Friday, 23 October 2026

But What's the Job?

23431 - Project Manager - The Project Delivery Function aim is to have capable and empowered teams, delivering Project Delivery excellence... The MoJ’s Functional Operating Model is unique across government. All project delivery professionals are line managed through the Function and then assigned to projects and programmes across the MoJ and its Agencies. Successful candidates will be part of a flexible resource pool and may be placed in roles based on business needs. The Project Manager leads and manages the project and project team. They are responsible for driving and overseeing the delivery of the project to ensure objectives are clearly defined and achieved within agreed time, cost, and quality constraints. The national salary range is £42,914- £46,182, London salary range is £49,325- £53,081.

But what's the fucking job?

23392 - Change Delivery Officer - Midlands Team - The Change Officer role is an integral role within both Area and National Change Delivery teams which work across Prison and Probation. This role is pivotal in overseeing, and in the delivery of, both local and nationally identified change initiatives. With approximately 175 staff across 3 functions, our Change Group represents half of the Change Directorate.
£37,238 - £44,520

But what's the fucking job??

23239 - Change Systems Project Officer - The Project Officer role specialises in change systems and is instrumental in facilitating the smooth implementation of HMPPS Gateway Management System and HMPPS EQuiP Process Management system and processes within HMPPS. Facilitate comprehensive process mapping workshops to visualise current workflows and identify opportunities for process optimization.
£28,064 - £33,549

Uhh?

22878 - Senior Project Manager - The Project Delivery Function aim is to have capable and empowered teams, delivering Project Delivery excellence. ​Our people will be empowered to develop the skills they need to succeed, and our line managers will be accountable for upholding functional standards and demonstrating excellence in project delivery. Successful candidates will be part of a flexible resource pool and may be placed in roles based on business needs. The Senior Project Manager leads and manages the project and project team. The national salary range is £71,381 - £80,419, London salary range is £75,674 - £85,257

But what's the fucking job???

23405 - Senior Programme Manager - This is an important leadership role within the Service Centre expansion project, providing an exciting opportunity to shape and deliver a significant programme of change across probation services. Working under the governance of the Our Future Probation Service Programme, the postholder will oversee the full range of governance arrangements for the project, including reporting on progress, managing risks and issues, and ensuring clear and effective decision-making. We'll assess you against these behaviours during the selection process:

Communicating & Influencing (skilful bullying)
Delivering at Pace (intense bullying)
Leadership (incompetent bullying)
Seeing the Big Picture (erm, which one?)
The national salary range is £81,338 - £89,472, London salary range is £84,458 - £94,690.

Has anyone any fucking idea what the fuck they're drivelling on about?
ahh... "Some of MoJ’s terms and conditions of service are changing as part of Civil Service reform."

*****

This makes me laugh - hysterical laughter. They are doing this arse about face. OFPS launched February 2025. The OFPS program should have been informed by a Business Process Reengineering (BPR) project firstly. Ha ha they are now looking at doing the BPR and advertising roles 18 months later.You couldn’t make this up. Most important role advertised is actually the 23239 - Change Systems Project Officer who will be mapping the ‘as is’ processes and then design the ‘to be’ processes. I can guarantee you all that they will not consult with the frontline officers re the current and future processes. I have repeatedly said that frontline officers know the problems and the solutions but no, the officers are not considered clever enough are they! The officers MUST be part of the mapping processes.

Senior management who have come up with the whole OFPS are Fuckwits (excuse that but I don’t think this deserves me to find a more polite way of saying it). I will bet my last £100 quid this is not going to end well as JB regularly references. Anon

*****
So AI, what is a Business Process Reengineering Project? 

A Business Process Reengineering (BPR) project is a radical, project-based management strategy that completely tears down and rebuilds core organizational workflows, systems, and structures from the ground up. Unlike incremental improvement methods (such as Business Process Improvement or Six Sigma), which tweak existing routines, BPR aims for dramatic, breakthrough leaps in performance metrics like cost, speed, quality, and customer service.

Core Characteristics of a BPR Project

Radical Redesign: It challenges every existing assumption and tradition rather than patching current flaws.

End-to-End Focus: It shifts an organization from a rigid, department-based structure to a fluid, process-based one.

Information Technology as an Enabler: IT is used to fundamentally transform operations (e.g., replacing manual paper invoicing with automated electronic systems), not just speed up old tasks.

Finite Scope: It is managed as a distinct, large-scale project rather than an ongoing daily routine.

Typical Phases of a BPR Project

1. Define Goals: Align high-level business objectives (like reducing cycle times or cutting operational costs) with strategic targets.

2. Map the "As-Is" State: Analyze current workflows, document steps, and pinpoint bottlenecks or redundant tasks.

3. Design the "To-Be" State: Rebuild the workflow from scratch using fresh process diagrams and new technology foundations.

4. Implement and Manage Change: Roll out the new structure supported by heavy leadership commitment, staff training, and active change management to ease employee resistance.

*****
You were right, JB, productivity IS the answer!

"Barclays is cutting its staff by around 5,000 as it introduces more artificial intelligence (AI) into its work processes. Barclays said the changes were the result of an ongoing modernisation plan, with the use of AI being the "icing on the cake" of its strategy.... "AI has an important role to play and may have a more important role to play in the future."

Oh.

"The Ministry of Justice projects the tool will save around 450,000 hours annually for frontline officers... Productivity improvement: The Justice Transcribe AI‑enabled transcription tool... Identifying opportunities for productivity improvement ..."

"The Project Delivery Function aim is to have capable and empowered teams, delivering Project Delivery excellence... The Change Officer role is an integral role within both Area and National Change Delivery teams which work across Prison and Probation... an exciting opportunity to shape and deliver a significant programme of change across probation services...facilitating the smooth implementation of HMPPS Gateway Management System and HMPPS EQuiP Process Management system and processes within HMPPS."

* "Some of MoJ’s terms and conditions of service are changing as part of Civil Service reform."

** "Artificial intelligence plays a growing and transformative role in probation services, primarily by reducing administrative workloads, enhancing record accuracy, and supporting risk management."

*** "HMPPS does not have actual time saved data to monitor how far estimated time savings have been achieved."

--oo00oo--

AI Action Plan Explorer

The Ministry of Justice (MOJ) is at the forefront of responsible AI adoption across government. One year on from publishing the AI Action Plan for Justice, this explorer highlights progress against our ambitions. We are committed to being transparent about how we use AI and will continue to work with industry, academia, civil society and the wider public sector to realise its benefits safely and responsibly.

Fred is an AI-powered chatbot that helps people on probation understand their requirements and stay on track with appointments, unpaid work, licence conditions, and rehabilitation activities. By providing clear, accessible information when it is needed, Fred helps people navigate probation more confidently and reduces uncertainty about what is expected of them.

As part of wider efforts to modernise probation services, Fred demonstrates how AI can make public services more accessible, responsive and user-centred. By providing personalised guidance and on-demand support, the tool aims to improve engagement, support compliance, and enable probation staff to focus on higher-value, person-centred interactions. Fred does not make any decisions regarding sentence management, nor does it discuss content outside of probation.

The project is currently being piloted in London, Norfolk and North Kent. Early feedback from both people on probation and practitioners has been very positive.

One individual reflected: “When I left prison, I was completely isolated, with addiction and mental health struggles. If I'd had Fred to talk to, it would have been a lifeline”.

14 comments:

  1. Is Fred to probation what Skynet was to the Terminator? It’s refreshing to see someone asking what the actual job is when referencing these stupid jobs advertised……..does it make the poster feel clever or is it a clever way into the security services?
    The answer of course is neither….its the usual verbosity from the top……….oi Fred, I can’t make my appointment today as I’ve no credit and me mam has washed me only pair of pants, what do you suggest?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fred!!! Fred!!! Please! If this person needed Fred to talk to as their "lifeline" does this not fully demonstrate what is wholly flawed with the current probation system...that offcers are so tied up in typing crap into OASYS and being overly preoccupied with so called "managing risk" that they no longer have the time, space or abilities, or are simply not encouraged to or increasingly not "allowed " to (reference supervision packages) simply talk to the people they are working with to clarify or address whatever issues they are confronting?

      Our service has been so led by the IT department over the last few years it seems our chief probation officer has herself forgotten about what probation is...MPOP, ARNS, EPF, Justice Transcribe, Create and Vary a license, RCAT, Refer and monitor, intranet pages, rehabilitation portal, Equip, data dashboards, electronic monitoring systems...I'm absolutely sick to my back teeth of all this "IT is the key to improve your practice"...well clearly not! If the chief probation officer spent a bit of time reading HMIP inspections she would see that since the implementation of all these electronic solutions our practice has become visibly worse and not better because our time is spent servicing these IT systems rather than investing in the workforce and our professional development

      Delete
  2. Right said Fred, bang the last support in, one more pull, we can get the bugger through, so we had a cup of tea and then we went home...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Join the fucking dots, people.

    "Fred is an AI-powered chatbot that helps people on probation understand their requirements and stay on track with appointments, unpaid work, licence conditions, and rehabilitation activities."

    "Barclays cutting 5,000 jobs as it increases reliance on AI"

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvj64jg5prpgo

    "UK needs plan in case of 'unprecedented' AI job losses, says AI minister.... AI had evolved rapidly from doing 'boring' tasks to 'more high-level reasoning and creative tasks'.... "We are not preparing enough for something quite big that's coming," "

    https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2026/10/22/world/politics/uk-politicians-ai-focus-groups/

    "U.K. politicians are testing their messages on AI-generated focus groups... Critics warn that reliance on AI-generated focus groups could detach politicians from reality... One early adopter was Kanishka Narayan, elected to Parliament in 2024, and now Britain’s AI minister. “The first thing that I remember I did as an MP was start to use synthetic focus grouping in thinking about what messages to deliver,”... Dario Krpan and colleagues at the London School of Economics warned in a paper in June that politicians may “begin treating the views generated by synthetic participants as if they were the views of actual people.” "

    ReplyDelete
  4. The future, as always, in the hands of narcissistic sociopaths, what could possibly go wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  5. A dystopian future.
    I wonder if Fred can be set to message Police and Probation staff
    when a dodgy question is asked by a the person on licence, or under a court order,? For example when is the next ferry to France? Maybe Fred could bypass humans and just send a drone to deliver an AI warrant for court, very neat as there will be a film of proof of service. The drone could also deliver a high vis jacket for the person to wear so the public can identify a “wrong un”.Better still a police drone could hold the person hostage ( sorry lawfully detain them) whilst police officers come pick them up for breach of licence?
    The future is bright, stay sitting at your computers and sit back, enjoy the “not getting your hands dirty” approach, have a bag of crisps to celebrate job done..

    Probation is about people and built on relationships.. it is all slipping down the plug hole..

    By the way the Probation blog is now officially blocked on the HMPPS system.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "By the way the Probation blog is now officially blocked on the HMPPS system." I wonder which blogpost it was that needled them? I know for a fact there have been internal emails circulating at Petty France in the past...

      Delete
    2. they don't like it up'em, capt. mainwaring

      "Parliament asked how many prisoners were freed early on 1 October 2026. The Ministry of Justice said the answer cannot be disclosed.
      It gave the same reply when asked how many were fitted with a tag before release, and how many have been tagged since.
      It also refused to say how many were let out of HMP Littlehey in the first wave. Every time, the reason was the same: the figures will appear in statistics at a later date."


      "The Telegraph - 13 Oct 2026 — Prisoners celebrate early release from overcrowded jails. Their release follows the freeing of 700 prisoners on Oct 1, dozens of whom have already been recalled to jail after having breached the terms ..." (paywall)


      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqwy7jwg29nno

      "15 October 2026 - Three people are back behind bars after being arrested by Humberside Police days after leaving prison under the government's early release scheme, the BBC has learnt. The woman and two men were arrested for offences including burglary, drunk and disorderly and fraud by false representation, the force confirmed. Humberside Police confirmed all three offenders were now back in prison."
      _______________________________________________
      Speaking of prisons:

      https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hmp-bure-action-plan

      Leaders had not done enough to understand or
      address the comparatively negative
      experiences of prison life reported by minority
      ethnic prisoners over several inspections

      Leaders and managers did not have
      appropriate oversight of the effectiveness of the
      prison education framework contract

      Offending behaviour programmes were limited
      to prisoners within 18 months of potential
      release

      Communication with
      prisoners about sentence
      progression was not
      good enough.

      There was no CCTV in accommodation and
      activity areas, which affected prisoners'
      feelings of safety and hindered investigations
      into alleged assaults

      During use of force, staff often did not activate
      body-worn video cameras until very late into an
      incident

      Leaders’ efforts to reduce the supply of alcohol
      and drugs were not sufficiently comprehensive
      or rigorous

      Leaders’ implementation of a
      reading strategy was poorly coordinated
      and had had limited impact

      There was insufficient support for prisoners to
      develop or rebuild relationships with family or
      friends in the community
      ________________________________________________

      https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/leyhill-prison-action-plan

      The curriculum did not meet
      the needs of prisoners
      sufficiently well.

      Too many prisoners failed to
      obtain employment on release.

      Support for disabled prisoners
      was undermined by poor arrangements
      to summon help in an emergency,

      Support provided to prisoners
      on their first night was weak

      The GP provider had
      insufficient governance,
      monitoring and oversight of
      staff.

      Patients’ resuscitation
      directions were not always
      correctly documented

      Prisoners were not prepared
      sufficiently for life in modern
      Britain on release.

      Too many prisoners faced
      delays in accessing release on
      temporary licence, often due to
      delayed contributions from the
      community probation teams.

      Prisoners were frustrated by a
      lack of communication from
      the offender management unit.

      Delete
  6. They clearly don’t want a collective voice shouting out the dissent being Broadcast to the minions.
    They will of course want to tell everybody that they believe in free speech and that they are prepared to listen to alternative dialogues.
    A bit like Donald Trump, saying it doesn’t make it so.

    ReplyDelete
  7. How come with every pilot they have ever done, feedback from officers and offenders is always 'very positive', do they have a small hostage group they inflict these pilots on who are trained to only give positive feedback, or does our glorious leader Kim Edwards dress up and cos play as an underpaid Probation Officer for kicks and writes all the feedback herself....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I personally don’t believe the feedback is from ‘real’ officers and offenders. Probably have an undergraduate Creative Writing student they are paying pittance to, to produce some creative writing on what they think will be seen as credible realistic feedback on the pilots. Think of it. If they were real, they would be visibly paraded around at every opportunity to sprout the bull dust and propaganda.
      Mind you, now I think of it, perhaps it is a gaggle of some naive and intimidated newly qualified POs’ whom they have promised the next SPO vacancy to in return for some ace feedback 🤔.

      Delete
  8. Those jobs are project management jobs . They don't need a particular label. Having undertaken a range of roles in service myself quite often restructure required a systematic approach to cutting reorganising and re dedicating resources to need . In other words staffing.
    You all know the old language start and cease dates . A formula for this or a consultation for that.
    In any case the machine above needs fresh faces to do these roles at a time when they have no roots or knowledge of the people it all impacts upon. Again staffing or colloquially resources.
    As for petty France they did worry about onward reputational damage but the new brood are much less bothered than old ties to looking considered and reflection has certainly been replaced. In my knowledge access to blog has not been a problem as most staff use their phones. It won't stop readership .

    ReplyDelete
  9. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m00333b9

    "Senior civil servant Richard Jackson was used to dealing with top-secret government information. It was a responsibility he took extremely seriously. In his office, everything was locked away with complicated combination locks, with briefcases of information physically chained to officials' wrists when travelling between buildings. But on his way into the Cabinet Office one day, panic struck. Richard realised he had made a catastrophic mistake: he had left a secret file on the train.

    Richard tells Dr Sian Williams about the horror of being thrust into the public eye, the feelings of shame that followed, and how he used the experience to help others. "

    ok, so? Well, the 'so' for me is that here's a senior civil servant who royally fucked up - yep, we all fuck up at times - and who was supported by (partner & family aside) the network of contacts he had made.

    He says he has used his experience to 'help others' who experience stress, trauma & make mistakes... but those 'others' are the members of the elite club that make it to senior civil service status. I didn't glean any sense that he now has any understanding of the mistakes that others in different tiers of society/employment make.

    His evident fear of reprisals & resignation to his anticipated fate shows the levels of terror that exist in Whitehall.

    For him, though, everyone was "kind" (line manager, senior military personnel, chair of joint intelligence committee) so clearly he didn't have to face the bitter polemic of, for example, a raging bully of a boss, an angry magistrate or an irritable overworked probation person.

    I wish Mr Jackson no ill, nor do I wish to minimise his experience but... (there's always a 'but' isn't there?) ... his experience could readily be translated into the foolish, spontaneous or erroneous behaviours of the plebian classes, those that didn't make OxBridge or were otherwise fast-tracked into the SCS (senior civil service).

    His experience could be utilised as a means of showing kindness, some understanding of others' poor choices, others' moments of madness, others' spontaneous failings.

    Yet the behaviour of a persistently belligerent hmpps towards prisons & probation staff - or the end-user population - indicates there is no space or scope for such lily-livered understanding within the (allegedly) 'civil' service

    Jackson remains employed by HMG in a pivotal role - which is fine as he seems to be a decent human being who made a mistake - but the SCS regularly & openly shows nowt but contempt for those who loiter in the lower echelons of government.

    The closing down of access to this blog is but one petty example of hmpps putting their hands over their ears & shouting "la-la-la-la-la" while they kick shit out of whoever gets in their way.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Perhaps the most revealing thing about these job adverts is how much money, organisational energy and management capacity we appear able to devote to changing probation, while seemingly struggling to provide the resources needed to deliver probation.

    Project delivery excellence, process optimisation, transformation, change management, governance arrangements… an impressive collection of terminology, but where is the evidence that any of this is making life better for the people delivering the service or those being supervised?

    And now we have Fred.

    I’m sure a chatbot capable of explaining appointment times and licence conditions has its uses. But when did we become so convinced that every problem in probation requires a technological solution?

    People don’t simply need information. They need relationships, consistency, skilled intervention and PPs who have sufficient time to understand what’s happening in their lives.

    We already know what prevents much of that from happening. Excessive workloads, duplication, administrative demands, insufficient professional development and a gradual erosion of professional discretion.

    Yet instead of addressing those fundamentals, we seem determined to build increasingly elaborate systems around them.

    And here’s what I find particularly extraordinary. We can apparently find substantial salaries for people to manage, oversee, coordinate and evaluate change, but when frontline PPs ask for better pay, manageable workloads and sufficient time to exercise their professional judgement, the conversation invariably returns to efficiency and productivity.

    Perhaps the problem isn’t that PPs need to become more productive. Perhaps it’s that we’ve created an organisation which consumes an extraordinary amount of its own resources managing the process of managing probation.

    I’d genuinely like to know how many of these transformation programmes have demonstrably reduced the demands on frontline staff, improved the quality of supervision or strengthened public protection.

    Because if we cannot answer those questions, what exactly are we transforming?

    Probation doesn’t need another impressive description of how change will be delivered. It needs people making decisions who understand what the job actually involves.

    And perhaps the most radical transformation of all would be to stop redesigning probation long enough to listen to the people who are trying to deliver it.

    We don’t need to be better at managing change. We need to be better at enabling probation.

    ReplyDelete