outcomes to our respective CRC members very soon. This process will also include the launch of a ballot for members currently employed by the Community Rehabilitation Companies on whether to accept the agreement. The ballot will only be open to members of a trade union and it’s never been so important for CRC staff to consider signing up to Napo membership.
Meanwhile, as part of the work to assist CRCs to exit their contracts next June and ensure sufficient lead in time for the Probation reunification process, a staff assignment scheme is now underway. Essentially, this will identify those current CRC staff whom it is expected will transfer to either:
What this means for CRC staff
During or soon after the week commencing Tuesday 25 August 2020, CRC staff will receive a letter from their CRC Director. This will explain their indicative role assignment to the NPS or the dynamic framework.
If individual staff disagree with this indicative assignment, they will have 15 working days from the date of the letter to appeal.
What information is being used for role assignment?
Your CRC employer’s intranet has information on role assignment and the appeals process. It is important to note that the assignment process is not something that is negotiated with the Trade Unions so although HMPPS has shared it with us it is not something that was, or could be, agreed by Napo. Please see the paragraph below ‘Mechanism of Transfer’ which explains this in more detail. In summary the following will be used for staff assignment:
Whilst Napo members have welcomed the announcement of the Government U-turn on the future of the Probation Service, your union has worked hard to try and tackle the many operational and HR challenges that have arisen following this decision.
A New Staff Transfer and Protections Agreement
Napo and our sister unions have almost concluded formal negotiations on a new Staff Transfer and Protections Agreement (STAP), and will be reporting the outcomes to our respective CRC members very soon. This process will also include the launch of a ballot for members currently employed by the Community Rehabilitation Companies on whether to accept the agreement. The ballot will only be open to members of a trade union and it’s never been so important for CRC staff to consider signing up to Napo membership.
Meanwhile, as part of the work to assist CRCs to exit their contracts next June and ensure sufficient lead in time for the Probation reunification process, a staff assignment scheme is now underway. Essentially, this will identify those current CRC staff whom it is expected will transfer to either:
- the National Probation Service (NPS), or
- a dynamic framework provider who will offer support services for Intervention and Programmes to be commissioned by the NPS.
What this means for CRC staff
During or soon after the week commencing Tuesday 25 August 2020, CRC staff will receive a letter from their CRC Director. This will explain their indicative role assignment to the NPS or the dynamic framework.
If individual staff disagree with this indicative assignment, they will have 15 working days from the date of the letter to appeal.
What information is being used for role assignment?
Your CRC employer’s intranet has information on role assignment and the appeals process. It is important to note that the assignment process is not something that is negotiated with the Trade Unions so although HMPPS has shared it with us it is not something that was, or could be, agreed by Napo. Please see the paragraph below ‘Mechanism of Transfer’ which explains this in more detail. In summary the following will be used for staff assignment:
- HMPPS guidance – the updated HMPPS Role Assignment Guidance (August 2020) We have attached this for reference, CLICK HERE
- Your current substantive post - if a staff member is providing temporary cover in another role or on secondment, the role assignment will be based on your substantive post,
- Your job description
It is likely that the majority of CRC staff will find the assignment process to be straightforward, but Napo will seek to support individual CRC members through any appeal process. If members wish to appeal they should do so within the timescale and contact their local Napo representative. We are requesting additional time from CRC employers for our Branch reps to engage in this work, which will be supported by our Napo National Officials where required.
Further material on the outcome of the national negotiations with HMPPS and planning for the CRC members ballot are currently being prepared. These will be the subject of a recommendation from Napo’s Probation Negotiating Committee who will meet soon and whose decision will be relayed to members as part of the ballot process.
The mechanism of transfer
The mechanism for transfer from a CRC to the NPS is a statutory staff transfer scheme as this is a reorganisation of public services involving a public sector employer. This is the same as the mechanism of transfer used for the TR project in 2014. The mechanism of transfer from a CRC to a Dynamic Framework provider is TUPE as no public sector employer is involved. This is a complex area of law but recent caselaw examples are the basis for the decision by HMPPS that this should be the case. The STAP will apply to all transfers but there will be a separate agreement for those staff transferring to the NPS (including those former CRC staff from Wales who transferred into the NPS last December). This includes harmonisation to NPS terms and conditions including NPS pay scales. Those transferring to the Dynamic Framework will have their CRC terms and conditions protected.
Maintaining your Napo membership
Irrespective of whether you eventually transfer to the NPS or a dynamic framework provider, it's vital that you make the switch for the payment of your Napo subscriptions by Direct Debit as the previous ‘Check Off’ arrangements carried out by your employer will cease at the date of transfer.
In order to assist the Napo membership team in managing our data base please do not delay in making that switch and consider doing so as soon as possible. You do not have to wait until your assignment is known, and you will also see that your subscriptions will reduce when you do so. Please click here to make that change!
Please look out for more information on Probation reunification and the many other issues that impact on your terms and conditions, and consider taking part in your local Napo Branch meeting.
Ian Lawrence General Secretary
Katie Lomas National Chair
--oo00oo--
Thanks go to the reader for forwarding the following from Interserve:-
20th August 2020
Dear colleague,
As you will be aware, as part of our transition process we need to understand which staff will go where in the new unified model, and in order to get this moving the Authority (the Ministry of Justice) have requested that we, along with all current CRC Providers, undertake a formal assignment process. This includes all directly employed and supply chain staff, and will determine which colleagues are likely to transfer either to the NPS or to a dynamic framework provider or those that are unlikely to transfer (for which a clear rationale will be provided).
We have been requested to complete the assignment activity by the end of September after which the Authority will work closely with us to finalise and conclude the assignment process. We anticipate this finalisation activity will take place during October.
The plan therefore is that over the next couple of months, we will work internally with each of the CRCs through the local senior managers to ensure assignment activity is undertaken according to the methodology set out by the Authority. When this is done, you will receive written confirmation of an indicative assignment outcome and at this point it will give you just that, the assignment outcome. We will be working with the Authority to understand details such as locations, line management etc as the next stage that follows on. I appreciate that for many staff, it is this layer of detail that will be of more significance that the indicative assignment outcome, but we need to work through the stages incrementally.
You will have a right of appeal against the indicative assignment outcome and details of the appeal process will be outlined in the outcome letter. Please note, although we undertake the assignment process ourselves using the Authority methodology and guidance, the Authority can still challenge our decisions, and therefore the final outcome of the assignment is conditional on there being no justifiable challenges by the Authority on the assignment of individuals. This is why it is termed an ‘indicative’ outcome at this stage. Should this be the case, we will get in touch with you promptly with a view to resolve the issue in an effective and timely manner.
Please be assured that throughout the process, we will work with you to address any concerns or queries you have. If you have any questions regarding this letter, then please contact Daniella Sinagoga via e mail. For any general queries please email HR Operations via email hr.operations@interserve.com
This is the beginning of a number of communications with you over the coming months on the transition and assignment process, and we are working through the various details to be able to share them with you properly and in a timely way as the changes progress.
Kind Regards
Kim Thornden-Edwards
Director of Justice
Interserve
--oo00oo--
Thanks go to the reader for forwarding the following from Interserve:-
20th August 2020
Dear colleague,
As you will be aware, as part of our transition process we need to understand which staff will go where in the new unified model, and in order to get this moving the Authority (the Ministry of Justice) have requested that we, along with all current CRC Providers, undertake a formal assignment process. This includes all directly employed and supply chain staff, and will determine which colleagues are likely to transfer either to the NPS or to a dynamic framework provider or those that are unlikely to transfer (for which a clear rationale will be provided).
We have been requested to complete the assignment activity by the end of September after which the Authority will work closely with us to finalise and conclude the assignment process. We anticipate this finalisation activity will take place during October.
The plan therefore is that over the next couple of months, we will work internally with each of the CRCs through the local senior managers to ensure assignment activity is undertaken according to the methodology set out by the Authority. When this is done, you will receive written confirmation of an indicative assignment outcome and at this point it will give you just that, the assignment outcome. We will be working with the Authority to understand details such as locations, line management etc as the next stage that follows on. I appreciate that for many staff, it is this layer of detail that will be of more significance that the indicative assignment outcome, but we need to work through the stages incrementally.
You will have a right of appeal against the indicative assignment outcome and details of the appeal process will be outlined in the outcome letter. Please note, although we undertake the assignment process ourselves using the Authority methodology and guidance, the Authority can still challenge our decisions, and therefore the final outcome of the assignment is conditional on there being no justifiable challenges by the Authority on the assignment of individuals. This is why it is termed an ‘indicative’ outcome at this stage. Should this be the case, we will get in touch with you promptly with a view to resolve the issue in an effective and timely manner.
Please be assured that throughout the process, we will work with you to address any concerns or queries you have. If you have any questions regarding this letter, then please contact Daniella Sinagoga via e mail. For any general queries please email HR Operations via email hr.operations@interserve.com
This is the beginning of a number of communications with you over the coming months on the transition and assignment process, and we are working through the various details to be able to share them with you properly and in a timely way as the changes progress.
Kind Regards
Kim Thornden-Edwards
Director of Justice
Interserve
Napo desperate to claim they have a role. The process is already in train
ReplyDeleteNapo are defunct but to ask members to continue subscriptions illustrates what they fear. The lack of objections to the alternate role in crcs while appeals could operate accepts that staff will not be returned to public service. What joke is this??? Playing out the cherry picking job description will then see CRC sack the remaining staff as the contracts for future roles decline. Napo do not mention redundancy protections which is a major mistake. As usual Ian Lawrence demonstrates his incompetence alongside the self serving chair.
Hopefully all those who fail the vetting will be offered a job by secondary sectors rather than being shown the door!
ReplyDeleteYes but why is there no talk of appropriate protections ?
DeleteProbably because they are none! If you (or a close family member) has lived experience of the CJS, or have debt, or CCJs, then it's tough luck. Sometimes life does not turn out how you'd like it. On the flip side, many will have skills which are still valid and will be able to find work elsewhere.
DeleteI was vetted for NPS and have post CCjs and defaults which I am repaying. I also had two brothers with serious criminal records, as long as you disclose you'll be fine.
DeleteSo while CRC staff get a ballot on the transfer procedures - something staff didn't have the opportunity of previously - its unlikely any vote against will stop it. The indicative assignment process is due to be completed in 5 weeks' time. Letters are due out this coming week from CRC owners.
ReplyDeleteAnd Napo? They "have almost concluded formal negotiations on a new Staff Transfer and Protections Agreement (STAP), and will be reporting the outcomes to our respective CRC members very soon."
Very soon will be, as always, way too late.
As for appeals: "Please note, although we undertake the assignment process ourselves using the Authority methodology and guidance, the Authority can still challenge our decisions, and therefore the final outcome of the assignment is conditional on there being no justifiable challenges by the Authority on the assignment of individuals."
So, dear reader, you might 'win' your appeal with your CRC owner then find The Authority over-rules it. The previous transfer had a simple system whereby you appealed, were refused, & then told if you challenged that decision you were regarded as handing in your notice.
They are not interested in the little people.
The plum jobs will go to the chums, the compliant favourites will be carried across with them while the 'difficult' & the less favoured will be thrown into the sea - a colder, darker, deeper sea than it was in 2015.
NPS good - if you're in the club.
There is no u-turn or renationalisation of probation.
ReplyDeleteThis is a simple case of TR being extended using a different mechanism. Why do Napo insist on promoting the myth: "Napo members have welcomed the announcement of the Government U-turn on the future of the Probation Service" ?
It reinforces my own view that since LedgerGate Napo have been in the pocket of NOMS/HMPPS/MoJ. They have collaborated with the employer & enabled TR from within - pay, grading, staff transfers, SFOs. Despite the valiant efforts of some local reps fighting local battles, Napo have been a disgrace to trade unionism:
The previous staff transfer agreement was shite. It had the hundreds of job losses enshrined within it. What union would do that to its members?
The 7-month no-redundancy clause was shite. Redundancies started in Sept 2015, 7 months after takeover. What union would not have seen through that smokescreen?
The loss of the EVR monies was shite. The nationally agreed EVR agreement was worthless, the CRCs pocketed the cash, the MoJ shrugged & said CRCs could keep the money. What union would stand by silently while its members were mugged?
The current bullshit is yet another load of TR-enabling garbage. There is no u-turn. There never was a u-turn. There is no renationalisation. There will be further distress, dismay, loss & grief.
The Authority is choking the final breath out of probation. Its been a cruel & slow death. A showcase of authoritarian bullying, of nepotism, of cronyism. Napo has been the poisoned minnow dangled off the barbed hook for the last ten years.
Oh, and don't forget, someone's got to pay the severance of Napo officers, so: "Irrespective of whether you eventually transfer to the NPS or a dynamic framework provider, it's vital that you make the switch for the payment of your Napo subscriptions by Direct Debit as the previous ‘Check Off’ arrangements carried out by your employer will cease at the date of transfer."
I am raging. Heartbroken. I gave 30 years' worth of subs & five years of my working life as Napo rep.
I agree there is no Uturn NPS are not coming out of the awful form loving dictatorship loving civil service. Nps lost health benefits, other terms are secondary to civil service ones and whilst we are demmed Hmpps prison officers get overtime rates we don't. It's all a sick joke and who is going to bring CRC colleagues up to date with changes and processes. The NPS civil service Elearning pile of crap or as per usual colleagues. There is no u turn as we would have a competent local HR function, Spos that can support staff rather than attend endless management meetings and proper training and the list goes on.
Delete1304 you are quite right given the downhill run the leader has favoured. His secrecy and ill informed approaches (lawyers) have damaged NAPO to a point of a worthless paying in club. The GS draws a fantastic salary for zero trade union skills. He reflects the ignorance of the membership and does not inform them of choice. The current NEC are happy to be stifled by having no pre meeting contacts or discussions. The NEC compliant to the incompetency of the whole top table and the self righteous chair. Napos problems are designed in to see itself destruct into a massive pay out for staff on Redundancies reflective of the original EVR rates. The general secretaries pay gives him a lot to gain. They should really talk of amalgamation and selling off Napo to a proper union to protect membership. Only a strong union with legal resources can members take heart they have some chance in disputes. The current homelessness of NAPO renting has been an open bleeding wound that was inflicted by the designs of the worst leadership team ever. The annual costs of renting has seen the initial sale of Chivalry road as the most gross error that it always was.
DeleteNapo have no role here they are clearly reactive to what they are instructed and whether in the pocket of the MOJ or not they are just not able to construct a strategy or strike any bargaining levels when the MOJ look at the talents and lack of skills this general secretary oozes.
uk govt covid-19 nonsense
ReplyDeletecases - 1,288
deaths - 18
______________________
The Foreign & Commonwealth Office currently advises British nationals against all but essential international travel.
That should be the norm. No exemptions, no corridors, no whiney bastards. Just don't go anywhere yet. Instead we're stuck with this hokey-cokey inny-outy losey-money stupidity.
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) advise against all but essential travel to Austria. This is based on the current assessment of COVID-19 risks.
Austria
Cases: 25,062
Deaths: 732
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) advise against all but essential travel to Croatia. This is based on the current assessment of COVID-19 risks.
Croatia
Cases: 7,900
Deaths: 170
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) advise against all but essential travel to Trinidad and Tobago. This is based on the current assessment of COVID-19 risks.
Trinidad and Tobago
Cases: 864
Deaths: 12
Travel to USA is subject to entry restrictions:
* British nationals cannot enter the USA if they have been in the UK, Ireland, Schengen zone, Iran, Brazil or China within the previous 14 days
* If you are eligible to enter the USA you must be prepared to self-isolate for up to 14 days after arrival
England, United Kingdom
Cases: 279,459
Deaths: 36,765
USA
cases: 5,633,879
Deaths: 175,588 deaths
Frank Lee Sickovitall
Guardian: "Coronavirus cases have been reported by at least 41 schools in Berlin, barely two weeks after the German capital’s 825 schools reopened... The disclosure by Berlin city education authorities that hundreds of students and teachers have had to quarantine has underlined once more how little is known about the risk of infection in school settings *** despite the insistence of governments and experts, including in the UK, that reopening schools is safe ***"
DeleteNO-ONE should insist that anything is safe in relation to this virus because WE DO NOT KNOW. Their political & economic imperatives are over-riding everything, putting lives at risk.
A balanced view of the future with the virus is discussed here:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000m0gg
Frank.
BBC News: Coronavirus will be present "forever in some form or another", a member of the government's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) has said.
DeleteSir Mark Walport said people would need to be vaccinated at regular intervals.
Sir Mark said denser populations and travel meant the virus spread easily.
_________________________
Well I couldn't disagree that recent evidence indicates the UK has a pretty dense population, led by a pretty dense government and an even denser (more dense?) PM who can't even go on holiday without fucking someone else over:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8654271/Carrie-Symonds-32-shares-photos-PM-hiking-Wilfred-baby-sling.html
There's a lovely picture of a proud dad with his daughter & grandson.
Prof Chris Whitty said "the chances of children dying from Covid-19 are incredibly small"
DeleteProf Whitty also said Covid-19 would be a challenge for at least nine months.
Prof Whitty, who is also England's chief medical officer, said "many more [children] were likely to be harmed by not going than harmed by going" to school.
Prof Whitty said it looked as if "there is much less transmission from children to adults than adults to adults".
On 3 June, Prof Whitty said: Hand washing, use of face coverings and the 2-metre rule are going to carry on really for as long as this epidemic continues.
In early March, Whitty mentioned the idea that the government should wait to impose restrictions because people might tire of them, later saying this was based on both “common sense” and “behavioural science”.
Yet this concept of “fatigue” was rejected by the behavioural scientists appointed by the government itself to Sage’s subcommittee, SPI–B. “The word was never used in any of our committee reports,” said Susan Michie, a SPI-B member. “It is just not a concept that exists in behavioural science, and it was unhelpful for it to be used.” Four other members of SPI-B also told the Guardian that the committee never advised that people would tire of restrictive measures. One senior Whitehall source said Whitty himself was the main advocate of the “fatigue” notion...
from various sources incl guardian, bbc, telegraph
To reiterate: NO-ONE should insist that anything is safe in relation to this virus because WE DO NOT KNOW, not even those in the most senior scientific or healthcare roles.
But we know that data is unreliable:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-53003038
Some high-risk offenders in England and Wales may not have been monitored as closely as they should have been during the lockdown, a report suggests.
An internal Ministry of Justice document shows probation staff did not carry out all the planned checks in half of cases, in one four-week period.
The National Probation Service (NPS) has insisted supervision was adequate.
It comes as the government is expected to announce the NPS will take over the probation system in England and Wales.
This would end the involvement of private companies.
Since the coronavirus lockdown, the state-run NPS has scaled back face-to-face supervision of thousands of sex offenders and violent criminals, to prevent infection.
Emergency plans were drawn up for most offenders to be contacted by telephone or visited on their doorstep.
But, according to the MoJ document seen by BBC News, in the four weeks to May 17, only 51% of high-risk offenders under supervision had all the contact that had been planned for.
The statistics also show that during the week leading up to May 17, 18% of high-risk prisoners did not have immediate appointments with probation officers on release.
They should have had a meeting within one "business day" of leaving jail.
'Unreliable data'
However, the NPS disputed the significance of the figures.
A spokesperson said: "This data is partial, experimental and unreliable.
"We don't use it in isolation to judge performance and the public shouldn't do either.
"All our wider evidence in combination shows offenders are receiving the right levels and types of supervision."
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/aug/23/cross-party-mps-sue-government-for-details-of-covid-ppe-contracts
ReplyDeleteA cross-party group of MPs has signed a pre-action letter accusing ministers of breaching transparency rules and demanding the immediate disclosure of the contracts, which are valued at more than £5bn. The legal letter claims: “Publication of the contracts themselves appears not to be happening in relation to Covid-19 contracts on a routine basis.”
The Labour, Lib Dem and Green MPs cite a series of contracts over which concerns have been raised. Details of a contract awarded to Ayanda Capital worth £252m have not been published; the 50m masks it supplied were later deemed unsuitable for use by NHS workers. Details of another £32m contract awarded to Crisp Websites, a pest-control firm trading under the name of PestFix, have also not yet been published.
According to the government, more than 600 contracts for PPE have now been concluded with almost 200 different suppliers. They range in value from less than £1m to many tens of millions, and total £5.5bn.
A government spokesperson said: “We are absolutely committed to being transparent in the awarding of contracts and we aim to publish these as soon as possible.”
I missed this story a couple of weeks back:
ReplyDeleteTwo-thirds of UK’s furloughed workers continued job in Covid-19 lockdown
Nearly nine out of ten (87%) men and eight out of ten women (77%) who received a salary top up continued to work for their employer while on furlough, even though the government explicitly forbids this practice. Among those workers who didn’t receive a top up, 69% of men and 52% of women routinely ignored this prohibition. Overall, 63% of furloughed people revealed they had spent some time working for the employer that had furloughed them, yet only 22% of furloughed men and 17% of furloughed women say they were formally asked by their employer to work.
One opinion expressed: "Six million people on furlough, paid for by taxpayer, were doing their jobs all along. OK. Super. Now the businesses can give the money back, thanks."
But its no surprise really. The country is run by spivs, chancers, crooks & liars who would steal the shirt off your back. Why should anyone else behave themselves?
uk govt covid-19 reported data for sun 23/8/20
ReplyDeletecases = 1,041/24hrs = 7,158/week = 14,818 over 14 days
deaths = 6/24hrs = 63/week = 151 over 14 days
testing capacity is claimed to be 326,000
tests processed are not yet 200,000 (except once when hancock had to deliver his promise on 31 July)
Frank.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/metro.co.uk/2020/08/23/water-rationing-food-shortages-second-wave-clashes-no-deal-brexit-13166025/amp/
ReplyDeletehttps://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/live:bbc_radio_fourfm
ReplyDeleteSparked by the Black Lives Matter protests around the world that followed the death of George Floyd, companies are wading into the conversation on racial inequality. With a focus on diversity in business, there was also interest and investment in a lot of companies run by black people in the UK.
Tobi Oredein, founder of media company Black Ballad, asks businesses including a home-ware maker, an interior design firm and a global bank if this is all a trend or if there will be substantial and long-term change.
Excellent radio journalism.
"Sir Mark said denser populations and travel meant the virus spread easily."
ReplyDeleteMore evidence needed?
"More than 70 unlicensed social gatherings including house and street parties were disrupted by police in Birmingham overnight.
Events included a "large street party" in the Northfield area that featured two marquees and a DJ, officers said."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-53875805
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cumbria-53804526
DeleteMs Kennedy, who runs the site with her partner Nick Gill, said Stonethwaite had room for about 60 tents but because it was part of a farm and not manned full-time, many more had been crowding in, ignoring signs saying the site was full.
Some campers had arrived in groups that were too large, set up their tents too close to each other, ignored the 23:00 sound cut off and left mounds of rubbish including tents, gazebos, airbeds and chairs, she said.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-53880688
More than 150 people attended an illegal rave at a reservoir overnight, Lancashire Police has said.
It was held at Entwistle Reservoir, near Blackburn where extra restrictions banning gatherings are in place.
Police said the rave was "stopped quickly" and they arrested the organiser and seized his equipment.
Deputy Chief Constable Terry Woods said he was "disappointed" by the event, while the county's public health director called it "unacceptable".
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-53881309
Two police vehicles were damaged as officers broke up an illegal party attended by 50 people.
A gazebo and speakers had been set up at the event in Crummock Grove, Bolton, on Saturday, police said.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-53877683
In Huddersfield, police broke up an illegal rave involving about 300 people.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-northamptonshire-53866377
A pub held a gathering for about 200 people with no social distancing, bar queues 10-people deep and staff without PPE on the day it reopened as lockdown was eased, council officers said.
The Green Dragon Hotel in Higham Ferrers, Northamptonshire, will have its licence reviewed.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-53843037
Six people have been arrested over a plan to hold an illegal rave over the bank holiday weekend.
The two-day rave had been promoted on social media, and was due to take place at a farm in Costock from 28 August, Nottinghamshire Police said.
The force believes "hundreds of people" were due to attend the event.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-53881486
A man has been arrested and sound equipment seized after police shut down an illegal rave following a tip-off by a member of the public.
About 70 people were found close to Bawsey Pits, near King's Lynn, Norfolk, after police were called at 01:00 BST.
Police cars were used to block roads before officers went on to the land and ordered the music to be switched off.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/aug/23/three-jailed-isle-of-man-breaking-covid-quarantine-rules
DeleteOn Monday 64-year-old Paul Dowd received a six-week jail sentence after going to the pub twice when he should have been in quarantine.
And on Tuesday a woman from Northern Ireland was jailed for a month after breaking quarantine rules.
In the latest case to reach court, Alistair McCormick from Douglas was jailed for four weeks on Saturday after visiting a bank in the town on 21 August when he should have been isolating at home.
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/communicable-disease-control-administration/
Delete