Wednesday, 3 September 2025

I Despair

Listening to Radio 4 last night, I became aware of yet another story I'd missed, namely that concerning the Safer Living Foundation based in Nottingham:-
File on Four Sex Offenders: The Long Way Back

Alison Holt, BBC social affairs editor, has been given exceptional access to the clients of a Nottingham charity that works to reintegrate men who have been convicted of sexual offences. 
'John, Matt, Dan and Liam', not their real names, are determined to turn their lives around after prison sentences. We hear how they work towards this with the help of the staff and volunteers at the Safer Living Foundation, the only charity of its sort in the country. Always mindful of the victims of sexual crime, the principal aim is to prevent further offending and the creation of further harm.
There are hurdles to overcome - public abhorrence, plus grave difficulties with accommodation and work among them. The Foundation also runs Aurora, an online advice scheme for people who have not offended but who are worried about their sexual thoughts.
This would be a 'good news' story of course, were it not for the fact it's now closed! As we continue to hear news of yet more punitive policies towards offenders - tag everyone leaving prison -  why on earth can't we find the wherewithal to fund enlightened projects like this? It makes me despair at the utterly misguided direction of travel our politicians are taking us on. Those with long memories will no doubt recall the disgraceful decision to remove funding for Circles of Support and Accountability in 2018. 

This posted on Linkedin:-  

It’s with great sadness that after more than 11 years the Safer Living Foundation, an organisation that I helped co-found, has today closed. The SLF was an award-winning organisation that existed to reduce sexual offending and re-offending through preventative and rehabilitative initiatives. 

It’s been an incredibly difficult decision to make for all involved, especially because of its impact on our service-users. It’s difficult to put into words what the SLF means to those involved with it and it’s very hard to say goodbye. At the end of March our centre in Nottingham closed, but our last day was one of celebration, hope (tears), tea and reflection on all the things we have done together in over a decade in existence.
  • First organisation (certainly in Europe) to run Prison Circles of Support and Accountability. 
  • First community reintegration and rehabilitation centre for people with sexual convictions (world-wide) 
  • First compassion-focused prevention intervention 
  • Third Sector Charity of the year 2019, 
  • We worked with well over 300 individuals with sexual convictions or individuals that were concerned they may offend during. 
  • Robust evidence to show that our service-users developed and strengthened meaningful protective factors, reduced risk and we had a 5 year recidivism rate of <2%
  • Over 6000 volunteer hours committed to projects 
We’ve worked with many great individuals, and have been supported by many funders and partner organisations, including Nottingham Trent University who have supported us since our first day, Notts PCC, Notts Police and Probation, Lloyds Bank Foundation, and University of Derby. We’ve had amazing staff and volunteers that have worked for us throughout the years, but a massive thanks to our centre manager Dave who was with us 9 years and he made the centre the success that it is/was. It’s been an absolute pleasure working with our men and working with the other trustees Lynn Saunders OBE Dr. Kerensa Hocken Kirsty Teague Claire Hampson Luke Vinter Professor (Hon). Dr. Geraldine AkermanLuke Vinter and Jordan Clayton all of whom are wonderful, compassionate and dedicated individuals. Our Chair of Trustees, Lynn, has been the moral compass of the SLF, and you have steered us through the beginning and the end. It’s been an honour to be part of the SLF with you all. 

There has been highs and lows, but what we achieved and built is something we all should be proud of and I’m grateful to have been a part of it. We gave it our all and we had an amazing run, but sadly all good things...

Nicholas Blagden
Prof. Criminological Psychology, Trustee/Co-Founder Safer Living Foundation, Member (accredited) National Register of Psychotherapists and Counsellors

--oo00oo--

Postscript
Thanks go to the reader for directing us to the following:-

A scheme helped prevent sex offenders committing more crimes - then it closed. Why?

It took me some time to find the front door of the Safer Living Foundation. There was no nameplate, and the building was one of many anonymous red-brick Victorian terraced houses in Nottingham. It was January 2025, and I was wrapped up against the cold as I walked up and down the street trying to find the right address.

There was a very good reason for this anonymity. The foundation works with people convicted and imprisoned for sexual offences after they have been released back into the community. The men may have been found guilty of anything from indecent exposure to viewing abusive images online to contact offences involving children.

And people who have committed sex crimes can be among the most reviled in society. At times they are the subject of vigilante action.

In May 2025, the government announced it was considering the roll-out of voluntary chemical castration for sex offenders and also looking at whether this could be made mandatory.

But while this sort of tough rhetoric grabs headlines, the Safer Living Foundation claims the work it does providing a safe space for people with sexual convictions to find support with reintegrating into society has had positive results.

And there is evidence to suggest they may be correct. Just 2% of the men who spent time at the foundation reoffended, according to its own figures. That compares to an average of 15.1% for those convicted of sexual crimes in England and Wales. The Foundation says it only takes people who say they are committed to change.

I was there to see for myself how the centre in Nottingham - the only project of its kind in the UK - operated. Over five months the BBC was given a unique insight into its work.

What none of us knew that cold winter morning was that these would prove to be its final months. In May 2025, the centre was forced to close. Persuading organisations to fund sex offender treatment had never been easy and in the tough financial climate, it had become impossible to secure the money they needed to keep going.

It's an outcome that casts light on the UK's attitude towards preventing those guilty of sex crimes from reoffending. It forces us to confront difficult questions, including whether spending public or charity money on attempting to rehabilitate sex offenders should be recognised as an effective way of preventing harm and in doing so protecting potential victims.

'I'll do whatever works'

When I eventually found the right door, it was opened by Dave Potter. He had run the service since it was set up 11 years ago.

Here, he told me, offenders meet people who have insight into their experience of having been convicted for sex crimes - both others who have been found guilty of these offences as well as counsellors - "because who else can you talk to?".

Inside, in a busy kitchen, lunch was being prepared. A handful of men of all ages, sitting and standing, quietly chatted about the day's news, football and food. In another room, a games club was taking place and elsewhere, counselling sessions were under way.

Often their partners and families wanted nothing more to do with them after their convictions, according to Dave.

Dave accepted that there would be those who wondered how he could bring himself to offer support to sex offenders. But he believed the bigger picture is what's important. "Everything we do underpins (the idea of) no more victims," he said. "I'll do whatever works to prevent further offending."

Certainly, the official statistics around sexual offending suggest that much more needs to be done to bring the numbers down. On average the police record more than 194,000 sexual offences each year in England and Wales. Of these, 40% are against children.

One child in every 10 experiences some form of sexual abuse before the age of 16 in England and Wales, according to "conservative estimates" by the Centre of Expertise on Child Sexual Abuse. Many victims, both adults and children, will never feel able to speak about what has happened.

The harm caused by these offences cannot be underestimated, and that was acknowledged in most of the conversations I had at the centre with offenders, staff and volunteers alike. At the time I visited about 60 men were enrolled as service users, but over the last decade hundreds of men and two women have been supported by staff here.

'The life I knew has completely ended'

The service users I spoke to wanted to remain anonymous. They described feeling lonely and even suicidal, and said they realised what they had done was wrong. They said they recognised the impact it had on their victims. They also talked about how the centre had helped them.

"I was petrified about leaving prison with a stigma attached," said Matt (the names of all ex-offenders have been changed). As a result of his conviction, he had lost his family, his job and everything he knew before. "The life I knew has completely ended." Without the centre he would be struggling even more, he said.

Another man, Liam, described being assaulted after he was released from prison.

"One of my neighbours found out who I was and then one night decided to come round and attack me," he said. "Physical violence, swearing at me and basically, telling everybody around there what I was," he said. He had to move.

Finding work can be a major challenge for the men, too. Some 95% of the service users here were on the Sex Offenders Register and were required to tell potential employers this. In my conversations with them, the same words came up time and again – anxiety, low self-esteem, fear and, in particular, isolation.

While to some these risk factors could sound like an excuse for what they have done, the centre's approach is based on the idea that addressing these issues will make these men less likely to offend. And so it tries to help them rebuild their lives in a way that protects them and others.

"By treating people with decency, by looking at the whole person and not just the crime, by finding ways to manage their social isolation, their shame and their guilt, that reduces further offending down the line," Dave said.

He accepted that some might think that what the centre was doing was naïve. Before he did his job, he says, he might have agreed with the suggestion that sex offenders simply need to be punished. But now, he said, "I know what we do works. It is about understanding the harm that acting on those impulses causes. It is about understanding what they've put victims through."

Distractions from inappropriate thoughts

There is group therapy as well as weekly one-to-one counselling sessions. In one of the discussions with Dave, a man called John, who has been jailed twice for his offending, talked about how he now distracted himself if he began to have any fleeting, inappropriate sexual thoughts. He played football video games and generally kept busy.

He also described how difficult the last few months have been. A homeless man, who John had offered to help, moved into his flat and became increasingly manipulative and violent. Eventually, he threatened to tell others about John's conviction.

With support from the Foundation, John called the police and the man was removed.

"If an alcoholic has no help and support, its unlikely they'll give up booze," said Dave. He believes it can be the same with sex offenders, so the centre provided controlled support that helps them cope, even under stress.

There is support for this approach, too, among groups that work with victims.

"This project further underpins the fact that we can't make a dent in the alarming figures of a quarter of the population experiencing sexual violence by simply pledging to change things," says Lucy Duckworth, policy lead at The Survivors Trust. "We need action and funding and to have difficult conversations with those who commit this crime, to enable us to intervene earlier."

A failing in the system

The main place where sex offenders currently get treatment is in prison – but even there it is limited. In the year ending March 2024, there were about 87,000 people in prison in England and Wales. More than 18,000 (21%) had been convicted of sex offences. Some 1,115 prisoners did start accredited treatment in prison and 1,094 people completed those courses.

The length of time the courses take means they may not be an option for offenders in jail for a short period. Matt, who had earlier told me how worried he had been about leaving prison, took two 30-hour programmes while an inmate at HMP Whatton in Nottinghamshire, which is, according to the Howard League for Penal Reform, the largest prison for adult sex offenders in Europe. Matt said these were hugely useful to him.

"You ripped yourself right open," he said. "Laid everything on the table. Looked at how and why you got there, and how are you going to rebuild yourself? How are you going to make sure it doesn't happen again?"

But once inmates are released, accessing this kind of treatment becomes even more difficult, experts say. "That's a failing of where we're at in the system," says Nick Blagden, professor of criminological psychology at the University of Derby and a co-founder and trustee of the Safer Living Foundation.

An alternative solution is to reach people before they end up in the criminal justice system - before they harm someone. There are UK projects that do good work offering services in the community, says Prof Blagden. But given the scale of the problem, the level of support is nowhere near as "wide-ranging" as is needed, he adds. He contrasts this with Germany, where he says there is a "much more sensible" approach to funding prevention projects that provide therapy to adults who feel they might commit sexual offences.

In addition to the Nottingham centre, the foundation also ran a programme called Aurora, which provided highly confidential support, online and in person, for people with concerning sexual thoughts, before they did something that put them in contact with the criminal justice system. It had 300 people on a 12-month waiting list.

"If we had unlimited funds and resources, we would be working with hundreds of people a month," says Prof Blagden.

'We've helped a lot of lives'

Getting all this right could not be more important. The National Crime Agency estimated in 2024 that between 710,000 and 840,000 UK adults posed varying degrees of sexual risks to children.

The questions for society are: as well as making it easier for victims of abuse to be heard and believed, are we ready to challenge the behaviour, thoughts and actions of those who have offended and are at risk of offending much sooner? And are we prepared to spend money on doing so?

For its part, the Ministry of Justice says: "We are determined to halve violence against women and girls in a decade and tackling sexual offenders' criminality is a vital part of this plan."

Ministers also point to their plan for a national roll-out of "medication to manage problematic sexual arousal in sex offenders", often known as chemical castration, which is delivered through drugs alongside psychiatric work, and say they are considering whether to make it mandatory. The department also says it recently announced a record £700m increase in overall probation funding by 2028.

For decades, the mantras of many politicians have focused on being tough on crime. The use and length of prison sentences have increased as a result. However, the current overcrowding in prisons is forcing a rethink.

In May 2025, an independent review of sentencing was published. It concluded that while punishment is important, there "has been insufficient focus on reducing crime". It called for more community-based sentences and support and more use of the third sector charities and organisations.

The government has since accepted most of the recommendations across all crimes. The Safer Living Foundation, with the guardrails it provided to support sex offenders in the community, seemed to be tailor-made for this strategy. But the same month the review was published, the Foundation learned that its application for a lottery grant - which it needed to keep running - had been turned down.

'Fairly hand-to-mouth'

"It has been fairly hand-to-mouth over the years we've been operating," says Lynn Saunders, another of the co-founders of the Safer Living Foundations as well as a former governor at Whatton and now professor of applied criminology at Derby University. "There seems to be a big reluctance because of the nature of the work, people find it difficult to be associated with it."

In May, the centre closed, while the Aurora Project was paused. On the final day, staff, volunteers and some of the men they have supported, packed into the small kitchen to say goodbye.

"I've decided to celebrate the fact we existed at all," said Dave. "We've helped a lot of lives and prevented a lot of victims."

A few hours later, when that anonymous front door was shut and locked, it marked the end of the project. There is no replacement and no prospect of re-opening.

Alison Holt
Social Affairs Editor

36 comments:

  1. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgqnqzkg83jo

    link to Alison Holt's report on Squealer website

    ReplyDelete
  2. As stated elsewhere on this blog, why 'kill the goose that lays the golden eggs', i.e. why allow something to continue that will jeopardise future opportunities to make profits?

    All the 'protect the public' & victim-centred rhetoric is intentional misdirection, a falsehood. A post by Anonymous 2 September 2025 at 22:17 is helpful in this respect:

    * “Tougher sentences that better punish offenders and stop them reoffending.” That is a supposition that stands no scrutiny.

    After all of the tough on this, that & the other high-octane muscle-speak, reoffending rates have hardly shifted in decades. Some inquisitive soul attempted to make enquiries via a FoI:

    "FOI reference: FOI-2025-2707
    You asked

    I would like information on criminal reoffending rates, covering the time period 1990 to 2008.

    I can find information from 2008 onwards on the Ministry of Justice Statistics Pages, but information prior to 2008 appears to be difficult to locate.

    We said

    Thank you for your request.

    Unfortunately, we do not hold the specific data you require."

    The energy employed to keep information unavailable is astonishing in our alleged open democracy.

    Strangely, this is available from MoJ dated 2010:

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7a325340f0b66a2fc0097e/compendium-of-reoffending-statistics-and-analysis.pdf

    So someone at ONS is either too lazy or lying through their fucking teeth.

    Cutting through the nuance & semantics of the typology of further offending. the rates of 'reoffending' have been stubbornly located in the 30%/40% range ever since the political choreography of NPS, the imposition of noms, trusts, tr, hmpps, etc etc. This regardless of the £billions thrown at incarceration & "better punishment". Even now the rate of reoffending is hovering around 30%

    https://data.justice.gov.uk/justice-in-numbers/jin-reduce-reoffending

    and (also 2023) the highest per-capita incarceration rate in Western Europe goes to 159 people per 100,000 in England and Wales.

    So it is no surprise that the crime & punishment industry looks after its own using lies, misdirections & false data to protect their economies; just like the cigarette industry, the asbestos industry, the pharma industry, the arms industry, etc.

    The sad truth is that millions of lives will have been ruined or lost because of this lack of humanity; this focus on greed & power over real, honest concern for the care & protection of people - both victims & perpetrators of crime.

    Yet another scandal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A very talented union activist during the critical changes was offered inducement to go peacefully . A wheelbarrow or two rocked up and that person felt it was their time. The industry has so much cash for some things ..

      Delete
    2. I could guess that person but surely more than a few went that way.

      Delete
  3. Some exchanges on Twitter:-

    "NEW Everyone leaving jail can expect to be tagged, under
    @MoJGovUK reforms to cut prison population by freeing inmates a-third of the way through their sentence. Up to 22,000 more offenders will be tagged each year - with some tagged before they leave jail, under a pilot scheme."

    "And just who is going to monitor these people, who served only a third of their sentence which was probably reduced by a third anyway? And if they fail to comply? The hole is still in the bucket, just bigger."

    "The Probation Service, as ever. Sadly underfunded and understaffed. Recall if non-compliant."

    "In a couple of roles I worked with excellent Probation Officers and ex-offenders, with some success. The Probation Service was destroyed by the last Govt. The impact of reduction of support services had big impact on ex-offenders….and a knock-on on recidivist offending later…."

    "IMHO the partial privatisation, now reversed, was a huge disaster. I worked through that, but it ultimately led to my disillusionment with the service, and taking retirement (not enhanced) very early. From contact with ex-colleagues, I know it’s still struggling."

    "I heard the same from many of your ex-colleagues at different levels. It’s struggling and will continue to do so, partly because like Policing, it keeps getting loaded with more and more responsibility and no more resources/people to undertake the tasks….Probation for profit???"

    "Correct. “Let’s start releasing prisoners at 40% instead of 50% of sentence.” No extra resources for the service suddenly having to deal with a massive influx of unplanned licence cases."

    ReplyDelete
  4. https://insidetime.org/newsround/were-losing-the-human-touch/

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We’re losing the human touch

      I’m deeply troubled by this new direction of travel in our justice system. It’s clear that Artificial Intelligence has incredible potential to improve our lives – but it isn’t the answer to complex and deep-rooted problems. Replacing the skill, experience and judgment of people working in the system with unaccountable computers is an extremely worrying turn.

      The ‘AI Violence Predictor’ has several problems. Setting aside the deeply-unsettling name, the risks of inbuilt bias and lack of accountability are real. It uses historic data such as age and past incidents in custody to decide who is ‘high risk’. But how accurate is the data that’s being used? If I feed discrimination into an algorithm, I’m going to get discrimination out. And a flawed risk score could mean more days in custody. If I wanted to challenge a faceless, AI-led decision, who would I go to? Another faceless, unaccountable computer?

      Restriction Zones take a similarly distanced approach. A cold algorithm determines where you can go rather than where you can’t. It might sound simple, but what if you need to travel to work, attend college, visit your family, or meet a support group? Rehabilitation will be harder, and the risk of breach (and recall) will become much greater.

      This ‘Computer says No’ justice system strips away the human touch. I know the value of a conversation with a probation officer. That’s someone who will understand my circumstances, who I am and the challenges I face. It’s that understanding that can make all the difference to my rehabilitation.

      Ministers know prisons are bursting at the seams and probation services are under immense pressure. They must also know that recalls triggered by tech breaches, questionable risk scores and data bias will make matters worse. When our aim should be to reduce recall, these measures could be driving churn through already overcrowded prisons.

      I really do believe technology can help make communities safer…but only if it supports (rather than replaces) compassionate and complex human relationships. We need greater transparency in the system, accountability and lived-experience input. Without these, I’m worried that we could hard-code injustices into the system for good. I really want a justice system that works. One that is forward thinking, compassionate and human led – not just a faceless, cold computer.

      Paula Harriott

      Delete
    2. Gpt chat ai online information builder. It is going to take over the research tool is fast though and far reaching backwards. It is going to write everything for us very soon.

      Delete
    3. Just wondering, do people view probation as a white collar or a blue collar occupation in today's world?

      'Getafix

      Delete
    4. just a collar with a chain attached

      Delete
    5. Hard to say CP is blue pso must be white as po now but it's all a bit grey now we don't deliver any professional fee type services. We are collard desk jockeys .

      Delete
    6. Strange question, it's always been a white collar job. The question I'd ask is are we really Proffesionals in any sense or now just community prison officers

      Delete
    7. I'd view probation as brown collar. We get crapped on left, right and centre with additional work for nothing extra.

      Delete
  5. From Bluesky:-

    "I share your despair. It is almost as though there is a determination to prove all the evidence about effectiveness wrong with recent policy announcements."

    ReplyDelete
  6. There's a dogged determination to prove whatever the wealthy & powerful want to prove is right or wrong.

    the torygraph howled with rage at the suspicion that rayner *the housing minister* paid less tax on a property deal than they thought she should have. Were they privy to the deal? Who leaked the complexities of court-protected trust? "Sack her! Jail her!" Rayner has (as far as I'm aware) done all she can to explain the error. The parliamentary gestapo have yet to determine if her error was an error; or a wilful attempt to avoid paying £40,000 on a £800,000 flat.

    But barely a murmur about jenrick, the *shadow justice secretary*, brazenly committing what in any other circumstance would be an obvious contempt of court via social media. Even the prosecutor said “the post is problematic because it delivers as apparent fact what the prosecution relies upon”. But the kindly judge said jenrick's post was "ill thought through" and urged him to "exercise caution".

    It seems there was no finding by the court that Jenrick was in contempt - and no-one is baying for his blood, exposing his private life or demanding his resignation/sacking.

    Seems despite his privileged education, jenrick can break any number of laws &/or moral codes & be excused by his tory chums; but a working class lass has to be bar-b-qued in public for following the advice of a wealthy solicitor.

    "Jenrick was privately educated at Wolverhampton Grammar School before reading history at St John's College, Cambridge, graduating in 2003 with a First Class Bachelor of Arts degree. He obtained a Thouron Award to study political science at the University of Pennsylvania from 2003 to 2004. He subsequently studied law, gaining a Graduate Diploma in Law from The College of Law in 2005 and completing a legal practice course at BPP Law School in 2006."

    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/attorney-general-launches-new-campaign-to-combat-contempt-of-court-online

    “A mis-judged tweet or post could have grave repercussions and interfere with a trial. A post on social media could mean a trial is delayed or at worst stopped because a fair trial isn’t possible – so I would caution everyone, don’t get in the way of justice being done." - Attorney General, Rt Hon Michael Ellis QC MP

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60d4a74f8fa8f50ab4035c78/Contempt_of_court_and_social_media_case_studies.pdf

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. addendum - rayner's response to the torygraph allegations was:

      1. to seek specialist legal advice then, when told she *did* actually owe the extra tax
      2. approach the courts & request that the confidentiality clause regarding the trust set up to manage her son's needs linked to his severe disability could be breached so that
      4. she could then explain how the error came about.

      Several sensitive aspects of her own & others' private lives have been unnecessarily exposed as a result.

      jenrick - with his fancy education & legal expertise, a man who painted over children's murals to make them feel unwelcome, who helped bend the rules to save his friend a huge tax bill - has gone 'no comment' & no-one seems to give a fuck.

      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/robert-jenrick-richard-desmond-housing-tory-donor-westferry-a9631876.html

      Delete
    2. Despite jenrick's best efforts to derail justice via social media, I hear on the wireless this morning that Squealer's broadcasting corporation are platforming jenrick's vile anti-immigration rhetoric (as published in the spectator). In conjunction with the extensive airtime gifted to poundland trump [aka farage] & the relentless pursuit of rayner, its clear that Squealer is strengthening its push of a right leaning agenda.

      There's more than enough scandal & despair surrounding health, probation, prisons, care of the elderly & sick, cost of living, corporate greed, shit in the water... but platforming racists, bigots and protecting the powerful & wealthy seems to take priority.

      There are outliers & exceptions in a handful of outstanding journos, but Squealer's agenda is increasingly explicit in its support for jenrick, farage & their ilk.

      Delete
    3. Anon 07:51 The subject of the BBC is close to my heart and over the last 18 months I've been reading several books/histories. What's 100% clear is right from birth, there's been a constant battle between politicians of left and right and the BBC - this battle is now at a defining moment with the BBC facing not one but several existential threats. All who care about its future have to be engaged and I'm sure it's a subject that just might crop up on here from time to time.

      Delete
    4. The problem here is that Rayner has opened the door on this scandal. It is irrelevant what the others get away with. The chunk in the armour of labour has been exposed and it matters not a jot this blog won't publish labour critique the fact is she will have to go at some point over this. They won't leave her alone it's now an open wound to starmer and will brief against her when it's time. Anyone doing a comparison it won't help Rayner now as she behaves like an offender justifying blaming displacing responsibility. She looks foolish at best incompetent at worst it is a shame for her but she did this error and had plenty of money in the sophisticated trust fund cash out for a flat in Brighton. See it for what it is not the niceties they want you to swallow she just got caught.

      Delete
    5. I agree this is a defining moment in history - in so many ways, not just for the bbc. Alison Holt's piece at the head of this blog post illustrates the top notch quality of reporting that is available, its just a pity the corporation is currently headed by those massively sympathetic to - and prepared to platform - the damaging & dangerous policies of the right.

      Delete
    6. Anon 13:17 You really do try my patience and I don't take kindly to being told what I may or may not do.

      Delete

    7. Justice
      Volume 768: debated on Tuesday 3 June 2025

      Robert Jenrick
      (Newark) (Con)

      "Brave prison officers are under attack, and I am warning again that, if the Government do not act now, an officer will be killed on the Justice Secretary’s watch. After the Southport killer, Axel Rudakubana, allegedly attacked an office with boiling water, he is now bingeing on treats such as Maltesers and Pringles. When will the Justice Secretary strip Rudakubana and monsters like him of those privileges and put them in solitary confinement? When will she finally have the backs of all our brave prison officers, by giving each and every one the protection that they need in the form of high-collar, stab-proof vests, and not just a privileged few in the most limited circumstances?"

      Really? His greatest concern is that someone is "bingeing on treats such as Maltesers and Pringles"? Where was his outrage over the incident in Preston Probation?

      Delete
    8. Just a quick one about the beeb again, if I may. Earlier this week they gave some airtime to the Greens & Polanski - who was elected leader with 80+% of the members' vote - most of which was spent aligning him with Corbyn & belittling his ideas (especially montagu on wato).

      Today on today robinson is engaged in 'serious' & lengthy discussion with tice about his thoughts about the economy, of tice being chancellor-in-waiting to farage's future role as pm.

      "Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has proposed sending some prisoners overseas to serve their sentences, as part of a raft of measures he says would create around 30,000 prison places and cost £17.4bn."

      The nation is being groomed. By the beeb.

      Delete
  7. Don't despair.

    hmip: "The East Midlands region will be disappointed to be rated as ‘Inadequate’ overall." Score: 4/24.

    But its not like there's anything serious or fundamental to address in the East Midlands; its not as if the basics of the job aren't being addressed.

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68b6e8b3d723ba6f74dba8e7/East_Midlands_Region_Probation_Service_action_plan_-_August_2025.pdf

    ... just a few tweaks here & there... all they have to do is:

    Improve the quality of court
    reports to inform sentencing,
    ensuring domestic abuse and
    safeguarding information is
    used effectively

    Work with sentencers to ensure
    advice from probation court
    staff is obtained pre-sentence

    Ensure that all MAPPA Level 1
    cases have sufficient
    management oversight and that
    there is an appropriate focus on
    information exchange with
    other agencies to inform risk
    assessment and review

    Improve the quality of work to
    assess, plan for, manage and
    review risk of harm

    Ensure that learning delivered
    by the region is embedded by
    managers and practitioners

    Ensure robust quality
    assurance of sentence
    management is in place, with
    appropriate manager workloads
    to deliver this effectively

    Review referral rates and use of
    CRS to ensure that they are
    meeting the needs of people on
    probation

    Ensure that sufficient resources
    are allocated to the region to
    enable effective and timely
    serious further offence reviews

    Ensure that senior probation
    officers have sufficient capacity
    and resource to undertake
    effective management oversight
    of casework

    Evaluate the effectiveness of
    training material delivered to
    practitioners in relation to
    keeping people safe and
    provide reporting mechanisms
    for regions to identify concerns
    about deficits in practitioner
    skills and knowledge... whoa!! hang on there jonesy...

    "This recommendation is partly agreed because evaluation is already a key aspect of central probation learning design and there are reporting mechanisms in place for regions to identify concerns, provide feedback and commission new learning through the single commissioning route."

    Furthermore, brace yourselves:

    "A new product designed for existing practitioners to enhance their risk assessment and management skills (Risk of Serious Harm: Developing and Enhancing Practice) was launched in April 2025 and will be evaluated in Spring 2026 to assess its impact on practitioner skills."

    See, all neatly sorted. Carry on, folks. Nothing to see here...

    ReplyDelete
  8. https://www.unison.org.uk/news/2025/09/sentencing-reform-must-not-overburden-probation-says-unison/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sentencing reform must not overburden probation staff, says UNISON

      Staff will need a significant share of new investment

      Commenting on the publication of the government’s Sentencing Bill, including “intensive supervision” requirements for probation officers and a major expansion in offender tagging, UNISON general secretary Christina McAnea said today (Wednesday):

      “More community sentencing and a bigger focus on rehabilitation are important. But this will increase the burden on probation workers, who’ll need to make more decisions about who to tag and be responsible for more offenders.

      “The probation system is already at breaking point. The recruitment crisis is being made worse by persistently poor wages and the service is around 10,000 staff short.

      “Ministers can’t squeeze any more out of a workforce still reeling from years of cuts and mismanagement by the previous government.

      “New probation recruits must be employed and trained swiftly to relieve pressure on existing staff. Yet it’s unclear how much of the promised £700m investment for this overhaul will go directly to probation.

      “These reforms suggest ministers are confident probation staff will be able to take on more, but they need to be paid fairly for doing this vital work.”

      Delete
    2. And here's the sentencing review in action:

      https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-prison-houseblocks-to-make-streets-safer

      " Two new houseblocks to be built at HMP Channings Wood by end of 2027
      Jail’s capacity boosted by 40 per cent to lock up dangerous criminals.
      Latest step in Government’s plans to build 14,000 prison places nationwide, as part of the Plan for Change."

      The economic miracle that is incarceration, the gift that keeps on giving:

      * Rebecca Boundy, Managing Director (Justice) at Kier Construction, said: "After recently completing HMP Millsike and starting work on expansion projects at HMP Northumberland and HMP Lancaster Farms, our specialist teams are delivering high-quality, state-of-the-art prison accommodation and facilities that are fit for the future.”

      And...

      "The build will also create hundreds of jobs in the South West, with an additional 200 permanent jobs expected at the prison once the houseblock is complete."

      Why give more to probation when the future is in high-quality, state-of-the-art real estate?

      Delete
  9. '.....the Independent Sentencing Review, the Bill will make changes to legislation to replace the RAR with a new simplified Probation Requirement. This measure will mean probation practitioners will be afforded greater flexibility to decide the volume and intensity of rehabilitation activity that an individual sentenced to a ‘Probation Requirement’ should complete'

    Whats the betting they won't actually let us Officers make any decisions around volume or intensity as stated, mangers just hate giving up the ability to control and measure us.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 'Offenders released from prison will enter a period of “intensive supervision” tailored to their risk and the type of crime they committed. Probation officers will maintain discretion to tag offenders based on their risk to the public and their victim. Those subject to Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements will remain in this “intensive supervision” stage for the duration of their sentence. Others will progress into a licence phase, with strict conditions on their behaviour remaining.'

    90% of my current caseloads are MAPPA, although the majority at level 1 and a fair few at MROSH. What on earth does intense mean and why for the total length, in most cases this will mean years and years!? Or will this only apply to level 2/3...? Not exactly giving them any incentives to engage if this is the future...

    ReplyDelete
  11. "Fly campers caught leaving waste behind at a beauty spot have been spared a fine but made to litter-pick for three hours."

    jenrick would probably have jailed them first then deported them to Rwanda:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd075rx1jr4o

    ReplyDelete
  12. The Probation Institutes initial response to the sentencing bill.

    https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ec3ce97a1716758c54691b7/t/68b9cfce92b3d60bab4e7942/1757007823310/The+Sentencing+Bill+2025+PI+September+2025.pdf

    'Getafix

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. On 11 July, the Minister for Prisons, Parole and Probaton, James Timpson, delivered the annual Bill
      McWilliams lecture, in association with the Institute for Criminology at the University of Cambridge, and the Probation Institute. The lecture series was inaugurated following Bill's death, with the aim of commemoratng his research and practce on the history, culture and values of probaton work, and to keep alive the values of the rehabilitative ideal.

      Members of the Probaton Institute and a wide audience of probaton staff, former chiefs, researchers and the judiciary were pleased to hear Lord Timpson reiterate the centrality of the Probaton Service in his presentaton, and did not at all disagree with the emphasis he placed on reducing reoffending, and public protection. However, there was some consternation regarding his focus on the possible and extended uses of Electronic Monitoring and AI to enable probation practice, with an apparent vision of 'custody in the community.'

      These concerns were justfied by the content and tone of the announcement of the provisions of the Sentencing Bill, made via a press release on 3 September. The Probaton Insttute applauds the principle of diminishing the use of short prison sentences, which, as the press release rightly points
      out, have a poor record of reducing reoffending, notably in comparison with community-based sentences. But we would argue that the current status of community sentences, with the provision of additional requirements to address offending behaviour, would be more than adequate, and suitable, to enable people to reform, and to achieve their rehabilitaton. We are disturbed by the proposed new powers to restrict the freedoms of people convicted of criminal offences, for
      instance, via restrictons of a Sendance at, amongst other places, 'pubs, concerts and football matches’; and the proposal that the personal details of people undertaking Unpaid Work in their local communites - originally known as Community Service - will be promulgated publicly. These proposals are at odds with any noton of rehabilitaton and reintegraton for people with criminal records - historically, core principles of Probaton work.

      Delete
    2. The publication of personal details, alongside the proposal to electronically tag anyone released from custody, appear to be measures designed to
      stigmatise and exclude those who have fallen foul of the law, not to enable their rehabilitation and reform.
      The Probation Service is identified as integral to the implementation of these new measures. Yet it is
      difficult to envisage a scenario in which effective supervision can be carried out, given the current
      strains on probation staff. Issues regarding the retention of qualified staff have dogged probation for
      over a decade, arising initially from the semi-privatisation of the service, and, more recently,
      following reunification. This issue, of a sufficiency of suitably qualified and experienced staff, has been raised frequently by the Probation Inspectorate in its reviews into Serious Further Offences, indicating that the organisational change imposed on Probation over the last decade or so has had real, and harmful consequences. Recent research conducted by the Rehabilitatng Probation team based at Liverpool John Moores University suggests that a factor in this attrition is that the role to which practitioners are recruited does not reflect the actual nature of the work; that the motivation to work in probation is, as it has always been, to enable people to make positive changes, not to provide a community based carceral environment.

      Delete
    3. The Probation Service has more than a century of working with people with criminal convictions to enable them to reform, and to reintegrate into their communities. Probation practitioners recognise
      that a key aspect of their work is putting clear and firm boundaries in place, alongside creating supportive and motivational relationships with those under their supervision. Probation does not shy away from the control aspects of the work, but does place such controls in a context of care and concern. Research by the Prison Reform Trust with people subject to probation supervision portrays the onerousness of this status. One participant, released from custody, escribed himself as 'free but not free.' Regrettably, this Bill seems to present a picture of justice which is punitive, stigmatsing and discriminatory, and which may only serve to further diminish real opportunities for effective rehabilitation.

      Any probation practitioner will be acutely aware that many of the people they are supervising have been victims of crime themselves, with consequences of trauma and diminution in opportunities to achieve, notably in education and work. These structural disadvantages seem likely to be further entrenched by the provisions of the Sentencing Bill. The Probation Institute regards this as a golden opportunity to forefront a rehabilitative narrative and agenda - in its current form, the Bill appears to be a missed opportunity.
      Trustees of the Probation Institute. September 2025

      Delete
    4. This also from the P.I website, posted as a forward to the main link.

      "We are disappointed to read the proposals for the Sentencing Bill 2025 as implementation of the Independent Sentencing Review. These measures point towards a probation service focussed on surveillance and "case tracking" rather than supervision and rehabilitation, and reflect an approach designed to appeal to perceived public appetite for harsher sentencing - which we do not see borne out when research indicates that the public is interested in reducing crime through rehabilitation.

      The proposal to publicly name individuals on unpaid work schemes is just dangerous. "

      'Getafix

      Delete
    5. Thanks again 'Getafix - am just not doing my homework clearly - but we're fortunate in that you are!

      Delete