Wednesday 4 May 2016

What's Probation Like Today?

I don't know if I'm imagining things, but there seems to be an awful lot more being written about probation and its plight just lately, including this in the Guardian yesterday by a former ACPO in London:-  

I became a probation officer again – after 30 years

Never go back, so they say, no matter how enjoyable the past. Nevertheless, for a few months last year, I decided to do just that. More than three decades after starting life at the coalface of the probation service as a raw 25-year-old in Tottenham, north London, I began work again as a probation officer for one of the 21 newly formed private community rehabilitation companies (CRCs).

Plenty had happened in the intervening decades. The last time I had a caseload was in 1986. My speedy elevation to the ranks of probation management had been driven in part by financial considerations, as well as seeking approval from my father. He had never understood why I might want to help people who had offended, but found much more to celebrate when I became, in his words, a “gaffer”. Years later, I yearned to connect again with the passion I had felt as I had driven my old minivan to work, wearing a full beard to make me look older and wiser for those children, young people and old lags I was soon to meet.

So what did I find as I sought to relearn the ropes in the wake of the government’s recent reforms of the probation service?

A slimmed down public sector National Probation Service (NPS) now undertakes all court reports and manages those assessed as posing a high or very high risk of serious harm. It also supervises registered sex offenders and those subject to multi-agency public protection arrangements. CRCs handle the rest, including those at the highest risk of reoffending (rather than posing the highest risk of serious harm), community payback (formerly community service), and most group work programmes. They must also deliver something worthwhile to many thousands of highly needy short sentence prisoners who have had little or no attention from probation until now. Both organisations now coexist in the same buildings, but now there are two plaques outside each door and separate organisations inside, creating a sense of perverse disintegration of a previously integrated whole.

A National Audit Office report last week found that the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) had successfully restructured probation without major disruption to services. However, it did find friction between staff working in the different organisations. Assessing risk of serious harm is an art rather than a science, and can quickly change, depending on what is happening in an offender’s life. The administrative demands of managing the transfer of complex cases across public/private sector organisational boundaries when risk has changed are substantial. This represents a major fault line in the new arrangements.

The split has major implications for staff and service users. All court reports must be undertaken by the NPS, including those on offenders already being supervised by the CRCs. Compare this to probation officers of the 1980s who used to do pretty much everything in relation to those they supervised. This elaborately constructed separation and specialisation creates a sense of fragmentation for staff and results in service users having to repeat their stories to many different people, which the NAO found to be a major source of dissatisfaction.

It is through having opportunities to establish and sustain constructive, purposeful relationships that we are all able to change and develop, whether an offender or not. Back in 2002, however, this had become disregarded and an obsessive emphasis placed instead on cognitive behavioural group work programmes.

On my return I saw some welcome indications that the value of relationships as the vehicle for human change had been recognised, with training in place to support practitioners’ skills in this vital area. Groups still played their part, for example in helping offenders with thinking skills or to move away from patterns of violent abuse of female partners, but the world is no longer besotted with them.

The challenge for overstretched probation staff is to find the time to provide what is so desperately needed, in the face of high caseloads (as was always the case) and major bureaucratic demands (a more recent phenomenon).

Cellular offices, secretaries and card index systems have long gone and been replaced by open-plan accommodation, administrators and a national electronic case management system. The latter is fiendishly clever in allowing users to create and access case records previously held in dusty filing cabinets. But it is staggeringly cumbersome, demanding a disproportionate amount of professional time be spent in routine desk-bound IT tasks instead of nurturing those relationships that we know make a difference. The NAO report highlights severe inefficiencies in relation to IT which confirms my impression that the problems are systemic.

Assessments of offenders, previously completed on a blank sheet of paper (occasionally brilliant but over-reliant on probations officers’ intuition) are no longer acceptable. Now a much-needed structure is provided through the offender assessment system (OASys). But this has the feel of a laborious tool for technicians, rather than an aid for professionals. It can run to 40 pages in length and it is easy to forget what has been written at the start when the end is finally reached.

On my return, I met many fine people. Some had stuck with probation through thick and thin, while others were just starting out on their careers, where training is employer, rather than university-led, and the old links with the social work training I undertook are sadly long since severed.

Despite the frustrations, I found a sense of exhilaration at suddenly having nothing between me and the person who walks through the probation service’s doors. I was reminded of how hard it is to always do the right thing under the pressure of day-to-day practice, and how in this role it is not possible to have the luxury of looking at things with hindsight, as I had so often been able to do as a manager. I was also reminded of my passion for working with troubled youth. Whereas at least half my caseload in the 1980s was made up of children, probation has long since passed this group to multi-agency youth offending teams (YOTs). So now it has an exclusively adult focus. This means that change is much harder to achieve among mostly adult men, for whom difficulties related to mental health, frequently combined with drug and alcohol misuse, employment and accommodation are both commonplace and deeply entrenched.

This led me to my next decision to remain on the frontline, but as a practitioner for a YOT where I now work where it is possible to help change the lives of tomorrow’s adults for the better.

In probation, so much has changed in the last 30 years – and yet maybe not. At the heart of the endeavour, though so much harder to spot than previously, lurks the prize of working to uncover potential which has remained hidden from view, often buried beneath unimaginable disappointment, despair and disadvantage. Today’s frontline workers, wherever they may be in the fragmented and divided world of probation, deserve our admiration and respect.


David Monk joined the probation service in north London in 1986. He became a senior manager and left the service in 2002 to head up a local Citizens Advice bureau. In 2015, he rejoined probation working on the frontline for one of the newly formed community rehabilitation companies. He now works in a youth offending team.

Such is the public's general disinterest, the article only seems to have attracted a handful of comments, including:-   

What he missed is the massive demoralisation in the Probation Service. I suppose he did get it because he decided to get out and go into youth justice.

A business operating in the interests of shareholders will presumably be expected to categorise as many difficult (but not necessarily dangerous) offenders as possible as high risk to get them off their books and as many easy (but potentially dangerous) offenders as possible into their offices.

Yep, there used to be a thing called IOM. Police, social services, mental health and probation working together to help really persistent but not dangerous people change. It was expensive and change was gradual (robbers to thieves to shoplifters to benefit fraudsters to ex offenders) The payment is based on re-offending (so OFF/ON) IOM is now dead in the water.

IOM is not totally dead and still very much supported, but sadly only internally and not by the purse string holders. The multi-agency working is still part of where I work and very much respected. A shame the breaking up of the service de-skilled so many highly proficient staff.

--oo00oo--

I confess I haven't looked at the prisoners newspaper InsideTimes for a while, but despite what it says in the recent NAO report about most service users 'not noticing any difference' this letter clearly demonstrates another view:- 

‘Probation – a national disgrace’

I came back to prison in 2014 after an 11 year break and I must admit that when I listened to the vast number of inmates telling me how they had been recalled for the tiniest infringements, I did so with a fair amount of suspicion that I wasn’t hearing the full story. But, after hearing similar stories day in and day out from literally dozens of inmates I soon realised that these guys were telling the truth. The number of men here on recall is staggering. However, even this realisation did not prepare for my own experience with Probation.

“And so, come Christmas Eve I was duly despatched onto the streets of Exeter, with my £46 discharge grant, for my first ever experience of homelessness”

I was quite rightly convicted and sentenced in 2014 with a release date of Christmas Eve 2015. From day one I told Probation that my plan on release was to go and live with my brother for a few months until I got back on my feet with my own place. My Offender Manager wasn’t enthusiastic about this because my brother has a conviction from 9 years previous but it wasn’t until 18 days before my release date that Probation decided to inform me that they considered his address unsuitable. Owing to the time of year no other housing options were available and it was decided I was less likely to reoffend whilst homeless on the streets than I was with close support and a roof over my head.

And so, come Christmas Eve I was duly despatched onto the streets of Exeter, with my £46 discharge grant, for my first ever experience of homelessness. Interestingly, during my first few days I met 2 other lads in exactly the same predicament as me.

For myself, the option of either committing crime in order to feed myself or starving on the streets in late December was not really a choice. I lasted just 2 weeks before I was recalled to prison where I am now serving that recall.

What we do not deserve is to be failed by a system that is supposedly designed to rehabilitate and help us to rebuild our lives, but so often does nothing except help to destroy us.

No civilised society should ever put making profits alongside or ahead of rehabilitating those who break its laws, yet, here we are, in the 21st century, doing just that. Having spent just one 40 minute visit with my Offender Manager since my conviction in 2014, I speak from experience when I say that a Probation Officer’s workload makes it all but impossible for them to be effective. We need to get rid of all the government-imposed targets and tick-boxes, the red tape and paper-filling exercises, the one-size-fits-all courses, but most of all we need to eradicate the potential for ANYONE to turn a profit from something as essential and life-changing as our Probation Service. Only then will it cease to be an unfit for purpose national disgrace.

--oo00oo--

On a completely different subject, given the growing need for foodbanks here in the UK, I find it somewhat surprising that our domestic media seem to have ignored this recent court decision from Italy, but is reported on this US website:- 

An Italian court just ruled that stealing food if you’re starving and homeless is not a crime


America could learn something from an Italian court’s decision that could help people who are homeless and starving avoid jail time and criminal convictions. Italy’s highest court of appeals ruled this week that stealing food is not a crime if it’s a minimal amount of food taken just to stave off extreme hunger.

The case revolved around a homeless man, Roman Ostriakov, who in 2011 was caught stealing around $4.50 worth of sausages and cheese from a supermarket in Genoa, the BBC reported. Last year, he was convicted of theft and sentenced to six months in jail, plus a $115 fine. The court of appeals decided on Monday that Ostriakov was trying to feed himself to survive, and overturned the conviction.

“The condition of the defendant and the circumstances in which the seizure of merchandise took place prove that he took possession of that small amount of food in the face of an immediate and essential need for nourishment, acting therefore in a state of necessity,” the ruling reads. “People should not be punished if, forced by need, they steal small quantities of food in order to meet the basic requirement of feeding themselves.”

In the U.S., according to the latest federal data from 2014, 48.1 million people were “food-insecure,” meaning they did not have enough to eat.

26 comments:

  1. Yes, i read this and it mirrored alot of my views and feelings after returning from 7 years out of the service/industry or whatever it is called now! I also read something yesterday about social services supporter calling for private office space for staff who do the face to face work rather than everything being discussed open plan or not at all.people become slowly accustomed to bad practice and just accept it but maybe we need to raise such issues again. Open plan ,noisy snd nosy offices are bad for staff and service users alike. They hinder 'productivity" ( private sector will like that term) being told to wear ear plugs so i can concentrate is appalling. Listening to other ' private'conversations is surely a breach of service users rights or are we now in a society that expects everything to be made public?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am a trained probation receptionist, no longer a position that is recognised, however I am still in the service working as admin which is okay I like it. It amazes me when the temp receptionist we have because to be honest it was a role that was made redundant which they now realise shouldn't have been so we have temps in place, openly discusses what notes have been put on delius to every service user that asks. The standard question is am I going to be breached as I've not come to my appointments, NO she replies it says here that you won't be. We might have been surplus to requirements but I feel we did a professional job and now like alot of probation nobody cares about confident sensitive data, it's an open house, ask what you want someone now will tell you.

      Delete
    2. sometimes I'm amazed at the ability of some probation officers to generalise from the specific and to deprecate all those who do not do their own role. Over the years I have become aware of how well trained reception staff can make a great difference to the running of an office and the service provided. 18.57 hang your head in shame

      Delete
  2. Looks like Probation has now come in line with other industries in terms of no privacy to talk, ie banks, building societies, doctors receptions, job centres, council offices, social services ect ect and the list goes on. Some of these are not all private industries.
    This is not going to stop unfortunatly we all know it!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The consultation for the first phase of E3 ends on Monday. Major changes to Victim work, Approved Premises, Courts and PSO's.
    Yet no comment anywhere :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There was plenty of comment when the blueprint consultation was going on. Nothing new to say, its still futile.

      Delete
  4. Why have working links had to take out a 10 million bank loan? I hope someone isn't planning on pocketing it and doing a runner?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Where did you hear this? Do tell!

      Delete
    2. Heard it today at bgsw crc.apparently we are all considered dimwits and are supposed to think this is normal. All agency jobs stopped and anything but essential travel stopped!

      Delete
    3. I heard £20 million... and the recruitment freeze and non-essential travel ban apply to Working Links just as much as the CRC... clearly bitten off more than they can chew!

      Delete
  5. In the last 2 years, with a high and complex caseload, I've only recalled one person. Even that was as a duty officer for an absent colleague, when a violent, aggressive young man on a long licence, not particularly cooperative went into a petrol station and set about the shop assistant, breaking their jaw,for no apparent reason! Arrested and charged on the spot! I, nor mother Theresa would have been able to avoid a recall!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am of the clear belief that the Transforming Rehabilitation Programme which has massively fragmented and privatised Probation work is detrimental. The most important matter to state is that fragmentation continues to put the public at risk but equally importantly I believe it has not provided what is needed to help support people to change and further reduce reoffending. These are not transitional issues, the cracks are evermore showing and widening.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It's well over a year since TR and due to the chaos and anxiety caused by the threat of TR, it almost felt like a relief when the split happened. This was despite railing against TR and going on strike. I thought naively that once the split happened at least we would be able to stabilise and get on with the work. No such luck as time goes on there is even more chaos, processes change weekly sometimes daily. No resources, the saddest thing is that the under 12 months custody cases are now forever trapped between probation and prison not enough time or resources to enable rehabilitation, only punitive measures that destroys the relationship.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lies. TR is offering support to a cohort of prisoners who never recievrd any help before. Through the Gate is a booming success

      Delete
    2. It is not a success where i am standing. For a start the prisons are full of drugs so some have a habit when they leave. Then catch 22 admit they cannot find housing pre release and down to po/pso. All we can do it point them to housing dept. Possibly another partnetship agency can help but limited. Result is people still released homeless. Also no hrlp to clsim benefits pre release so they come out with all that to sort out when it should be done pre release. Saying that there are some good staff doing useful assessments pre and post release at the so called hubs but overall it is not what it was cracked up to be and if you work with anyone post release you will know that.

      Delete
    3. Absolutely! Bloggers post on this site specific examples, day after day, of how TR is not working - and yet all the naysayers reply with is vague unsubstantiated generalities such as 'TTG is a boomingg success'. I think it is just mischief making designed to wind everybody up.

      Delete
    4. My experience is the same as yours 23:39 we've all reached burn out point in my office and desparaetly need some stability and time to re establish ourselves Probation had become the dumping ground for all the difficult individuals that all the other agencies discard

      Delete
    5. Police cover ups are so sad to see in my area at the moment, but is this so different from those in positions of power who are deceiving people by pushing the lie that TR is a raving success (after having had a few expected hiccups with such a transformation).

      Delete
  8. What's probation like today? We get a trip down memory lane from someone who sought a management position to please his Daddy. The probation service was not reformed, anymore than the coal mines or the steel industry was reformed or BHS is being reformed. Probation was broken up, it's public ethos was destroyed and private interests were advanced at the expense of the public good. Remember how the railways and the forensic science services were reformed – and then had to be effectively renationalised and subsidised for the benefit of the public good – like farming is to the tune of £3 billion a year

    All these changes in probation are described as though they were ordained by a higher power, were somehow inevitable, but they happened because the probation workforce was meek and ineffectual in its resistance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ministers offer contract pause' to the junior doctors to allow for further talks. This is what you get when 80% of the workforce strike. And it also explains why the probation workforce was mauled - and can only lick its wounds.

      Delete
  9. Just heard the news. Medway has been taken over from g4s by noms following the scandal exposed by panorama filming undercover. Criminal case ongoing.but remember TR Is a 'raving success'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-36210923

      G4S Medway centre: Government to take over young offenders' unit

      Delete
    2. Might be a good time for some reflection everyone? One of my favourite quotes: Without reflection, we go blindly on our way, creating more unintended consequences, and failing to achieve anything useful.

      Delete
    3. If I'm entirely honest I have come to regard public ownership of probation with as much suspicion and mistrust as I do my current private employer. It's a case of being caught between the devil and the deep blue sea. Both are misguided, ignorant and hateful towards us and our service users. Maybe we should just start again like with the original probation.

      Delete
  10. 1. Children who enter the care system are severely held back, in many cases, for rest of lives. More likely to end up in prison/ on probation/ substance misuse etc. What is being done to address this?
    2.criminalising drugs pleases polititians and general public but does nothing to reduce drug use. It feeds the drug dealers and makes situation worse. De-criminalisation is the only way forward.
    3. Trying to reduce crime/ move people away from crime using 'talking'methods and groups can only be effective when it is backed up by providing education,training, good /well paid employment and housing. Basic needs must come first.
    4. Licences with post sentence supervision are sucking resources , time and energy out of the service and are far too long! They create dependency when people should be finding support in community. Some pss but not a year and possibly flexibility over statutory or voluntary.
    5. Caseloads are creeping up, in my office it't between 50/70 for f/t staff. How much more can we take? There has never been a limit put on cases or an effective tool to determine how many cases we can realistically manage in 37 hour week. We need better protection and the courts need to know when we are reaching the threshold and can take no more!
    6. Not covering maternity leave has always been a massive problem. If maternity leave is statutory then covering it should also be. No excuses.
    7. Similarly if staff have the right to have paid sick leave, remaining staff have the right for that to be covered, otherwise they are suffering.
    8. Staff should be 'fit for purpose'. I understand that people become ill at times but when certain staff are constantly off for long periods then something needs to be done to either rectify the problem/ ensure their tasks are covered or ultimately reach a decision that they are unable to do the job. I realise this is going to be controversial!

    ReplyDelete
  11. why probation reluctant to use the word addiction in relatonship to internet pornography ?

    ReplyDelete