Monday, 10 August 2020

Good Luck With That

As thoughts turn from crisis management to designing a 'new normal' for prison and probation, the third or voluntary sector are clearly hoping to influence the direction of travel by the great Ship of State:-     

What does recovery look like?


The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) Third Sector Task Force formally asked the Reducing Reoffending Third Sector Advisory Group Covid-19 Special Interest Group (RR3 SIG) to produce a think piece presenting the voluntary sector’s views on the recovery of voluntary services in the criminal justice system after the pandemic.

Clinks commissioned Russell Webster to co-ordinate the think piece on behalf of the RR3 SIG. The report is based on the views of the group’s members and those of organisations in their networks, as well as information gathered from Clinks’ engagement with over 850 people through 85 online events in the past few months. In this blog, Russell Webster summarises its main contents and you can read the piece in full here.

Key principles

The paper highlights six principles the voluntary sector sees as critical to responding to the challenges of Covid-19 and creating a fairer and more effective post-pandemic criminal justice system:
  1. A full and equal partnership between the criminal justice voluntary sector and the MoJ and HMPPS, which enables all of us to act as critically constructive friends
  2. Our belief in the importance of transparency on both sides
  3. The importance that both the emergency responses to Covid-19 and the construction of a new normal within the criminal justice system reflect the detailed and continuing input of people with lived experience of that system
  4. The importance of a holistic approach across government departments and sectors, particularly around issues relating to physical and mental health, employment, benefits and housing
  5. Consistency across the prison estate and the national probation landscape. Voluntary organisations were concerned at the very different Covid-19 responses between apparently similar prisons and probation areas
  6. Recovery is an opportunity to learn how to make the system work better for the men, women and children it works with.
Impact on the voluntary sector

Clinks and the RR3 SIG have already described in some detail the devastating impact of coronavirus and the associated lockdown on voluntary sector organisations working with people in contact with the justice system, with smaller and black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) charities disproportionately affected.

The voluntary sector has, however, responded to diverse challenges at every stage of the justice system via a wide range of adaptations and innovations. The document highlights a number of key challenges, responses and persisting barriers in six areas:
  1. Safe working practices to protect workers, volunteers and service users from Covid-19
  2. Work in prisons (including both group work and one-to-one work)
  3. Work with the families of prisoners
  4. Through the gate work
  5. Work with people subject to probation supervision and community (including access to accommodation and employment)
  6. Work with groups who are medically vulnerable and at particular risk from Covid-19.
Please refer to the report (pages 8-14) for full details of emerging best practice in these areas.

The RR3 SIG also raises the issue of the disproportionate impact of Covid-19 on people from BAME backgrounds in particular and notes its disappointment that this disproportionate impact was not mentioned in either the National Framework for Prison Regimes and Services nor the Probation Roadmap to Recovery and that there appears to be no equality impact assessment of either document. The group also highlights a number of other groups whose specific needs appear to be overlooked, including women; Gypsy, Roma and Traveller people; and care leavers (many of whom lack family members who are able to support or advocate for them).

In a separate paper, voluntary organisations have set out areas for action that HMPPS must take in order to address the challenges of BAME-led organisations as the criminal justice system recovery process continues. The RR3 has given its full support to the paper, in a letter to Dr Jo Farrar, Chief Executive of HMPPS. Read the paper and supporting letter here.

Putting service users first

The RR3 SIG argue strongly that input from people with lived experience of the criminal justice system is absolutely essential to successful recovery planning and that the prison system often actively obstructs contributions from people with lived experience.

The group suggest that MoJ/HMPPS could enable people in prison to be more active players in their resettlement planning by building on the emergency provisions to make in-cell communication a priority. Mainstreaming video visits, improving access to free/low cost family contact through technology and allowing secure internet access are all thought to be vital components of a more effective new normal.

The RR3 SIG argue that both overall prisoner wellbeing and equality issues should be on an equal footing with safety and security in the prison and probation roadmaps to recovery, and that this is not yet the case. The group also recommends that HMPPS considers rolling out programmes that foster better staff/prisoner relationships.

What next?

As well as writing the document, Clinks and other members of the RR3 SIG have presented the report to HMPPS and received a positive response from senior officials keen to benefit from the (unwanted) opportunity of coronavirus to develop a more effective and fairer criminal justice system.

--oo00oo--

Race and ethnicity: a critical moment 

Dear Dr Farrar, 

We have very much welcomed the public stance you have taken in championing issues of diversity in your leadership of HMPPS. We are therefore pleased to bring to your attention the excellent paper (attached) prepared by a small group of BAME led organisations in response to a request for assistance channelled through the RR3 special interest group on Covid 19. We hope you will agree that it makes a series of practical suggestions for how the recovery process in prisons and probation can meet its obligations to the people from minority communities who are so disproportionately disadvantaged in our current criminal justice system. 

We wanted to write to you as a group representing a much wider spectrum of the sector, however, to underline a key message from those specialist organisations. It’s a message that has been very prominent in the coverage of events both in the United States and here in recent weeks. 

It is that the task of eradicating discrimination based on race and ethnicity belongs to all of us. It requires leadership from those who hold power and influence now, not just those from minority communities who have for so long struggled to fill those positions or command that influence. 

You made your personal passion for equality very clear when you took up post. As tends to happen, events have intervened and we understand how the attention of HMPPS has been pulled in many directions over the last 6 months in particular. But events in the wider world convince us that we are at a critical moment on equality, charged with both opportunity and risk. 

So we ask you to act promptly and decisively on the advice that this particular report contains. The people whose views it represents have been disappointed on many occasions, and feel let down by their experience of communication with HMPPS in recent months. There is an opportunity to put that right by deeds rather than words, and inspire trust for the future. 

But we also hope that you will feel able to take practical and very visible action that demonstrates that HMPPS corporately is changing gear on equality in response to the outpouring of public anger and shame that we have witnessed. Your strategic plan made commitments to change the make up of the organisation you lead, and that is welcome. We are focussed on the people for whom you care, however, and the plan says much less about the discrimination that many of them are experiencing and have experienced for many years. They, and the organisations that know them best, are looking for evidence that they have been heard. We look forward to your response.

Yours,

8 comments:

  1. It will be interesting to see how the involvement of the third sector in the criminal justice arena will be shaped.
    Many third sector organisations are struggling with funding at the moment. I wonder if government contracts will become the 'new way' of funding for the third sector as the economy shrinks, and what control might that give the government over individual third sector organisations?

    I think the third sectors vision of having more influence on government decisions and policy making is for the birds really. I think it will be more a case of "if you want the money, then you'll do as you're told".

    https://www.thirdsector.co.uk/third-sectors-manifesto-future/article/1689875

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
  2. Third sector pleading for money offering nothing but same old worn out argument. Seeking equal status not a chance. Pleading to their Tory benevolents won't help they have built rising debt for decades while blaming c19. Johnson the clown is more dangerous to Britain right now than the natzis were in the 40s. They won't sort out justice when that money could be spent in their idelogical free market laisee faire ..

    ReplyDelete
  3. Please forgive a slight detour but the government's Revisionistas have been woken up by the warmth of the weekend sun:

    "The UK's official Covid-19 daily death count could be scrapped following an investigation into Public Health England's method of counting the toll, The Telegraph newspaper reported.

    The conclusions of the investigation, which was ordered by Health Secretary Matt Hancock after it emerged officials were "exaggerating" virus deaths, are expected this week, the newspaper said.

    One recommendation could be to move to a weekly official death toll instead, a government source told the Telegraph."


    Or maybe just scrap all that nasty misleading data and issue daily Government News Briefings accompanied by happy music & applause.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I went for a job interview with a third sector organisation working in CJS. The job was attracitve, the people were lovely, their values and aspirations laudable. The money on offer was so low, and the job security even lower, that I felt unable to leave NPS to take it up. Absolutely desperate as I am to leave the NPS. That is the only attraction to HMPPS of third sector. Its cheaper, and that's because of the wages and terms being even worse than they are in house

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Get a CRC job and wish you were back at nps. They shaft your terms Les pay lower pension and overwork you just worse.

      Delete
    2. CRC managers have discretion to pay there favourites more. What happens is the less competent make a serious mistake, then they are stressed to breaking point during extensive investigations . They imply they would do anything to keep their jobs . The deal is done as they start looking for irregularities with those not willing to be part of the victim culture . Suddenly they are put on manager training , the less competent they are the better .

      Delete
    3. That's sounds familiar.

      Delete
  5. daily uk govt covid-19 stuff for 10 aug 2020

    cases - 816
    deaths - its either 8 or 21, who's counting?

    According to the govt's new calculating method there are probably no cases or deaths at all. Boris has got rid of the virus so children can go back to school, we can all go back to the pub & he can go on holiday. Huzzah!!


    As for probation-related info, there's complete radio silence. The last PR puffpiece was "Frontline probation services will be boosted by more than 1,000 new recruits as part of a major three-year plan to strengthen the supervision of offenders"

    Maybe HMPPS will get the self-styled 'turd sector' to provide these new recruits at a fraction of the NPS rate?

    ReplyDelete