Issued a short time ago:-
C19 CRISIS - UNIONS DEMAND AN END TO FACE TO FACE CONTACT
Further to Friday's mail out explaining the work that the unions had undertaken across all employers to in respect of the current C19 crisis, this mailing brings you up to date with the demands that the Probation Unions made at this morning’s strategic discussion with the HMPPS Director General Probation. As you would expect, we have also maintained contact with senior employer leads over the course of the weekend. Cafcass members should know that your elected Officers are also in regular touch with senior Cafcass management and their latest advice appears on the employer’s intranet.
Our aim is to issue regular updates to members following these high level representations which are currently taking place twice weekly, or as circumstances dictate.
EXCEPTIONAL DELIVERY MODELS
The NPS has drawn up exceptional delivery models (EDM) for all aspects of service delivery and staffing. These have been shared with the unions on a confidential basis and are forming the subject matter for on-going discussions between the unions and NPS on how to keep staff and service users safe. During the call with Amy Rees this morning, the unions made the following demands
- the closure of all NPS offices to service users with similar instructions to be issued to CRC providers
- London Service Hub plans to be withdrawn
- home working for all staff who can work from home
- special leave for staff with health vulnerability who should be self-isolating for their own protection, but who cannot work from home
- provision for proper social distancing for operational staff who remain at work
- supervision to be carried out by phone or off-site face to face with social distancing for high risk service users and those assessed at medium risk where the current crisis potentially increases risk to others or self for example DA perpetrators or victims or those with specific health or mental health issues that could be exacerbated by social distancing / isolation.
- the provision of soap and hot water in any offices which remain open for staff along with appropriate cleaning of workplaces
- closure of any offices which cannot provide basic hand washing facilities or appropriate cleaning
- appropriate PPE for all staff who come into close contact with service users, e.g. in approved premises
EMERGENCY MEETING OF NPS HEALTH AND SAFETY COMMITTEE
To discuss the above protection measures requested by the unions, the NPS are to convene an emergency meeting of the NPS Health and Safety Committee which will take place on 24 March. If you have any health and safety concerns about Covid 19 and your work, speak with your local Napo representative, Napo Branch or e-mail your Link Officer who will feed in concerns to the Napo team.
EXCEPTIONAL PAY PACKAGE
The NPS wishes to introduce a package of exceptional pay arrangements to pay staff extra money in certain circumstances arising from the Covid 19 crisis. This package has been shared with the unions and whilst we have been able to improve them around the edges we have not reached formal agreement. These will be published later today and will appear on the staff intranet. .
Please note, this is a voluntary package – i.e. members are free to choose to take up the opportunities, or not. It is up to members to decide whether the offer is one they wish to accept in relation to their own individual circumstances. You cannot be compelled to undertake any of the additional work responsibilities set out in the exceptional pay package. A number of members have made valid observations about the fact that the employer is seeking the goodwill of staff despite the delay in implementing the agreed Pay Progression arrangements under the 2018 NPS Pay Agreement.
LAST WEEK'S MEETING OF THE NEC
As also explained in last week’s member’s mail out, Napo’s National Executive Committee met last Thursday. Whilst the C19 crisis (and two related Emergency Motions) provided the main focal point, there was an important opportunity to discuss the decision to delay the NPS pay progression arrangements. The meeting heard NEC representatives register their abject anger and disgust that members had asked them to convey, about the interference by HM Treasury which had delayed the payout of the expected remuneration.
The General Secretary advised the NEC that the Napo leadership shared this anger and had made it clear to the Director General and Ministers some time ago that members would be livid if there was a delay in paying out the expected pay progression. The unions had been invited to engage with Pay and Reward and senior NPS leaders as soon as possible to discuss the next steps.
The NEC also heard that further representations were being made to the NPS in terms of the employer’s failure to apply the necessary training and support for staff who were downgraded as a result of the E3 Project. Should the union’s latest representations be rejected, members would be advised to submit grievances using material prepared by Napo and our sister unions.
On a brighter note, the NEC heard from the Napo Co-Vice Chairs that along with the General Secretary, they had met with the new CEO Cafcass Jacky Tiotto. There had been a very positive response to Napo’s concerns around Workloads and how the current partnership working arrangements could be improved. It was also noted that the employer had also responded quickly and in consultation with the unions on the advice that it was issuing to staff on the C19 crisis.
Ian Lawrence General Secretary
Katie Lomas National Chair
Very late in the day NAPO!! On a positive note mosques are reaching out to food banks, many of whose existing volunteers are elderly, and young Muslims are offering to fill their gaps. It goes without saying that the Telegraph/the shite sun will not be reporting this.
ReplyDeleteOH no what a mess. At last the NAPO leader applies some his highly paid for time to the job in hand but again fails to issue the appropriate Hand S advice to ensure members are not placed at risk by ensuring risk assessments are carried out. That will send all staff home legitimately as the risk cannot be measured. The good will on Pay another laughable issue. The Government are divisively funding 80% of pay for those in employment and nothing for those on benefits and nowt for the self employed. Now there is a reneged pay deal for us and some how there is an option on overtime. The union need to understand what the officials are paid for and they ought to get on and do things properly. Pay the owed and then ask for goodwill overtime if they are not playing ball leave. It is heartening to think NAPO are listening to the members through this blog as all their actions to date have been on here first.
ReplyDeleteI have just received my NHS 111 notification to self isolate, which we forward to our employer with a reference code. As concerned as we are as a family, especially as we have not stockpiled, I can't help but be more concerned for colleagues and SUs still meeting face to face without reccomended protection. Please colleagues take very good care, this is not a trial run, we only have one shot a this life.
ReplyDeleteI have very frightened SUs self isolating without the 111 notification. I am adding them to the list of self-isolators spreadsheet as if they had the notification, and phoning them daily to make sure they are ok. And yeah, no DV cases in those I am doing this with. They are looking after themselves, and frankly, if they have curfewed themselves then who am I to interfere with that. If only I had that leeway from my employers, I was in work today and am scared shitless by the crap situation, the unnecessary number of people working in the office, and tbh, the careless attitude to personal (let alone safe) space on the part of young staff, I am short of 70 but so on the list for being denied the necessary if NHS overwhelmed. I am prepared to take well managed risks with proper protection and support for the public good, but I am being put at risk for no discernible benefit other than to pander to achingly slow to react leadership.
ReplyDeleteSo agree 20.20
ReplyDeleteToday we were told that high risk service users had to report to the office, unless they had underlying health problems. Probation appointments are not one of the reasons just given by the Prime Minister to leave home.
ReplyDeleteJust seen BJ’s announcement
DeleteAnd there we have it. Offenders will not be attending appointments. Thank you Boris.
ReplyDeleteDon't count those chickens just yet. Wait for the directive from NPS in the morning...
DeleteAnd credit to Napo / unions for demanding offices close.
ReplyDeleteYes, undoubtedly it was NAPO's campaigning that has led to the shutdown!!!!
DeleteNapo did not influence the shut down. What Napo and unions did was to argue for probation offices to close to protect staff. This is why at 9am today the pressure from directors to keep offices open had reduced. This was due to Union pressure and I believe partly due to the posts on this blog over the weekend.
DeleteMy understanding is that the decision to close offices was made last week. Also, how do they protect staff? The staff who are at work, having to congregate in fewer offices. Where is the social distancing?
DeleteOffice closures seem to be about pooling limited numbers of staff to create reporting centres.
Correct. As of today Napo opposed face to face reporting. This opposition was all that was needed.
DeleteNafo did nothing of significance missed every opportunity to protect members they couldn't run a flag up a pole on time pathetic.
Delete"The NPS wishes to introduce a package of exceptional pay arrangements to pay staff extra money in certain circumstances arising from the Covid 19 crisis."
ReplyDelete"During the call with Amy Rees this morning, the unions made the following demands..." - Get real, Napo. You're out of your league.
This is all too little too late, wrapped up in pound notes.
So who wants to risk their life to bail out the lying cheating HMPPS/NPS while stealing their colleagues' pay?
Because that's what this amounts to.
Passive-Aggressive bullshit playing staff off against each other. This isn't leadership or management.
Its a piss-take, a scam, extortion, racketeering.
It worked to get TR through. NPS v. CRC. Its still working; but now its NPS v. NPS.
Dog Eat Dog
On prime time crime the victim begs
Money is the road to justice
and power walks it on crooked legs
Prime Time Crime
Holy hope in the hands of
Snakebite evangelists and racketeers
and big wig financiers
Land of snap decisions
Land of short attention spans
Nothing is savored
Long enough to really understand
In every culture in decline
The watchful ones among the slaves
Know all that is genuine will be
Scorned and conned and cast away
Joni Mitchell© 1985; Crazy Crow Music
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIrz6uCDnu8
But this is how it should be. Probation worker will be paid for risk they choose to take. None of us will be forced to take these risks. Napo did argue for our safety and credit to them for this.
DeleteBut y'all been forced into taking those risks for a week or more now under the guise of "business as usual" WITHOUT the extra pay; and posters on here describe being at work today with some staff paying little or no attention to the social distancing & consideration that has been requested for some days. And while pay to which you're entitled is being withheld, others prepared to gamble are being rewarded. Which could be seen as those not prepared to gamble with their lives are being punished.
DeleteIts plain & simple passive/aggressive bullying. And that is NOT how it should be.
From the David Raho post (next blog along):
Delete"Napo General Secretary Ian Lawrence has made Napo’s views very clear to Gold Command. The position is that we do not believe that members should be required to have any face to face contact with service users and that this should rather be carried out by phone or text messaging or by other electronic means. Napo believes that anything short of zero contact will inevitably place staff at foreseeable risk."
So any staff prepared to run the risk & take the money are effectively undermining the union's position on workers' health & safety.
Agree 2115 we've been forced to take risks under Business as Usual. Visits as usual in prison, no social distancing measures or PPE and still expected to go on the wings. The rate of infection in prisons is much much higher if a virus gets in. Worried if refuse officer colleagues will feel I think its OK for them to be forced to have contact but not us as Probation. I'm not a Prison Officer though and whilst not absolutely necessary to go on the wings it is expected.
DeleteActually no. In my office we commenced telephone reporting for all cases from early last week. Nearly all staff were working at home since early last week. We were probably the only office in our division doing this.
DeleteThat will be down to a responsible SPO then I presume, as this has not been the case in all other places, so we are being made to take risks depending on decisions made in our own workplaces.
DeleteTry a brief experiment - get up from wherever you are now, go to the kitchen, make a brew, go into the bathroom, walk to your usual external entry/exit door & open/close it, go back to the kitchen, grab your brew & return to where you started.
DeleteThen repeat - but this time make a careful note of all of the surfaces you touched, the handles, the switches, etc. If those surfaces are 'hard' and not porous then the virus can survive up to 72 hours.
Even if you never went on the wing at work, how many surfaces have you touched over the course of 72 hours that (i) won't have been cleaned, let alone sanitised & (ii) will have had hundreds of others touching it; others who will have been on the wing.
I went to collect a prescription today & nipped in to a local shop to pick up some bits & bobs. I pulled on latex gloves before leaving the car, and took them off again before opening the car. I took my own bag into the shop - didn't use their baskets or trolleys. I washed my hands once I got in the house & before unloading the shopping. I washed them again after that.
I have asthma. This fucking virus will kill me unless I take real good care.
So what do we do take risks if we don't fall under the vulnerability category or risk losing our jobs. Napo can suggest it is unreasonable but wether they would back staff up legally in individual cases where people refuse under health and safety is debatable.
DeleteYou’re not alone. I do all of this too. Then I detox spray my credit card when I get home too. Mask in a bag left by the door. Wash hands multiple times. Some item boxes are sprayed too. Post left on the doormat for 3-4 days before opening. And on and on.
DeleteHMPPS webpage just updated. Hard to believe what I'm reading. Not sure the POA will be best pleased:
Delete- Coronavirus in prisons: confirmed cases
There is one confirmed case of coronavirus at each of the following prisons:
HMP Birmingham
HMP High Down
HMP Manchester
HMP Oakwood
- Prisons and coronavirus: the latest situation
Prisons have been working closely with Public Health and NHS services to put robust contingency plans in place. The plans prioritise the safety of staff, prisoners and visitors while ensuring that there is as little disruption as possible to normal prison regimes, including visits.
- Visiting prisons during the coronavirus outbreak
We understand that visitors and prisoners may have particular concerns about visits during this period... If you do not have symptoms, check how to avoid catching or spreading coronavirus during your visit.
___________________________________________________
Looks like prison visits are still available. Didn't see them on Boris's list of things you're allowed to do.
@17:50 today - UK is now 5,837 cases & 335 deaths.
ReplyDelete@21:00 - 6,650 cases (still 335 deaths)
21. 01 so agree, experience, wisdom Vs youthful exuberance
ReplyDeleteAnd to think these subserviant, ambitious children manage adult SUs. In my early years our CHIEF PROBATION OFFICERS (clue being no mention of bean counters) wanted POs to think outside the box, now it seems the more POs jfdi the quicker they are promoted.
ReplyDeleteIt wasn’t just the young PO’s that we’re towing the line. In fact, from what I saw it was the young PO’s that were more vocal about cancelling face to face reporting and rejecting the direction of probation senior management.
DeleteThe older POs and some ‘experienced’ managers were the ones wiping down door handles after service users finished their supervision. The younger colleagues refused to do this and I saw a less experienced manager tell staff to stop doing this, to stop seeing offenders and to stop putting themselves at risk.
DeleteMushroom, here you are agreeing with 21.01's sentiment that leaders are playing staff off against each other.
ReplyDeleteYet in the next breath calling your younger colleagues, subservient, ambitious children...