This is the scandal caused by RUI (Release Under Investigation):
1. The govt tightened the use of police bail to score cheap headlines
2. Thousands of suspected violent & sex offenders RUI’d with no conditions
3. Under resourced police take years to investigate alleged offences
4. Under resourced Crown Prosecution Service take months to make a charging decision
4. Under resourced Crown Prosecution Service take months to make a charging decision
5. Defendants summonsed to court for a first appearance 6 months later
6. Trial listed in the Crown Court a year later due to lack of open courtrooms
7. Trial inevitably adjourned because of 6.
8. Three years down the line, witnesses lose heart and the case ends up being dropped on the fourth trial listing. No justice for anyone.
The story has been investigated by BBC Newsnight:-
'Scandal brewing' as thousands of suspects released8. Three years down the line, witnesses lose heart and the case ends up being dropped on the fourth trial listing. No justice for anyone.
The story has been investigated by BBC Newsnight:-
More than 93,000 suspected violent criminals and sex offenders have been released without restrictions by police in England and Wales since 2017, figures obtained by BBC Newsnight show. People suspected of offences including rape and murder have been among those "Released Under Investigation" (RUI).
Richard Miller of the Law Society said a "major scandal" was brewing over the way RUIs are being used. The Home Office said the cases must be regularly reviewed and managed.
In 2017, the rules on pre-charge bail changed, making it more difficult for police to keep suspects on bail beyond 28 days. The overuse of RUIs, Mr Miller said, is the unintended consequence of the changes. Unlike pre-charge bail, RUIs do not impose a limit on suspects' movements, stop them from contacting certain people or require them report to a police station. Earlier this month the government announced plans to review the 2017 changes.
In September 2018, Alan Martin, 53, was released under investigation by police in Sunderland, after his estranged wife Kay Richardson had gone to the police accusing him of rape. No conditions were imposed and the police gave Martin the keys back to the home he had shared with Ms Richardson. Martin let himself into the house and waited for Ms Richardson, 49, before attacking her with a hammer and strangling her.
"They might as well have gone and opened the door for him," said Audrey Richardson, Kay's mother. "He killed her," she said. "We've got to accept this and the police is not taking a little bit of responsibility... We are haunted by what happened."
Mr Martin had a history of domestic violence. But Northumbria Police said, because he had not been bailed, officers had no legal right to keep the keys from him. The force were cleared of misconduct by The Independent Office for Police Conduct.
Newsnight's data - obtained under the Freedom of Information Act - revealed there were 322,250 RUI cases between April 2017 to October this year. Of these, 93,098 related to violence against a person and sexual offences cases. The figures were provided by 20 of the 44 police forces in England and Wales - meaning the total number of RUIs since 2017 is likely to be much higher.
Caroline Goodwin QC, chairwoman of the Criminal Bar Association, said there were people being released without "any form of judicial control or indeed police bail control" which "can be dangerous" for victims.
Newsnight found 2,772 of the cases involving violent and sexual offences had been classed as RUI for more than 12 months. "It's unfair on defendants and complainants if these cases are not resolved quickly," said Mr Miller, head of justice at the Law Society. "It also means that the quality of the evidence is impacted as the longer a case is left the more memories fade."
Newsnight spoke to a man who was released under investigation for more than two years, after he was accused of rape. He agreed to speak to the BBC anonymously. "Your life is effectively put on hold. You're put into this limbo where everything starts falling apart around you, you've got no control of it whatsoever," he said. "I felt suicidal." He protested his innocence and was eventually told he would not be charged. "I would expect, with the nature of the crime I was accused of, to have been placed under specific instructions," he added. "But there were no restrictions at all."
The Home Office said the National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC) released guidance to frontline officers this year stressing the importance of using pre-charge bail where necessary and proportionate, including in high harm cases.
"We will always give the police and the criminal justice system the full support and powers they need to protect the public from harm," said Home Secretary Priti Patel. "We launched a review of pre-charge bail legislation to prioritise the safety of victims and empower the police investigating all types of offences, whilst continuing to make sure cases are dealt with as swiftly as possible."
Thanks for this, this would explain in part why Police are pushing for recall more often....
ReplyDeleteDid we miss the *real* purpose of the PSS, i.e. was it intentionally imposed as an alternative to conditional bail? For example, someone serves a 3 month sentence & released on PSS & is then arrested on suspicion of a new offence - as highlighted by 07:44 above, recall on the PSS could easily serve to replace conditional bail pending further enquiries. The pressure from CRC management to recall for any and all newly alleged matters would fit the HMPPS/MoJ tactic. Perhaps it was a cash-linked target?
ReplyDeleteIt doesn't cover those not on PSS but, given the reoffending profiles of those who serve short sentences, it would cover a fair few cases.
From Twitter:-
Delete"Categorically not! Whilst disastrously flawed in its implementation, there is no grounds for this belief. New offences in PSS period aren’t even recall-able, they’d be a breach through the Courts."
"The pressure from CRC management to recall for any and all newly alleged matters would fit the HMPPS/MoJ tactic."
DeleteThat was my understanding based upon what a CRC senior manager had told me not so long back. It is obviously not right, as the Twitter comment says.
Its worrying, however, that that is the view of a CRC senior manager. Further info below:
__________________________________________________
pi24/2014
2.2 The decision on whether an offender has failed to comply with the Post-Sentence Supervision Requirements and what if any sanctions should be imposed for a proven breach will fall to magistrates’ courts (not to NOMS acting on behalf of the Secretary of State, as with recall from licence).
2.3 The court has the following options where a breach of a requirement under the Post-Sentence Supervision period is proven:
• No action – the offender continues with the requirements of supervision
• Fine
• Committal to prison for up to 14 days
* Impose a Supervision Default Order (SDO). This can be either Unpaid Work (minimum 20 hours, maximum 60 hours) or an electronically-monitored curfew (with a minimum of 20 days and no longer than the end of the Post-Sentence Supervision period).
______________________________________________
Sentencing Guidelines
Breach of post-sentence supervision
Where the court determines a penalty is appropriate for a breach of a post-sentence supervision requirement it must take into account the extent to which the offender has complied with all of the requirements of the post-sentence supervision or supervision default order when imposing a penalty.
In assessing the level of compliance with the order the court should consider:
the offender’s overall attitude and engagement with the order as well as the proportion of elements completed;
the impact of any completed or partially completed requirements on the offender’s behaviour;
the proximity of the breach to the imposition of the order; and
evidence of circumstances or offender characteristics, such as disability, mental health issues or learning difficulties which have impeded offender’s compliance with the order.
__________________________________________________
HoC Justice Committee report 2016/17
The Council’s resource assessment states that only limited data are available on the number of PSS breaches brought to court and those that result in recalls to custody, although it notes that the Ministry of Justice impact assessment of the new legislation anticipated a large volume of offenders being sentenced to short custodial sentences following a breach.
_________________________________________________
HMIP report
38,617 Offenders released from custody with sentences of less than 12 months(October 2017 to September 2018)
8,994 Number of offenders recalled to custody (October 2017 to September 2018), having previously been sentenced to less than 12 months and released
That's 23%
__________________________________________________
Another stat not reported widely:
29% Percentage fall in the number of pre-sentence reports completed from July-September 2013 to July-September 2018
When everything is target driven outcome based, there is always going to be serious flaws, especially when budgets have been so drastically slashed year on year.
ReplyDeletePolice cuts, legal aid restrictions, court closures, privatisation and over crowded prisons means the CJS can't be anywhere else but be in a mess.
The consequences of such a mess effects everyone of course, but some groups are effected in very particular ways.
The length a young offender can spend from arrest, on bail, to prosecution, to sentence can have a very serious consequence indeed.
This from the Guardian in September.
https://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/amp.theguardian.com/society/2019/nov/05/revealed-hundreds-of-children-pushed-into-adult-courts-by-delays?amp_js_v=a2&_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15755418490863&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&_tf=From%20%251%24s&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fsociety%2F2019%2Fnov%2F05%2Frevealed-hundreds-of-children-pushed-into-adult-courts-by-delays
'Getafix
From Twitter:-
ReplyDelete"Probation staff are burnt out with the endless meddling by ministers who expect staff to work harder/ faster for less but keep changing goalposts. We just settled after TR now we have TR2. Please please stop and give Probation time to get on with their job."