Murder victim's mum fears probation changes
The mother of a teenager who was killed by a man on probation has joined calls to reunify Wales' probation service. Nadine Marshall fears that unless the National Probation Service (NPS) has responsibility for programmes and unpaid work, the risk of offenders committing further offences increases. Her son Conner, 18, was murdered in 2015 by a man in breach of probation.
The way offenders are managed in Wales changes next week, with a private firm handing back most work to the NPS. The UK Government said there was "widespread support" for the proposals. But concerns have been raised there are still important areas of offender rehabilitation that will be under the remit of private firms or charities.
The probation officers' union Napo pointed out that in so many serious further offence reviews, or homicide reviews, there is a call for the free flow of information so risk assessments are as accurate as possible. It worries that by keeping these two elements of offender management and rehabilitation separate, it reduces that flow, which in turn increases the risk to the public.
Conner Marshall, 18, died four days after being beaten with a pole by David Braddon at Trecco Bay caravan park in Porthcawl, Bridgend county, in 2015. Braddon - who had mistaken Conner for someone else - was jailed for life after admitting murder. In the nine months before the killing, Braddon, from Caerphilly, breached his probation by missing eight separate meetings. He was being monitored by a private company - Working Links, Wales' Community Rehabilitation Company (CRC) - after he was convicted for drugs offences and assaulting a police officer.
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) denied the unprovoked attack could have been predicted or prevented and the company has since gone into administration.
Mrs Marshall, from Barry, Vale of Glamorgan, backed the concerns of Napo that the changes will leave essential parts of probation being done by non-specialists. She is worried there might be more "devastating cases like ours". "In our case, you don't know when that worm will turn," she added. "It reaches back to the accountability of it - particularly if third sector organisations are expected to pick up the pieces. Risk is transient - it's not static, what's a risk today, isn't necessarily one tomorrow. There could be any manner of things that happen." She said it was a huge expectation to expect non-professionals to notice changes in behaviour or triggers.
Napo said two separate organisations dealing with an offender also made it harder for professionals to know if the risks had increased. The changes will bring low and medium-risk offenders back under the NPS, alongside the management of high-risk offenders. But CRCs or third sector organisations will be responsible for unpaid work that offenders must carry out - as well as the courses they have to attend - for example, programmes for addicts, addressing aggressive behaviour or domestic violence.
Four years ago the service was split, with private firms created to manage all but high-risk offenders, leading to a number of critical reports and a rise in the number of people on probation going on to commit serious crimes. These changes will happen in Wales first and will roll out to England in 2021.
The UK Government in its response to the consultation earlier this year noted there was "widespread support" for the proposals in Wales and they were "broadly considered" as a positive step.
And the fact that UPW are themselves outsourcing a high percentage of their cases to charity placements or suchlike then the link is again broken regarding any information that could be first heard on a group by a supervisor and passed on to the relevant officer or their team, this may be regarding domestic abuse, risk to other adults or children. All this will be lost when they are working in some charity shop or call centre etc. Another link broken.
ReplyDelete...and the link is broken when there are drug/alcohol/psychiatric referrals. I thought it was the task of probation to coordinate and case manage. There was a probation service before programmes and I don't see why programmes are seen as integral, a core service, when drug treatment or housing provision isn't.
DeleteWell said annon 7.14. Placements are only suitable for a very small percentage of service users. The fact that most placements let them go to the shops use there phones and generally do what they want speaks for itself. Crc wants 60 percent placements shame the percentage wasn’t the same as that for
DeleteSessional supervisors needing contracts instead of ad hoc work
Good to hear Napo Gen Sec on the radio in Wales this morning. England needs to take note, as this is on its way to you. Just moving the dividing line and remarketing again is not enough. It would be so simple and so obvious to reunify the whole of probation in the public sector, it would be popular, easily understood and go a good way to repairing the lost confidence of courts, clients, staff, and, judging from this item, victims
ReplyDeleteThe song remains the same. For years now, and that includes the BlueLabour years, the move has been towards 'monetising' & 'profitising' anything and everything.
ReplyDeleteIts always been thus in the USA where the pioneer spirit defined the development of that relatively modern nation. And look what they elected as a 'Leader'.
The UK is a different animal. Its place in the global market has always been defined by the priveleged 1% (most by accident of birth rather than talent or ability) and a cabal of calculating greedy spivs acting on their behalf.
This election is crunchtime for the UK in so many ways.
From my perspective:
* do we let the 1% of priveleged bullies continue to drain the public purse for their own enjoyment
* do we sacrifice 'community' for petty personal gain
* do we let multinationals continue to rape the planet
* do we sell the remainder of the UK to a global facilities magnate
* do we abandon all notion of social care for 'career prospects'
* what do we tell future generations when they ask "What the fuck were you thinking?"
Watch Mike Leigh's 'Peterloo'; watch Ken Loach's 'Sorry We Missed You'; watch 'I, Daniel Blake'. They are accounts of how the UK works when the 1% are in charge. Perhaps not everyone sees it.
Perhaps, on take-home salaries of £2k/3k/4k/5k+, its hard to comprehend? For some, perhaps, the caseload of the day live in another world that disappears after 5pm? For others, perhaps, the attitudes and actions of those before the courts are just something to 'highlight, criticise & correct' through punishment?
Do not forget - we are all not so very far away from each other. We have more in common than we are different. It only takes.... a false allegation; a missed payment; a moment of anger; one too many wines after a stressful day; a line of this or that on a night out; a failed company; loss of employment; illness; bereavement...
But hey ho, being a touchy-feely lefty pinko fluffy-bunny just ain't cool:
"Toughen up."
"Get over it."
"We are where we are."
"It is what it is."
"Just fucking do it."
"This isn't a pity-fest."
"You're paid to protect the public, not mollycoddle bloody offenders."
Not one single political party has made one single reference to the probation profession. Not once, Not even in passing. The Wales experiment will become the UK experience. It is NOT reunification. It is NOT public ownership. It is NOT a victory for the woefully inadequate & amateur "probation union" (whose staff are nevertheless paid professional-sized fees).
It is, as stated above, "Just moving the dividing line and remarketing again".
***The consequences for staff, for victims' families and the public in general WILL be far more serious than TR1***
"The UK Government in its response to the consultation earlier this year noted there was "widespread support" for the proposals in Wales and they were "broadly considered" as a positive step."
ReplyDeleteOf course it is a positive step. One they had to be dragged by the scruff to make. Just not a big enough step. SO much damage, and this refusal to do the blinking obvious and reunify probation in its entirety will inflict unnecessary delay strain and complexity.
Yes coming to the rest of England. I worry it will result in more just b losses and a worsening of the current situation. I am hoping on surprise in the election but will it make a difference
ReplyDeleteJob losses
ReplyDeleteHMPPS 16 May 2019
ReplyDeleteProgress and updates
We are providing updates for the reform programme in the monthly Probation change bulletin
* But only two have ever been published (Aug & Sept 2019)
We ran a public consultation between July and September 2018, receiving over 450 written responses, and hosting more 38 events with over 1,000 delegates. This feedback was invaluable. It has informed our thinking and we have published the Government’s response.
* But none of the responses or feedback has ever been published, so no-one knows if "widespread support" was really there for anything
staff equality report was released yesterday by HMPPS
ReplyDelete- The NPS had higher female representation than the other parts of HMPPS, comprising of 64.1% (98) of staff in senior NPS roles (NPS bands A-D), 70.0% (783) in NPS bands 5-6, and 77.2% (7,424)in NPS grades below management level (which includes probation officers at band 4).
- In HMPPS the system of staff appraisals is called the ‘Staff Performance and Development Record’... Staff Appraisal outcomes were worse for male staff, staff aged under 30 and over 60 and Black staff. Independent of protected characteristics, more senior staff receive better appraisal markings.
- Female staff were awarded a higher proportion of ‘Outstanding’ markings (19.7%) than male staff (12.6%).
- The proportions of staff receiving ‘Improvement required’ ratings were highest among Black staff and Other Ethnic Group staff, both at 4.8%. The proportion of staff receiving ‘Outstanding’ markings was lower among Black staff (8.9%)than any other group.
- Overall, male staff were investigated at more than double the rate of female staff in 2018/19, at 3.8per 100 males compared to 1.6per 100 females.
- The proportion of BAME staff investigated in 2018/19 was very slightly higher than the proportion of White staff investigated, 2.8per 100 staff compared to 2.7. Similarly, a slightly larger proportion of BAME staff, 1.3per 100 staff, were subject to conduct and discipline action than White staff at 1.2per 100 staff.
- In 2018/19, 5.2% of permanent staff were promoted, an equivalent of 2,644 promotions.The rate of promotions was higher for: females (even across all grade groups), those aged 30-39 years old, White, and non-disabled staff.
- Special bonuses allowlocal management the opportunity to recognise and reward any member of staff for exceptional performance in a particularly demanding task or situation through a one-off non-consolidated lump sum payment of up to £2,000 (or up to £20,000 with CEO approval)... The rate of special bonuses awarded in 2018/19was higher for males at 3.2per 100 staff than for females at 2.6per 100 staff. The average value of the bonuses was also higher for males who received an average of £1,025compared to females who received an average of £765.
I've often pondered what an unspoken and underacknowledged truth it is that the probation service is highly feminised. I hear a LOT about providing a specific/tailored/minority service to WOMEN on probation; I NEVER hear anything about doing the same for men. It is simply assumed that a feminised probation service is simply the "right" way for men to be supervised, and that women need something far more different/tailored.
DeleteI am reading online suggestions that the knife man at London Bridge today who has killed two and been shot by police - is an ex-prisoner who may have been wearig a tag - possibly also a probation supervisee- maybe the full glare of main stream media is about to come
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/FollowCSP/status/1200539159380680704
BBC TV news 10.30pm confirm attacker was former terrorist prisoner still on licence - expect to see Probation bods answering in the media - shame Parliament not sitting - let us see what Secretary of Statae for Justice and his shadow have to say.
DeleteExpect announcements - something must/will be done!
What a turn up today! The perpetrator of the London Bridge incident, was a recently released terrorist prisoner (on licence), but also on tag (private sector).
ReplyDeleteThis is a big problem for the MoJ.
Into the mix of events at London Bridge yesterday, it's emerged that one of the people that provided help was a Lifer on day release.
Deletehttps://www-mirror-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/london-bridge-hero-murderer-day-20994055.amp?amp_js_v=a2&_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15751094033049&_ct=1575109418876&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&_tf=From%20%251%24s&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mirror.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fuk-news%2Flondon-bridge-hero-murderer-day-20994055
'Getafix
There will have been a number of former or current clients in the vicinity due to the nature of the event. A devastating blow to a very worthwhile charity:-
DeleteLearning Together Five Year Celebration Alumni Event
A day to celebrate, connect and collaborate.
You are warmly invited to join us for our Learning Together Network Alumni Event.
You are warmly invited to join us for our Learning Together Network Alumni Event on:
Friday 29th November, 11.00 – 16.00 at Fishmongers’ Hall, London.
Everyone who has been involved in a Learning Together Partnership across the UK is invited to join us in celebrating 5 years of Learning Together.
Rehabilitation is all very well but for those convicted of serious terrorist offences, surely the only option is an irrevocable death sentence?
ReplyDelete