Friday 11 April 2014

Voices

Having been allocated to CRC after more than 20 years' experience as a PO, I'd like advice regarding compensation for having my professional role compromised by the sifting lottery, e.g. no more work with high risk cases, loss of the role of Officer of the Court, etc. I have approached my local branch (napo) but had no reply. The insult is aggravated by the Noms and MoJ insistence that CRC will be the 'junior partner' in the split.

************
Totally agree with you, I've been in the service 30 years, assigned to CRC, keep making noises about the sifting process,"experienced officer" etc. but no one is listening. When given a briefing by our ACE, he made comments like things will be going "up to NPS" instead of saying across. Language used made me feel like I am worthless after all those years of commitment to the service I no longer count. Also I don't know if this has happened in other areas but Manchester City offices only have one black Probation Officer assigned surely this is also a legal issue under discrimination equality. Not representative of the communities we serve. I have brought this up in Union meetings and tried to get facts and figures which no one is rushing to give to me. It all stinks and needs to stop now.

************
Couldn't sleep because of the amount of work I have. Stuff just going through my head work related. I'm struggling with my current workload, not to mention the expected changes which are due under TR and worrying about how will I manage to deal with the extra work. It's a difficult time for staff who feel alone and vulnerable. Unions seem to be running around like 'headless chickens' not knowing what to do. Management digging their heads in the sand and telling staff "just do it, I don't know how but do it". Staff colleagues are ripping their hair out trying to keep up with the constant emails coming through 'do this, do that, we need this done, we need that done by'. It's a nightmare & I can't flippin sleep.
 
One of the annoying emails was from our new CEO's introducing themselves, with smiley photo's in a glossy, well polished, colourful brochure attached to an email. I just thought to myself are these people for real? Do they live in the same world as me? Have they any idea what staff are going through? I guess they don't because if they did they wouldn't send it out. Then again, I guess that's the easy way out blaming the CEO's.

 
I find myself trying to trick my mind to 'say carry on, it will be ok. You will come through it'. But I worry that I'm not going to make it through because the expectations are just so unreal. When you wake up in the middle of the night worrying about work, can't sleep, trying your best to make sure that the person you serve is not impacted on and receives a quality service; it's flippin hard work.


Reading Jim's blog about a probation officer Anonymous 10 April 2014 18:19 (above ) made me feel really sad about the situation staff find themselves in. There were some helpful comments in response but very little practical support offered - 'you are struggling, we know that, but try this and do that'. Things the person had already considered doing. The point was missed. The writer was asking for action but instead received suggestions. I'm sure the comments were well intended but I couldn't help notice how detached we have become from realising each other's needs. At these times people need others to rally behind them and join forces instead our compassion & care for one another might have been impacted on. I'm going to try & get some sleep again, and think about nice things. I've got work tomarrow!!!

**********
IS ANYONE LISTENING???? WE ARE NOT COPING, WE ARE BEING DESTROYED AND THIS WILL NOT WORK.

I call upon everyone who reads this who is employed in a probation role to see their MP's in person NOW to express specific concerns about precisely what is happening in each area as they try to roll this out but it must be done as the chaos unfolds. Not to voice objections to TR in principle, they can dismiss that easily because the bill has been passed. Please take concerns about YOUR situation and the HARM that will occur in the communities they represent because this is NOT SAFE and say WHY. For example a brilliant team disbanded, the new IOM's muddle, sex offender specialist teams being destroyed, how the split was done with lack of cover in some areas as a result, CRC uncertainty, the list is extensive now.


Make each MP responsible NOW because if they have the knowledge and do nothing they are culpable. Let's tell them the truth about where we are NOW as this unravels. Middle managers must be terrified about having to try to make this work because they have so little information and really it is practice developing on the back of a fag packet as Jim writes on this blog. Managers must speak out.


The concerns are becoming real now, not some reaction by public sector staff moaning, but UNSAFE SYSTEMS and destruction of a system that worked being replaced with what????? 


THIS IS GRAYLING'S FAULT let's make the MP's culpable too by providing the knowledge to them because they deserve to own this. Use your union reps to come with you if you need to, they will be happy to do this.

43 comments:

  1. Here's the link to the FOI mentioned yesterday

    https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/202666/response/504537/attach/html/3/FOI%252089579%2520Reply%2520to%2520Mr%2520Ferguson.pdf.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your email of 18 March, in which you asked for the following information from the Ministry of Justice:

      Under the FOI arrangements are you able to tell me what specific part/s of the 2007 Act was/were used to legally dismantle all probation trusts in England & Wales as of 31 May 2014?

      Your request has been handled under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

      I can confirm that the Department holds the information that you have asked for, and I am pleased to provide this to you.

      Section 2 of the Offender Management Act 2007 (‘the OMA’) provides that the Secretary of State shall have responsibility for ensuring the provision of probation services. Section 3 provides him with power to make contractual or other arrangements for the provision of those services. The contracts with the 35 probation
      trusts are due to terminate on 31 May 2014. As regards the staff and property of the trusts, Schedule 2 to the OMA gives the Secretary of State power to make employee and property transfer schemes.

      Once the required winding-up activities have been carried out, the trusts can be formally dissolved under section 5(1) of the OMA, which confers on the Secretary of State power, by order, to dissolve probation trusts.

      I hope you find this information helpful. You have the right to appeal against our response if you think it is incorrect. Details can be found in the ‘How to Appeal’ section attached at the end of this letter.

      Delete
    2. Thanks Jim.

      Delete
  2. I am so angry I spend every day on the verge of tears struggling to complete the work I believe in while all around is being dismantled in the context of pseudo corporate speak shite. There will be more victims because of this, costs will continue to escalate and good people will be lost. GRAYLING WHY DO YOU HAVE SUCH CONTEMPT FOR PUBLIC SERVICE???

    ReplyDelete
  3. Senior manager of a trust where crr are biding has confirmed mike maiden is advising the crr bid. Isn't this a bit too hasty, being only 8 months after leaving NOMS? I thought there were 'cooling off' rules for civil servants.

    Moj were quick enough to put in a clause for anyone taking VR which would prevent re-employment by NPS or CRC within 2 years. Two-tier society?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Just noticed this posted at 7:30 on another comment thread;-

    BREAKING NEWS

    Just heard that Napo Branches are encouraging their members to walk out when delegations from the preferred bidders arrive at short notice to look around probation offices.

    Apparently there was a mass walkout at Rotherham Office by staff whether union members or not to show their disgust at whats happening. This is likely to be repeated at many probation offices as staff decide to take a break at the same time.

    It sounds as if this is the kind of opportunity for direct action that Napo members have been waiting for and the response so far has been shock as the bidders are being told by the MoJ that the staff have accepted privatisation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I used to work for London but due to a ton crap left. I now work as a temp and have to say its the best thing that ever happened. Not as much stress and a fair wage. What would really scupper TR would be an on mass resignation. Then all go and earn more money as contractors. The cost would go through the roof! To make this crap work they need us. There is a national shortage of Probation Officers! If we dig our heels in what can they do? Sack everyone. Think again! They need us, thats what we all need to realise. If we each did one small thing it becomes something bigger than Grayling can handle!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. On-mass resignation will play straight into the hands of the contract winners...it'll save them a ton of money they would otherwise have to spend making you (well not you, but those that are currently Trust employees) redundant post June 2015 (which they will inevitably do). They wont need to contract you in - they'll employ lower skilled staff to deliver and have it overseen by a few SPO's. Any failure will be punted straight back at the MoJ as a failure to make the split work in the first place ie we inherited a shit service, it'll take a while for us to fix it... the big boys will still make their buck.

      Most of the bidders have undertaken large TUPE transfers and are used to inheriting staff in turmoil with low morale, walkouts don't scare them...resigning = natural wastage and is factored into, and indeed required by, their financial models. At least if you stay till the bitter end they'll have to pay you redundancy if they want rid.

      People are focusing on the idea that without making the PbR targets these contracts are not profitable. The Primes will actually look to deliver significant returns from the fee for service element alone by slashing the cost of delivery...any PbR they do win will just be gravy on top. Think about it - if you win, say, 4 CRC's then over ten years (contract life) it's a billion pounds or so up for grabs. Ignoring profit for a moment, the shareholder value that a billion pound contract pipeline brings is not inconsiderable.

      Delete
  6. I've heard grayling might be visiting hmp Northumberland today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh that's good. Presumably he's gone to sort it all out then? Hope he doesn't end up on one of those unsafe wings, now...

      Delete
  7. He's meeting lawyers in Carlisle today as well.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ever thought of picketing this event

    Clinks is running a TR subcontracting workshop [30th May, Newcastle, free] to provide an overview of the new Industry Standard Partnering Agreement (ISPA) – the contract that Tier 1’s (Primes) will be required to use when subcontracting with their partners in TR. The workshop forms part of our Legal Support Project which also includes a helpline and access to free legal advice. Video introductions to each module in our guide 'Subcontracting: A Guide to the Legal Implications of the ISPA' can now be found on our website, along with video footage from a recently delivered subcontracting workshop. All the project resources are available on our website here, and bookings for the Newcastle workshop are being taken here

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No-one would fund my 300 mile roundtrip to shout at CG in a cold border town - not even me, at todays prices.

      Delete
  9. Why am I not surprised about these comments. What are the unions doing about this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are the union. What are you going to do about it?

      Delete
    2. It's platitudinous to retort, 'you are the union'. There is a difference between being an ordinary member and a paid or elected official. Let's not pretend there is no power differential, or cliques of power. Things go on in some unions that ordinary members have no knowledge of...until we hear about 'difficult employment tribunals' and unwarranted payoffs, or curious personnel appointments. How does 'you are the union' stand up in those circumstances? Sometimes, as we appear to be seeing with the Police Federation things go a bit skewwhiff. But it's taken an independent review to bring all that to the fore.

      Delete
    3. Your missing the point unions are as strong as their membership

      Delete
    4. No, YOU'RE missing the point.. oh what's the use....

      Delete
  10. Mass walk out. Good idea but management will bring a rule in restricting how many staff can take a break at any one time. What would we do then.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No Trust is going to waste their time disciplining anyone for this kind of gesture. The negative publicity would far outweigh the benefits of doing so.

      Delete
  11. I have been corresponding via email with my Conservative MP. He has been fully informed of the risks all the way along and done nothing. In fact he has written in support of TR despite the risks. I will be writing to him again soon to step it up a notch and let him know of all the local folk I'll be talking to in the lead up to the elections. Anyone know if I can quote his emails in local papers? Anywhere else I can do this? Notice boards for example??

    ReplyDelete
  12. If it is factually correct, you can quote him anywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I have been writing to my MP (Con). He has replied promptly and politely on both occasions but says he has to toe the party line or resign. Not much of an answer really. I used to vote conservative. I wouldn't vote for this lot if you paid me. Labour are, to misquote a tory I can still respect "the least worst choice for government".

    ReplyDelete
  14. I get the feeling, that now that the chickens are coming home to roost many staff are finally realising what some of us have been saying for a long time, this is here and happening and employers and the gov don't give a monkeys about us as individuals so keep on working hard like good little automatons and air your views whenever you can....cos we aint listening and we dont care anyway.......hopefully staff who allowed others to take action on their behalf now wished that they had done something to try and stop it....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Honestly my friend most people are fully aware this was going to happen, and it may make you feel better to keep on calling fellow colleagues 'automatons' and 'clones' and all the other rubbish....and you clearly feel better for saying ' I told you so....' Fine if it helps you, but really grow up. We know we are stuffed, I know we need to keep fighting but you don't win battles by pretending if we only stick together we will win. Face up to it the odds are heavily against us, we need to be planning how we remain a united workforce in NPS, but given the sniping at each other that may be a vain hope

      Delete
    2. Look I know we're all getting fractious, but please try and be civil - I really don't want to 'moderate' stuff off here.

      Thanks,

      Jim

      Delete
    3. Should have been in NPS and CRC (I'm actually CRC so no smugness here), my point only that 1st June is 2 months away and I don't see it not happening. I am planning joint meetings with NPS colleagues in the hope that the whole thing is stopped, but....

      Delete
  15. I work in London and today got another of Pat Waterman's (London FT Branch Chair) diatribes. If you're not a main grade PO/PSO, you're the enemy to be sneered at or accused of not having a clue or colluding with TR.

    One of my jobs as an SPO is to help colleagues as best I can to cope with this crap and survive the working week intact. I don't need a templated e-mail from one of my team regarding workload to do something about it, I'm only down the corridor and the door is open, tell me and we'll see what can be ignored.

    Being told you're going to be working in the CRC is insecure and daunting, but a lot of us are going to have to do it (unless something dramatic happens (I'm not in the business of giving false hope to people). Talking about what might be a way of making the best of terrible job and trying to equip colleagues for this future is reasonable to do and does not mean that I think TR is OK.

    Pat Waterman's e-mails do not represent my values as a NAPO member, JL's behaviour does not either, I struggle to see my place in the Union, so at the very time solidarity is needed and out of pocket from the strike, I am on the verge of resigning.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wish the Management in my office had the same notion as you of their job being to support colleagues! I can honestly say that,as a CRC PO, I appear to have got the job from hell. I have all my NPS cases still as I have no time to do reviews/transfer sheets, more new CRC cases than I know what to do with, PSR's to write, T4 OASys to do and parole reports. We appear to be under allocated in terms of officers,some off sick and a lot now on leave. In addition, not one member in management are lifting a finger to help. I have never felt so alone than I have recently.

      Delete
    2. 'I'm only down the corridor and the door is open, tell me and we'll see what can be ignored' ...and yet they're sending you templates emails? Funny that...

      Delete
    3. Open season on SPO, you never could do any right just got a 100 times worse. Union will start on you next

      Delete
  16. If bidders come to my office and d'management have said I can't take my lunch; I may have to go to the loo, for a while, as I won't be feeling too well.

    ReplyDelete
  17. My reply about my e-petition request:
    Your e-petition "Refer Maria Miller's 'administrative failures' to the Crown Prosecution Service." hasn't been accepted.

    E-petitions cannot be used to request action on issues that are outside the responsibility of the government. This includes:

    party political material
    commercial endorsements including the promotion of any product, service or publication
    issues that are dealt with by devolved bodies, eg The Scottish Parliament
    correspondence on personal issues

    No real shock, I will now write to the Crown Prosecution Service directly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nice try though 30 years in. Where's the Proceeds of Crime Act when you need it?

      Delete
  18. I agree with the vicar above, sustained and serious industrial action would cause chaos, the robots are always complaining about being criticised but being apathetic and obsessing about your oasys comfort blanket won't help in the long run, look at the rmt , yes railways bring the capital to a stop but united strike action quite simply gets results.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's a dream world where probation staff will strike for more than a day, it's not going to happen

      Delete
  19. We are part of a grand neoliberal project to sell off the state to the rich and impoverish the rest of us. Its austerity for the masses and masses of money for the few. Its been a class war for 30 years people in probation need to choose a side and start to fight. Yes strike but organise politically in a party of the left. This needs to be seen in class terms and as a class project, this is how Grayling sees it.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Proposed CRC structure for our area released today appears at first glance to have twice as many "backroom staff" than "operational" staff. Everyone has been found a role. Seems someone somewhere is very keen not to utilise VR? Wasn't this staff-heavy bureaucratic structure exactly what Spurr, Wright, Grayling etc said would be dispensed with by their slash & burn policy - one of their key funding arguments? I am left confused. How much is this costing the public? Many thousands of pounds of public funds are being spent each day on designing and "mobilising" this pseudo-private sector CRC, something the winning bidder may simply junk once they get their hands upon the company. Its arse about face at best, a criminal act of public sector vandalism, a deception and a vanity project for inept, misguided ideologues. Lib Dems should be eternally ashamed of their collusion in this vicious gamble with public safety. This Parliament should be forever condemned for the irreparable damage they have inflicted upon the fabric and structure of society and community. Rarely has there been such a desire to see "what goes around comes around" come to life.

    ReplyDelete
  21. its getting v annoying being run off my feet as a CRC pso and my counterpart is swanning round with half the work. SPOs are useless - all they do is delegate, delegate.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Do you think it would be a good Idea to get the new socialist political party Left Unity to support probation and the Public Sector generally via a specific resolution that can be used to publicised our awful plight. They have been on news night and other political programmes recently simply because they offer something different to the neoliberal agenda of all the main parties. I say this because we are in another housing and financial bubble( Bonds) that could crash and bring the economy down again and if this happens a party like this could have more more interest in it. If Left Unity did something like this post the crash others may think it's a good idea.

    papa

    ReplyDelete