Wednesday, 15 January 2020

NPS Is Not Fit For Purpose

Yesterday's HMI report on NPS core functions pretty much explodes the myth that this command and control civil service bureaucracy has been performing well since the TR omnishambles and is fit and ready to absorb case management from the CRCs. Not only is it patently not ready, there must be urgent reconsideration of the NPS being part of HMPPS before reintegration happens. 

The smug top management is basically out of touch with what's happening at the service delivery level and this fundamental disconnect will only get worse under a malign and corrosive civil service command and control mindset. This from the Guardian:-

Staff shortages leave probation service in crisis, report finds

Public safety is at risk as huge workloads and staff shortages continue to place the probation sector under pressure, inspectors have said, while officers lack the “professional curiosity” needed to spot potentially dangerous behaviour among offenders managed in the community. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation has painted a picture of a service in crisis with hundreds of vacancies, overstretched officers and managers, and crumbling, overcrowded buildings, including hostels for recently released offenders.

An inspection of the central functions supporting the National Probation Service (NPS), the publicly run arm of the probation sector, which supervises about 105,000 high-risk offenders, found that some officers were not properly reviewing their cases. The report follows a number of high-profile cases with links to probation, including those of the London Bridge terrorist Usman Khan and the serial rapist Joseph McCann. As part of their work, probation officers are tasked with rooting out offenders who claim their behaviour has improved but have not actually reformed – known as “false compliance”.

Khan, a convicted terrorist who killed two people on London Bridge in November while out of prison on licence, appeared to have convinced professionals around him that he was no longer a risk by taking part in rehabilitation courses. Inspectors said false compliance was a real challenge for probation officers who needed highly tuned skills and expertise to interview and challenge offenders effectively. Justin Russell, the chief inspector of probation, said the lack of skills could be down to inexperience in the job.

Amid questions over the failings in the case of McCann, a convicted burglar who carried out a string of sex attacks after being freed in a probation error, Russell said probation officers were still not carrying out basic domestic violence and child safeguarding checks for some offenders. The inspectorate said having a workload that offered “enough space and time to do that reflective thinking” was important.

The NPS has a workforce including 6,500 probation officers and a budget of more than £500m a year. Inspectors rated all of its divisions as requiring improvement on staffing, and none of the areas are fully staffed. High rates of staff sickness average 11 days per person, 50% of which relate to mental health difficulties, and there are 650 job vacancies nationwide.

Russell said the vacancies were in part related to a pause in recruitment from 2014, when disastrous privatisation reforms introduced by the then justice secretary Chris Grayling were being pushed through. Those reforms are in the process of being unravelled after the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) decided to renationalise the sector. Those probation officers in place had an average of 39 cases on their books but could have up to 60 at any one time, while victim liaison officers had an average of 215.

Russell said staff shortages were especially acute in London and the south-east. He said putting probation officers under such pressure could compromise effective work with offenders and their ability to manage cases properly. Staff were being “driven spare” by offices in disrepair, he added. Inspectors found broken CCTV, plumbing and heating problems and one case of a rat infestation. Russell said it was unacceptable that outstanding repairs also meant premises approved for housing high-risk offenders when they were initially released from prison were out of action.

The inspectors also found significant areas of positive performance, including better services for victims and women under supervision. Leadership was good but middle managers were too stretched, the report found. Among 24 recommendations made to HM Prison and Probation Service – the part of the MoJ that runs the NPS – department bosses missed opportunities to make improvements, inspectors said. Russell said immediate steps should be taken to tackle workloads and more investment in training was needed.

The justice minister, Lucy Frazer, said: 


“We know that probation is not getting enough of the basics right – that’s why we are bringing all offender management back under the National Probation Service, which the independent inspectorate says is good at protecting the public. It is also clear that the workload is simply too high for many probation officers and the 800 new officers currently training to join the NPS will make a real difference. I am reassured that the chief inspector shares my confidence in the vision and leadership of the National Probation Service – which will be essential to delivering these reforms.”

8 comments:

  1. With Carillion back in the news this week and it's woeful handling of government contracts and cost to the taxpayer, (see todays Guardian), Security magazine picks up on the dismal state of the NPS Estate as a consequence of its outsourced facility management.

    https://www.professionalsecurity.co.uk/news/government/probation-has-faulty-cctv/

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Broken locks, faulty CCTV, vermin infestations, and poor plumbing and heating were found at National Probation Service (NPS) sites by HM Inspectorate of Probation, according to its latest report. Official inspectors between July 2018 and June 2019 rated the quality of NPS facilities as ‘requires improvement’ in six out of the seven NPS divisions.

      HM Chief Inspector of Probation Justin Russell said: “NPS staff have told us repeatedly that facilities are not managed properly. Repairs are not fixed quickly and there are difficulties with escalating jobs.

      “We looked more closely at the issue in this inspection. The management of NPS facilities is contracted out to four private sector firms, with a fifth company acting as the managing agent.

      “The target is for jobs to be fixed within ten working days. For the first six months of 2019, less than half (43 per cent) of jobs were completed in this timescale. Although this is an improvement on the previous year, it is still not good enough.

      “Probation staff need appropriate facilities to do their job. In particular, it is unacceptable that outstanding repairs at approved premises mean staff have to find alternative accommodation for high-risk offenders because beds cannot be used.

      “The Ministry of Justice needs to hold these companies to account to ensure they deliver the contract as intended. Probation staff deserve to work in safe and secure environments.”

      Inspectors also found staff shortages. Many probation officers have unacceptably high workloads, Mr Russell said. He said: “Staff are under pressure and this could compromise their ability to build effective working relationships with people under supervision and to manage all cases to a consistently high standard.”

      Background

      The NPS is responsible for supervising nearly 106,000 high-risk offenders, and violent and sexual offenders subject to Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA). In May 2019, the government announced that the NPS will take over the supervision of all offenders from 2021, taking on nearly 150,000 low and medium-risk cases from Community Rehabilitation Companies. The NPS supervised 105,951 offenders as of June 2019.

      Delete
  2. I'm an NPS SPO. Reality is worse than this report. Caseloads unmanagable. SPOs supervising too many staff so can't do any meaningful work, no coaching, no improving of quality. We just respond to crisis management.

    ReplyDelete
  3. My NPS area are just about to be inspected. The amount of "prep" work going on is shameful. If we get anything less than outstanding there should be some serious questions raised!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree anon 19:48, reality is much worse. As a PO in the NPS who is over 100% on WMT majority of the time, what is going to happen in the short term to address high caseloads? I’m certainly not coping with my workload and know others aren’t either. How long are we expected to carry on like this. Surely there must me some sort of contingency plan in place? What am I missing? Does the service not have a duty to look after it’s staff? I can’t carry on much longer in this job

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. I'm meeting with the HMIP inspector in next two weeks and can't wait to tell them the truth about what it's really like in NPS right now. Senior managers, I'm sure, will only want to present the glossy version!

      Delete
  5. The author of this is talking about the education system, but I'm struck by just how relevent it seems to the discussions on this blog recently about concerns in probation.
    Please delete if of no interest.

    https://www.timeshighereducation.com/opinion/box-ticking-inevitable-result-top-down-impositions#survey-answer

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As ever, spot on 'Getafix - extremely relevant to a blogpost in gestation right now! The last three paragraphs make the point perfectly in relation to NPS I think:-

      Box-ticking is the inevitable result of top-down impositions

      Overseeing an Athena SWAN application convinced an anonymous academic that if tasks cannot be properly resourced, they should not be attempted at all.

      The current industrial action by members of the University and College Union is about many things, and not everything can be solved by cultural change. Yet the way UK universities currently work – or don’t work – has created a system in which everyone loses. It was inevitable that overloaded colleagues could not give Athena SWAN applications the attention required: they were juggling other tasks and needed to protect their personal time.

      The neoliberal university incentivises half-hearted implementation. It delegates tasks to those unable to say no. Whether as a conscious coping strategy or out of sheer necessity, slow walking, box-ticking and perfunctory hoop-jumping are inevitable defence mechanisms that people adopt in the face of such top-down managerialism. All too often, valuable staff time is wasted without universities' having anything to show for it. This is Kafkaesque, yet the solution ought to be a simple one: if tasks cannot be properly resourced, it is much better that they not be done at all.

      When my school’s new equality, diversity and inclusion committee met to consider the feedback on our successful Athena SWAN application, only a single member of the senior management team showed up. Half an hour late. But perhaps that is as it should be. Staff are not a resource to be managed. Properly empowered, they will flourish of their own accord.

      The author was, from 2017 to 2019, a lead in equality, diversity and inclusion in the humanities school of a UK university.

      Delete